Skip to main content
Log in

A Mixed Duopoly with Switching Costs

  • Article
  • Published:
The Japanese Economic Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We examine the effects of switching costs in a two-period Hotelling-type model where a profit-maximising private firm competes with a welfare-maximising public firm. We show that, in contrast with the case in which both firms are private, where switching costs raise prices in both periods, in the mixed duopoly they raise prices in the second period but reduce them in the first period. Moreover, the first-period price reduction is of such magnitude that switching costs reduce firms’ profits and raise consumer welfare. We also find that switching costs affect the consequences of privatisation in favour of firms and against consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burguet, R., R. Caminal and C. Matutes (2002) “Golden Cages for Showy Birds: Optimal Switching Costs in Labor Contracts”, European Economic Review, Vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1153–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caminal, R. and C. Matutes (1990) “Endogenous Switching Costs in a Duopoly Model”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (1997) “Paying Customers to Switch”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 877–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadpay, A. and J. S. Heywood (2006) “Mixed Oligopoly in a Single International Market”, Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Q. and J. C. Bárcena-Ruiz (2017) “Privatization and Entry with Switching Costs”, Manchester School, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 491–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. and P. Klemperer (2007) “Coordination and Lock-in: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects”, in M. Armstrong and R. Porter eds, Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1967–2072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Ruiz, J. (2009) “Managerial Delegation in a Mixed Duopoly with a Foreign Competitor”, Economics Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2017) Online Appendix to “A Mixed Duopoly with Switching Costs”, mimeo., El Colegio de México. Available from URL: http://jorgefernandez.webstarts.com/.

  • Fjell, K. and J. S. Heywood (2002) “Public Stackelberg Leadership in a Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Firms”, Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— and D. Pal (1996) “A Mixed Oligopoly in the Presence of Foreign Private Firms”, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 737–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzybowski, L. and P. Pereira (2011) “Subscription Choices and Switching Costs in Mobile Telephony”, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. S. and G. Ye (2009) “Mixed Oligopoly and Spatial Price Discrimination with Foreign Firms”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 592–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi, K. and T. Kaneko (2008) “Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly with Price and Quality Competition”, Journal of Economics Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi, T. (2007) “Switching Costs and the Impact of Trade Liberalization”, Economics Bulletin, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., D. Kliger and B. Vale (2003) “Estimating Switching Costs: The Case of Banking”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitahara, M. and T. Matsumura (2013) “Mixed Duopoly, Product Differentiation and Competition”, The Manchester School, Vol. 81, No. 5, pp. 730–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (1987) “The Competitiveness of Markets with Switching Costs”, Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (1995) “Competition when Consumers Have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International Trade”, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 515–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, J. and E. Salies (2008) “The Diffusion of ADSL and Costs of Switching Internet Providers in the Broadband Industry”, Research Policy, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 706–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. H., L. Xu and Z. Chen (2013) “Competitive Privatization and Tariff Policies in an International Mixed Duopoly”, The Manchester School, Vol. 81, No 5, pp. 763–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M. H. and T. Matsumura (2012) “Presence of Foreign Investors in Privatized Firms and Privatization Policy”, Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. and S. Poddar (2007) “Firm Ownership, Product Differentiation and Welfare”, The Manchester School, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura, T. and N. Matsushima (2003) “Mixed Duopoly with Product Differentiation: Sequential Choice of Location”, Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, ——— and I. Ishibashi. (2009) “Privatization and Entries of Foreign Enterprises in a Differentiated Industry”, Journal of Economics, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohnishi, K. (2010) “A Three-stage International Mixed Duopoly with a Wage-rise Contract as a Strategic Commitment”, The Manchester School, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, H. and Y. Sanjo (2007) “Location of Public Firm in the Presence of Multinational Firm: A Mixed Duopoly Approach”, Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, M. (2011) “Consumer Learning, Switching Costs, and Heterogeneity: A Structural Examination”, Quantitative Marketing and Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 25–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanjo, Y. (2009) “Bertrand Competition in a Mixed Duopoly Market”, The Manchester School, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shy, O. (2002) “A Quick-and-Easy Method for Estimating Switching Costs”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • To, T. (1994) “Export Subsidies and Oligopoly with Switching Costs”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. F. and T. L. Chen (2011) “Mixed Oligopoly, Optimal Privatization, and Foreign Penetration”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1465–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, Y. C. Wang and L. Zhao (2009) “Privatization and Efficiency Gain in an International Mixed Oligopoly with Asymmetric Costs”, Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 539–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández-Ruiz, J. A Mixed Duopoly with Switching Costs. JER 70, 235–257 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jere.12182

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jere.12182

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation