Skip to main content
Log in

Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy

  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates how the presence of foreign investors in privatized firms affects privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly. We find that an increase in the stockholding ratio of foreign investors in a privatized firm increases the optimal degree of privatization, whereas an increase in the penetration of foreign firms in product markets reduces it. These results imply that the degree of openness of financial markets and that of product markets have contrasting implications for the optimal privatization policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bárcena-Ruiz JC (2007) Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: price competition. J Econ 91(3): 263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2003) Mixed duopoly, merger and multiproduct firms. J Econ 80(1): 27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2005a) Economic integration and privatization under diseconomies of scale. Eur J Polit Econ 21(1): 247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2005b) International trade and strategic privatization. Rev Dev Econ 9(4): 502–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang WW (2005) Optimal trade and privatization policies in an international duopoly with cost asymmetry. J Int Trade Econ Dev 14(1): 19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao C-C, Yu ESH (2006) Partial privatization, foreign competition, and optimum tariff. Rev Int Econ 14(1): 87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corneo G, Jeanne O (1994) Oligopole mixte dans un marché commun. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 33: 73–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadpay A, Heywood JS (2006) Mixed oligopoly in a single international market. Aust Econ Pap 45(4): 269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fraja G, Delbono F (1989) Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxf Econ Pap 41(2): 302–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjell K, Heywood JS (2002) Public Stackelberg leadership in a mixed oligopoly with foreign firms. Aust Econ Pap 41(3): 267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjell K, Pal D (1996) A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Can J Econ 29(3): 737–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara K (2006) Trade patterns in an international mixed oligopoly. Econ Bull 6(9): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara K (2007) Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. J Econ 92(1): 51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Moltó MJ, Poyago-Theotoky J (2008) Flexible versus dedicated technology adoption in the presence of a public firm. Southern Econ J 74(4): 997–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Han L, Ogawa H (2007) Partial privatization and market opening policies: a mixed oligopoly approach. Economic Research Center (Nagoya University), Discussion paper, No. E07-3

  • Han L, Ogawa H (2008) Economic integration and strategic privatization in an international mixed oligopoly. FinanzArchiv 64(3): 352–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood JS, Ye G (2009a) Delegation in a mixed oligopoly: the case of multiple private firms. Manag Decis Econ 30(2): 71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood JS, Ye G (2009b) Mixed oligopoly and spatial price discrimination with foreign firms. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39(5): 592–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood JS, Ye G (2009c) Partial privatization in a mixed duopoly with R&D rivalry. Bull Econ Res 61(2): 165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ino H, Matsumura T (2010) What role should public enterprises play in free-entry markets?. J Econ 101(3): 213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T, Kamijo Y, Tomaru Y (2009) Interregional mixed duopoly. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39(2): 233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishida J, Matsushima N (2009) Should civil servants be restricted in wage bargaining? A mixed-duopoly approach. J Public Econ 93(3–4): 634–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato K (2006) Can allowing to trade permits enhance welfare in mixed oligopoly?. J Econ 88(3): 263–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long NV, Stähler F (2009) Trade policy and mixed enterprises. Can J Econ 42(2): 590–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y (2006) Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly with foreign competitors: the linear demand case. J Econ 88(1): 49–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Poddar S (2007) Firm ownership, product differentiation and welfare. Manch School 75(2): 210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura T (1998) Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. J Public Econ 70(3): 473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura T (2003a) Endogenous role in mixed markets: a two-production-period model. Southern Econ J 70(2): 403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura T (2003b) Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor. Bull Econ Res 55(3): 275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura T, Kanda O (2005) Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. J Econ 84(1): 27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura T, Ogawa A (2010) On the robustness of private leadership in mixed duopoly. Aust Econ Pap 49(2): 149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura T, Shimizu D (2010) Privatization Waves. Manch School 78(6): 609–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura T, Tomaru Y (2011) Market structure and privatization policy under international competition. Jpn Econ Rev (forthcoming)

  • Matsumura T, Matsushima N, Ishibashi I (2009) Privatization and entries of foreign enterprises in a differentiated industry. J Econ 98(3): 203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsushima N, Matsumura T (2006) Mixed oligopoly, foreign firms, and location choice. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36(6): 753–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez-Naya J (2008) Merger profitability in mixed oligopoly. J Econ 94(2): 167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill W, Schneider N (1966) Government firms in oligopoly industries: a short-run analysis. Q J Econ 80(3): 400–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Suetrong K (2009) Privatization, strategic foreign direct investment and host-country welfare. Eur Econ Rev 53(7): 775–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohori S (2006) Optimal environmental tax and level of privatization in an international duopoly. J Regul Econ 29(2): 225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal D (1998) Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly. Econ Lett 61: 181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal D, White MD (1998) Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. Southern Econ J 65(2): 264–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaru Y (2006) Mixed oligopoly, partial privatization and subsidization. Econ Bull 12(5): 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LFS, Chen T-L (2010) Do cost efficiency gap and foreign competitors matter concerning optimal privatization policy at the free entry market?. J Econ 100(1): 33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LFS, Wang Y-C, Zhao L (2009) Privatization and efficiency gain in an international mixed oligopoly with asymmetric costs. Jpn Econ Rev 60(4): 539–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Hsin Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, M.H., Matsumura, T. Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy. J Econ 107, 71–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-011-0254-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-011-0254-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation