Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between Dcrit considering the abrupt variation and inflexion in the concrete mercury intrusion porosimetry curve

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) has been widely used to evaluate the quality of concrete through the pore size distribution parameters. Two of these parameters are the critical pore diameter (Dcrit) and the percentage of the most interconnected net of pores compared to the total volume of pores. Some researchers consider Dcrit as the diameter obtained from the inflexion point of the cumulative mercury intrusion curve while others consider Dcrit as the diameter obtained from the point of abrupt variation in the same curve. This study aims to analyze two groups of concretes of varying w/c ratios, one cast with pozzolanic cement and another with high initial strength cement, in order to determine which of these diameters feature a better correlation with the quality parameters of the concretes. The concrete quality parameters used for the evaluations were (1) the w/c ratios and (2) chloride diffusion coefficients measured at approximately 90 days. MIP cumulative distributions of the same concretes were also measured at about 90 days, and Dcrit values were determined (1) from the point of abrupt variation and alternatively, (2) from the inflexion point of each of these plots. It was found that Dcrit values measured from the point of abrupt variation were useful indicators of the quality of the concrete, but the Dcrit values based on the inflexion points were not. Hence, it is recommended that Dcrit and the percentage of the most interconnected volume of pores should be obtained considering the point of abrupt variation of the cumulative curve of pore size distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garboczi, E.J., “Permeability, Diffusivity, and Microstructural Parameters: A Critical Review,” Cement and Concrete Research 20:591–601 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehta, P.K., and Monteiro, P.J.M., Concrete: Structure, Properties, and Materials, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quénard, D., and Sallée, H., “Le transfert isotherme de la vapeur d’eau condensable dans les matériaux microporeux du bâtiment,” Cahiers du CSTB. Livraison 323, Cahier 2525 (1991).

  4. Mehta, P.K., and Manmohan, D., “Pore Size Distribution and Permeability of Hardened Cement Paste,” 7th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Paris, Proceedings Vol. III, pp. VII-1–VII-5 (1980).

  5. Katz, A.J., and Thompson, A.H., “Quantitative Prediction of Permeability in Porous Rock,” Physical Review B, 34(11):8179–8181 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Garboczi, E.J., and Bentz, D.P., “Computer Simulation of the Diffusivity of Cement-Based Materials,” Journal of Materials Science 27:2083–2092 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Cimento Portland Pozolânico (Pozzolanic Portland cement), NBR-5736, Rio de Janeiro (1991).

  8. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Cimentos Portland de alta resistencia inicial (High-early-strength Portland cements), NBR-5733, Rio de Janeiro (1991).

  9. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Cimentos Portland Resistentes a Sulfatos (Sulphate resistant Portland cements), NBR-5737, Rio de Janeiro (1992).

  10. Guimarães, A.T.C., and Helene, P.R.L., “Models of Variation of Chloride Ion Diffusion as a Function of Changes in the Saturation Degree (SD) of Concrete Mixes Prepared with Pozzolanic Cement,” Proceedings of the International RILEM Workshop on Integral Service Life Modelling of Concrete Structures, RILEM Publications S.A.R.L., Cachan, France, pp. 63–70 (2007).

  11. Guimarães, A.T.C., Climent, M.A., de Vera, G., Vicente, F.J., Rodrigues, F.T., and Andrade, C., “Determination of Chloride Diffusivity Through Partially Saturated Portland Cement Concrete by a Simplified Procedure,” Construction and Building Materials 25:785–790 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Climent, M.A., Viqueira, E., de Vera, G., and López-Atalaya, M.M., “Analysis of Acid-Soluble Chloride in Cement, Mortar, and Concrete by Potentiometric Titration Without Filtration Steps,” Cement and Concrete Research 29(6):893–898 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Climent, M.A., de Vera, G., Viqueira, E., and López-Atalaya, M.M., “Generalization of the Possibility of Eliminating the Filtration Step in the Determination of Acid-Soluble Chloride Content in Cement and Concrete by Potentiometric Titration,” Cement and Concrete Research 34(12):2291–2295 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crank, J., The Mathematics of Diffusion, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aligizaki, K.K., Pore Structure of Cement Based Materials, Taylor and Francis, London (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winslow, D.N., Diamond, S., “A Mercury Porosimetry Study of the Evolution of Porosity in Portland Cement,” Journal of Materials (ASTM) 5(3):564–585 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Willis, K.L., Abell, A.B., and Lange, D.A., “Image Based Characterization of Cement Pore Structure Using Wood’s Metal Intrusion,” Cement and Concrete Research 28(12):1695–1705 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diamond, S., “Mercury Porosimetry: An Inappropriate Method for the Measurement of Pore Size Distributions in Cement-Based Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research 30(10):1517–1525 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wild, S., “A Discussion of the Paper “Mercury porosimetry: an inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement-based materials” by S. Diamond,” Cement and Concrete Research 31:1653–1654 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook, R.A., and Hover, K.C., “Mercury Porosimetry of Cement-Based Materials and Associated Correction Factors,” ACI Materials Journal 90(2):152–161 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Laskar, M.A.I., Kumar, L., and Bhattacharjee, B., “Some Aspects of Evaluation of Concrete Through Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry,” Cement and Concrete Research 27:93–105 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar, R., and Bhattacharjee, B., “Porosity, Pore Size Distribution and In Situ Strength of Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research 33:417–424 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar, R., and Bhattacharjee, B., “Study on Some Factors Affecting the Results in the Use of MIP Method in Concrete Research,” Cement and Concrete Research 33:155–164 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gallé, C., “Effect of Drying on Cement-Based Materials Pore Structure as Identified by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry. A Comparative Study Between Oven-, Vacuum-, and Freeze Drying,” Cement and Concrete Research 31:1467–1477 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Atahan, H.N., Oktar, O.N., and Tasdemir, M.A., “Effects of Water-Cement Ratio and Curing Time on the Critical Pore Width of Hardened Cement Paste,” Construction and Building Materials 23:1196–1200 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Antón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guimarães, A.T.C., de Vera, G., Rodrigues, F.T. et al. Comparison between Dcrit considering the abrupt variation and inflexion in the concrete mercury intrusion porosimetry curve. Exp Tech 39, 43–52 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/ext.12002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ext.12002

Keyword

Navigation