Abstract
Who represents labor market outsiders in the age of dualization? This article provides a government partisanship explanation for the cross-national variation in the political representation of outsiders. Specifically, this article argues that countries with a strong central party are more likely to enact pro-outsider policies such as job creation programs, generous unemployment benefits, and employment protection for outsiders. To substantiate this claim, this article chooses The Netherlands, Ireland, and Sweden as three exemplar cases in the central party strength. This article demonstrates that these countries vary in their policy responses to outsiders in the manner we expected from government partisanship-based explanation. It is also noteworthy that the empirical results based on ten welfare states from 1980 to 2007 strengthen my argument.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
I agree with the permissions for the reproduction of third-party data (if applicable).
References
Bürgisser, R., and T. Kurer. 2021. Insider–outsider representation and social democratic labor market policy. Socio-Economic Review 19 (3): 1065–1094.
Castles, F.G., and P. Mair. 1984. Left-right political scales: Some ‘expert’ judgments. European Journal of Political Research 12 (1): 73–88.
Daalder, H. 1984. In search of the center of european party systems. The American Political Science Review 78 (1): 92–109.
Emmenegger, P., S. Häusermann, B. Palier, and M. Seeleib-Kaiser, eds. 2012. The age of dualization: The challenging face of inequality in deindustrializing societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green-Pedersen, C. 2002. The politics of justification: Party competition and welfare-state retrenchment in Denmark and The Netherlands from 1982 to 1998. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Gregory, M., W. Salverda, and R. Schettkat, eds. 2007. Services and employment: Explaining the U.S.-European Gap. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Hamann, K., and J. Kelly. 2007. Party politics and the reemergence of social pacts in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 40 (8): 971–994.
Häusermann, S., and H. Schwander. 2012. Varieties of dualization? Labor market segmentation and insider-outsider divides across regimes. In The age of dualization: The challenging face of inequality in deindustrializing societies, ed. P. Emmenegger, S. H usermann, B. Palier and M. Seeleib-Kaiser, 27–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hemerijck, A., and I. Marx. 2010. Continental welfare at a crossroads: The choice between activation and minimum income protection in Belgium and The Netherlands. In A long goodbye to bismarck? The politics of welfare reform in continental Europe, ed. B. Palier, 129–156. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Huber, E., and J. Stephens. 2001. Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hübscher, E. 2017. Party governments, clientelistic reforms, and varying levels of political constraints. Comparative European Politics 15 (6): 848–871.
Iversen, T. 1999. Contested economic institutions: The politics of macroeconomics and wage bargaining in advanced democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iversen, T., and D. Soskice. 2015. Democratic limits to redistribution: Inclusionary versus exclusionary coalitions in the knowledge economy. World Politics 67 (2): 185–225.
Kalyvas, S.N., and K. van Kersbergen. 2010. Christian democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 183–209.
Keizer, A.B. 2010. Non-regular employment in The Netherlands. JILPT Report 10: 141–178.
Kjellberg, A. 1998. Sweden: Restoring the model? In Changing industrial relations in Europe, ed. A. Ferner and R. Hyman, 74–117. Oxford: Blackwell.
Knotz, C., and J. Lindvall. 2015. Coalitions and compensation: The case of unemployment benefit duration. Comparative Political Studies 48 (5): 586–615.
Laver, M.J. 2005. Voting behaviour. In Politics in the republic of ireland, ed. J. Coakley and M. Gallagher, 183–210. London, New York: Routledge.
Lindvall, J., and D. Rueda. 2012. Insider-Outsider Politics: Party Strategies and Political Behavior in Sweden. In The age of dualization: The challenging face of inequality in deindustrializing societies, ed. P. Emmenegger, 277–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mair, P., and L. Weeks. 2005. The party system. In Politics in the Republic of Ireland, ed. J. Coakley and M. Gallagher, 135–159. London, New York: Routledge.
Mair, P., and M. Marsh. 2004. Political parties in electoral markets in Postwar Ireland. In Political parties and electoral change, ed. P. Mair, W.C. Müller, and F. Plasser, 234–263. London: Sage Publications.
Mair, P., W.C. Müller, and F. Plasser. 2004. Political parties and electoral change. London: Sage Publications.
Martin, C.J., and K. Thelen. 2007. The state and coordinated capitalism: Contributions of the public sector to social solidarity in postindustrial societies. World Politics 60: 1–36.
Nousiainen, J. 2000. Finland: The consolidation of parliamentary governance. In Coalition governments in Western Europe, ed. W.C. Müller and K. Strøm, 264–299. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oesch, D., and L. Rennwald. 2018. Electoral competition in Europe’s new tripolar political space: Class voting for the left, centre-right and radical right. European Journal for Political Research 57 (4): 783–807.
Pierre, J., and A. Widfeldt. 1999. Political data yearbook, 1999 (1 January 1998-1 January 1999) - Sweden. European Journal of Political Research 36: 511–518.
Riain, Ó. 2014. The rise and fall of Ireland’s celtic tiger: Liberalism, boom, and bust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Donnell, R., and D. Thomas. 2002. Ireland in the 1990s: Policy concertation triumphant. In Policy concertation and social partnership in Western Europe, ed. S. Berger and H. Compston, 167–190. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Plantenga, J. 2002. Combining work and care in the polder model: An assessment of the dutch part-time strategy. Critical Social Policy 22 (1): 53–71.
Roche, W.K. 2007. Social partnership in ireland and new social pact. Industrial Relations 46 (3): 395–425.
Roche, W.K., and P. Teague. 2014. Successful but unappealing: fifteen years of workplace partnership in Ireland. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 25 (6): 781–794.
Rueda, D. 2005. Insider-outsider politics in industrialized democracies: The challenge to social democratic parties. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 61–74.
Rueda, D. 2014. Dualization, crisis and the welfare state. Socio-Economic Review 12 (2): 381–407.
Schwander, H. 2019. Are social democratic parties insider parties? Electoral strategies of social democratic parties in Western Europe in the age of dualization. Comparative European Politics 17 (5): 717–737.
Seeleib-Kaiser, M., S. van Dyk, and M. Roggenkamp. 2008. Party politics and social welfare: comparing Christian and social democracy in Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Swank, D. 2013. Comparative political parties dataset: Electoral, legislative, and government strength of political parties by ideological group in 21 capitalist democracies, 1950–2011. Electronic Database Department of Political Science. Marquette University.
Thelen, K. 2004. How Institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In Comparative historical analysis in the social science, ed. J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, 208–240. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, K. 2014. Varieties of liberalization: The new politics of social solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Todosijevic, B., K. Aarts, and H.G. van der Kaap. 2010. Dutch parliamentary election studies: Data source book 1971–2006. The Hague: DATA Archiving and Networked Services.
van Oorschot, W. 2004. Balancing work and welfare: activation and flexicurity policies in The Netherlands, 1980–2000. International Journal of Social Welfare 13 (1): 15–27.
van Praag, P. 1994. Conflict and cohesion in Dutch labour party. In Conflict and cohesion in western european social democratic parties, ed. D.S. Bell and E. Shaw, 133–150. London, New York: Pinter Publishers.
van Roozendaal, P. 1993. Cabinets in the Netherlands (1918–1990): The importance of ‘dominant’ and ‘central’ parties. European Journal of Political Research 23 (1): 35–54.
Visser, J. 2015. Data base on institutional characteristics of trade unions, wage setting, state intervention and social Pacts, 1960–2014 (ICTWSS), Institute for Advanced Labour Studies. AIAS, University of Amsterdam.
Visser, J., and A. Hemerijck. 1997. A Dutch miracle: job growth, welfare reform, and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Wren, A., ed. 2013. The political economy of the service transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Jong Hee Park and Hyeok Yong Kwon as well as two anonymous reviewers for constructive critical engagement with the paper that strengthens and clarifies its theoretical argument and empirical evidence. This research is funded by the Korean Political Science Association (KPSA) research grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Son, J.W. Who represents outsiders? A comparative study of The Netherlands, Ireland, and Sweden. Comp Eur Polit 20, 443–462 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-022-00275-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-022-00275-8