Abstract
During the boom years 2000–2007, the new Central and East European (CEE) members of the European Union (EU) had more than twice as high economic growth as the 15 countries that were members of the EU before 2004. From 2010, however, their growth rates have been mediocre though still higher than those of the older EU members. This paper investigates seven structural benchmarks, fiscal burden, tax system, labor markets, education, pensions, governance, and research and development. The CEE countries are continuing to perform quite well in all these regards apart from research and development. Another cause of concern is large emigration. Thus, growth of GDP per capita instead of GDP growth looks much better for the CEE countries. No middle-income trap is apparent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The CEE-11 are shown in black in the figures and the other EU-28 in gray, and the average for each group is indicated in the figure. For all figures, the data are ordered in ascending or descending order.
All averages in this paper are unweighted, that is, giving all countries equal weight, since our interest is the economic policy of each country rather than their economic weight.
References
Acemoglu, D., S. Naidu, P. Restrepo, and J.A. Robinson. 2015. Democracy Does Cause Growth, NBER Working Paper No. 20004, Cambridge, Massachusetts, March.
Acemoglu, D., and J. Robinson. 2006. Economic Origins or Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Aiyar, S., R. Duval, D. Puy, Y. Wu, and L. Zhang. 2013. Growth Slowdowns and the Middle-Income Trap, IMF Working Paper no. 71. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Åslund, A. 2002. Building Capitalism: The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Åslund, A. 2013. How Capitalism Was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Åslund, A., and S. Djankov. 2017. Europe’s Growth Challenge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bokros, L. 2014. Regression: Reform Reversal in Hungary after a Promising Start. In The Great Rebirth: lessons form the Victory of Capitalism over Communism, ed. A. Åslund, and S. Djankov, 39–51. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Eurostat. 2017. Eurostat Database. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
Fraser Institute. 2016. Economic Freedom Index. http://www.freetheworld.com/release.html.
Freedom House. 2017. Freedom in the World 2017. http://www.freedomhouse.org.
Gill, I.S. and M. Raiser (eds.). 2012. Golden Growth: Restoring the Lustre of the European Economic Model. Washington: World Bank.
Goleniowska, S. 1997. Delayed Reforms of the Social Policy. In Economic Scenarios for Poland. Warsaw: Center for Social and Economic Research, pp. 31–42.
International Monetary Fund. 2017. World Economic Outlook Database, October. IMF, Washington, DC.
Kornai, J. 1992. The Postsocialist Transition and the State: Reflections in Light of Hungarian Fiscal Problems. American Economic Review 82(2): 1–21.
Laar, M. 2002. Little Country That Could. London: Centre for Research into Post-Communist Economies.
Lindbeck, Assar, et al. 1994. Turning Sweden Around. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lindbeck, A., and D.J. Snower. 1986. Wage Setting, Unemployment, and Insider-Outsider Relations. American Economic Review 76 (2): 235–239.
Musgrave, Richard. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2000. OECD Economic Surveys: The Baltic States. Paris: OECD.
Shanghai Ranking. 2017. Discovering World-Class: Academic Ranking of World Universities 2017. http://www.shanghairanking.com/.
Tanzi, Vito. 2011. Government Versus Market: The Changing Economic Role of the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tanzi, Vito, and Ludger Schuknecht. 2000. Public Spending in the 20th Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Times Higher Education. 2017. World University Rankings. www.timeshighereducation.com.
Transparency International. 2017. Corruption Perceptions Index. Berlin. www.transparency.org.
World Bank. 1994. Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. 1996. World Development Report 1996: From Plan to Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. 2017a. Doing Business 2018. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. http://www.doingbusiness.org/~/media/WBG/DoingBusiness/Documents/Annual-Reports/English/DB2018-Full-Report.pdf.
World Bank. 2017b. Paying Taxes 2018. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. http://www.doingbusiness.org/~/media/WBG/DoingBusiness/Documents/Special-Reports/2018-Paying-Taxes.pdf.
Acknowledgements
I have greatly benefited from research assistance from Alvaro Weis and from the lively discussion at the Dubrovnik conference. I did one similar presentation at the Atlantic Council in Washington and another at the European Commission in Brussels. I want to thank the editors Paul Wachtel and Nauro Campos for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Åslund, A. What Happened to the Economic Convergence of Central and Eastern Europe After the Global Financial Crisis?. Comp Econ Stud 60, 254–270 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-018-0060-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-018-0060-x