Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do leadership behaviour preferences differ among generations? A qualitative study of Gen X, Y, and Z in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The workplaces of the 21st Century are multi-generational, wherein employees of different generational groups—from experienced Baby Boomers to the new-bees Gen Z—work alongside. Entry of the youngest generation—Gen Z—into the workforce has challenged the dynamics of leading teams at workplaces. Literature has established consensus that employees of each generational group have unique expectations and preferences for leadership behaviour. However, it has not been addressed adequately, especially in the Indian context. Since work performance is impacted significantly by how a leader leads his/her team, we contribute to the existing body of knowledge by building upon the behavioural theory of leadership. We adopted qualitative research methodology to explore the leadership behaviour preferences of Indian Gen X, Gen Y, and Gen Z employees in a multi-generational work environment. Our findings provide ample evidence of both differences and similarities in the leadership behaviour preferences of the Indian Gen X, Gen Y and Gen Z employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akram, M., Alam, H. M., Ali, L., & Mughal, M. M. (2012). How Leadership Behaviors Affect Organizational Performance in Pakistan. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 4(6), 354–363, ISSN: 2220-6140.

  • Al-Asfour, A., & Lettau, L. (2014). Strategies for Leadership Styles for Multi-Generational Workforce. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 11, 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, R. (2008). The trophy kids grow up: How the Millennial generation is shaking up the workplace. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (Gen) Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrea, B., Gabriella, H. C., & Timea, J. (2016). Y and Z Generations at Workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 90–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsenault, P. M. (2004). Validating generational differences: A legitimate diversity and leadership issue. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25, 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldoni, J. (2004). Powerful leadership communication. Leader to Leader, 32, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, J. C. (1977). The variables of leadership: A review and conceptual framework. The Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Manktelow, J., d’Amato, V., Tosca, E., & Macchi, F. (2019). Older and wiser? How management style varies with age. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(4), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkman, (n.d.). How Do Generational Differences Impact Organizations and Teams? Part 1, in Birkman. Retrieved from https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/1668981/HowGenerationalDifferencesImpact_digital.pdf

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Stephens, M. (1996). The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90025-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnard, P., Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Analysing and presenting qualitative data. British Dental Journal, 204(8), 429–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, T. F., & Sedrak, M. (2012). Leading a multigenerational workforce: Strategies for attracting and retaining Millennials. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 29(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carfagno, R. (2019). Value Based Leadership: The Impact on Preferred Leadership Preferences across Generational Cohorts. Doctoral Dissertation, College of Business and Leadership, St. Davids, Pennsylvania.

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Sanger, M. (2016). What Leadership Looks Like in Different Cultures. Harvard Business Review, Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/05/what-leadership-looks-like-in-different-cultures

  • Chillakuri, B. (2020). Examining the role of supervisor support on generation Z’s INTENTION TO QUit. American Business Review. https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.23.2.408-430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, S. Y. (2012). Millennials in the workplace: A conceptual analysis of Millennials’ leadership and followership styles. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 2(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v2i2.1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. H., Hair, J. F., & Rocco, T. S. (2009). The older-worker-younger-supervisor Dyad: A test of the reverse pygmalion effect. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, S. M., & Hodge, J. W. (2009). Generation Y: Unchartered territory. Journal of Business & Economics Research. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v7i4.2272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. R. V., & Luthans, F. (1979). Leadership reexamined: A behavioral approach. Academy of Management Review, 4(2), 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanraj, C., & Khanna, T. (2011). Transforming mental models on emerging markets. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 684–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, P., & Ladusingh, L. (2013). Economic activity in post retirement life in India. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 26(3), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, P. W., Howell, J. P., Hibino, S., Lee, J. K., Tate, U., & Bautista, A. (1997). Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. Leadership Quarterly, 8(3), 233–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, S. P. (2005). Managing Generation Y. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 4–15.

  • Farmer, R. N., & Richman, B. M. (1965). Comparative management and economic programs. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, S. (2008). Examining the effects of leadership behavior on employee perceptions of performance and job satisfaction. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(2), 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E. A., & Harris, E. F. (1962). Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 15, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G., Collins, R., & Brenner, R. (1991). Age and leadership effectiveness: From the preferences of the follower. International Human Resource Management, 2(29), 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybill, J. (2014). Millennials among the professional workforce in academic libraries: Their perspective on leadership. The Journal of Academic Librarianship., 40(1), 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guibord, A. R. (2012). IT leadership manual: Roadmap to becoming a trusted business partner. Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. A. (2006). Generations in the workplace: Finding common ground. Medical Laboratory Observer, 38(10), 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlicek, J., Domeova, L., & Hlavaty, R. (2018). Gen Z in the workplace: Expectations, communication and relationships. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference Efficiency and Responsibility in Education 2018 (ERIE), Prague, Czech Republic, 76–82.

  • Haynes, B. P. (2011). The impact of generational differences on the workplace. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(2), 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample Sizes for Saturation in Qualitative Research: A Systematic Review of Empirical Tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292.

  • Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An organization and management perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, D. R. (2014). Understanding multigenerational work-value conflict resolution. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 29, 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2014.933961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockaday, J., & Puyear, D. E. (2000). Community college leadership in the New Millenium. Community College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hole, D., Zhong, L., & Schwartz, J. (2010). Talking about whose generation? Why Western Generational Models Can’t Account for a Global Workforce. Deloitte University Press. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/talking-about-whose-generation-ages-and-attitudes-among-the-global-workforce/US_deloittereview_Talking_About_Whose_Generation_Jan10.pdf

  • Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2013). Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher, 20(4), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2005). Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, O. E., & Ryabinina, E. V. (2019). Assessing Work Values of Generation Z Representatives and their Impact on a Person's Organizational behaviour. Revista Espacios, 40(18), ISSN: 0798 1015.

  • Kapoor, C., & Solomon, N. (2011). Understanding and managing generational differences in the workplace. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 3(4), 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, M. D. (2016). Comparing Generation X and Generation Y on their Preferred Emotional Leadership Style. MBA Master's Thesis, the University of Applied Sciences, Kempten.

  • Kubatova, J. (2016). Work related attitudes of czech generation Z: International comparison. Central European Business Review, 5(4), 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigenerational employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyles, D. (2005). Managing your multigenerational workforce. Strategic. Finance, 87(6), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshman, C., & Rai, S. (2021). The influence of leadership on learning and innovation: Evidence from India. Asian Business & Management, 20, 307–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, J., & Vinberg, S. (2010). Leadership behaviour in successful organisations: Universal or situation-dependent? Total Quality Management, 21(1), 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limsila, K., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2008). Performance and leadership outcome correlates of leadership styles and subordinate commitment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(2), 164–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisbon, E. I. (2010). A study of Leadership Preferences by Generation. Doctoral Dissertation, Our Lady of the Lake University, San Antonio, Texas.

  • Littrell, R. F., & Valentin, L. N. (2005). Preferred leadership behaviours: Exploratory results from Romania, Germany, and the UK. Journal of Management Development, 24(5), 421–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littrell, R. F., Yurtkoru, E. S., Sinangil, H. K., Durmus, B., Katrinli, A., Atabay, R. G., Gunay, G., & Cangarli, B. G. (2013). Explicit leader behaviour preferences Turkish and cross-national sample comparisons. Journal of Management Development, 32(6), 606–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mailert, J., & Stanar, I. (2015). Exploring engaging leadership in a global organization: Taking the lead in leadership. Master Thesis, Uppsala University.

  • Martin, C. (2005). From high maintenance to high productivity: What managers need to know about Generation Y. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37(1), 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, D. (2011). Generations: A search for leadership preferences and leadership satisfaction. Master Thesis, Tilburg University.

  • Moorthy, R. (2014). An empirical study of leadership theory preferences among Gen Y in Malaysia. Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research, 3(2), 398–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J., Jr., & Jensrud, Q. (1995). Gender, leadership, and vocational education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 33(1), 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Educating the net generation. EDUCAUSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, M., Bitencourt, C. C., dos Santos, A. C. M. Z., & Teixeira, E. K. (2015). Thematic content analysis: Is there a difference between the support provided by the MAXQDA® and NVivo® software packages? Revista de Administração da UFSM, 9(1), 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orkan, M., & Solmaz, B. (2015). The changing face of the employees—Generation Z and their perceptions of work (A study applied to university students). Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 476–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palrecha, R., Spangler, W. D., & Yammarino, F. J. (2012). A comparative study of three leadership approaches in India. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 146–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., Han, S. J., Hwang, A. J., & Park, C. K. (2019). Comparison of leadership styles in Confucian Asian countries. Human Resource Development International, 22(1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porath, C. (2015). The leadership behavior that’s most important to employees. Harvard Business Review, 93, 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, W. C. H. (2004). Understanding leadership. Harvard Business Review, 82(1), 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, S., & Ekambaram, K. (2014). Generational diversity in the Indian workforce: An exploratory study. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 2(7), 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, L., Bush, E.C., & Geist, R. (2008). The Gen Y Imperative. Communication World, March/April, 19–22.

  • Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., & Vohra, N. (2022). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. (2020). Development and validation of an empirical model to study the mediating role of empathic school leadership in the motivation of high school students in India. Metamorphosis, 19(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruck, K., & Welch, M. (2012). Valuing internal communication: Management and employee perspectives. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sautner, R. (2012). Preferred leadership style and traits: Differences among the multigenerational workforce. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database (UMI No. 3539164).

  • Sharkawi, S., Mohamad, S. J. A. N. S., & Roslin, R. (2016). Leaders we prefer: Perspectives from Malaysian Gen Y employees. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(2), 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Varma, A., & Minai, M. H. (2020). India rising: How human resource management policies and practices are helping shape the new India. Personnel Review, 49(7), 1329–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society for Human Resource Management (2009). The Multigenerational Workforce: Opportunity for Competitive Success. SHRM Research Quarterly. https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/employee-relations/Documents/09-0027_RQ_March_2009_FINAL_no%20ad.pdf

  • Spence, L. A. (2009). Preferences for leader traits and leadership communication styles among members of different generational cohorts. Master Thesis, Gonzaga University.

  • Srinivasan, V. (2012). Multi generations in the workforce: Building collaboration. IIMB Management Review, 24, 48–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, D. (2010). Multigenerational workforce issues and their implications for leadership in nursing. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 846–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M., & Coons, A. E. (1957). Leader behaviour: Its description and measurement. Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulgan, B. (2013). Meet Generation Z: The second generation within the giant “Millennial” cohort. Rainmaker Thinking Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenti, A. (2019). Leadership Preferences of the Millennial Generation. Journal of Business Diversity, 19(1), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varma, A., Pichler, S., & Srinivas, E. S. (2005). The role of interpersonal affect in performance appraisal: Evidence from two samples–the US and India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(11), 2029–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdinelli, S., & Scagnoli, N. I. (2013). Data display in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijaybaskar, L. (2020). A new leadership model for millennial leaders in the innovation age. The Journal—Contemporary Management Research, 14(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 878–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worldwide, W. W., & Bethesda, M. (2007). Secrets of Top Performers: How Companies with Highly Effective Employee Communication Differentiate Themselves. Watson Wyatt.

  • Yadav, R., & Chaudhari, S. (2018). Work values: Generation Y expectations and HRM implications (study of an Indian Public Sector Non-Life Insurer). Bimaquest, 18(1), 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R., & Chaudhari, S. (2020). Relationship Conflict in Vertical Dyad- A Generational Study. In Shome, S. and Saurabh, P. (Eds.), Unlocking management research—A road map to future business (pp. 189–195). Boomerang, ISBN 978-81-949561-0-5.

  • Yadav, R. (2022). A Study of Leadership Preferences of Gen X, Y, And Z in Vertical Dyads and its Impact on Relationship Conflict. Doctoral thesis, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.

  • Yu, H., & Miller, P. (2005). Leadership style: The X Generation and Baby Boomers compared in different cultural contexts. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510575570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1971). Toward a behavioral theory of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 414–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, L., & Romani, L. (2004). When nationality matters: A study of departmental, hierarchical, professional, gender and age-based employee groupings’ leadership preferences across 15 countries. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4(3), 291–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Yang, H., & Bai, G. (2016). Effect of superior-subordinate intergenerational conflict on job performance of new generation employees. Social Behavior and Personality, 44(9), 1499–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Web Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Insurance Academy, 25, Balewadi, Baner Road, NIA P.O., Pune, 411045, India

    Ruchika Yadav & Sushama Chaudhari

Authors
  1. Ruchika Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sushama Chaudhari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruchika Yadav.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, R., Chaudhari, S. Do leadership behaviour preferences differ among generations? A qualitative study of Gen X, Y, and Z in India. Asian Bus Manage 23, 337–365 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-024-00266-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-024-00266-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation