Skip to main content
Log in

Should firearms be allowed in K-12 public schools? An analysis of law enforcement’s perceptions of armed teacher policies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mass shootings in schools generate both widespread public concern and a demand to “do something.” Among the most controversial of responses are policies permitting teachers and staff to conceal carry firearms at school, which have gained traction since the 2018 shooting in Parkland, FL. Polls regularly find that the public broadly, and teachers, students, and administrators specifically, do not support such a policy, but have failed to consider perceptions from law enforcement. Using a nationally drawn sample of law enforcement, the present study finds that officers overwhelmingly support armed teacher policies, but such support is contingent upon concerns related to training. School resource officers are less likely than those in other roles (e.g., patrol) to support arming teachers, as are individuals in supervisory positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 was passed as part of the Crime Control Act of 1990 (see § 1702). The Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994 was passed as part of the Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994 (see § 14601).

  2. This project was approved by the Texas State University IRB under proposal # 7382.

  3. The following states were not represented in the sample: CT, NM, ND, SD, VT, WY.

  4. Nix et al. (2019) state that there is no accurate metric of what constitutes a good or acceptable response rate for law enforcement surveys. They further caution that survey findings from law enforcement samples should not be dismissed due to what is traditionally considered a low response rate (Nix et al. 2019, p. 542).

  5. Oblimin rotation was chosen over Varimax as it does not force factors orthogonally (which is sometimes an unrealistic assumption for factors).

  6. The race variable was collapsed to two categories (White [n = 296; 81.54%] and Other than White [n = 67; 18.46%]) due to low numbers of “Other” races present in the sample.

  7. Open-ended responses were coded dichotomously for any reference to training.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions during the review process that served to strengthen this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaclyn Schildkraut.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schildkraut, J., Martaindale, M.H. Should firearms be allowed in K-12 public schools? An analysis of law enforcement’s perceptions of armed teacher policies. Secur J 35, 1288–1307 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-022-00327-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-022-00327-4

Keywords

Navigation