Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis by using TOPSIS-DEA method

  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis methods classify the decision making units into two groups: efficient and inefficient ones. Therefore, the fully ranking all DMUs is demanded by most of the decision makers. However, data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making units are developed independently and designed for different purposes. However, there are some applications in problem solving such as ranking, where these two methods are combined. Combination of multiple criteria decision making methods with data envelopment analysis is a new idea for elimination of disadvantages when applied independently. In this paper, first the new combined method is proposed named TOPSIS-DEA for ranking efficient units which not only includes the benefits of both data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making methods, but also solves the issues that appear in former methods. Then properties and advantages of the suggested method are discussed and compared with super efficiency method, MAJ method, statistical-based model (CCA), statistical-based model (DR/DEA), cross-efficiency—aggressive, cross-efficiency—benevolent, Liang et al.’s model, through several illustrative examples. Finally, the proposed methods are validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi M and Kaviani MA (2016). Operational efficiency-based ranking framework using uncertain DEA methods: an application to the cement industry in Iran. Management Decision, 54(4):902–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afsharian M, Ahn H, Neumann L and Neumann L (2016) Generalized DEA: an approach for supporting input/output factor determination in DEA. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(7):1892–1909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbarian D (2015). Ranking all DEA-efficient DMUs based on cross efficiency and analytic hierarchy process methods. Journal of Optimization 2015(2015):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alirezaee MR, and Sani MRR (2011). New analytical hierarchical process/data envelopment analysis methodology for ranking decision‐making units. International Transactions in Operational Research, 18(5):533–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen P and Petersen NC (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10):1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, Cordero JM and Pastor JT (2016). The determination of the least distance to the strongly efficient frontier in data envelopment analysis oriented models: modelling and computational aspects. Omega, 219. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.008i.

  • Bagherikahvarin M, and De Smet Y (2016). Determining new possible weight values in PROMETHEE: a procedure based on data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1–12. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0107-1

  • Banker RD, and Chang H (2006). The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2):1311–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao CP, Chen TH, and Chang SY (2008). Slack-based ranking method: an interpretation to the cross-efficiency method in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society 59(6):860–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero R, Romero C and Ruiz F (2016). Multiple criteria decision making and economics: an introduction. Annals of Operations Research 245(1–2):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6):429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitnis A and Vaidya OS (2016). Efficiency ranking method using DEA and TOPSIS (ERM-DT): case of an Indian bank. Benchmarking: An International Journal 23(1):165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinca CS and Molinero CM (2004). Selecting DEA specifications and ranking units via PCA. Journal of the Operational Research Society 55(5):521–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong JY and Wan SP (2016). Virtual enterprise partner selection integrating LINMAP and TOPSIS. Journal of the Operational Research Society 67(10): 1288–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 120(3):253–290.

  • Friedman L and Sinuany-Stern Z (1997). Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context. European Journal of Operational Research 100(3):629–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganley JA and Cubbin JS (1992). Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis. Elsevier Science Inc.

  • Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Jahanshahloo GR, Khodabakhshi M, Rostamy-Malkhlifeh M, Moghaddas Z and Vaez-Ghasemi M (2013). A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Applied Mathematics 2013:492421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL and Lin MJ (2012). Group Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications (Vol. 281). Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Hwang CL and Yoon K (2012). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications a State-of-the-Art Survey (Vol. 186). Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Junior HV, Lotfi FH and Akbarian D (2007). A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set. European Journal of Operational Research 181(1):331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Khanmohammadi M, Kazemimanesh M and Rezaie V (2010). Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights. Expert Systems with Applications 37(12):7483–7488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Rezai HZ and Balf FR (2005). Using Monte Carlo method for ranking efficient DMUs. Applied Mathematics and Computation 162(1):371–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Rezaie V and Khanmohammadi M (2011). Ranking DMUs by ideal points with interval data in DEA. Applied Mathematical Modelling 35(1):218–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Shoja N, Tohidi G and Razavyan S. (2004). Ranking using l 1-norm in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation 153(1):215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JS and Lu WM (2012). Network-based method for ranking of efficient units in two-stage DEA models. Journal of the Operational Research Society 63(8):1153–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WB, Meng W, Li XX and Zhang DQ (2010). DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Annals of Operations Research 173(1):177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi FH, Fallahnejad R and Navidi N (2011). Ranking efficient units in DEA by using TOPSIS method. Applied Mathematical Sciences 5(17):805–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi FH and Alvar MH (2012). A new method for ranking efficient DMUs based on TOPSIS and virtual DMUs. International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering 1(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao N, Song M and Deng S (2016). Application of TOPSIS method in evaluating the effects of supply vane angle of a task/ambient air conditioning system on energy utilization and thermal comfort. Applied Energy 180:536–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakhshan SA, Kamyad AV and Effati S (2015). Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research 226(1):505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramón N, Ruiz JL and Sirvent I (2014). Dominance relations and ranking of units by using interval number ordering with cross-efficiency intervals. Journal of the Operational Research Society 65(9):1336–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal EC and Weiss HJ (2016). A data envelopment analysis approach for ranking journals. Omega 1–49. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.006.

  • Sexton TR, Silkman RH, Hogan AJ (1986). Data Envelopment Analysis. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson G (2005). Programmatic efficiency comparisons between unequally sized groups of DMUs in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56(12):1431–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinuany‐Stern Z, Mehrez A and Hadad Y (2000). An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. International Transactions in Operational Research 7(2):109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn SY (2006). Random effects logistic regression model for ranking efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57(11):1289–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli MM, Shirouyehzad H and Dabestani R (2016). Proposing a hybrid method based on DEA and ANP for ranking organizational units and prioritizing human capital management drivers. Journal of Modelling in Management 11(1):213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis E, De Witte K, Johnes J, Johnes G, Karagiannis G and Portela CS (2016). Applications of data envelopment analysis in education. In Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, New York, pp. 367–438.

  • Wang YM, Liu J and Elhag TM (2008). An integrated AHP–DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 54(3):513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerafat-Angiz LM, Mustafa A, and Emrouznejad A. (2010). Ranking efficient decision-making units in data envelopment analysis using fuzzy concept. Computers and Industrial Engineering 59(4):712–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Poh KL and Ang BW (2016). Data envelopment analysis for measuring environmental performance. In Handbook of Operations Analytics Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, New York, pp. 31–49.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is very grateful to Dr. Ali Emrouznejad (Professor and Chair in Business Analytics in Aston University) for reading carefully the paper, his comments and suggestions which have improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Seyed Ali Rakhshan

  2. Department of Mathematics, Quchan University of Advanced Technology, Quchan, 67335-94771, Iran

    Seyed Ali Rakhshan

Authors
  1. Seyed Ali Rakhshan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Ali Rakhshan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rakhshan, S.A. Efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis by using TOPSIS-DEA method. J Oper Res Soc 68, 906–918 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0237-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0237-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation