Skip to main content
Log in

Do corporate social responsibility and corporate image influence performance of the financial sector?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the mediating role of corporate image between corporate social responsibility and marketing performance in the financial sector. Data were collected from 220 Ghanaian financial houses. Questionnaire for the data collection was based on measurement scale. Statistical values were derived to test the relationship between the three variables understudy. The effect of corporate image on marketing performance was found to be positive. Corporate image was also found to positively mediate the relationship between corporate social responsibility and marketing performance. Fostering corporate social responsibility and maintaining high corporate image will have a direct positive effect on marketing performance of financial houses. The paper thus contributes to marketing performance studies by extending the predictors of firm performance to test the mediating role of corporate image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advantage, C. 2020. Corporate social responsibility. CSR and Socially Responsible Investing Strategies in Transitioning and Emerging Economies, 65.

  • Adeosun, L. P. K., and R. A. Ganiyu. 2013. Corporate reputation as a strategic asset. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2).

  • Agudelo, M.A.L., L. Jóhannsdóttir, and B. Davídsdóttir. 2019. A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 4 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, R., Y. Koskinen, and C. Zhang. 2019. Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence”. Management Science 65 (10): 4451–4469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alrowwad, A.A., F. Alkhalafat, B. Obeidat, and S. Abualoush. 2018. The role of corporate social responsibility in enhancing firm performance from the perspective of IT employees in Jordanian banking sector: The mediating effect of transformational leadership. Modern Applied Science 12 (7): 1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alrubaiee, L.S., S. Aladwan, M.H.A. Joma, W.M. Idris, and S. Khater. 2017. Relationship between corporate social responsibility and marketing performance: The mediating effect of customer value and corporate image. International Business Research 10 (2): 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agyemang, O.S., and A. Ansong. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance of Ghanaian SMEs: Mediating role of access to capital and firm reputation. Journal of Global Responsibility. 8 (1): 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E.W., C. Fornell, and S.K. Mazvancheryl. 2004. Customer Satisfaction and Shareholder Value. Journal of Marketing 68: 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anning-Dorson, T., R.E. Hinson, M. Amidu, and M.B. Nyamekye. 2018. Enhancing service firm performance through customer involvement capability and innovativeness. Management Research Review. 41 (11): 1271–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amores-Salvadó, J., G. Martín-de Castro, and J.E. Navas-López. 2014. Green corporate image: Moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance”. Journal of Cleaner Production 83: 356–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anser, M.K., Z. Zhang, and L. Kanwal. 2018. Moderating effect of innovation on corporate social responsibility and firm performance in realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25 (5): 799–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansong, A. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance of Ghanaian SMEs: The role of stakeholder engagement. Cogent Business and Management 4 (1): 1333704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alamgir, M., and M. Nasir Uddin. 2017. The mediating role of corporate image on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Business and Development Studies 9 (1): 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G., A. Aybars, and O. Kutlu. 2010. Managing corporate performance: Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging markets. International Journal of productivity and Performance management.

  • Arendt, S., and M. Brettel. 2010. Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate identity, image, and firm performance. Management Decision 48 (10): 1469–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya, R., B. Antonisamy, and S. Kumar. 2012. Sample size estimation in prevalence studies. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics 79 (11): 1482–1488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashrafi, M., M. Adams, T.R. Walker, and G. Magnan. 2018. How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: A theoretical review of their relationships. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 25 (8): 672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, X., and J. Chang. 2015. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: The mediating role of marketing competence and the moderating role of market environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 32 (2): 505–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bist, J.P. 2018. Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of 16 African and non-African low-income countries. Cogent Economics and Finance 6 (1): 1449780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., H. He, and K. Mellahi. 2015. Corporate social responsibility, employee organizational identification, and creative effort: The moderating impact of corporate ability. Group and Organization Management 40 (3): 323–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., and A. Cohen. 2001. The financial crisis of the local authorities in Israel: A resource-based analysis. Public Administration 79 (4): 893–913.

  • Carroll, A.B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review 4 (4): 497–505.

  • Cheong, C.W., J. Sinnakkannu, and S. Ramasamy. 2017. Reactive or proactive? Investor sentiment as a driver of corporate social responsibility. Research in International Business and Finance 42: 572–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, R. 2005. Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews 7 (2): 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, N. 2010. The limits of time and transitions: Challenges to theories of sequential image comprehension. Studies in Comics 1 (1): 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. 2000. Corporate image: An audience centred model. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 5 (2): 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., R.B. Handfield, R.J. Calantone, and S. Ghosh. 2000. A contingent view of quality management-the impact of international competition on quality. Decision Sciences 31 (3): 649–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, V.S. 2008. “Report of the working group on improvement of banking services in the state of Jharkhand” Jan, 2008. Available at http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/PublicationReport/Pdfs/84199.pdf.

  • Den Hond, F., K.A. Rehbein, F.G. de Bakker, and H.K.V. Lankveld. 2014. Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies 51 (5): 790–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dmytriyev, S., R.E. Freeman, and J. Hörisch. 2021. The relationship between stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility: Differences, similarities, and implications for social issues in management. Journal of Management Studies 58 (6): 1441–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. 2000. Creating corporate reputations: Identity, image and performance. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R.L., and J. Schwalbach. 2000. Corporate reputation and performance in Germany. Corporate Reputation Review 3 (2): 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durusu-Ciftci, D., M.S. Ispir, and H. Yetkiner. 2017. Financial development and economic growth: Some theory and more evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling 39 (2): 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J.E., M.C. Worline, P.J. Frost, and J. Lilius. 2006. Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly 51 (1): 59–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.R., and W.M. Lindsay. 2013. Managing for quality and performance excellence. Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberl, M., and M. Schwaiger. 2005. Corporate reputation: Disentangling the effects on financial performance. European Journal of marketing.

  • Ekatah, I., M. Samy, R. Bampton, and A. Halabi. 2011. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability: The case of Royal Dutch Shell Plc. Corporate Reputation Review 14 (4): 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elouidani, A., and F.A. Zoubir. 2015. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 4 (1): 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavián, C., M. Guinalíu, and E. Torres. 2005. The influence of corporate image on consumer trust: A comparative analysis in traditional versus internet banking. Internet Research 15 (4): 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., and S. Dmytriyev. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management 1: 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, D.M. 2010. The development of corporate image: A historiographic approach to a marketing concept”. Corporate Reputation Review 13 (1): 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatsi, J.G., C.A.A. Anipa, S.G. Gadzo, and J. Ameyibor. 2016. Corporate social responsibility, risk factor and financial performance of listed firms in Ghana. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking 6 (2): 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J., and P. Shum. 2012. Do customer satisfaction and reputation mediate the CSR–FP link? Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management 37 (2): 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J. 2010. Drivers of corporate social responsibility: The role of formal strategic planning and firm culture. British Journal of Management 21 (2): 511–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D.W., and D.B. Turban. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society 39 (3): 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galant, A., and S. Cadez. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 30 (1): 676–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C.B., C. Riordan, and B.S. Schaffer. 2010. Does social identity theory underlie relational demography? A test of the moderating effects of uncertainty reduction and status enhancement on similarity effects. Human Relations 63 (7): 903–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.R., and J.M. Balmer. 1998. Managing corporate image and corporate reputation. Long Range Planning 31 (5): 695–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T., and J. Peloza. 2011. How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing.

  • Greenwood, M., H.J. Van Buren, and III. 2010. Trust and stakeholder theory: Trustworthiness in the organisation–stakeholder relationship. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3): 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.J., and J.F. Mahon. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society 36 (1): 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigore, G. F. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and marketing. In Governance in the business environment, 41–58. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Hair, J.F., M. Sarstedt, T.M. Pieper, and C.M. Ringle. 2012. The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning 45 (5–6): 320–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., M. Gabriel, and V. Patel. 2014. AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2).

  • Hammond, S.A., and J.W. Slocum. 1996. The impact of prior firm financial performance on subsequent corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2): 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.J., and G.D. Keim. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22 (2): 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J.E., K.N. Lemon, and B. Libai. 2003. What Is the True Value of a Lost Customer? Journal of Service Research 5 (3): 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. C., S. W. Yen, C. Y. Liu, and P. C. Huang. 2014. The relationship among corporate social responsibility, service quality, corporate image and purchase intention. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 6(3).

  • Hurtado Gonzalez, J.M., S.B. Cámara, and J.L. Galan Gonzalez. 2009. Exploring paths between web adoption and firm performance: The mediating effect of customer satisfaction, corporate image, market expansion and internal efficiency. Total Quality Management 20 (10): 1055–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.T., and P.M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igbudu, N., Z. Garanti, and T. Popoola. 2018. Enhancing bank loyalty through sustainable banking practices: The mediating effect of corporate image. Sustainability 10 (11): 4050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jager, J., D.L. Putnick, and M.H. Bornstein. 2017. More than just convenient: The scientific merits of homogeneous convenience samples”. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 82 (2): 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., A.M. Safieddine, and M. Rabbath. 2008. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16 (5): 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., and G. M. Zinkhan. 2015. Defining and measuring company image. In Proceedings of the 1990 academy of marketing science (AMS) annual conference, 346–350. Cham: Springer.

  • Jurišová, V., and K. Ďurková. 2012. CSR communication and its impact on corporate image. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research 4 (2): 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamond, D., R. Dwyer, S. Arendt, and M. Brettel. 2010. Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate identity, image, and firm performance. Management Decision.

  • Lai, C.S., C.J. Chiu, C.F. Yang, and D.C. Pai. 2010. The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3): 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizarraga, I. 2010. Benefits of corporate societal marketing. Helium.com. Available from internet: http://www.helium.com/items/1841732-benefits-of-corporate-societal-marketing-csm

  • Lizarzaburu, E. R., and J. D. Brío. 2018. Corporate social responsibility and corporate reputation in emerging countries: An analysis of the Peruvian banking sector. In Innovation and capacity building, 55–76. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Lopatta, K., F. Buchholz, and T. Kaspereit. 2016. Asymmetric information and corporate social responsibility. Business and Society 55 (3): 458–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C., H. Farag, and K. Ow-Yong. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Islamic banks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 103: S21–S38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., T.B. Mackey, and J.B. Barney. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review 32 (3): 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqbool, S., and M.N. Zameer. 2018. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Future Business Journal 4 (1): 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., and O.C. Ferrell. 2001. Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument-Concepts, evidence and research directions. European Journal of Marketing 35 (3/4): 457–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruf, A.A., and B.A. Afeez. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and corporate image. Transnational Journal of Science and Technology 3 (8): 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.R., L. Eden, and D. Li. 2020. CSR reputation and firm performance: A dynamic approach. Journal of Business Ethics 163 (3): 619–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., and A. Roepstorff. 2015. CSR as corporate political activity: Observations on IKEA’s CSR identity—image dynamics. Journal of Business Ethics 128 (2): 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization and Environment 21 (3): 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moura-Leite, R., and R. Padgett. 2014. The effect of corporate social actions on organizational reputation. Management Research Review. 37 (2): 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musah, A. 2020. Corporate social responsibility spending of commercial banks: Determinants and consequence. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah 8 (5): 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzellec, L., and M. Lambkin. 2006. Corporate rebranding: Destrsoying, transferring or creating brand equity? European Journal of Marketing 40 (7/8): 803–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navickas, V., and R. Kontautiene. 2013. The initiatives of corporate social responsibility as sources of innovations. Business: Theory and Practice 14 (1): 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsom, J.T. 2015. Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction. New York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis.

  • Nguyen, N., and G. Leblanc. 2001. Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 8 (4): 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nollet, J., G. Filis, and E. Mitrokostas. 2016. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling 52: 400–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyarku, K.M., and S. Ayekple. 2019. Influence of corporate social responsibility on non-financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal. 15 (7): 910–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppong, S. 2016. Corporate social responsibility in the Ghanaian context. In Key initiatives in corporate social responsibility, 419–442. Cham: Springer.

  • Oyewumi, O.R., O.A. Ogunmeru, and C.S. Oboh. 2018. Investment in corporate social responsibility, disclosure practices, and financial performance of banks in Nigeria. Future Business Journal 4 (2): 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L.D. 2014. Corporate social accountability through action: Contemporary insights from British industrial pioneers. Accounting, Organizations and Society 39 (8): 632–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parente, T.C., and C.A.P. Machado Filho. 2016. Corporate social responsibility: Perceptions of directors in Brazil. Management Research Review 39 (11): 1472–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, N.P., S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, and N.P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomering, A., and L.W. Johnson. 2009. Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image: Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(4): 420–439.

  • Preston, L.E., and D.P. O’bannon. 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business and Society 36 (4): 419–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M., M.A. Rodríguez-Serrano, and M. Lambkin. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and marketing performance: The moderating role of advertising intensity. Journal of Advertising Research 57 (4): 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W.J., and V. Kumar. 2003. The impact of customer relationship characteristics on profitable lifetime duration. Journal of Marketing 67 (1): 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C., and S. Thomsen. 2004. The impact of corporate reputation on performance: Some Danish evidence. European Management Journal 22 (2): 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P.W., and G.R. Dowling. 2002. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 23 (12): 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, R., R. Cerchione, R. Singh, and R. Dahiya. 2020. Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27 (2): 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarpong, S. 2018. Ensuring sanity in Ghana’s financial sector: a focus on Ghana’s microfinance institutions. In Corporate governance in banking and investor protection, 287–301. Cham: Springer.

  • Sen, S., and J. Cowley. 2013. The relevance of stakeholder theory and social capital theory in the context of CSR in SMEs: An Australian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (2): 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, L., and J. Coughlan. 2008. Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications 14 (2): 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrettle, S., A. Hinz, M. Scherrer-Rathje, and T. Friedli. 2014. Turning sustainability into action: Explaining firms’ sustainability efforts and their impact on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics 147: 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A.S., and M.B. Masuku. 2014. Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management 2 (11): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinthupundaja, J., and Y. Kohda. 2019. Effects of corporate social responsibility and creating shared value on sustainability. In Green business: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, 1272–1284. IGI Global.

  • Soana, M.G. 2011. The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance in the banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (1): 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnackenberg, A.K., and E.C. Tomlinson. 2016. Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management 42 (7): 1784–1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, W.G., and T. Kohers. 2002. The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics 35 (2): 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanov, P. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and corporate image building. Economics and Finance N 8: 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, S.H., I. Welch, and T.J. Wong. 1998. Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance 53 (6): 1935–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodoulidis, B., D. Diaz, F. Crotto, and E. Rancati. 2017. Exploring corporate social responsibility and financial performance through stakeholder theory in the tourism industries. Tourism Management 62: 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.S., W.J. Reinartz, and V. Kumar. 2004. Getting the Most Out of All Your Customers. Harvard Business Review 82 (7–8): 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torku, K., and E. Laryea. 2021. Corporate governance and bank failure: Ghana’s 2018 banking sector crisis. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1–21.

  • Tran, M.A., B. Nguyen, T.C. Melewar, and J. Bodoh. 2015. Exploring the corporate image formation process. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 18 (1): 86–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treadwell, D.F., and T.M. Harrison. 1994. Conceptualizing and assessing organizational image: Model images, commitment, and communication. Communications Monographs 61 (1): 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virvilaitė, R., and U. Daubaraitė. 2011. Corporate social responsibility in forming corporate image. Inžinerinė Ekonomika 22 (5): 534–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.A., C. Bodwell, and S.B. Graves. 2002. Responsibility: The new business imperative. Academy of Management Perspectives 16 (2): 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waheed, A., S. Hussain, H. Hanif, H. Mahmood, and Q.A. Malik. 2021. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: The moderation of investment horizon and corporate governance. Cogent Business and Management 8 (1): 1938349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., and S. Ferris. 1997. Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal 18 (1): 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posnikoff, J.F. 1997. Disinvestment from South Africa: They did well by doing good’. Contemporary Economic Policy 15 (1): 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, B., and Y. Chung. 2018. The effects of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 37: 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Collins Kankam-Kwarteng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kankam-Kwarteng, C., Donkor, G.N.A., Osei, F. et al. Do corporate social responsibility and corporate image influence performance of the financial sector?. J Financ Serv Mark (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-023-00208-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-023-00208-w

Keywords

Navigation