Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of market returns and market volatility on investor risk tolerance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 2008 credit market debacle and subsequent “Great Recession” accompanied by the stock market crash of 2008 has caused many investors and their advisors to reevaluate their risk tolerance and investment asset allocation choices. Additionally, marketers for many financial institutions and investment advisors are rethinking the strategies and tactics they use for both individual and corporate clients about the level of risk that is appropriate to meet their investment objectives. This research shows that an investor’s risk tolerance is not as stable as it has been portrayed previously in the literature and can be affected by both the direction of movement and the volatility in the market. In addition, this research provides some suggestions on how to frame investment decisions for individual investors to better assess their actual risk tolerance in the face of a volatile market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batemen, H., J. Louviere, S. Thorp, T. Islam, and S. Satchell. 2010. Investment decisions for retirement savings. Journal of Consumer Affairs 44 (3): 463–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, S.L. 2007. Semivariance in asset allocations: Longer horizons can handle riskier holdings. Journal of Financial Planning 20 (1): 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel, D., E. Carmel, D. Leiser, and A. Spivak. 2015. Facing a biased advisor while choosing a retirement plan: The impact of financial literacy and fair disclosure. Journal of Consumer Affairs 49 (3): 576–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.C., K.T. Jones, and K. Moreland. 2014. Differences in learning styles. CPA Journal 84 (8): 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.G., and M. Statman. 1998. Bullish or bearish? Financial Analysts Journal 54 (3): 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corter, J.E., and Y.J. Chen. 2006. Do investment risk tolerance attitudes predict portfolio risk? Journal of Business and Psychology 20 (3): 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. 2012. On the stability of risk tolerance: An important discussion for all involved in financial advisory services. White Paper: FinaMetrica Pay Ltd. Available from: www.finametrica.com.

  • Decker, J.H., A.R. Otto, N.D. Daw, and C.A. Hartley. 2016. From creatures of habit to goal-directed learners: Tracking the developmental emergence of model-based reinforcement learning. Psychological Science 27 (6): 848–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano, G., F. Gino, G.P. Pisano, and B.R. Staats. 2016. Making experience count: The role of reflection in individual learning. Harvard Business School Working Paper 14-093.

  • Droms, W.G. 1987. Investment asset allocation for PFP clients. Journal of Accountancy 163 (4): 114–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J.H. 2002. An investigation of the determinants of investment risk behavior in employer-sponsored retirement plans. Journal of Management 28 (1): 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, J.E., S. Chatterjee, and D. Zhu. 2010. Determinants of risk tolerance in the baby boomer cohort. Journal of Business & Economics Research 8 (5): 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grable, J.E. 2013. Is risk tolerance stable? The role of projection bias. Journal of Financial Services Professionals 67 (1): 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grable, J.E., W. Heo, and M. Kruger. 2016. The intertemporal persistence of risk tolerance scores. Journal of Financial Planning 29 (8): 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grable, J.E., R. Lytton, and B. O’Neill. 2004. Projection bias and financial risk tolerance. The Journal of Behavioral Finance 5 (3): 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, W.V. 1991. Asset allocation in a downside-risk framework. Financial Analysts Journal 47 (5): 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A.O.I., T. Post, and J. Pennings. 2012. Individual investor perceptions and behavior during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance 37 (1): 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huzdik, K., D. Beres, and E. Nemeth. 2014. An empirical study of financial literacy versus risk tolerance among higher education students. Public Finance Quarterly 59 (4): 444–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A. 2014. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, vol. 2. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A., and R. Fry. 1975. Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In Theories of group process, ed. C. Cooper. London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, L.R.L., J.K. Eastman, and D.E. Bock. 2016. A multi-method exploration of the relationship between knowledge and risk: The impact of millennials’ retirement investment decisions. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice 24 (1): 72–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. 1952. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7 (1): 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. 1959. Portfolio selection. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nantell, T., and B. Price. 1979. An analytical comparison of variance and semivariance capital market theories. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis 14 (2): 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuenschwander, L.M., A. Abbott, and A.R. Mobley. 2013. Comparison of a web-based vs in-person nutrition education program for low-income adults. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics 113 (1): 120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkus Jr., E. 2000. A theoretical and practical framework for service-learning in marketing: Kolb’s experiential learning cycle. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (1): 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, T., M.J. van den Assem, G. Baltussen, and R.H. Thaler. 2008. Deal or no deal? Decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show. American Economic Review 98 (1): 38–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roszkowski, M.J., and G. Davey. 2010. Risk perception and risk tolerance changes attributable to the 2008 economic crisis: A subtle but critical difference. Journal of Financial Services Professionals 64 (4): 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahm, C.R. 2012. How much does risk tolerance change? Quarterly Journal of Finance 2 (4): 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, M., A. Homan, and D. van Knippenberg. 2013. To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 34: 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyczek, S., and J. Matysiewicz. 2015. Consumers’ financial literacy as a tool for preventing future economic crisis. Review of Business 36 (1): 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washer, K.M., and R.R. Johnson. 2013. An intuitive examination of downside risk. Journal of Financial Planning 26 (6): 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, R., S.D. Hanna, and S. Lindamood. 2004. Changes in financial risk tolerance. Financial Services Review 13 (4): 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, R., and A.L. Curl. 2011. Do market returns influence risk tolerance? Evidence from panel data. Journal of Family Economic Issues 32 (3): 532–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtney Droms Hatch.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Graphical depictions of market conditions for Studies 1 and 2

Panel A: Market up & low volatility

figure a

Panel B: Market up & high volatility

figure b

Panel C: Market down & low volatility

figure c

Panel D: Market down & high volatility

figure d

Appendix 2: Risk tolerance measure

Please read each statement below and indicate the extent to which you agree with it. (1 = strongly disagree; 7 = strongly agree).

  1. 1.

    Earning a long-term rate of return that will outpace inflation is one of my most important investment goals.

  2. 2.

    Protecting the value of my existing capital is not as important to me as earning a high long-term rate of return.

  3. 3.

    I would be comfortable “riding out” a major market downturn in the expectation that my long-run results will be higher than I would earn in less volatile investments.

  4. 4.

    I am psychologically prepared to tolerate wide swings in the value of my investment portfolio.

  5. 5.

    I am financially prepared to tolerate wide swings in the value of my investment portfolio.

  6. 6.

    I am willing to invest in less liquid assets in order to seek higher returns.

  7. 7.

    I am willing to tolerate sharp downswings in the return on my investments (e.g., stock market investments) in order to seek a potentially higher return than would be available from more secure investments (e.g., US Treasury Bills or bank CDs).

  8. 8.

    I am willing to risk a short-term loss in return for a potentially higher long-run rate of return.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hatch, C.D., Carlson, K. & Droms, W.G. Effects of market returns and market volatility on investor risk tolerance. J Financ Serv Mark 23, 77–90 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-018-0049-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-018-0049-6

Keywords

Navigation