Skip to main content
Log in

Order dynamics during the flash crash

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Asset Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

US common stocks are simultaneously traded on multiple trading centers. We study quotes and trades with millisecond time stamps during the flash crash of May 6, 2010, and document new findings about order dynamics when the fragmented market is under stress. First, relative to May 5, 2010, the number of trades and the number of quotes quadrupled on May 6, 2010. Second, during the flash crash, the proportional time of a trading center offering the best bid/ask quotes substantially reduced on all trading centers, while the effectiveness of turning best quotes into trades increased on almost all trading centers. Third and most importantly, we find significant changes in the level of trade (or quote) fragmentation during the flash crash for stocks with a high or low level of fragmentation, but no significant change for stocks with a fragmentation level in the middle range. These findings together demonstrate that, despite the dramatic increase in the number of quotes, there was insufficient liquidity on all trading centers, and stocks with a medium level of trade (or quote) fragmentation were most resilient to the sudden order flow shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Two prominent examples of these market glitches are the IPO debacle of the third-largest US stock exchange, BATS, on March 23, 2012, and the huge trading loss of the market-maker firm, Knight Capital Group Inc, on August 1, 2012, which led to the firm being acquired eventually.

  2. The executive summary of his report “Regulation NMS Part I: Loved or loathed and why many want it to die” is available at http://www.tabbgroup.com/PublicationDetail.aspx?PublicationID=1302.

  3. See her speech at the Security Traders Association 80th Annual Market Structure Conference on October 2, 2013.

  4. On April 21, 2015, Navinder Singh Sarao, a London-based futures trader, was arrested on charges in connection with his role in the flash crash. He allegedly used an automated trading program to manipulate the market for E-Mini S&P 500 futures contracts (E-Minis) on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). His implementation of high-speed manipulative trading strategies might have triggered the Flash Crash (DoJ 2015). Sarao pleaded guilty to fraud in November 2016.

  5. We sincerely thank an anonymous reviewer for comments and suggestions that motivate the analysis in this section.

  6. We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this direction of future research.

References

  • Amihud, Y., B. Lauterbach, and H. Mendelson. 2003. The value of trading consolidation: Evidence from the exercise of warrants. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38: 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angel, J.J., L. Harris, and C.S. Spatt. 2011. Equity trading in the 21st Century. Quarterly Journal of Finance 1: 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, M., T. Hendershott, and D.T. McCormick. 2003. Competition among trading venues: Information and trading on electronic communication networks. Journal of Finance 58: 2637–2665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biais, B., P. Hillion, and C. Spatt. 1995. An empirical analysis of the limit order book and order flow in Paris Bourse. Journal of Finance 50: 1655–1689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, W., and P. Schultz. 1994. Why do NASDAQ market makers avoid odd-eighth quotes? Journal of Finance 49: 1813–1840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdry, B., and V. Nanda. 1991. Multimarket trading and market liquidity. Review of Financial Studies 4: 483–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, K.J., S.F. Maier, R.A. Schwartz, and D.K. Whitcomb. 1982. An analysis of the economic justification for consolidation in a secondary security market. Journal of Banking & Finance 6: 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice (DoJ). 2015. Futures trader charged with illegally manipulating stock market, contributing to the May 2010 market “Flash Crash”. Office of Public Affairs. www.justice.gov/opa/pr/futures-trader-charged-illegally-manipulating-stock-market-contributing-may-2010-market-flash.

  • Easley, D., M.L. de Prado, and M. O’Hara. 2011. The microstructure of the “Flash Crash”: Flow toxicity, liquidity crashes, and the probability of informed trading. Journal of Portfolio Management 37: 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., R. Michaely, and M. O’Hara. 2002. The making of a dealer market: From entry to equilibrium in the trading of Nasdaq stocks. Journal of Finance 57: 2289–2316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, T. 1999. Order flow composition and trading costs in a dynamic limit order market. Journal of Financial Markets 2: 99–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, T., O. Kadan, and E. Kandel. 2005. Limit order book as a market for liquidity. Review of Financial Studies 18: 1171–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., B. Smith, D. Turnbull, and R.W. White. 2000. The costs and the determinants of order aggressiveness. Journal of Financial Economics 56: 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M.A., A.V. Shkilko, B.F. Van Ness, and R.A. Van Ness. 2008. Competition in the market for Nasdaq securities. Journal of Financial Markets 11: 113–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. 1993. Consolidation, fragmentation, segmentation, and regulation. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 2: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J. 1995. One security, many markets: Determining the contributions to price discovery. Journal of Finance 50: 1175–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J. 2013. High frequency quoting: Short-term volatility in bids and offers. Working paper.

  • Hasbrouck, J., and G. Saar. 2009. Technology and liquidity provision: The blurring of traditional definitions. Journal of Financial Markets 12: 143–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, T., and C. Jones. 2005. Island goes dark: Transparency, fragmentation, and regulation. Review of Financial Studies 18: 743–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, T., and P.C. Moulton. 2010. Automation, speed, and stock market quality: The NYSE’s Hybrid. Journal of Financial Markets 14: 568–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirilenko, A., A.S. Kyle, M. Samadi, and T. Tuzun. 2011. The Flash Crash: the impact of high frequency trading on an electronic market. Working paper.

  • MacKinlay, C.A. 1997. Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, A. 1995. Consolidation, fragmentation, and the disclosure of trading information. Review of Financial Studies 8: 579–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, A. 2012. Exchange-traded funds, market structure, and the flash crash. Financial Analyst Journal 68: 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, H. 1987. Consolidation, fragmentation, and market performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22: 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muravyev, D., N.D. Pearson, and J.P. Broussard. 2013. Is there price discovery in equity options? Journal of Financial Economics 107: 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obizhaeva, A.A., and J. Wang. 2013. Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics. Journal of Financial Markets 16: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, M. 2015. High frequency market microstructure. Journal of Financial Economics 116: 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, M., and M. Ye. 2011. Is market fragmentation harming market quality? Journal of Financial Economics 100: 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranaldo, A. 2004. Order aggressiveness in limit order book markets. Journal of Financial Markets 7: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roşu, I. 2009. A dynamic model of the limit order book. Review of Financial Studies 22: 4601–4641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppi, D.J. 1997. Liquidity provision with limit orders and a strategic specialist. Review of Financial Studies 10: 103–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). 2010. Concept release on equity market structure. Release No. 34-61358; File No. S7-02-10.

  • Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). 2013. Equity market structure literature review. Part I: Market fragmentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, H.R., et al. 1982. Comments ‘An analysis of the economic justification for consolidation in a secondary security market’ by Kalman J. Cohen. Journal of Banking & Finance 6: 75–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (CFTC/SEC). 2010. Findings regarding the market events of May 6, 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth J. Hunsader.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ang, J.S., Hunsader, K.J. & Zhang, S. Order dynamics during the flash crash. J Asset Manag 20, 365–383 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-019-00129-1

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-019-00129-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation