Skip to main content
Log in

Integral resource capacity planning for inpatient care services based on bed census predictions by hour

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The design and operations of inpatient care facilities are typically largely historically shaped. A better match with the changing environment is often possible, and even inevitable due to the pressure on hospital budgets. Effectively organizing inpatient care requires simultaneous consideration of several interrelated planning issues. Also, coordination with upstream departments like the operating theatre and the emergency department is much-needed. We present a generic analytical approach to predict bed census on nursing wards by hour, as a function of the Master Surgical Schedule and arrival patterns of emergency patients. Along these predictions, insight is gained on the impact of strategic (ie, case mix, care unit size, care unit partitioning), tactical (ie, allocation of operating room time, misplacement rules), and operational decisions (ie, time of admission/discharge). The method is used in the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam as a decision-support tool in a complete redesign of the inpatient care operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The mean absolute error (MAE) is given by MAE=(1)/(n)∑i=1n|a i y i |, where a i is the actual value and y i the predicted value.

  2. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is given by MAPE=(100%)/(n)∑i=1n|(a i y i )/a i |, where a i is the actual value and y i the predicted value.

References

  • Adan I, Bekkers J, Dellaert N, Vissers J and Yu X (2009). Patient mix optimisation and stochastic resource requirements: A case study in cardiothoracic surgery planning. Health Care Management Science 12 (2): 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akcali E, Côté M and Lin C (2006). A network flow approach to optimizing hospital bed capacity decisions. Health Care Management Science 9 (4): 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman R and Knip M (2004). Reallocation of beds to reduce waiting time for cardiac surgery. Health Care Management Science 7 (2): 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain LJ and Engelhardt M (1992). Introduction to Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Vol. 2. Duxbury Press: Belmont, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekker R and De Bruin A (2010). Time-dependent analysis for refused admissions in clinical wards. Annals of Operations Research 178 (1): 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekker R and Koeleman P (2011). Scheduling admissions and reducing variability in bed demand. Health Care Management Science 14 (3): 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beliën J, Demeulemeester E and Cardoen B (2009). A decision support system for cyclic master surgery scheduling with multiple objectives. Journal of Scheduling 12 (2): 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran J and Bharti A (2006). Stochastic bed balancing of an obstetrics hospital. Health Care Management Science 9 (1): 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa A, Ridley S, Shahani A, Harper P, De Senna V and Nielsen M (2003). Mathematical modelling and simulation for planning critical care capacity. Anaesthesia 58 (4): 320–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei H, Meskens N and Chu C (2010). A planning and scheduling problem for an operating theatre using an open scheduling strategy. Computers & Industrial Engineering 58 (2): 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorunescu F, McClean S and Millard P (2002). A queueing model for bed-occupancy management and planning of hospitals. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53 (1): 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulding L, Adamson J, Watt I and Wright J (2012). Patient safety in patients who occupy beds on clinically inappropriate wards: A qualitative interview study with NHS staff. BMJ Quality & Safety 21 (3): 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green L and Nguyen V (2001). Strategies for cutting hospital beds: the impact on patient service. Health Services Research 36 (2): 421–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerriero F and Guido R (2010). Operational research in the management of the operating theatre: A survey. Health Care Management Science 14 (1): 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper P (2002). A framework for operational modelling of hospital resources. Health Care Management Science 5 (3): 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper P and Shahani A (2002). Modelling for the planning and management of bed capacities in hospitals. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53 (1): 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper P, Shahani A, Gallagher J and Bowie C (2005). Planning health services with explicit geographical considerations: A stochastic location–allocation approach. Omega 33 (2): 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison G, Shafer A and Mackay M (2005). Modelling variability in hospital bed occupancy. Health Care Management Science 8 (4): 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulshof P, Kortbeek N, Boucherie R, Hans E and Bakker P (2012). Taxonomic classification of planning decisions in health care: A structured review of the state of the art in OR/MS. Health Systems 1: 129–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Beullens P, Jones D and Tamiz M (2009). An integrated queuing and multi-objective bed allocation model with application to a hospital in China. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60 (3): 330–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PubMed (2012). http://www.pubmed.gov/, accessed 1 August 2012.

  • Ridge J, Jones S, Nielsen M and Shahani A (1998). Capacity planning for intensive care units. European Journal of Operational Research 105 (2): 346–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RVZ (2012). Council for Public Health and Health Care [Raad voor de Volksgezondheid & Zorg]. Medisch-specialistische zorg in 2020 (In Dutch). http://www.rvz.net/, accessed 1 August 2012.

  • Troy P and Rosenberg L (2009). Using simulation to determine the need for ICU beds for surgery patients. Surgery 146 (4): 608–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oostrum J, Van Houdenhoven M, Hurink J, Hans E, Wullink G and Kazemier G (2008). A master surgical scheduling approach for cyclic scheduling in operating room departments. OR Spectrum 30 (2): 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanberkel P and Blake J (2007). A comprehensive simulation for wait time reduction and capacity planning applied in general surgery. Health Care Management Science 10 (4): 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanberkel P, Boucherie R, Hans E, Hurink J and Litvak N (2010a). A survey of health care models that encompass multiple departments. International Journal of Health Management and Information 1 (1): 37–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberkel P, Boucherie R, Hans E, Hurink J, van Lent W and van Harten W (2010b). An exact approach for relating recovering surgical patient workload to the master surgical schedule. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62 (10): 1851–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa S, Barbieri M and Lega F (2009). Restructuring patient flow logistics around patient care needs: implications and practicalities from three critical cases. Health Care Management Science 12 (2): 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vissers J, Adan I and Dellaert N (2007). Developing a platform for comparison of hospital admission systems: An illustration. European Journal of Operational Research 180 (3): 1290–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW, applied science division of NWO and the Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs.The authors would like to acknowledge Peter Vanberkel and Erwin Hans for the discussion that contributed to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikky Kortbeek.

Appendices

Appendix A

In the appendix, the derivations are presented that were omitted in the main article for reasons of readability. Note that the exposition is such that it is supplementary to the main text, and is therefore not intended to be comprehensible in isolation.

Demand predictions for elective patients

Single surgery block

To calculate we first determine the admission process under a given number of performed surgeries y. Define an, tj(x|y) as the probability that x patients are admitted until time t on day n, given that y admissions take place in total. Then:

where vn, tj is the probability for a type j patient to be admitted in time t, given that he/she will be admitted at day n and is not yet admitted before t:

Finally,

To calculate dn, tj(x), we first determine d n j(x), for day 0 the probability that x patients are present at the start of the discharge process (t=ϑ j ) and for days n>0 the probability that x patients are present at the start of the day:

where s n j is the probability that a type j patient who is still present at the begin of day n is discharged on day n:

Starting from d n j(x), we determine the day process:

where zn,tj is the probability of a type j patient to be discharged during time interval [t, t+1) on day n, given this patient is still present at time t:

Single MSS cycle

We determine the overall probability distribution of the number of patients in recovery resulting from a single MSS, using discrete convolutions. If specialty j is assigned to OR block bi, s, then the distribution for the number of recovering patients of block bi,s present at time t on day m(m∈{0, 1, 2, …, S, S+1, S+2, …}) is given by:

where 0 means and all other probabilities are 0. Then, Hm, t is computed by:

Steady state

Since the cyclic structure of the MSS implies that the recovery of patients receiving surgery during one cycle may overlap with patients from the next cycle, the distributions Hm, t have to be overlapped in the correct manner. Hs,tSS can be computed as follows:

where M=max{m|∃t, x with Hm, t(x)>0}.

Appendix B

Demand predictions for acute patient types

Single patient type

For patient type j=(p, r, θ), the admission process is determined by a non-homogeneous Poisson process:

To calculate , we first determine , for day 0 the probability that x patients are present at the start of the discharge process (t=θ+1) and for days n>0 the probability that x patients are present at the start of the day:

where is the probability that a type j patient who is still present at the begin of day n is discharged during day n:

Starting from we determine the day process:

where is the probability of a type j patient to be discharged during time interval [t, t+1) on day n, given this patient is still present at time t:

Single cycle

To determine the overall probability distribution of the number of patients in recovery resulting from a single AAC, define as the probability distribution of the number of recovering patients of type j present at time interval t on day w(w∈{0, 1, 2, …, R, R+1, R+2, …}). The distribution is given by:

Then, Gw, t is computed by:

Steady state

Gr, tSS can be computed as follows:

where W=max{r|∃t, x with Gr, t(x)>0}.

Appendix C

Performance indicators

In this appendix, the derivation of Zq, tk(x k |n) is presented. To this end, let us first introduce the concept cohort. A cohort is a group of patients originating from a single instance of an OR block (electives) or admission time interval (acute patients). Then,

where Ω is the total number of cohorts, ω the number of cohorts that do generate arrivals during time interval [t, t+1) on day q, and the permutation σ is such that the patient types σ(1), …, σ(ω) are the types that can generate those arrivals. Further, for notational convenience we introduce the function fq, ti as fq, ti=hq, ti for the elective patients, and for acute patient types. Also, we introduce αq, tj as αq, tj=αq, tj for the elective patient types and for the acute patient types. It remains to define the probability that for an arriving cohort, from the y j patients present in total, n j arrivals occur during time interval [t, t+1):

where for elective patient types vn, tj=(wn, tje n j)/e n jk=0twn, kj+e−1j·1(n=0) and for acute patient types vn, tj=1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kortbeek, N., Braaksma, A., Smeenk, F. et al. Integral resource capacity planning for inpatient care services based on bed census predictions by hour. J Oper Res Soc 66, 1061–1076 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.67

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.67

Keywords

Navigation