Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Primary care network development: the regulator’s perspective

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Our research is motivated by the proliferation of primary care models in Ontario, Canada. Currently, primary care is mainly provided by facilities belonging to six models of care. These models are remunerated by various schemes—a mixture of fee-for-service, capitation and salary. In addition, they provide different levels of care and several are better adjusted than others to treat complex health needs. The proposed mixed integer programming model allows the regulator to test the outcomes of locating different types of primary care facilities on the overall cost, accessibility and appropriateness of provided care. The network design is fitted to the heterogeneity of the population residing in a defined geographical area, directly using an index (deprivation index) that was found to correlate with increased health needs and barriers to care. The model capabilities are illustrated on the geographical area of Kingston, Ontario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auditor General of Ontario (2011). Annual report. Section 3.06. Available at http://www.auditor.on.ca/en/reports_2011_en.htm, accessed 13 July 2014.

  • Berman O, Krass D and Menezes MBC (2007). Facility reliability issues in network p-median problems: Strategic centralization and co-location effects. Operations Research 55 (2): 332–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biro S, Sehdev A, Belanger P and Moore K (2012). Understanding health inequities and access to primary health care in southeastern Ontario. Report prepared for the Belleville Quinte West Community Health Centre. Available at http://www.kflaphi.ca/wp-content/uploads/HealthInequities_FullReport.pdf, accessed 13 July 2014.

  • Blomqvist Å, Kralj B and Kantarevic J (2013). Accountability and access to medical care: Lessons from the use of capitation payments in Ontario. C.D. Howe Institute Ebrief 168. Available at http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/e-brief_168.pdf, accessed 13 July 2014.

  • Brandeau ML and Chiu SS (1989). An overview of representative problems in location research. Management Science 35 (6): 645–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho CJ (1998). An equity-efficiency trade-off model for the optimum location of medical care facilities. Socio-economic Planning Sciences 32 (2): 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahrouge S et al (2009). The comparison of models of primary care in Ontario (COMP-PC) study: Methodology of a multifaceted cross-sectional practice-based study. Open Medicine 3 (3): 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskin MS and Dean LK (2004). Location of health care facilities. In: Brandeau ML, Sainfort F and Pierskalla WP (eds). Operations Research and Health Care: A Handbook of Methods and Applications. Kluwer: New York, NY, pp 4376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Ingolfsson A and Erdoğan G (2008). Ambulance location for maximum survival. Naval Research Logistics 55 (1): 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazier RH, Zagorski BM and Rayner J (2012). Comparison of primary care models in Ontario by demographics, case mix and emergency department use, 2008/09 to 2009/10. ICES Investigative Report. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. Available at http://www.ices.on.ca/Publications/Atlases-and-Reports/2012/Comparison-of-Primary-Care-Models, accessed 13 July 2014.

  • Green LV, Savin S and Lu Y (2013). Primary care physician shortages could be eliminated through use of teams, nonphysicians, and electronic communication. Health Affairs 32 (1): 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin MP, Scherrer CR and Swann JL (2008). Optimization of community health center locations and service offerings with statistical need estimation. IIE Transactions 40 (9): 880–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günes ED, Yaman H, Çekyay B and Verter V (2014). Matching patient and physician preferences in designing a primary care facility network. Journal of the Operational Research Society 65 (4): 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hefford M, Crampton P and Foley J (2005). Reducing health disparities through primary care reform: The New Zealand experiment. Health Policy 72 (1): 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson MJ (1988). An hierarchical location-allocation model for primary health care delivery in a developing area. Social Science and Medicine 26 (1): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg W et al (2009). Health promotion activity in primary care: Performance of models and associated factors. Open Medicine 3 (3): 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison B and Glazier R (2013). Ontario’s primary care reforms have transformed the local care landscape, but a plan is needed for ongoing improvement. Health Affairs 32 (4): 695–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison B, Levesque JF, Strumpf E and Coyle N (2011). Primary health care in Canada: Systems in motion. The Milbank Quarterly 89 (2): 256–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalcsics J, Nickel S and Schröder M (2005). Towards a unified territory design approach—Applications, algorithms and GIS integration. Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa TOC 13 (1): 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MM, Ali D, Ferdousy Z and Al-Mamun A (2001). A cost-minimization approach to planning the geographical distribution of health facilities. Health Policy and Planning 16 (3): 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamarche PA, Beaulieu MD, Pineault R, Contandriopoulos AP, Denis JL and Haggerty J (2003). Choices for change: The path for restructuring primary healthcare services in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Available at http://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/Migrated/PDF/ResearchReports/CommissionedResearch/choices_for_change_e.pdf, accessed 13 July 2014.

  • McLafferty S and Broe D (1990). Patient outcomes and regional planning of coronary care services: A location-allocation approach. Social Science and Medicine 30 (3): 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mestre AM, Oliveira MD and Barbosa-Póvoa A (2012). Organizing hospitals into networks: A hierarchical and multiservice model to define location, supply and referrals in planned hospital systems. OR Spectrum 34 (2): 319–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken O, Devlin RA, Barham V, Hogg W and Dahrouge S (2011). Comparative efficiency assessment of primary care service delivery models using data envelopment analysis. Canadian Public Policy 37 (1): 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitropoulos R, Mitropoulos I, Giannikos I and Sissouras A (2006). A biobjective model for the locational planning of hospitals and health centers. Health Care Management Science 9 (2): 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muldoon L, Rowan MS, Geneau R, Hogg W and Coulson D (2006). Models of primary care service delivery in Ontario: Why such diversity? Healthcare Management Forum / Canadian College of Health Service Executives 19 (4): 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P and Raymond G (2009). A deprivation index for health planning in Canada. Chronic Diseases in Canada 29 (4): 178–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomey MP, Martin E and Forest PG (2009). Quebec’s family medicine groups: Innovation and compromise in the reform of front-line care. Canadian Political Science Review 3 (4): 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid R, Bogdanovic B, Roos NP, Black C, MacWilliam L and Menec V (2001). Do some physician groups see sicker patients than others? Implications for primary care policy in Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation. Available at http://mchp-appserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/reference/acg2001.pdf, accessed 13 July 2014.

  • Russell G, Dahrouge S, Tuna M, Hogg W, Geneau R and Gebremichael G (2010). Getting it all done. Organizational factors linked with comprehensive primary care. Family Practice 27 (5): 535–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah CP (2003). Public Health and Preventive Medicine in Canada. 5th edn University of Toronto Press: Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HK, Harper PR and Potts CN (2013). Bicriteria efficiency/equity hierarchical location models for public service application. Journal of the Operational Research Society 64 (4): 500–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starfield B (2012). Primary care: An increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services. SESPAS Report 2012. Gaceta Sanitaria S.E.S.P.A.S. 26(1): 20–26.

  • Starfield B and Simpson L (1993). Primary care as part of US health services reform. The Journal of the American Medical Association 269 (24): 3136–3139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starfield B, Shi L and Macinko J (2005). Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Quarterly 83 (3): 457–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verter V and Lapierre SD (2002). Location of preventive health care facilities. Annals of Operations Research 110 (1–4): 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilton P and Smith RD (1998). Primary care reform: A three country comparison of ‘budget holding’. Health Policy 44 (2): 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodchis WP, Bushmeneva K, Nikitovic M and McKillop I (2011). Guidelines on person-level costing using administrative databases in Ontario. Toronto: Health System Performance Research Network. Available at http://www.hsprn.ca/uploads/files/Guidelines_on_PersonLevel_Costing_May_2013.pdf, accessed 13 July 2014.

  • Zhang Y, Berman O, Marcotte P and Verter V (2010). A bilevel model for preventive healthcare facility network design with congestion. IIE Transactions 42 (12): 865–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Berman O and Verter V (2012). The impact of client choice on preventive healthcare facility network design. OR Spectrum 34 (2): 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Kieran Moore and Dr Paul Belanger from KFL&A Public Health for the help with defining the scope of the problem and data collection, provided while preparing this article. In addition, the authors would like to thank the computing facility at HPCVL for providing the CPLEX capabilities for the full-size instance. Two anonymous reviewers greatly improved this article by providing valuable inputs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Anna Graber-Naidich & Michael W Carter

  2. McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Vedat Verter

Authors
  1. Anna Graber-Naidich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael W Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vedat Verter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vedat Verter.

Appendix

Appendix

Presented here is an example of assignment percentages from DAs with DI=5 to the different models of care. This is part of the solution for the full size example with parameters W d =0.1, W NAS =1 and W c =0.03.

illustration

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graber-Naidich, A., Carter, M. & Verter, V. Primary care network development: the regulator’s perspective. J Oper Res Soc 66, 1519–1532 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.119

Keywords

Search

Navigation