Abstract
The research-policy-practice nexus is a long-standing issue in higher education research (HER). Although closer linkages and greater relevance have been repeatedly suggested to improve the impact of HER on policy and practice, sophisticated theorization with contextual sensitivity is underdeveloped to renew the discussion in the non-western contexts. As the Chinese higher education system has become the largest in student number, its HER field is worthy of study, particularly regarding its impact on policy and practice. In comparison with the European model and the American model (Scott, 1999), the Chinese model of the research-policy-practice nexus is characterized by strong institutional basis, a strong practice orientation at the macro- and meso-levels, support from and legitimacy by the state, and program orientations for scholars and administrators. Those features have supported rich interactions through actors, activities and reifications in the Chinese higher education context to connect the research, policy and practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akkerman, S.F. and Bakker, A. (2011) ‘Boundary crossing and boundary objects’, Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169.
Altbach, P. (1997) ‘Research on Higher Education: Global Perspectives’, in J. Sadlak and P.G. Altbach (eds.) Higher Education Research at the Turn of the New Century: Structures, Issues, and Trends, Paris: UNESCO Publishing, pp. 3–23.
Amaral, A. and Magalhaes, A. (2013) ‘Higher Education Research between Policy and Practice’, in B. Kehm and C. Musselin (eds.) The Development of Higher Education Research in Europe: 25 Years of CHER, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 43–59.
Begg, P. (ed.) (2003) The Dialogue Between Higher Education Research and Practice, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bridges, D. and Watts, M. (2008) ‘Educational research and policy: epistemological considerations’, Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (S1): 41–62.
Bridges, D., Smeyers, P. and Smith, R. (2009) ‘Educational Research and the Practical Judgement of Policy-Makers’, in D. Bridges, P. Smeyers and R. Smith (eds.) Evidence-based Education Policy: What Evidence? What Basis? Whose Policy?, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–10.
Chen, H. (2010) ‘Higher education research in Peking university: discipline development and paradigm shift’, (in Chinese), Peking University Education Review 8 (4): 2–11.
Chen, S. and Hu, L. (2012) ‘Higher education research as a field in China’, Higher Education Research and Development 31 (5): 655–666.
Chen, S., Meng, L. and Zhang, H. (2014) ‘Education policy evidence in the big data era: the uses of evidence-based policy for modern education governance and scientific educational policy-making in China’, (in Chinese), Global Education 43 (2): 121–128.
Clegg, S. (2012) ‘Conceptualising higher education research and/or academic development as ‘fields’: a critical analysis’, Higher Education Research and Development 31 (5): 667–678.
Deem, R., Mok, K.H. and Lucas, L. (2008) ‘Transforming higher education in whose image?: exploring the concept of the ‘world-class’ university in Europe and Asia’, Higher Education Policy 21 (1): 83–97.
El-Khawas, E. (2000a) ‘Research, Policy and Practice: Assessing Their Actual and Potential Linkages’, in U. Teichler and J. Sadlak (eds.) Higher Education Research: Its Relationship to Policy and Practice, Oxford: Pergamon and IAU Press, pp. 37–46.
El-Khawas, E. (2000b) ‘Patterns of Communication and Miscommunication between Research and Policy’, in S. Schwarz and U. Teichler (eds.) The Institutional Basis of Higher Education Research: Experiences and Perspectives, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 45–56.
Gao, B. (2003) ‘Higher education research in China: progress, problems and prospect’, (in Chinese), Educational Research (7): 26–31.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
Gornitzka, A. (2013) ‘The interface between research and policy — a note with potential relevance for higher education’, European Journal of Higher Education 3 (3): 255–264.
Hemsley-Brown, J. and Sharp, C. (2003) ‘The use of research to improve professional practice: a systematic review of the literature’, Oxford Review of Education 29 (4): 449–471.
Huisman, J. (2008) ‘World-class university’, Higher Education Policy 21 (1): 1–4.
Hume, D. (1748/1995) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Cambridge: Pearson.
Jacob, M. (2005) ‘Boundary work in contemporary science policy: a review’, Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation 23 (2): 195–207.
Jung, J. and Horta, H. (2013) ‘Higher education in Asia: a publication and co-publication analysis’, Higher Education Quarterly 67 (4): 398–419.
Kaneko, M. (2000) ‘Higher Education Research, Policy and Practice: Context, Conflicts and the New Horizon’, in U. Teichler and J. Sadlak (eds.) Higher Education Research: Its Relationship to Policy and Practice, Oxford: Pergamon and IAU Press, pp. 47–48.
Kang, C., Wang, G. and Shi, M. (2007) ‘The analysis on the contents of higher education research in past decade: through the method of structural quantitative research’, (in Chinese), University Education Science (5): 31–41.
Kehm, B.M. and Musselin, C. (eds.) (2013) The Development of Higher Education in Europe: 25 Years of CHER, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Kogan, M. (1999) ‘The Impact of Research on Policy’, in F. Coffield (ed.) Speaking Truth to Power, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 11–18.
Kogan, M. and Henkel, M. (2000) ‘Future Directions for Higher Education Policy. Getting Inside: Policy Reception of Research’, in U. Teichler (ed.) The Institutional Basis of Higher Education Research, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 25–44.
Labaree, D.F. (2008) ‘The dysfunctional pursuit of relevance in education research’, Educational Researcher 37 (7): 421–423.
Levin, H.M. (1978) ‘Why isn’t educational research more useful?’ Prospects 8 (2): 157–166.
Li, J. (2005) History of Higher Education Research in China. (in Chinese) Guangzhou: Guangdong Higher Education Press.
Liu, Y. (2011) ‘Evidence-based education policy-making: based on the policy of the 4% of public education expenditure in GDP’, (in Chinese), Peking University Education Review 9 (2): 132–142.
Locke, W. (2009) ‘Reconnecting the research-policy-practice nexus in higher education: ‘evidence-based policy’ in practice in national and international contexts’, Higher Education Policy 22 (2): 119–140.
Mead, L.M. (2015) ‘Only connect: why government often ignores research’, Policy Sciences 48 (2): 257–272.
Min, W. and Wen, D. (2010) The Power of Scholarship: Educational Research and Policy Making. (in Chinese), Beijing: Peking University Press.
Ministry of Education, China (2014) Educational statistics of 2012, http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s7567/index.html, accessed 30 May 2014.
Mohrman, K., Ma, W. and Baker, D. (2008) ‘The research university in transition: the emergent global model’, Higher Education Policy 21 (1): 5–27.
Ness, E. (2010) ‘The Role of Information in the Policy Process: Implications for the Examination of Research Utilization in Higher Education Policy’, in J.C. Smart (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 25, New York: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 1–49.
Pan, M. and Li, J. (2009) ‘Higher education research in 60 years: catch-up and rise-up’, (in Chinese), Chinese Higher Education 19 (1): 15–19.
Salmi, J. (2009) The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities, Washington DC: The World Bank.
Schwarz, S. and Teichler, U. (eds.) (2000) The Institutional Basis of Higher Education Research: Experiences and Perspectives, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Scott, P. (1999) ‘The research-policy gap’, Journal of Education Policy 14 (3): 317–337.
Shin, J.C. and Kehm, B.M. (eds.) (2013) Institutionalization of World-Class University in Global Competition, Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.
Teichler, U. (2000a) ‘The Relationships between Higher Education Research and Higher Education Policy and Practice: The Researchers’ Perspective’, in U. Teichler and J. Sadlak (eds.) Higher Education Research: Its Relationship to Policy and Practice, Oxford: Pergamon and IAU Press, pp. 3–34.
Teichler, U. (2000b) ‘Higher Education Research and Its Institutional Basis’, in U. Teichler and J. Sadlak (eds.) Higher Education Research: Its Relationship to Policy and Practice, Oxford: Pergamon and IAU Press, pp. 13–24.
Teichler, U. (2013) ‘Academically ambitious and relevant higher education research: the legacy of the Consortium of Higher Education Researchers’, European Journal of Higher Education 3 (3): 242–254.
Teichler, U. and Sadlak, J. (eds.) (2000) Higher Education Research: Its Relationship to Policy and Practice, Oxford: Pergamon and IAU Press.
Teixeira, P. (2013) ‘Reflecting about Current Trends in Higher Education Research; A View from the Journals’, in B. Kehm and C. Musselin (eds.) The Development of Higher Education Research in Europe: 25 Years of CHER, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 103–121.
Tight, M. (2004) ‘Research into higher education: an a-theoretical community of practice’, Higher Education Research and Development 23 (4): 395–411.
Tight, M. (2008) ‘Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: a co-citation analysis’, Higher Education 55 (5): 593–605.
Trowler, P. (2003) Education Policy, 2nd edn., London: Routledge.
Walters, P.B. and Lareau, A. (2009) ‘Education Research that Matters: Influence, Scientific Rigor and Policy Making’, in P.B. Walters, A. Lareau and S. Ranis (eds.) Education Research on Trial: Policy Reform and the Call for Scientific Rigor, New York: Routledge, pp. 197–217.
Wang, X. (2010) Higher Education as a Field of Study in China, Lanham: Lexington Books.
Wang, Q. and Liu, N.C. (2014) ‘Higher education research institutes in Chinese universities’, Studies in Higher Education 39 (8): 1488–1498.
Waterton, C. (2005) ‘Scientists’ boundary work: scientists’ conceptions of the boundaries between their own research and policy’, Science and Public Policy 32 (6): 435–444.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2000) ‘Communities of practice and social learning systems’, Organization 7 (2): 225–246.
Williams, G. (2014) ‘Reflections on research into higher education after Robbins’, Higher Education Quarterly 68 (2): 210–224.
Williams, P. (2002) ‘The competent boundary spanner’, Public Administration 80 (1): 103–124.
Wong, A. and Edwards, G. (2009) ‘Connecting Communities of Practices’, in A.B.M. Tsui, G. Edwards and F. Lopez-Real (eds.) Learning in School-University Partnership, New York: Routledge, pp. 132–147.
Zgaga, P. (2013) ‘Higher education research and higher education policy in South-East Europe’, European Journal of Higher Education 3 (3): 280–294.
Zhou, N. and Cheng, F. (1997) ‘Research on Higher Education in China’, in J. Sadlak and P.G. Altbach (eds.) Higher Education Research at the Turn of the New Century: Structures, Issues, and Trends, Paris: UNESCO Publishing, pp. 209–230.
Zhou, G. and Xie, Q. (2013) ‘Frontier and situation of the higher education research in China: 2012 annual report’, (in Chinese), Chinese Higher Education (7): 23–36.
Acknowledgements
This is to acknowledge support of data collection from Chinese Higher Education offered by Dr. Hu Lifang, and invaluable suggestions from two anonymous reviewers, guest editors of the special issue, Dr. Jeroen Huisman, and Dr. Lin Xiaoying.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, S. Boundary Objects and Boundary Brokering to Make the Research-Policy-Practice Nexus Possible: The Case of the Chinese Higher Education Field. High Educ Policy 28, 441–457 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.13
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.13