Abstract
It was perhaps Friedrich Nietzsche who first had a glimpse of how technology remediates practice. In early 1882, the philosopher, suffering from encroaching blindness, bought a Malling-Hansen Writing Ball, an early typewriter that had its keyboard arranged in the form of a sphere, which made it look like a hedgehog. The fixed positions and the large size of the letters allowed him to write with more ease than by handwriting. As he experimented with the new ‘writing machine’, he came to realize that the tool affected his thinking. Using the machine led him to express his thoughts in short, telegraphic sentences. His writing style in the later period of his active life shifted from arguments to aphorisms, from thoughts to puns. Indeed, Nietzsche understood how his writing practice was being ‘remediated’ by the tool, and in a letter to Peter Gast in February 1882 expressed his insight in terse language:
‘Unser Schreibzeug arbeitet mit an unseren Gedanken’
(Our writing equipment is also working with our thoughts)
Delivered as a keynote paper at the Fourth Workshop on ‘Organizations, Artifacts, and Practices’, Rome, 26–27 June 2014. The chapter further elaborates and expands some material that has already appeared in First Monday, 15 (6–7), 2010.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aaltonen, V. A. & Lanzara, G. F. (2014). The Evolving Societas of Online Social Production Systems: Capabilities and Rights in the Governance of Wikipedia. 5th Latin American and European Meeting of Organization Studies (LAEMOS), 2–5 April 2014, Havana, Cuba.
Bamberger, J. & diSessa, A. (2003). Music As Embodied Mathematics: A Study of a Mutually Informing Affinity. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 8 (2), 123–160.
Berg, M. (2000). Lessons from a Dinosaur: Mediating IS Research Through an Analysis of the Medical Recording. In R. Baskerville, J. Stage & J. DeGross (eds), Organizational and Social Perspectives in Information Technology, 487–504. Boston: Kluwer.
Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext and the Remediation of Print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (1996). The Social Life of Documents. FirstMonday, 1 (1), 19. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/466/820
Brown, S. & Eisenhardt, K. (1997). The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Based Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 14.
Burnett, R. (2004). How Images Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chandler, D. (1996). Engagement with Media: Shaping and Being Shaped. ComputerMediated Communication Magazine, February. Available at: http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/short/determ.html
Collins, H. M. & Pinch, T. J. (1982). Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Cook, S. D. N. & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organization Science, 10 (4), 381–400.
Daston, L. (ed.) (2004). Things that Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science. New York: Zone Books.
Dewey, J. (2002/1922). Human Nature and Conduct. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Dorrance Kelly, S. (2005). Seeing things in Merleau-Ponty. In T. Conman & M. B. N. Hansen (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty, 74–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dourish, P. (1993). Culture and Control in Media Space. In G. De Michelis, C. Simone & K. Schmidt (eds), Hearing of the Third European Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work, 125–137. Milan, Italy, September 1993. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art. Cambridge, MA: Hackett.
Hayles, N. K. (2002). Writing Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Heath, C. & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Control Rooms. Computer Supported Collaborative Work, 1 (1), 694.
Heidegger, M. (1962/1927). Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.
Jorges, B. & Czarniawska, B. (1998). The Question of Technology, or How Organizations Inscribe the World. Organization Studies, 19 (3), 363–385.
Kallinikos, J. (2002). Reopening the Black Box of Technology: Artefacts and Human Agency. International Conference on Information Systems, 15–18 December 2002, Barcelona, Spain.
Kallinikos, J. (2003). Mediated Action and Representation: On the Vicissitudes of Human Signification. Homo Oeconomicus, 19 (4), 607–622.
Kallinikos, J. (2009). On the Computational Rendition of Reality: Artefacts and Human Agency. Organization, 16 (2), 183–202.
Kallinikos, J. (2011). Governing through Technology: Information Artefacts and Social Practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A. V. & Marton, A. (2013). The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artefacts. MIS Quarterly, 37 (2), 357–370.
Kittler, F. A. (1997). Literature, Media, Information Systems: Essays (edited by J. Johnston). Amsterdam: G & B Arts International.
Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, Film, Typewriter: Writing Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Knorr Cetina, K. & Brugger, U. (2002). Global Microstructures: The Global Societies of Financial Markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107 (4), 905–950.
Lanzara, G. F. (2009). Reshaping Practice Across Media: Material Mediation, Medium Specificity and Practical Knowledge in Judicial Work. Organization Studies, 30 (12), 1369–1390.
Lanzara, G. F. & Morner, M. (2005). Artifacts Rule! How Organizing Happens in Open Source Software Projects. In B. Czarniawska & T. Hernes (eds), Actor-Network Theory and Organizing, 67–90. Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
Lanzara, G. F. & Patriotta, G. (2001). Technology and the Courtroom: An Inquiry into Knowledge Making in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38 (7), 94–171.
Leonardi P. M., Nardi, B. A. & Kallinikos, J. (eds) (2012). Materiality and Organizing. Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.
Luhmann, N. (1998). Observations on Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: McGraw Hill.
Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Manovich, L. (2013). Software Takes Command. New York: Bloomsbury.
Maras, S. & Sutton, D. (2000). Medium Specificity Re-visited. Convergence, 6 (2), 98–113.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/1945). Phenomenology of Perception (translated by C. Smith). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
Miettinen, R. (2009). Artifact Mediation in Dewey and in Cultural-historical Activity Theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8 (4), 297–308.
Miettinen, R., Frederick, D. S. & Yanov, D. (2009). Re-turn to Practice. An Introductory Essay. Organization Studies, 30 (12), 1309–1327.
Moon, J. Y. & Sproull, L. (2002). Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux kernel. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work, 381–404. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neff, G. & Stark, D. (2002). Permanently Beta: Responsive Organizations in the Internet Era. In P. N. Howard & S. Jones (eds), Society Online: The Internet in Context, 173–188. London: Sage.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. (1994). Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (4), 54–74.
Plowman, L. (1994). The Primitive Mode of Representation and the Evolution of Interactive Multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3 (3), 75–93.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor.
Schelling T. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Schreyogg, G. & Sydow, J. (2010). Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 21 (6), 1251–1262.
Sternberg, R. J. & Horwath, J. A. (eds) (1999). Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice: Researcher and Practitioner Perspectives. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sturken, M. & Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vaast, E. & Walsham, G. (2005). Representations and Actions: The Transformation of Work Practices with IT Use. Information and Organization, 15, 659.
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Giovan Francesco Lanzara
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lanzara, G.F. (2015). How Technology Remediates Practice: Objects, Rules, and New Media. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N., Lanzara, G.F., Mukherjee, A. (eds) Materiality, Rules and Regulation. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552648_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552648_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55262-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55264-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)