Skip to main content

Gazing Inward in Jonathan Lethem’s Chronic City and Teju Cole’s Open City

  • Chapter
Fictions of the War on Terror
  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

In her 2012 article ‘The Storytellers of Empire’, Kamila Shamsie argues that ‘with pitifully few exceptions, the [American] 9/11 novel looks at 9/11 the day itself, in New York — think of the most acclaimed novels in that genre: Don DeLillo’s Falling Man, Claire Messud’s The Emperor’s Children or Jonathan Safran Foer’s Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close’.1 This is not to say, Shamsie continues, that ‘September 11, the day itself in New York, is not itself a worthy subject for fiction’.2 Rather, her point is that ‘just as the day itself is only one part of the genre of 9/11 nonfiction books, so it should be with fiction’.3 This desire for novelists to shift their fictional framing of September 11, in a way that places ‘the day itself’ into a complex geopolitical context, is one that is shared by other critics also. Michael Rothberg has argued that ‘[w]hat we need from 9/11 novels are cognitive maps that imagine how US citizenship looks and feels beyond the boundaries of the nation-state, both for Americans and for others’.4 Likewise, as I mentioned in the Introduction, Richard Gray calls upon American novelists to perform a literary ‘enactment of difference’.5 He draws attention to a minority of non-canonical post-9/11 texts that, in his view, ‘reconfigure language, the themes and tropes of American writing in terms that go way beyond bipolar, biracial models. In the process, they become a lexical equivalent of the immigrant encounter, transforming their literary environs just as they are transformed by them — and, in effect, force us to rethink 9/11.’6

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Michael Rothberg, ‘A Failure of the Imagination: Diagnosing the Post-9/11 Novel: A Response to Richard Gray’, American Literary History, 21.1 (2009), p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard Gray, After the Fall: American Literature since 9/11 (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), p. 30.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Judith Butler, Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? (London: Verso, 2009), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Judith Butler, Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence (London: Verso, 2006), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jonathan Lethem, Chronic City (London: Faber and Faber, 2010), p. 386.

    Google Scholar 

  6. James Peacock, Jonathan Lethem (Manchester University Press, 2012), p. 152.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Jonathan Lethem, ‘My Egyptian Cousin’, in The Ecstasy of Influence: Nonfictions, Etc. (London: Jonathan Cape, 2012), p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonathan Lethem, Motherless Brooklyn (New York: Vintage, 1999), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jonathan Lethem, ‘The Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism’, in Ecstasy of Influence, p. 98. It is worth noting here that Heidegger’s notion of ‘enframing’ is rather different from that of the ‘world picture’ that I referred to in the Introduction. While the latter potentially enables a broadening of perspective, ‘enframing’ is more in line with Butler’s restricting frame (although it pertains specifically to the effects of technology upon perception): ‘Enframing means the gathering together of that setting-upon which sets upon man, i.e., challenges him forth, to reveal the real, in the mode of ordering, as standingreserve. Enframing means that way of revealing which holds sway in the essence of modern technology and which is itself nothing technological.’ Martin Heidegger, ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, trans. William Lovitt, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, ed. William Lovitt (New York and London: Garland, 1977), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lethem might here be said to be writing in what Nicoline Timmer, with reference to David Foster Wallace, has described as a ‘post-postmodern’ mode of ‘critical fiction’: that is, a kind of contemporary fictional writing ‘that shows a heightened awareness of the twists and turns of critical theory of the last few decades, and very “knowingly” … [works] through some of the most arresting contradictions and paradoxes of postmodern thought’. Nicoline Timmer, Do You Feel It Too?: The Post-Postmodern Syndrome in American Fiction at the Turn of the Millennium (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2010), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See for example: Antonio Gramsci, Selections From the Prison Notebooks, ed. Geoffrey Nowell-Smith (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 2005);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (London: Vintage, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe and Paul Willis (eds), Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79 (London: Hutchinson, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kalí Tal, Worlds of Hurt: Reading the Literatures of Trauma (Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM III-R), qtd in Laura S. Brown, ‘Not Outside the Range: One Feminist Perspective on Psychic Trauma’, in Trauma: Explorations in Memory, ed. Cathy Caruth (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cathy Caruth, Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robert Hampson has made a similar argument about Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness in his introduction to the Penguin Classics edition of that novel: ‘As in those gestalt drawings that can be read as either a vase or two profiles, as foreground and background change places, here language that is offered as figurative suddenly asserts its literal meaning, and this kind of unsettling of language proves to be a characteristic feature of Marlow’s narration.’ Robert Hampson, ‘Introduction’, in Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness (London: Penguin Classics, 2000), p. xxx. It is worth noting that Conrad’s novella is another well-known text that employs a Buellian ‘observer-hero’ narrative, in this instance to illustrate a division at the heart of the European colonial self.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Although Lethem draws heavily on techniques that might be described as ‘postmodern’ or ‘deconstructive’, this emphasis on the authentication of reality simultaneously comes close to resembling what Charles Taylor (a critic of both schools of thought) has described as a contemporary imperative to ‘fight[] over the meaning of authenticity …. The struggle ought not to be over authenticity, for or against, but about it, defining its proper meaning.’ Charles Taylor, The Ethics of Authenticity (Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 2003), pp. 72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Derek Attridge, ‘Context, Idioculture, Invention’, New Literary History, 42.4 (2011), pp. 682–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lethem, Chronic City, p. 126. See also Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Jonathan Culler, qtd in Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism (New York: Cornell University Press, 2007), p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jonathan Lethem, ‘You Don’t Know Dick’, in The Disappointment Artist, and Other Essays (London: Faber and Faber, 2005), p. 77. See also Erik Davis, ‘Chronic Citizen: Jonathan Lethem on P.K. Dick, Why Novels are Weird Technology, and Constructed Realities’, h+ Magazine, 18 December 2009 http://hplusmagazine.com/2009/12/18/chronic-citizen-jonathan-lethem-pk-dick-why-novels-are-weird-technology-a/.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Michael Rothberg, Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization (Stanford University Press, 2009), pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stef Craps, Postcolonial Witnessing: Trauma Out of Bounds (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Teju Cole, Open City (London: Faber and Faber, 2009), pp. 170–1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jacques Derrida, ‘On Cosmopolitanism’, trans. Mark Dooley, in Jacques Derrida, On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, ed. Simon Critchley (London: Routledge, 2001), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richard Rorty, Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 106; 76–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pieter Vermeulen, ‘Flights of Memory: Teju Cole’s Open City and the Limits of Aesthetic Cosmopolitanism’, Journal of Modern Literature, 37.1 (2013), p. 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Slavoj Žižek, Welcome to the Desert of the Real (London and New York: Verso, 2002), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Walter Benjamin, The Origin of German Tragic Drama, trans. John Osborne (London: New Left Books, 1977), p. 34. The website Poetry Genius has published a page dedicated to the constellation of literary and other artistic and cultural references in Open City. The site contains an interactive excerpt from the novel (verified by Cole himself), and users are able to click on sections of it to reveal passages from an eclectic mix of literature, opera and hip-hop that Cole has consciously evoked in the text. ‘Teju Cole — Open City (Excerpt)’, Poetry Genius website http://poetry.rapgenius.com/Teju-cole-open-city-excerpt-lyrics.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Theodor Adorno, Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life, trans. E.F.N. Jephcott (London and New York: Verso, 2005), p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Theodor W. Adorno, Negative Dialectics, trans. E.B. Ashton (London: Routledge, 1990), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rothberg, Multidirectional Memory, p. 13. As Stef Craps notes in Postcolonial Witnessing, ‘screen memory’ has also been explored by other memory theorists in recent years; see esp.: Andreas Huyssen, Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory (Stanford University Press); Miriam Bratu Hansen, ‘Schindler’s List Is Not Shoah: The Second Commandment, Popular Modernism, and Public Memory’, Critical Inquiry, 22.2 (1996), pp. 292–312; Craps, Postcolonial Witnessing, p. 79. In this chapter, I use the term in the sense described by Rothberg, but it is worth noting that Freud’s original definition is a little more specific. In his 1899 treatise, ‘Screen Memories’, he defines the phenomenon as ‘[r]ecollection … whose value lies in the fact that it represents in the memory impressions and thoughts of a later date whose content is connected with its own by symbolic or similar links’ (my emphasis).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sigmund Freud, ‘Screen Memories’, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Volume III (1893–1899): Early Psycho-Analytic Publications, trans. James Strachey (London: Hogarth Press, 1995), p. 316.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Daniel O’Gorman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Gorman, D. (2015). Gazing Inward in Jonathan Lethem’s Chronic City and Teju Cole’s Open City . In: Fictions of the War on Terror. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506184_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics