Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Communication: A Turkish Industry Example

  • Chapter
Integrated Communications in the Postmodern Era

Abstract

Many companies are concerned with satisfying social responsibility expectations and communicating their policies of corporate social responsibility (hereafter CSR). In other words, CSR communication has become a vital issue in building and sustaining the legitimacy of a company in the eyes of stakeholders. According to the definition provided by Podnar (2008: 75):

CSR communication is a process of anticipating stakeholders’ expectations, articulation of CSR policy and managing of different organization communication tools designed to provide true and transparent information about a company’s or a brand’s integration of its business operations, social and environmental concerns, and interactions with stakeholders.

Companies utilize means, such as advertisements, product labels, media relations, CSR reports, and websites to achieve the above. While advertising and public relations are considered to be open communication, CSR reports and websites are considered to be subtle communication (Morsing and Schultz, 2006). Although the Web is thought to be a passive informational tool (Pomering, 2011), getting information through the Web involves active participation on the part of users. Active participation of users in the communication process is also considered to be a characteristic of the postmodern era, in which communication is taken to be a process whereby “meaning is produced through negotiation and contention between the author, the reader (the receiver) and the culture” (Firat and Dholakia, 2006: 146).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acar, Ö. (2010) “Turkish statistical institute results of labour cost survey 2004 and 2008”, Cement Employer Magazine, 4(24), 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C.A. and Frost, G.R. (2006) “The Internet and change in corporate stake-holder engagement and communication strategies on social and environmental performance”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 2(3), 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabaci, A. (2008) “Explaining transformation of Turkish civil society in the EU accession process”, Insight Turkey, 10(2), 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ararat, M. (2005) “Turkey: social responsibility in a state-dependent business system”, in Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., and Schmidpeter, R. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe: Discovering National Perspectives of Corporate Citizenship, Heidelberg: Springer-Berlin, 247–259.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ararat, M. (2008) “A development perspective for corporate social responsibility: Case of Turkey”, Corporate Governance, 8(3), 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ararat, M. and Göcenoğlu, C. (2006) “Drivers for sustainable corporate responsibility: case of Turkey”, retrieved from http://www.csrturkey.org/dl/CSRTurkeyMDF5.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzova, S.B. (2009) “Turkey: CSR in practice”, in Idowu, S.O. and Filho, W.L. (eds) Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 373–391.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Turkish Construction Material Producers (2013) Monthly Sector Report September 2013, retrieved from http://imsad.org/docs/09_2013_ayerap.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkhi, K. and Tench, R. (2009) “CSR and the media in Turkey: media CSR toolkit report”, retrieved from http://www.kssd.org/dl/mediaguide.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholtz, A.K. and Carroll, A.B. (2009) Business & Society, Canada: South-Western/Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.L. (2007) “Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capital Markets Board of Turkey (2004) Survey on Corporate Governance Practices, retrieved from http://www.spk.gov.tr/displayfile.aspx?action=displayfile&page id=68&fn=68.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1979) “A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance”, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1991) “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders”, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1999) “Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct”, Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhri. V. and Wang, J. (2007) “Communicating corporate social responsibility on the Internet: a case study of the top 100 information technology companies in India”, Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deren van Het Hof, S. (2009) Türkiye’de kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk üçgeni: şirketler, toplum ve toplum kuruluşlari, retrieved from http://www.yasamadair.org/Adminjkl/4.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B., and Sen, S. (2010) “Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ersöz, H.Y. (2007) Türkiye’de kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk anlayişinin gelişiminde meslek ve sivil toplum kuruluşlari, İstanbul: İstanbul Chamber of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firat, A.F., and Dholakia, N. (2006) “Theoretical and philosophical implications of postmodern debates: some challenges to modern marketing”, Marketing Theory, 6(2), 123–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B.L., and De Colle, S. (2010) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gökdemir, M., Kömürcü, M.I., and Evcimen, T.U. (2012) “An overview on hydroelectric energy and hydro power plants”, Turkey Engineering News, 471(1), 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzhausen, D.R. (2000) “Postmodern values in public relations”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İçduygu, A., Meydanoğlu, Z., and Sert, D.S. (2011) Türkiye’de sivil toplum: bir dönüm noktasi uluslararasi sivil toplum endeksi projesi Türkiye ülke raporu II, retrieved from http://www.tusev.org.tr/userfiles/image/step2011_web%20SON.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • İleri, Ü. (2005) “Industrial relations in the construction industry”, Turkish Heavy Industry and Service Sector Public Employers’ Association Magazine, 72–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • İş kazalarinda birincilik Türkiye’nin (2012) “Radikal”, retrieved from http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/is_kazalarinda_birincilik_turkiyenin-110192427/09/2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeurissen, R. (2007) “Responsibility towards and of employees”, in Jeurissen, R. (ed.) Ethics & Business, Assen: Royal Van Gorcum, 166–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, V., Yalçınkaya, Ö., and Hüseyni, İ. (2013) “Role of construction sector in economic growth: the case of Turkey (1987–2010)”, Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 27(4), 148–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini (KLD) Research & Analytics, Inc. (2003) KLD ratings data: inclusive social rating criteria, retrieved from http://datalib.library.ualberta.ca/data/KLDRatings/Ratings%20Criteria%20Description_All%20 Years.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köksal, O. (2011) “Paternalizm ile algilanan örgütsel adalet arasindaki iliskinin tespitine yönelik bir araştırma”, Cumhuriyet University Economic and Administrative Sciences Journal, 12(2), 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M.J., and Brown, M.E. (2006) “Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry”, Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M. and Schultz, M. (2006) “Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies”, Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müngen, U. (2011) “Major types of work accidents in our construction sector”, Turkey Engineering News, 469(5), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notification regarding Law No. 6356 (2013) T.C. Resmî Gazete, 30 July, retrieved from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2013/07/20130730–6.pdf.

  • Ortayli, I. (1998) “The Ottoman millet system and it’s [sic] social dimensions” in Rikard, L. (ed.) Boundaries of Europe, Uppsala: Ord & Form, 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, P. (2009) “Perspectives of lawyers in practice on CSR” in Idowu, S.O. and Filho, W.L. (eds) ProfessionalsPerspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 33–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paşa, S.F., Kabasakal, H. and Bodur, M. (2011) “Society, organisations, and leadership in Turkey”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4), 559–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podnar, K. (2008) “Guest editorial: communicating corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomering, A. (2011) “Communicating corporate social responsibility through corporate image advertising” in Ihlen, Bartlett, J. and May, S. (eds) Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 379–398.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Development (n.d.) “Economic and Social Indicators”, retrieved from http://www.kalkinma.gov.tr/Pages/EkonomikSosyalGostergeler.aspx.

  • Response of Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs (2012) 12 November, retrieved from http://www2.tbmm.gov.tr/d24/7/7–10289sgc.pdf.

  • Sachs, S. and Maurer, M. (2009) “Toward dynamic corporate stakeholder responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 535–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarısoy, I. and Sandıkçi, H. (2010) “Evaluation of shadow economy activities in construction sector from perspectives of tax revenues and social security system contributions”, Journal of Finance Research Center Conferences, 54: 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.S. and Carroll, A.B. (2003) “Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001) “Does doing good always lead to doing better? consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S.P. (1975) “Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytical framework”, California Management Review, 17(3), 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D.S. and Clarke, I. (1998) “Culture, consumption and choice: towards a conceptual relationship”, Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 22(3), 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W.H. (2011) Business Ethics: A Textbook with Cases. Boston: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sözen, S. and Shaw, I. (2003) “Turkey and the European Union: modernizing a traditional state?” Social Policy and Administration, 37(2), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tak, B. (2009) Işletmelerin sosyal sorumluluklan ve paydaş grupları ile ilişkilerinin yönetimi. İstanbul: Beta Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Employers’ Association of Construction Industries (2013) Construction Industry, Problems and Solutions, retrieved from http://www.intes.org.tr/content/eylul-raporu.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) (2010) Annual review, anniversary edition, retrieved from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_Events/8.1/UNGC_Annual_Review_2010.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2010) “Developing countries” in Visser, W., Matten, D., Pohl, M., and Tolhurst, N. (eds) The A-Z of Corporate Social Responsibility, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W.B. and Chandler, D. (2011) Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholders in a Global Environment, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willums, J.O. (2005) “Norway: voluntary partnerships as a social asset” in Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., and Schmidpeter, R. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe: Discovering National Perspectives of Corporate Citizenship, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 37–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group (2000) The World Business Environment Survey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Selin Türkel and Aysun Akan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Türkel, S., Akan, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Communication: A Turkish Industry Example. In: Kitchen, P.J., Uzunoğlu, E. (eds) Integrated Communications in the Postmodern Era. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388551_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics