Skip to main content

Turkey

Social Responsibility in a State-Dependent Business System

  • Chapter
Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, N. J., & Boyacigiller, N. 1995. Going beyond traditional HRM scholarship. In: R. N. Kanunga (Ed.), New approaches to employee management, Vol. 3. Employee management in developing countries: 1–13. Greenwich, CT: JAI press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdalla, I., & Al Homoud, M. 2001. Exploring the Implicit Leadership Theory in the Arabian Gulf States. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4): 506–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ararat, M., & Ugur, M. 2003. Corporate Governance in Turkey: An Overview and Some Policy Recommendations. Corporate Governance, International Journal of Business in Society, 3(1): 58–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascigil, S. 2004. TESEV research on CSR, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E. 1984. An empirical measure of corporate social orientation. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 6: 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugra A. 1994. State and business in modern Turkey: A comparative study. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caroll, A. B. 1979. A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 446–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilber, M. 1967. Management in the Turkish Private Sector Industry. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fikret-Pasa, S., Kabasakal, H., & Bodur, M. 2001. Society, Organisations, and Leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4): 559–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J. E. 1989. If Homo Oeconomicus Could Choose His Own Utility Function, Would He want One with a Conscience? Comment. The American Economic Review, 79: 588–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1983. The Cultural relativity of organisational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2): 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R., Wright, N. S., Aditya R. N. 1997. Cross-cultural research on organisational leadership. A critical analysis and a proposal theory. In: P. C. Early, & M. Erz (Eds.), New Perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology. San Francisco, CA: Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabasakal, H., & Bodur, M. 1998. Leadership, values and Institutions: The Case of Turkey. Research Paper. Bogazici University, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabasakal, H., & Dalmachian, A. 2001. Introduction to the Special Issues on Leadership and Culture in the Middle East. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4):479–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute. 2003. Türkiye, Verimlilik ve Büyüme Atılımının GerçekleÅŸtirilmesi. Istanbul: McKinsey and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozen, R. 1998. Mentoring, gender and ideological perspectives: A case study. Doctoral dissertation. Bogazici University, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • PriceWaterhouseCoopers. 2001. Opacity Index. http://www.opacityindex.com, accessed 05.08.2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. 1994. Cultural Dimensions of Values: Towards and understanding national differences. In: U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism, Theoretical and methodological issues: 85–119. Thousand Oaks, CS: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen S. 2001. Business Ethics as Corporate Governance. European Journal of Law and Economics, 11(2): 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. 2001. Corruption Perceptions Index Report 2001. Paris. http://www.transparency.org/cpi, accessed 05.08.2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. 2002. Corruption Perceptions Index Report 2002. Paris. http://www.transparency.org/cpi, accessed 05.08.2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugur, M. 1999. The European Union and Turkey: An Anchor/Credibility Dilemma. Aldereshot: Ashgate Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2001. World Investment Report 2001. New York & Geneva: UN Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. 1994. Dominant forms of economic organisation in market economies. Organization Studies, 15(2): 153–182.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ararat, M. (2005). Turkey. In: Habisch, A., Wegner, M., Schmidpeter, R., Jonker, J. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26960-6_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics