Skip to main content

Teaching the “Other”: Curriculum “Outcomes” and Digital Technology in the Out-of-School Lives of Young People

  • Chapter
Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education

Abstract

The research on sociocultural approaches to pedagogy is full of teachers who attempt to draw on “historically accumulated and culturally developed bodies of knowledge and skills” (Moll, Amanti, Neff, & Gonzalez, 1992, p. 133) to engage their students in learning in the classroom. In the field of educational technology, research examining young people’s lives largely focuses on school contexts, and tends to ignore the value of informal learning outside of the school gate. In this chapter, the “other” (Lévinas, 1979) concerns the formal curriculum outcomes performed in the out-of-school lives of young people’s practices with digital technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auld, G., & Johnson, N. F. (2014). Connecting literacy learning outside of school to the Australian Curriculum in the middle years. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 22(2), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auld, G., Snyder, I., & Henderson, M. (2012). Using mobile phones as a placed resource for literacy learning in remote Indigenous communities. Language and Education, 24(4), 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2014). The Australian Curriculum. Retrieved May 5, 2014, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearne, E., & Marsh, J. (2007). Uncomfortable spaces. In E. Bearne & J. Marsh (Eds.), Literacy and social inclusion: Closing the gap (pp. 133–140). Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boomer, G. (1992). Negotiating the curriculum. In G. Boomer, N. Lester, C. Onore, & J. Cook (Eds.), Negotiating the curriculum: Educating for the 21st century (pp. 4–14). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulfin, S., & Koutsogiannis, D. (2012). New literacies as multiply placed practices: Expanding perspectives on young people’s literacies across home and school. Language and Education, 26(4), 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D., & Scanlon, M. (2003). Education, entertainment and learning in the home. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, V. (2005). Txting: The end of civilization (again)? Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, V. (2006). Rethinking middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawley, A., & Hynes, D. (2010). Evolving mobile communication practices of Irish teenagers. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 62(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0 for schools: Learning and social participation. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVane, B., Durga, S., & Squire, K. (2010). “Economists who think like ecolo-gists”: Reframing systems thinking in games for learning. E–Learning and Digital Media, 7(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doecke, B., Kostogriz, A., & Illesca, B. (2010). Seeing “things” differently: Recognition, ethics, praxis. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 9(2), 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdall, C. (2009). Masters and critics: Children as producers of online digital texts. In V. Carrington & M. Robinson (Eds.), Digital literacies: Social learning and classroom practices (pp. 43–61). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited (rev. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnish National Board of Education. (2012). National core curriculum for basic education. Retrieved May 18, 2012, from http://www.oph.fi/english/sources_of_information/core_curricula_and_qualification_requirements/basic_education

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, U. M. (1992). The real world of technology. Concord, OT: Anansi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. (2010). Women and gaming: The Sims and 21st century learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A. (2008). Multiliteracies and diversity in education: New pedagogies for expanding landscapes. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honan, E. (2008). Barriers to teachers using digital texts in literacy classrooms. Literacy, 42(1), 36–43. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9345.2008.00480.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honan, E. (2012). A whole new literacy: Teachers’ understanding of students’ digital learning at home. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. F. (2009a). The Teenage Expertise Network: The online availability of expertise. International Journal of Learning, 16(5), 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. F. (2009b). Teenage technological experts’ views of schooling. Australian Educational Researcher, 36(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, D. (2003). Dialogics and dialectics: Bakhtin, young Hegelians, and dramatic theory. In V. Z. Nollan (Ed.), Bakhtin: Ethics and mechanics (pp. 3–46). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning (2nd ed.). New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (1979). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. (2005). Afterword. In J. Marsh (Ed.), Popular culture, new media and digital literacy in early childhood (pp. 28–50). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, H., Aitkinson, S., & Beavis, C. (2006). New media pathways: Navigating the links between home, school, and the workplace. In L. W. H. Tan & R. Subramanyam (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy in technology at the K-12 level (pp. 118–136). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prinsloo, M. (2005). The new literacies as placed resources. Perspectives in Education, 23(4), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southerton, D. (2013). Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption: From individual behaviours to the reproduction of everyday practices. Time & Society, 22(3), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. V. (1993). Cross-cultural perspectives on literacy. In J. Maybin (Ed.), Language and literacy in social practice (pp. 139–150). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. (2002). Schooling the rustbelt kids: Making the difference in changing times. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Scott Bulfin Nicola F. Johnson Chris Bigum

Copyright information

© 2015 Scott Bulfin, Nicola F. Johnson, and Chris Bigum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Auld, G., Johnson, N.F. (2015). Teaching the “Other”: Curriculum “Outcomes” and Digital Technology in the Out-of-School Lives of Young People. In: Bulfin, S., Johnson, N.F., Bigum, C. (eds) Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385451_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics