Skip to main content

Nash Equilibrium, Refinements of

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

This article describes ways that the definition of an equilibrium among players’ strategies in a game can be sharpened by invoking additional criteria derived from decision theory. Refinements of John Nash’s 1950 definition aim primarily to distinguish equilibria in which implicit commitments are credible due to incentives. One group of refinements requires sequential rationality as the game progresses. Another ensures credibility by considering perturbed games in which every contingency occurs with positive probability, which has the further advantage of excluding weakly dominated strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Banks, J., and J. Sobel. 1987. Equilibrium selection in signaling games. Econometrica 55: 647–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., A. Brandenburger, and E. Dekel. 1991a. Lexicographic probabilities and choice under uncertainty. Econometrica 59: 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., A. Brandenburger, and E. Dekel. 1991b. Lexicographic probabilities and equilibrium refinements. Econometrica 59: 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, I., and D. Kreps. 1987. Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 179–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., D. Kreps, and D. Levine. 1988. On the robustness of equilibrium refinements. Journal of Economic Theory 44: 351–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. 1991. Perfect Bayesian equilibrium and sequential equilibrium. Journal of Economic Theory 53: 236–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, S., and R. Wilson. 2005. Essential equilibria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 15706–15711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, S., and R. Wilson. 2009a. On forward induction. Econometrica 77: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, S. and Wilson, R. 2009b. Axiomatic theory of equilibrium selection for generic two-player games, Stanford Business School Research Paper 2021. https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2021.pdf.

  • Harsanyi, J. 1967–1968. Games with incomplete information played by ‘Bayesian’ players, I–III. Management Science 14: 159–82, 320–34, 486–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J., and R. Selten. 1988. A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillas, J. 1998. How much of ‘forward induction’ is implied by ‘backward induction’ and ‘ordinality’? Mimeo: Department of Economics, University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillas, J., and E. Kohlberg. 2002. The foundations of strategic equilibrium. In Handbook of game theory, ed. R. Aumann and S. Hart, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, E. 1990. Refinement of Nash equilibrium: the main ideas. In Game theory and applications, ed. T. Ichiishi, A. Neyman, and Y. Tauman. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, E., and J.-F. Mertens. 1986. On the strategic stability of equilibria. Econometrica 54: 1003–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. 1990. Game theory and economic modeling. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., and R. Wilson. 1982. Sequential equilibria. Econometrica 50: 863–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, J.-F. 1989. Stable equilibria – a reformulation, Part I: definition and basic properties. Mathematics of Operations Research 14: 575–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, J.-F. 1992. The small worlds axiom for stable equilibria. Games and Economic Behavior 4: 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, J.-F., and S. Zamir. 1985. Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory 14: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. 1978. Refinement of the Nash equilibrium concept. International Journal of Game Theory 7: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. 1950. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 36: 48–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. 1951. Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54: 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. 1965. Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfragetragheit. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 121(301–24): 667–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. 1975. Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. International Journal of Game Theory 4: 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, E. 1984. A relation between perfect equilibria in extensive form games and proper equilibria in normal form games. International Journal of Game Theory 13: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, E. 1989. Stable equilibria and forward induction. Journal of Economic Theory 48: 476–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, E. 1991. Stability and perfection of Nash equilibria. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Govindan, S., Wilson, R.B. (2018). Nash Equilibrium, Refinements of. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2515

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics