Abstract
Digital music is heterogeneous: what is brought under or left outside of the umbrella of digital music differs. Nowak and Whelan demonstrate this with reference to three examples: the 2007 release of In Rainbows by Radiohead as a ‘pay-what-you-want’ download, the 2010 leak of Autechre’s Oversteps, and the fan videos set to the Phoenix song ‘Lisztomania’, discussed by law professor Lawrence Lessig. They use the concept of the ‘boundary object’, as developed in science and technology studies and in anthropology, to describe how digital music works in these conversations. Pointing out that these stories and others like them foreground particular perspectives and moral orientations, they highlight how digital music serves as a vehicle for the expression of political imaginings of value and cultural and social exchange.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Adorno, T. (2002). Essays on music. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Attali, J. (1985). Noise: The political economy of music. London: University of Minnesota Press.
Baym, N. K. (2007). The new shape of online community: The example of Swedish independent music fandom. First Monday, 12, 8. doi:10.5210/fm.v12i8.1978. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1978/1853.
Baym, N. K. (2010). Rethinking the music industry. Popular Communication, 8(3), 177–180.
Beer, D. (2008). Making friends with Jarvis Cocker: Music culture in the context of Web 2.0. Cultural Sociology, 2(2), 222–241.
Bowker, G., & Star, S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Burnett, R., & Baym, N. (2008). The Swedish model: Control vs. collaboration in the Web 2.0 Music Industry, at International Communication Association Conference (ICA), Montreal, Canada.
Coates, N. (1998). Can’t we just talk about music?: Rock and gender on the Internet. In T. Swiss, J. Sloop, & A. Herman (Eds.), Mapping the beat: Popular music and contemporary theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Coté, M., & Pybus, J. (2007). Learning to immaterial labour 2.0: MySpace and social networks. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 7(1), 88–106.
DeVille, C. (2014, February 28). Phoenix side with Lawrence Lessig on ‘Lisztomania’ fair use Lawsuit. Stereogum. Retrieved October 30, 2015, from http://www.stereogum.com/1667378/phoenix-side-with-lawrence-lessig-on-lisztomania-fair-use-lawsuit/news/
Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2014). Lawrence Lessig settles fair use Lawsuit over phoenix music snippets. Retrieved October 31, 2015, from https://www.eff.org/press/releases/lawrence-lessig-settles-fair-use-lawsuit-over-phoenix-music-snippets
Fat Roland. (2010, February 24). Autechre’s new album oversteps gets a shock release. Retrieved September 23, 2015, from http://fatroland.blogspot.co.uk/2010/02/autechres-new-album-oversteps-gets.html
Fuchs, C. (2015). Dallas Smythe and digital labor. In R. Maxwell (Ed.), Routledge companion to labor and media. New York: Routledge.
Gorton, K., & Garde-Hansen, J. (2013). From old media whore to new media troll: The online negotiation of Madonna’s ageing body. Feminist Media Studies, 13(2), 288–302.
Kibby, M. D. (2000). Home on the page: A virtual place of music community. Popular Music, 19(1), 91–100.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York: Routledge.
Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin.
Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
McSherry, C. (2001). Who owns academic work?: Battling for control of intellectual property. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morrow, G. (2009). Radiohead’s managerial creativity. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 15(2), 161–176.
O’Reilly, D., & Doherty, K. (2006). Music b(r)ands online and constructing community: The case of New Model Army. In M. Ayers (Ed.), Cybersounds: Essays on virtual music culture (pp. 137–160). New York: Peter Lang.
Philip, K. (2014). Keep Copyin’ in the free world? Genealogies of the postcolonial pirate figure. In L. Eckstein & A. Schwarz (Eds.), Postcolonial piracy. Media distribution and cultural production in the global south. London: Bloomsbury.
Potts, L. (2012). Amanda Palmer and the #LOFNOTC: How online fan participation is rewriting music labels. Participations, 9(2), 360–382.
Prior, N. (2010). The rise of the New Amateurs: Popular music, digital technology and the fate of cultural production. In J. Hall, L. Grindstaff, & M. Lo (Eds.), Handbook of cultural sociology (pp. 398–407). London: Routledge.
Spracklen, K. (2014). There is (almost) no alternative: The slow ‘heat death’ of music subcultures and the instrumentalization of contemporary leisure. Annals of Leisure Research, 17(3), 252–266.
Star, S. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology and Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.
Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
Stiegler, B. (2015). States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the 21st century. Cambridge: Polity.
Strathern, M. (2004). Commons and borderlands: Working papers on interdisciplinarity, accountability and the flow of knowledge. Wantage: Sean Kingston Publishing.
Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Morrow.
Weber, M. (1958 [1921]). The rational and social foundations of music. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nowak, R., Whelan, A. (2016). The Digital Music Boundary Object. In: Nowak, R., Whelan, A. (eds) Networked Music Cultures. Pop Music, Culture and Identity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58290-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58290-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58289-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58290-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)