Abstract
The topic of digital humanities provokes widely varying views in the German-speaking world. In Germany digitalization efforts are often limited to a regional scale. This paper presents several examples of digitalization in the humanities: the use of audio sources, weblogs, big data, and simulations. The paper also examines the dissemination of practices of digitalization in the German-speaking world. Some experts note structural problems for digital innovation in Germany. Others make a plea for the realization of achievable tasks. The third part of the paper focuses on the general discussion of digitalization in Germany. Several authors see Germany in a “digital hibernation.” Prominent intellectuals such as Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Frank Schirrmacher, and Harald Welzer have on the other hand become harsh critics of digitalization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See also Kurz (2015), p. XI
- 2.
Although not developed in the German-speaking world, a nice example of digitalized teaching material in the field of Chinese studies – the author’s own background – is the philosophical book of Zhuangzi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM6kdJ6xq2A
- 3.
See, for example, Graham (2017).
References
Blatter, M., Noti, D., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Generationen Z und Y zur Mediennutzung in der Schule. In M. Blatter & F. Hartwagner (Eds.), Digitale Lehr- und Lernbegleiter (pp. 28–47). Bern: hep.
Cramer, F. (2014). Enzensberger’s rules for the digital world: Defend yourselves! [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://networkcultures.org/blog/2014/03/03/enzensberger/
Crane, G. (2015). The big humanities, national identity and the digital humanities in Germany. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/obcmpzh
Draeger, J., & Müller-Eisele, R. (2016, February 25). Transforming education in the digital age. The European Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.theeuropean-magazine.com/joerg-draeger%2D%2D2/10758-revolution-at-schools-and-universities
Enzensberger, Hans-Magnus. (2014, February 28). Wehrt Euch! Enzensbergers Regeln für die digitale Welt. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/enzensbergers-regeln-fuer-die-digitale-welt-wehrt-euch-12826195.html
Graham, C. (2017). ‘Modern Day Presidential’: Donald Trump defends use of social media in Twitter storm. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/01/modern-day-presidential-donald-trump-defends-use-social-media/
Haber, P. (2011). Digital past. Geschichtswissenschaft im digitalen Zeitalter. München: Oldenbourg.
Handke, J. (2014). Patient Hochschullehre. Vorschläge für eine zeitgemäße Lehre im 21. Jahrhundert. Marburg: Tectum.
Handke, J. (2015). Handbuch Hochschullehre digital. Leitfaden für eine moderne und mediengerechte Lehre. Marburg: Tectum.
Heynders, O. (2015). Writers as public intellectuals. Literature, celebrity, democracy. London: Macmillan.
Hirsch, B. D. (2012). Digital humanities and the place of pedagogy. In B. D. Hirsch (Ed.), Digital humanities pedagogy. Practices, principles and politics (pp. 3–30). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
Jungherr, A. (2015). Analyzing political communication with digital trace data: The role of Twitter messages in social science research. Heidelberg: Springer.
Kergel, D., & Heidkamp, B. (2015). Forschendes Lernen mit digitalen Medien. Ein Lehrbuch. Münster: Waxmann.
Klumpp, D. (2014). Strukturprobleme für Innovation im digitalen Neuland. In D. Klumpp et al. (Eds.), Überwiegend Neuland. Positionsbestimmungen der Wissenschaft zur Gestaltung der Informationsgesellschaft (pp. 181–202). Berlin: Edition Sigma.
König, M. (2015). Herausforderung für unsere Wissenschaftskultur: Weblogs in den Geisteswissenschaften. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 57–74). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Köstlbauer, J. (2015). Spiel und Geschichte im Zeichen der Digitalität. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 95–124). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Kurz, S. (2015). Digital humanities. Grundlagen und Technologien für die Praxis. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Lembke, G. (2017). Breaking through behavioral routines. Retrieved from https://cosplaymade.wordpress.com/2017/05/30/breaking-through-behavioral-routines/
Lüber, K. (2016). Study on digital literacy. German pupils mediocre. Retrieved from https://www.goethe.de/en/kul/med/20693523.html
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. A revolution that will transform how we live. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Morozov, E. (2014, July 14). The rise of data and the death of politics. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/20/rise-of-data-death-of-politics-evgeny-morozov-algorithmic-regulation
Natascha Zowislo-Grünewalt et al. (2015). Web 2.0 als‚ religion? In: Grimm, Petra et al. (Eds.). Anonymität und Transparenz in der digitalen Gesellschaft (pp. 209–230). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Peters, O. (2013a). Introduction. In O. Peters (Ed.), Against the tide. Critics of digitalisation (pp. 7–14). Oldenburg: BIS.
Peters, O. (2013b). The admonisher: Susanne Gascke. In O. Peters (Ed.), Against the tide. Critics of digitalisation (pp. 123–134). Oldenburg: BIS.
Peters, O. (2013c). The debate instigator: Frank Schirrmacher. In O. Peters (Ed.), Against the tide. Critics of digitalisation (pp. 147–159). Oldenburg: BIS.
Peters, O. (2013d). The dramatist: Botho Strauß. In O. Peters (Ed.), Against the tide. Critics of digitalisation (pp. 161–172). Oldenburg: BIS.
Reimann, D. (2008). Developing a learning environment for drama with hypermedia. In R. Mason & T. Eça (Eds.), International dialogues about visual culture, education and art (pp. 131–139). Bristol: Intellect.
Rötzer, F. (1997). Virtueller Raum oder Weltraum? Raumutopien des digitalen Zeitalters. In S. Münker & A. Roesler (Eds.), Mythos internet (pp. 368–390). Frankfurt A.M.: Suhrkamp.
Schaller, M. (2015). Arbeiten mit digital(isiert)en Quellen. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 15–30). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Schmale, W. (2015). Einleitung. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 9–14). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Simanowski, R. (2001). Autorschaften in digitalen Medien. Text+Kritik, 152, 3–21.
Sprenger, F., & Engemann, C. (2015). Internet der Dinge. Über smarte Objekte, intelligente Umgebungen und die technische Durchdringung der Welt. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Strauss, W., Denzinger, J., Wolf, M., & Li, Y. (2004). Knowledge spaces: Cultural education in the media age. Retrieved from http://netzspannung.org/about/tools/intro
Thaller, M. (2012). Controversies around the digital humanities: An agenda. Historical Social Research, 141, 7–23.
The Way of Lao Tzu. (1963). (W.-T. Chan, Trans.). London: Macmillan.
Walach, T. (2015). Stimmen hören. Audioquellen als digitale Objekte. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 31–44). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Welzer, H. (2016). Die smarte Diktatur. Der Angriff auf unsere Freiheit. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.
Wenkel, R. (2017, June 9). Germany in the digital slow lane. Deutsche Welle. Retrieved from http://www.dw.com/en/germany-in-the-digital-slow-lane/a-39187166
Wirth, U. (1997). Literatur im Internet. Oder: Wen kümmert’s, wer liest? In S. Münker et al. (Eds.), Mythos internet (pp. 319–337). Frankfurt A.M.: Edition Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gänßbauer, M. (2019). Digital Humanities in the German-Speaking World. In: Tso, A.Wb. (eds) Digital Humanities and New Ways of Teaching. Digital Culture and Humanities, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1277-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1277-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1276-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1277-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)