Skip to main content

Digital Humanities in the German-Speaking World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Humanities and New Ways of Teaching

Part of the book series: Digital Culture and Humanities ((DICUHU,volume 1))

Abstract

The topic of digital humanities provokes widely varying views in the German-speaking world. In Germany digitalization efforts are often limited to a regional scale. This paper presents several examples of digitalization in the humanities: the use of audio sources, weblogs, big data, and simulations. The paper also examines the dissemination of practices of digitalization in the German-speaking world. Some experts note structural problems for digital innovation in Germany. Others make a plea for the realization of achievable tasks. The third part of the paper focuses on the general discussion of digitalization in Germany. Several authors see Germany in a “digital hibernation.” Prominent intellectuals such as Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Frank Schirrmacher, and Harald Welzer have on the other hand become harsh critics of digitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also Kurz (2015), p. XI

  2. 2.

    Although not developed in the German-speaking world, a nice example of digitalized teaching material in the field of Chinese studies – the author’s own background – is the philosophical book of Zhuangzi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM6kdJ6xq2A

  3. 3.

    See, for example, Graham (2017).

References

  • Blatter, M., Noti, D., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Generationen Z und Y zur Mediennutzung in der Schule. In M. Blatter & F. Hartwagner (Eds.), Digitale Lehr- und Lernbegleiter (pp. 28–47). Bern: hep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, F. (2014). Enzensberger’s rules for the digital world: Defend yourselves! [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://networkcultures.org/blog/2014/03/03/enzensberger/

  • Crane, G. (2015). The big humanities, national identity and the digital humanities in Germany. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/obcmpzh

  • Draeger, J., & Müller-Eisele, R. (2016, February 25). Transforming education in the digital age. The European Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.theeuropean-magazine.com/joerg-draeger%2D%2D2/10758-revolution-at-schools-and-universities

  • Enzensberger, Hans-Magnus. (2014, February 28). Wehrt Euch! Enzensbergers Regeln für die digitale Welt. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/enzensbergers-regeln-fuer-die-digitale-welt-wehrt-euch-12826195.html

  • Graham, C. (2017). ‘Modern Day Presidential’: Donald Trump defends use of social media in Twitter storm. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/01/modern-day-presidential-donald-trump-defends-use-social-media/

  • Haber, P. (2011). Digital past. Geschichtswissenschaft im digitalen Zeitalter. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handke, J. (2014). Patient Hochschullehre. Vorschläge für eine zeitgemäße Lehre im 21. Jahrhundert. Marburg: Tectum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handke, J. (2015). Handbuch Hochschullehre digital. Leitfaden für eine moderne und mediengerechte Lehre. Marburg: Tectum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynders, O. (2015). Writers as public intellectuals. Literature, celebrity, democracy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, B. D. (2012). Digital humanities and the place of pedagogy. In B. D. Hirsch (Ed.), Digital humanities pedagogy. Practices, principles and politics (pp. 3–30). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, A. (2015). Analyzing political communication with digital trace data: The role of Twitter messages in social science research. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kergel, D., & Heidkamp, B. (2015). Forschendes Lernen mit digitalen Medien. Ein Lehrbuch. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp, D. (2014). Strukturprobleme für Innovation im digitalen Neuland. In D. Klumpp et al. (Eds.), Überwiegend Neuland. Positionsbestimmungen der Wissenschaft zur Gestaltung der Informationsgesellschaft (pp. 181–202). Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • König, M. (2015). Herausforderung für unsere Wissenschaftskultur: Weblogs in den Geisteswissenschaften. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 57–74). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köstlbauer, J. (2015). Spiel und Geschichte im Zeichen der Digitalität. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 95–124). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, S. (2015). Digital humanities. Grundlagen und Technologien für die Praxis. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lembke, G. (2017). Breaking through behavioral routines. Retrieved from https://cosplaymade.wordpress.com/2017/05/30/breaking-through-behavioral-routines/

  • Lüber, K. (2016). Study on digital literacy. German pupils mediocre. Retrieved from https://www.goethe.de/en/kul/med/20693523.html

  • Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. A revolution that will transform how we live. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2014, July 14). The rise of data and the death of politics. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/20/rise-of-data-death-of-politics-evgeny-morozov-algorithmic-regulation

  • Natascha Zowislo-Grünewalt et al. (2015). Web 2.0 als‚ religion? In: Grimm, Petra et al. (Eds.). Anonymität und Transparenz in der digitalen Gesellschaft (pp. 209–230). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, O. (2013a). Introduction. In O. Peters (Ed.), Against the tide. Critics of digitalisation (pp. 7–14). Oldenburg: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, O. (2013b). The admonisher: Susanne Gascke. In O. Peters (Ed.), Against the tide. Critics of digitalisation (pp. 123–134). Oldenburg: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, O. (2013c). The debate instigator: Frank Schirrmacher. In O. Peters (Ed.), Against the tide. Critics of digitalisation (pp. 147–159). Oldenburg: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, O. (2013d). The dramatist: Botho Strauß. In O. Peters (Ed.), Against the tide. Critics of digitalisation (pp. 161–172). Oldenburg: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, D. (2008). Developing a learning environment for drama with hypermedia. In R. Mason & T. Eça (Eds.), International dialogues about visual culture, education and art (pp. 131–139). Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rötzer, F. (1997). Virtueller Raum oder Weltraum? Raumutopien des digitalen Zeitalters. In S. Münker & A. Roesler (Eds.), Mythos internet (pp. 368–390). Frankfurt A.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, M. (2015). Arbeiten mit digital(isiert)en Quellen. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 15–30). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmale, W. (2015). Einleitung. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 9–14). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simanowski, R. (2001). Autorschaften in digitalen Medien. Text+Kritik, 152, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenger, F., & Engemann, C. (2015). Internet der Dinge. Über smarte Objekte, intelligente Umgebungen und die technische Durchdringung der Welt. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, W., Denzinger, J., Wolf, M., & Li, Y. (2004). Knowledge spaces: Cultural education in the media age. Retrieved from http://netzspannung.org/about/tools/intro

  • Thaller, M. (2012). Controversies around the digital humanities: An agenda. Historical Social Research, 141, 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Way of Lao Tzu. (1963). (W.-T. Chan, Trans.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walach, T. (2015). Stimmen hören. Audioquellen als digitale Objekte. In W. Schmale (Ed.), Digital humanities (pp. 31–44). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welzer, H. (2016). Die smarte Diktatur. Der Angriff auf unsere Freiheit. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenkel, R. (2017, June 9). Germany in the digital slow lane. Deutsche Welle. Retrieved from http://www.dw.com/en/germany-in-the-digital-slow-lane/a-39187166

  • Wirth, U. (1997). Literatur im Internet. Oder: Wen kümmert’s, wer liest? In S. Münker et al. (Eds.), Mythos internet (pp. 319–337). Frankfurt A.M.: Edition Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Gänßbauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gänßbauer, M. (2019). Digital Humanities in the German-Speaking World. In: Tso, A.Wb. (eds) Digital Humanities and New Ways of Teaching. Digital Culture and Humanities, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1277-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1277-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1276-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1277-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics