Abstract
This chapter presents commonly held views on organizational leadership and distinctive organizational leader development practices in South Korea. The country has been actively adopting popular leadership theories originated from Western countries, yet two local views, paternalistic leadership and flexible leadership, prevail in the society and most organizations. Paternalistic leadership combines strong discipline and authority with fatherly benevolence, while flexible leadership emphasizes harmony through dynamic and dialectal interplays between conflicting forces. Two global corporate cases exemplify successful organizational changes by adjusting Western leadership principles to fit the paternalistic and communal culture of Korean organizations. These cases also highlight that leadership is a normative concept that is culturally shaped in local contexts, challenging a direct transfer between different national cultures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ardichvili, A., & Manderscheid, S. V. (2008). Emerging practices in leadership development: An introduction. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(5), 619–630.
Ashkanasy, N. M. (2002). Leadership in the Asian century: Lessons from GLOBE. International Journal of Organizational Behavior, 5(3), 150–163.
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 9–32.
Blunt, P., & Jones, M. L. (1997). Exploring the limits of Western leadership theory in East Asia and Africa. Personnel Review, 26(1/2), 6–23.
Chai, D., Jeong, S., Kim, J., & Kim, S. (2015). Perceived managerial effectiveness in a Korean context: A qualitative study on indigenous management. Paper presented at the 2015 AHRD International Research Conference in the Americas, St. Louis, MO.
Chang, S. (2012). Study on human resource management in Korea’s chaebol enterprise: A case study of Samsung Electronics. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 237, 1536–1561.
Chemers, M. (2000). Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 27–43.
Cheng, B. S. (1995). Paternalistic authority and leadership: A case study of a Taiwanese CEO. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academic Sinica, 79, 119–173 (in Chinese).
Cheng, B. S. (1997). Paternalistic leadership and leader effectiveness: A preliminary investigation. Report prepared for Taiwan’s National Science Council. Taiwan: National Taiwan University (in Chinese).
Choi, J., & Patterson, D. (2007). Conglomerate regulation and aggregate concentration in Korea: An empirical analysis. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 122, 250–271.
Choi, M., Yoon, H. J., & Jeung, C.-W. (2012). Leadership development in Korea: A Delphi study. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, 23–42.
Chuang, S. (2012). Confucianization through globalization: Evidence from the US. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 3(2), 118–135.
Day, D. V. (2001). Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581–613.
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62.
Dorfman, P. W., Howell, J. P., Hibino, S., Lee, J. K., Tate, U., & Bautista, A. (1997). Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(3), 233–274.
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 85–127). London: Macmillan.
Festing, M., & Maletzky, M. (2011). Cross-cultural leadership adjustment: A multilevel framework based on the theory of structuration. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 186–200.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). The relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of LMX theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level, multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.
Gupta, V., Hanges, P. J., & Dorfman, P. W. (2002). Cultural clustering: Methodologies and findings. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 11–15.
Han, S. H., Seo, G., Li, J., & Yoon, S. W. (2016). The mediating effect of organizational commitment and employee empowerment: How transformational leadership impacts employee knowledge sharing intention. Human Resource Development International, 19(2), 98–115.
Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2007). Management of organizational behavior: Leading human resources (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jacques, P. H., Garger, J., Lee, K., & Ko, J. (2015). Authentic leadership on the frontline and its effects on Korean restaurant employees. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 18(4), 389–403.
Joo, B. G., & Lim, T. J. (2013). Transformational leadership and career satisfaction: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(3), 316–326.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36–51.
Kim, U. M. (1994). Significance of paternalism and communalism in the occupational welfare system of Korean firms: A national survey. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 251–266). London: Sage.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kotter, J. P. (1998). A sense of urgency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Lee, C. Y. (2012). Korean culture and its influence on business practice in South Korea. Journal of International Management Studies, 7(2), 184–191.
Lewin, K., Lippit, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–301.
Li, P. P. (2012). Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of yin-yang balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 849–872.
Liden, R. C., & Antonakis, J. (2009). Considering context in psychological leadership research. Human Relations, 62, 1587–1605.
Lievens, F., & Thornton III, G. C. (2005). Assessment centers: Recent developments in practice and research. In A. Evers, O. O. Smit-Voskuijl, & N. Anderson (Eds.), The blackwell handbook of personnel selection (pp. 243–264). Boston, MA: Blackwell.
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Merkin, R. S. (2009). Cross-cultural communication patterns—Korean and American communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 20. Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr20/merkin.htm
Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2001). Shared leadership: Toward a multilevel theory of leadership. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 7, 115–139.
Pratt, K. (2006). Everlasting flower: A history of Korea. London: Reaktion.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sashkin, M. (2014). Management and leadership in HRD. In N. E. Chalofsky, T. S. Rocco, & M. L. Morris (Eds.), Handbook of human resource development (pp. 62–79). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 463–478.
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. The Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222–240.
Yang, I., & Kelly, A. (2009). Assumptions in Korean organizations and their implications in a cross-cultural setting. Advances in Global Leadership, 5, 297–320.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yoon, S.W., Shin, J., Kim, S., Chai, D.S. (2017). Effective Leadership and Leadership Development in South Korea: Lessons Learned from Two Large Conglomerates. In: Ardichvili, A., Dirani, K. (eds) Leadership Development in Emerging Market Economies. Palgrave Studies of Internationalization in Emerging Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58003-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58003-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58002-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58003-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)