Skip to main content

Reflexive Academic–Practitioner Collaboration with the Police

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reflexivity and Criminal Justice

Abstract

Reflexivity in the understanding and practice of research is not just something to be cultivated amongst researchers. Particularly as models of collaborative research develop—models which tend to already work with a reflexive understanding of research—there is a growing need to think about the reflexivity of the researched. This chapter characterises research as ultimately being about learning across the (recognised) boundaries of social worlds (the academy or, in this case, the police being distinctive social worlds). It will argue that reflexive practice on the part of social researchers, in that it challenges some of the myths about scientific social research, might itself play an important role in encouraging reflexivity on the part of practitioners (or ‘the researched’), and that reflexivity on the part of practitioners will encourage challenge of some of the myths about their practice, fostering a more realistic understanding and ownership of research that sees it not in narrow instrumental, credibility-enhancing terms, but as something relevant and to be learned from, even where—perhaps especially where—it is critical of extant practice. However, local demands of practice, external politics, and interests in maintaining public relations also make reflexive engagement with research a challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be acknowledged that many police officers in Scotland were already reflexive and outward looking prior to SIPR, indeed some of them were instrumental in establishing the collaboration.

  2. 2.

    Here I’m not using ‘critical’ to denote critical theory as such (although it might of course produce very important, albeit challenging insights for practitioners), rather I’m using it in a general way to refer to research that does not merely validate extant practice.

References

  • Advisory Group on Stop and Search (2015) Report of the Advisory Group on Stop and Search, Edinburgh: The Advisory Group on Stop and Search.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. and Skoldberg, K. (2009) Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H.S. (1982) Art Worlds, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, C. (2009) The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Case, S. and Haines, K. (2014) Reflective friend research: the relational aspects of social theory. In K. Lumsden and A. Winter (eds) Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. (1999) ‘What is evidence-based education?’, British Journal of Educational Studies 47(2): 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think, Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, M. (2015) ‘Police lost 20,000 stop and search records after “wrong button pressed”’, BBC News Website (19 February). URL (accessed on 14 May 2016): http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-31525040.

  • Engel, R. and Henderson, S (2013) ‘Beyond rhetoric: establishing academic-police collaborations that work’. In J. Brown (ed), The Future of Policing, London: Routledge: 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1989) Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. (2010) ‘Learning to work together: police and academics’, Policing 4(2): 139–145.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, N.R. and Wilson, P. (2012) ‘Knowledge exchange and police practice: broadening and deepening the debate around research-practitioner collaborations’, Police Practice and Research 13(4): 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A.W. (1970) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, London: Heineman Educational Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A. (2012) ‘Situating community safety: emergent professional identities in communities of practice’, Criminology and Criminal Justice 12(4): 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A. (2007) ‘Looking back on Police and People in London’. In A. Henry and D.J. Smith (eds), Transformations of Policing, Aldershot: Ashgate: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A. and Mackenzie, S. (2012) ‘Brokering communities of practice: a model of knowledge exchange and academic-practitioner collaboration developed in the context of community policing’, Police Practice and Research 13(4): 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, P. (2015) ‘Revealed: Police Scotland and Scottish Government tried to hamper research into stop and search’, Herald Scotland, 22 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, M., Fielding, N. and Cope, N. (2005) ‘“The appliance of science?”: the theory and practice of crime intelligence analysis’, British Journal of Criminology vol. 45(1): 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. and Shearing, C. (2009) ‘From a “dialogue of the deaf” to a “dialogue of the listening”: towards a new methodology of policing research and practice’, Police Practice and Research 10(5–6): 415–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, B. (2009) Police Culture in a Changing World. Oxford: (Clarendon) Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. (2008) ‘Participatory action research’, Qualitative Research Methods Series 52, Thousand Oaks, Cal: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, C., Adair, C.E., Mckenzie, E., Patten, S.B. and Perry, B.W. (2007) ‘Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature’, The Milbank Quarterly 85(4): 729–768.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. (2014a) ‘Stop and search in Scotland: an evaluation of police practice’, SCCJR Report 01/2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. (2014b) ‘The proactive turn: stop and search in Scotland’, SIPR Annual Report 2013, 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. (2015) The Proactive Turn: Stop and Search in Scotland (A Study in Elite Power). Unpublished University of Edinburgh PhD Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutley, S., Walter, I. and Davies, H.T.O. (2007) Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services, Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.J. (2007) New challenges to police legitimacy. In A. Henry and D.J. Smith (eds), Transformations of Policing, Aldershot: Ashgate: 273–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, B. and Chilvers, R. (2000) Evidence-Based Social Care: A Study of Prospects and Problems, Lyme Regis: Russell House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henry, A. (2017). Reflexive Academic–Practitioner Collaboration with the Police. In: Armstrong, S., Blaustein, J., Henry, A. (eds) Reflexivity and Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54641-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54642-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics