Abstract
Atla Regio, Venus, is interpreted as a young major mantle plume centre, and we address whether it is at plume head or plume tail stage. Our approach uses graben-fissure lineaments, interpreted as the surface expression of dykes. Mapping > 40,000 such lineaments reveals giant radiating dyke swarms associated with major volcanic centres of Maat (>1500 km dyke swarm radius), Ozza (>2000 km), Ongwuti (>1100 km) and Unnamed montes (>1100 km), indicating that each is due to plume head magmatism rather than plume tail magmatism (maximum swarm length ~ 100 km). The size of an underlying flattened plume head is estimated by the radius where the swarm transitions from a radiating to linear pattern. All four centres and their plume heads group within the 1200 km radius of the Ozza Mons plume head, consistent with a single event. Atla Regio is at the plume head stage with coeval triple-junction rifting, which on Earth would typically precede attempted continental breakup.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Given the absence of plate tectonics1 (at least since ~1 Ga ago2), all volcanism on Venus is intraplate and the largest events are considered analogous to terrestrial Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) generated by large mantle plumes3,4,5,6. We apply a terrestrial dyke swarm interpretation to assess whether one of the largest and youngest interpreted Venusian plume events, Atla Regio, is still at the plume head stage or has progressed to the plume tail stage. If at the plume head stage, then in a terrestrial plate-tectonics context, it could just be a few Myr away from an attempted continental breakup. However, if Atla Regio has already reached the plume tail stage, then (in a terrestrial context) the timing for any breakup transitioning into ocean crust spreading would likely be passed.
On Earth, an ascending mantle plume arriving at the base of the lithosphere can massively and partially melt and produce a LIP with a scale of at least 100,000 km2 and in some cases millions of km2 7,8. Seismic tomography and thermal modelling suggest that the plume conduit (stalk) is only about 100–200 km wide as it buoyantly ascends through the mantle, with the top (the head) of the plume growing during ascent, due to resistance from the overlying mantle7. For a plume originating in the lower mantle, the plume head is about 1000–1200 km in diameter when it reaches the base of the lithosphere. It rapidly spreads to produce a flattened plume head about 2000–2400 km in diameter7,9. The voluminous LIP volcanism associated with the plume head (‘starting plume’) stage can be of short duration, often only lasting a few million years. However, LIPs can also be of longer duration, especially when associated with rifting, with multiple magmatic pulses spanning up to several 10 s of Myr8.
Beyond about 50 Myr the capacity for high-volume partial melting of the plume head diminishes as the plume head thermal anomaly cools (e.g.9,10). After this point ‘plume tail’ volcanism can continue via continued ascent and partial melting of the plume tail for a duration of up to at least 180 Myr (e.g. refs. 7,11,12). The plume tail stage is associated with smaller volumes of partial melting and on Earth is typically recognised by a hot spot chain, as the lithospheric plate moves above the approximately stationary plume tail. The classic example is the >6000 km long Hawaiian-Emperor seamount (hot spot) chain that can be traced for at least 85 Myr across the moving Pacific plate; in this case, the inferred initial plume head event, an oceanic plateau, is interpreted to have been partly subducted in the Aleutian trench and partly obducted in Kamchatka, Russia13,14.
On the other hand, if the plate is approximately stationary (as on Venus, which is currently a one-plate planet1), the entire volume of plume tail magmatism would be superimposed in one location4. A terrestrial example is the Iceland plateau, which can be interpreted as the accumulation in one spot (fixed on a spreading ridge) from the plume tail stage following the plume head stage that produced the 62–55 Ma North Atlantic LIP15. Although, the volcanism of the plume tail stage is characterised by low flux, the cumulative volume can be huge. In the case of Hawaii, the cumulative volume of the 85 Myr duration Hawaii-Emperor hot spot chain (not including any estimate of the subducted portion) is 750,000 km3 (https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/Hawaiian.html). The volume of the Iceland plateau is approximately 1.6 Mkm3 based on its E-W extent of 800 km, N-S extent of 500 km and 4000 m elevation above the seafloor16. Thus, the cumulative volume of plume tail magmatism can be of LIP scale, making it difficult to determine whether a volcanic centre represents a LIP (plume head event) or the accumulation (in one location) of protracted plume tail magmatism. In this contribution, we use mafic dyke swarm length (or lava flow length) as a simple proxy parameter for identifying whether a volcanic centre (on Venus or on Earth) is at the plume head or plume tail stage.
Atla Regio is part of the extensive BAT (Beta-Atla-Themis) region with the youngest volcanism and rifting on Venus4,17,18,19,20,21,22,23. Atla Regio represents a major concentration of large volcanic centres and related coronae that are associated with topographic and geoid highs, gravity lows and a radiating rift system (Fig. 1), all classic signatures of terrestrial LIPs associated with currently active large mantle plumes that originated in the deep mantle7,8,11 (Fig. 1). Available modelling of the Venusian mantle suggests it can also support mantle plumes17,24,25.
Major volcanic centres belonging to Atla Regio include Maat Mons (9 km elevation, with reference to mean planetary radius), the highest volcano on Venus26,27, Ozza Mons (7.5 km elevation), Ongwuti Mons (8.5 km elevation), and an unnamed mons (7.5 km elevation), which will be referred to in this study as 'Unnamed Mons'. Major lava flows, at least 1200 km long, are associated with the volcanic features. For instance, Ningyo fluctus is a major flow field 1200 km long28. A remarkable four-armed ‘triple-junction’ rift system radiates from Ozza Mons (Fig. 1). It features the 8000 km long ENE-trending Hecate Chasma which connects with Beta Regio29,30,31, the 10,000 km long SE-trending Parga Chasma which connects with Themis Regio29,31,32, the 7500 km long SW-trending Dali-Diana Chasma which connects with Thetis Regio33 and the 2500 km long N-trending Ganiki (Ganis) Chasma34,35.
However, the characteristics and timing of Atla Regio volcanism are not well understood, with the most detailed regional mapping conducted at a scale of about 1:2.5 M26. More detailed mapping at a scale of about 1:500,000 is in progress27,36. An important question is the level of present-day volcanic activity. One insight is from the Ganiki Chasma, north of Atla Regio, where the Venus Express mission revealed transient thermal anomalies interpreted to represent the extrusion of lava flows34,35. Also, based on emissivity data from NASA’s Magellan mission, ref. 37 concluded that some of the lava flows at Maat Mons may be geologically recent. Herrick and Hensley38 recently proposed ongoing volcanic activity at Matt Mons based on differences observed in Magellan images taken eight months apart.
Results and discussion
Dyke swarms and magmatic centres of Atla Regio
While there have been regional and some detailed studies on the volcanism and rifting associated with Atla Regio18,19,22,26, the dyke swarm component has not been previously considered, except at a reconnaissance scale39,40. Comparable LIP magmatism on Earth consists of major volcanism in the form of shield and plateau basalts, and a plumbing system that includes giant radiating (up to 3000 km in radius) and circumferential dyke swarms (up to 1800 km in diameter) (e.g. refs. 5,41,42). Given the absence of extensive surface erosion on Venus (at least back to the time of formation of tessera terrain, the stratigraphically oldest unit in the global geological record22), dyke swarms on Venus are unlikely to be exposed on the surface. Rather they are interpreted to be expressed as sets of long narrow grabens and fissures (and also pit chains) that overlie blind dykes (not reaching the surface) that were, for the most part, laterally emplaced (e.g. refs. 39,43). Although such grabens above dykes are rarely observed on Earth due to extensive erosion, they have been documented in a number of dyke swarms44,45. There have been several detailed studies of graben systems (herein, we use graben system as a short form for graben-fissure system) interpreted in the context of dykes in multiple regions of Venus (e.g. refs. 29,46,47,48) and other planetary bodies41,49,50. Such grabens are interpreted to overlie dykes on the basis of specific criteria: (a) the grabens extend beyond any central domal uplift (and are therefore not purely tectonic features), (b) lava flows locally emanate from the grabens, (c) pit craters are aligned along the grabens48,51 and (d) chains of shield volcanoes are aligned along the grabens (see Methods for a more detailed discussion of the evidence for recognising grabens which are overlying dykes, and distinguishing them from purely tectonic extensional lineaments).
The mapping of Atla Regio graben systems (interpreted as dyke swarms) is shown in Fig. 2, with more than 40,000 lineaments traced to date. Generalised (and colour-coded) linework is shown in Fig. 3 and S7. These giant radiating (and circumferential) graben systems are linked to the four recognised montes of Atla Regio (Ongwuti, Ozza, Unnamed and Maat mons), two additional named centres (Sapas Mons, and Zemina Corona), and multiple unnamed magmatic centres (Fig. 1). In this study, we focus our discussion on the four large volcanic centres of Atla Regio, Ongwuti, Ozza, Unnamed and Maat montes, whose graben systems extend radially for >1100, >2000, >1100 and >1500 km, respectively.
The relative age of magmatism associated with the various montes of Atla Regio is determined based on cross-cutting relationships of lineaments, flows and craters, and is presented in Figs. S2–S6. These data indicate that the relative age order from oldest to youngest is Ongwuti, Ozza, Unnamed and finally Maat mons. However, the volcanism of Ozza Mons continued during the emplacement of the Maat Mons radiating graben set. Furthermore, the development of the major arms of triple-junction rifting (Fig. 1) are associated with the Ozza Mons stage. While Sapas Mons could also be related to the Atla Regio superplume given its proximity (Fig. 1), cross-cutting relationships (Figs. S2–S6) indicate that its magmatism preceded the magmatism of the four Atla Regio centres discussed above, and, hence, is likely not part of the Atla Regio superplume. Zemina Corona, which is further away (Fig. 1), is also thought to be older.
Atla Regio plume head stage
Giant mafic dyke swarms on Earth can be emplaced laterally for great distances beyond the edge of the underlying plume head because of a continued flux of magma being laterally injected from the plume centre region40,43,52. This mechanism solved an important problem related to the nature of graben systems on Venus and Mars39,50. On Venus, it explained how radiating graben-fissure systems could extend beyond the domal uplift40. On Mars, the problem was even more acute. It is impossible for the entire extent of the Tharsis region radiating graben systems (up to 4000 km in radius) to form only by domal uplift, since the small radius of curvature for Mars appeared to require two distinct modes for the formation of the radiating grabens: on the top of Tharsis (attributed to isostatic stresses) and on the flanks and distal portions of the rise (more consistent with flexure)50.
The inferred dykes underlying large radiating graben systems on Venus are interpreted to be mainly mafic in composition (likely dolerites). This interpretation is based on: (a) the remarkable similarity in the distribution patterns of these graben systems with terrestrial giant mafic (dolerite) dyke swarms and (b) their spatial association and apparent plumbing system relationships with the widespread 80% of Venus that is inferred to be covered by basaltic volcanism.
The size of a plume head (as it spreads and flattens against the base of the lithosphere) can be estimated from the geometry of the associated giant radiating dyke swarm. This approach was developed for terrestrial LIPs, where the distance at which the dyke swarm transitions from a radiating pattern (due to the stress field associated with the underlying plume head) to a linear pattern (due to the dominance of the regional stress field) is a proxy for plume head size5,43,52. Similarly, Venusian swarms typically transition from a radiating to a linear geometry, with the latter reflecting a regional stress field5,40,53. We apply this criterion to the radiating swarms of Atla Regio in order to estimate the size of the underlying and evolving plume head that is responsible for the uplift and the transition in dyke trend.
The current topography of Atla Regio is the result of multiple magmatic centres and stages of uplift. Similar complications occur for some plume/LIP associations on Earth (ch. 12 in ref. 8). Our dyke swarm approach circumvents these issues. On Earth, each dyke swarm (radiating or circumferential) represents a short-duration snapshot (confirmed by precise U-Pb dating) of the stress pattern associated with a specific magmatic centre. Therefore, multiple intermixed dyke swarms associated with a single magmatic event capture the stress history of the evolving plume head in a series of timestep snapshots. Implicit in this view is that dyke swarm trends accurately reflect the regional stress (at each timestep); this has been repeatedly shown to be true for terrestrial swarms, with only local influence of pre-existing fractures or zones of weakness8.
Applying this dyke swarm method, we conclude that the largest plume head associated with Atla Regio is that of Ozza Mons, with an inferred radius of 1200 km (Fig. 3). The plume heads of the other three major magmatic centres (with radii of 600, 600 and 200 km) are all enclosed within the extent of the Ozza Mons plume head (Fig. 4).
On the basis of this scale comparison, we interpret all four Atla Regio magmatic centres (Ongwuti, Ozza, Unnamed and Maat montes) to be related to a single large plume (or superplume; variably defined4,11,54, but here used to refer to a large plume derived from the deep mantle) centred on Ozza Mons. In the absence of radiometric dating (no rock samples are available from Venus), the spatial clustering of these major magmatic centres is strong circumstantial evidence in support of these four volcanic centres being approximately coeval and all belonging to a single plume/LIP event. The spatially associated negative Bouguer gravity anomaly (Fig. 1c, see also Fig. 1b in ref. 55) is explained by the decreased density associated with an underlying plume head that is still hot.
Maximum mafic dyke swarm length and flow length are simple proxy parameters for identifying whether a volcanic centre is at the plume head or plume tail stage. On Earth, giant radiating dyke swarms are associated with plume head events. They extend at least several hundred km, and in some cases nearly 3000 km away from the plume centre8, owing to the high flux of magma from shallow buffered magma reservoir sources (continuously resupplied from deeper reservoirs) that feed these long dyke swarms56. In contrast, plume tail volcanism consists of smaller volume flows (fed from essentially unbuffered magma reservoirs), and their dyke swarms have a maximum length of about 100 km (ref. 43 and references therein). Lava flow length can also be a discriminant, with plume head stage lava flows extending up to hundreds and even >1000 km8, and plume tail lavas typically up to 10 s of km long extending in rare cases up to >100 km (e.g. refs. 57,58,59).
We apply these terrestrial dyke swarm (and lava flow) observations to assess whether Atla Regio is at the plume head stage or has progressed to the plume tail stage. A potential caveat in applying these terrestrial relationships to Venus is considered. Unlike Earth, Venus does not have a low viscosity layer at the base of the lithosphere6,60,61, which would lead to a wider plume tail reaching the base of the lithosphere on Venus compared to Earth (cf. ref. 62. However, this will not result in longer plume tail dykes (nor greater lava flow length) on Venus, since the length of laterally emplaced dykes (and flows) is primarily controlled by available magma flux, which is much greater for buffered magma reservoirs56 associated with the plume head stage and smaller for the unbuffered magma reservoirs at the plume tail stage.
Our approach is to examine the youngest magmatic centre at Atla Regio to see whether it represents an approximate equivalent to an Iceland plateau plume tail (small flux magmatism accumulated over many 10 s of million years). On Earth, plume tail magmatism is mainly expressed in the oceans (as hot spot trails) where crustal thickness is about 7 km and lithospheric thickness ranges from 50 to 140 km. Hotspots can be more rarely tracked into continents, but only where the lithosphere is thin (thinner than 110 km for hotspots of basaltic composition63). The Venusian crustal thickness at Atla Regio reaches about 40 km, but drops away to typical values for the plains of 20–25 km (Fig. 4c in ref. 55; see also refs. 19,28), and (elastic) lithospheric thickness is only about 20 km greater both beneath and away from Atla Regio (Fig. 6a in ref. 55). With these values, plume tail magmatism should be able to traverse the Venusian lithosphere in the vicinity of Atla Regio and be observable.
The fact that giant radiating graben systems (giant dyke swarms, ranging in radius from 1100 to >2000 km) are associated with each of the four main volcanic centres on Atla Regio (Ongwuti, Ozza, Unnamed and Maat montes) indicates that each is at the plume head stage and not the plume tail stage. Of particular importance is the giant radiating graben system associated with the youngest volcanic centre of Maat Mons. Furthermore, there are no other major edifices recognised in Atla Regio that could represent an accumulation of plume tail magmatism above a stationary plate, or even any observed linear trend of volcanic edifices that could mark a hot spot track if there was some plate movement.
It should be noted that plume head graben systems and volcanics would likely be covered by any later plume tail magmatism (and their grabens). Therefore, the short plume tail grabens should be readily visible, and not simply intermixed with the older plume head grabens.
Young magmatism at Maat Mons is expressed as flows that postdate the major radiating dyke swarm. Some of these flows can reach hundreds of km long (e.g. Fig. 8 in ref. 26 and Fig. 1 in ref. 27) in support of a plume head interpretation. However, the very youngest of these flows that are located at the summit of Maat Mons (Fig. 726), have lengths of <100 km, and could possibly represent waning plume head activity or minor plume tail activity.
In conclusion, Atla Regio is interpreted to still be at the plume head stage, and potentially no older than about 50 Myr, by analogy with Earth (based on the maximum duration of plume-caused terrestrial LIPs8; see discussion above).
Geological history of Atla Regio
On the basis of our mapping, four stages are distinguished in the geological history of the Atla Regio (Fig. 5).
Stage 1
The initial stage of Atla Regio involves the Ongwuti centre. The elongation of this centre and its alignment with the younger Ozza and Unnamed centres suggest the presence of a proto-rift (parallel to the younger Dali-Diana Chasma). The radiating dyke swarm associated with Ongwuti is initially radial, but swings into a rift-parallel pattern (Fig. 3), further supporting the hypothesis of active extensional stresses associated with this proto-rift.
Stage 2
The next centre to be emplaced, Ozza Mons, is the largest, based on the inferred size of the plume head (>2000 km radius dyke swarm and inferred plume head radius of 1200 km). The four-armed ‘triple-junction’ rifting also occurred at this time. It has been previously suggested that “Hecate Chasma may be younger than Parga Chasma and could experience a secondary stage of corona formation in the future”31. From this perspective, the sequence of development of the rift arms is (from older to younger) Dali-Diana, Parga and then Hecate. The timing of the fourth arm, Ganis, has not yet been assessed. It is notable that a detailed study of corona ages (from cross-cutting relationships of their graben-fissure systems) along Hecate Chasma47 indicates a trend that is younger to the northeast along Hecate Chasma away from Ozza Mons, consistent with a zipper-style extension of Hecate trending away from Ozza Mons. It is also noted that the proto-rifting in Stage 1 is parallel to the development of the Dali-Diana rift zone in this stage. The unnamed centre is also part of this Stage 2 (Fig. 5).
Stage 3
The final centre, Maat Mons, has radiating dykes with trends that are not influenced by those of Ozza Mons. This suggests that the topographic uplift-related stress (which caused the radiating geometry of the Ozza Mons dyke swarm) had decreased before the formation of Maat Mons. Modelling indicates that topographic changes above plumes can occur within short periods of a few million years as the plume head spreads7,9.
We interpret that Maat Mons was emplaced at this Stage 3, off the proto-rift zone along which the three earlier centres (Ongwuti, Ozza and Unnamed) were aligned. While Maat Mons lava flows are clearly younger than most flows from Ozza, Unnamed and Ongwuti, the NE sector of the Maat Mons radiating swarm is covered by an NW trending flow field from Ozza Mons. This indicates a pulse of Ozza Mons volcanism overlapping in time with, or post-dating the graben-fissure system of Maat Mons.
Stage 4
On Earth, when a plume is at the plume head stage and triple-junction rifting has occurred, the next step (often within 5–25 Myr) is attempted continental breakup. However, as discussed in the section on Triple-Junction Rifting below, triple-junction rifting associated with Atla Regio on Venus is not expected to lead to an actual breakup.
Geographic shifts between the four volcanic centres
Figure 6 shows the age progression between the four main centres. Having shown evidence that these centres are all at the plume head stage (and not the plume tail phase, except possibly at the very end of Maat Mons history) we consider several models to explain the minor geographic shifts between the centres (Figs. 3, 4, 6): (1) lateral movement of the lithosphere above a stationary plume (akin to plate movement on Earth, but presumably at a much slower rate for a single-plate planet) (Fig. 6b), (2) lateral movement of the plume itself (due to ‘mantle wind’ associated with mantle convection)64,65 (Fig. 6c), (3) lithospheric controls (including development of incipient rift zones, or lithospheric thin-spots above a stationary plume head)12 (Fig. 6d) and/or (4) a pause of the rising plume at a mid-mantle boundary, spread along this boundary and resumed ascent as multiple separated plumes/diapirs (e.g. ref. 11) (Fig. 6e). With respect to model 1 (shifting lithosphere) or model 2 (plume shifting in the mantle wind), it has been proposed that mantle convection might lead to some horizontal motion and associated surface deformation (e.g. refs. 66,67,68). On the basis of our data, we provisionally favour model 3 (development of incipient proto-rifting) to explain the alignment of Ongwuti, Ozza and Unnamed montes.
Triple-junction rifting—prelude to a phase of Earth seafloor-like crustal spreading?
On Venus, there is currently no evidence of ongoing global plate tectonic activity1, but plate tectonics could have existed prior to the postulated ca. 700 Ma Great Climate Transition on Venus2 during which the atmosphere is suggested to have changed from more Earth-like conditions (temperate climate, water cycle and potential plate tectonics) to the present-day conditions (atmosphere with 450 °C, 96% CO2, 9 MPa). Could the young age of Atla Regio (being at the plume head stage with incipient pronounced four-armed ‘triple-junction’ rifting) indicate that seafloor-like crustal spreading might be re-initiated within a few million years?
A terrestrial example of a plume/LIP at the incipient ocean-opening phase is the Afro-Arabian LIP69. This LIP is associated with plume-related magmatism in both NE Africa and the adjacent Arabian Peninsula, initial opening of the Red Sea and Gulf of Yemen and incipient opening along the East African Rift System. On Earth, the time gap between the initial rifting and ocean-opening (if it actually occurs) is typically 5–25 Myr8,70. There are also numerous other examples in the terrestrial record of LIP events being linked to continental breakup. Examples include the 201 Ma Central Atlantic LIP, 134 Ma Parana-Etendeka LIP and 52–55 Ma North Atlantic LIP (pulse 2) associated with the central, southern and northern portions of the Atlantic Ocean, respectively29. More generally, major ocean-opening events typically are associated with major LIP8.
Given this terrestrial perspective, we can consider the potential for application to Venus. In the case of Atla Regio, the most likely rift arm to develop into active rifting within the next few Myr is Hecate Chasma, because it is arguably younger than Parga31. However, sustained spreading and development of oceanic-like crust would require complementary subduction elsewhere on Venus. Several studies have discussed potential subduction initiation by mantle plumes on Venus71. But such incipient subduction is unlikely to lead to seafloor spreading and ongoing plate tectonics. In their classic paper, Campbell and Taylor72 suggested that water is essential for the formation of granites via subduction and essential for the formation of continents. This is also emphasised in subsequent papers (e.g. ref. 73), and it is observed that a considerable volume of water is subducted and hydrates the mantle during subduction74. Therefore, although the Atla Regio rift arms (particularly Hecate or Parga) are inferred to be at the plume stage and ready to progress to full breakup and initiation of an oceanic spreading ridge, this is unlikely to occur given a dry Venus mantle. We are currently assessing the amount of extension involved and how this deformation is accommodated laterally in the absence of subduction and crustal spreading.
Lessons for mapping dyke swarms of other major mantle plume centres on Venus
Other Venusian regios, including Beta, Bell, Phoebe and Eistla, are also inferred to be linked to major mantle plumes4,20,21. Following the approach employed in the present study of Atla Regio, all these regions can be assessed to (1) determine the full scale of radiating dyke swarms in order to establish which magmatic centres are at the plume head vs plume tail stage, (2) determine the plume head sizes from the transition distance at which the radiating patterns swings into alignment with regional stresses, (3) identify additional cryptic magmatic centres from their radiating and circumferential dyke swarms, (4) establish the relative ages of the magmatic centres from cross-cutting relationships of dyke swarms and volcanic flows and (5) reconstruct the tectonic and geological history. Such studies will be valuable for contributing to target selection by the fleet of new missions to Venus planned over the next decade (VERITAS, DAVINCI, EnVision, Venera-D, Shukrayaan-1, VOICE).
Conclusions
Atla Regio is a major mantle plume centre in the BAT (Beta-Atla-Themis) Region, which is the locus of voluminous young volcanism on Venus. Our goal was to determine the relative timing of the main magmatic centres and to assess whether Atla Regio is still at the plume head (LIP stage) or has reached the plume tail (hot spot) stage. On Venus, owing to the absence of significant plate movement, plume tail magmatism (spanning 10 s to 100 s of Myr) could accumulate in a single location, producing a magmatic centre of LIP size. Therefore, on the basis of magma volume, it is difficult to distinguish plume head from stationary plume tail magmatism.
We note that the length of mafic dyke swarms is an excellent proxy for distinguishing plume head (swarm lengths 100 s up to 3000 km in length due to high flux) from plume tail volcanism (swarms <100 km in length due to low flux). Through the mapping of more than 40,000 graben-fissure lineaments, interpreted to overlie dykes, we show that all the major magmatic centres of Atla Regio (Ongwuti, Ozza, Maat and Unnamed mons) have large radiating dyke swarms (>1000 km radii) and, therefore, each represents a plume head event. Furthermore, the size of the flattened plume head can be determined for each of the four centres from the radius at which a radiating swarm transitions to a linear swarm. All four plume heads fit within the interpreted flattened plume head size of Ozza Mons (1200 km radius), consistent with all four belonging to a single plume event.
Cross-cutting relationships indicate the emplacement of the volcanic centres in the order of Ongwuti, Ozza, Unnamed and finally Maat. A final stage of magmatism is marked by late flows of Ozza Mons covering portions of the graben-fissure system (dyke swarm) of Maat Mons.
Based on dyke swarm and lava flow length criteria, our key conclusion is that Atla Regio is currently at the plume head stage (with an inferred maximum age of 50 Myr in analogy with Earth), and, therefore, should today be very active both magmatically and tectonically.
Methods
Data and mapping tools
For our geological mapping study of the Atla Regio region, we used full-resolution (75 m/pixel) Magellan Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images and its altimetry data. SAR images are greyscale images where pixel brightness indicates the intensity of radar signal return, due to either surface roughness or the orientation of a structure relative to the incident radar. Mapping was done using ArcGIS v.10.6. JMARS (Java Mission-planning and Analysis for Remote Sensing) was used for regional reconnaissance and to generate topographic profiles from the Magellan topographic data.
Interpretation of graben-fissure systems as overlying dyke swarms
A key focus of our approach is the interpretation of regional graben-fissure sets (radiating, circumferential and linear geometry) as overlying dykes. There was an important debate in the 1990s, as the Magellan SAR images were initially being interpreted, regarding whether the widespread extensional lineaments were of purely structure origin75 or could be formed by underlying dykes (e.g. ref. 40). A key criterion noted by Grosfils and Head40 was that radiating extensional systems (graben-fissure-fractures) which extend beyond any central domal uplift must be underlain by dykes. Where mapped in detail many radiating sets clearly meet this criterion and can be inferred to be underlain by dykes5,40,43,48. More generally, the scale and patterns of radiating graben-fissure systems on Venus is remarkably similar to that of giant radiating dolerite dyke swarms on Earth41,43, again strengthening the interpretation of graben-fissure systems on Venus as analogues of terrestrial dyke swarms. More recently Buchan and Ernst5 have recognised a class of giant circumferential dyke swarms on Earth and have proposed that the circumferential grabens associated with coronae on Venus may also in many cases be underlain by dykes. It is always valuable to employ supporting observations, such as lava flows emerging from such grabens [e.g. refs. 19,46], aligned shield volcanoes27,43 and pit chains48, and in the present study, we made such observations.
Data availability
Source Magellan SAR images and topographic data are available from the USGS. (https://astrocloud.wr.usgs.gov).
References
Solomon, S. C. et al. Venus tectonics: an overview of Magellan observations. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 97, 13199–13255 (1992).
Way, M. J., Ernst, R. E. & Scargle, J. D. Large scale volcanism and the heat-death of terrestrial worlds. Planet. Sci. J. 3, 92 (2022).
Head, J. W. & Coffin, M. F. Large igneous provinces: a planetary perspective. AGU Geophys. Monogr. 100, 411–438 (1997).
Ernst, R. E., Buchan, K. L., Desnoyers, D. W. in Superplumes: Beyond Plate Tectonics. Ch. 18 (eds Yuen, D. A., Maruyama, S., Karato, S.-I., & Windley, B. F.) (Springer, 2007).
Buchan, K. L. & Ernst, R. E. Plumbing systems of large igneous provinces (LIPs) on Earth and Venus: Investigating the role of giant circumferential and radiating dyke swarms, coronae and novae, and mid-crustal intrusive complexes. Gondwana Res. 100, 25–43 (2021).
Kiefer, W. S. & Hager, B. H. A mantle plume model for the equatorial highlands of Venus. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 96, 20947–20966 (1991).
Campbell, I. H. Large igneous provinces and the mantle plume hypothesis. Elements 1, 265–269 (2005).
Ernst, R. E. Large Igneous Provinces (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Friedrich, A. M. et al. Stratigraphic framework for the plume mode of mantle convection and the analysis of interregional unconformities on geological maps. Gondwana Res. 53, 159–188 (2018).
Ernst, R. E., Davies, D. R., Jowitt, S. M. & Campbell, I. H. When do mantle plumes destroy diamonds. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 502, 244–252 (2018).
Courtillot, V., Davaille, A., Besse, J. & Stock, J. Three distinct types of hotspots in the Earth’s mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 205, 295–308 (2003).
Sleep, N. H. Mantle plumes from top to bottom. Earth-Science Rev. 77, 231–271 (2006).
Portnyagin, M., Savelyev, D., Hoernle, K., Hauff, F. & Garbe-Schönberg, D. Mid-Cretaceous Hawaiian tholeiites preserved in Kamchatka. Geology 36, 903–906 (2008).
Wei, S. S., Shearer, P. M., Lithgow-Bertlloni, C., Stixrude, L. & Tian, D.-D. Oceanic plateau of the Hawaiian mantle plume head subducted to the uppermost lower mantle. Science 370, 983–987 (2020).
Rohrman, M. Methodology for evaluating the North Atlantic Igneous Province reveals multiple hotspots at breakup. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 23, e2021GC010110 (2022).
Dauteuil, O. & Bergerat, F. Interactions between magmatism and tectonics in Iceland: a review. Geodin. Acta. 18, 1–9 (2005).
Rolf, T. et al. Dynamics and evolution of Venus’ mantle through time. Space Sci. Rev. 218, 70 (2022).
Head, J. W., Crumpler, L. S., Aubele, J. C., Guest, J. E. & Saunders, R. S. Venus volcanism: classification of volcanic features and structures, associations, and global distribution from Magellan data. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 13153–13197 (1992).
Ivanov, M. A. & Head, J. W. The history of volcanism on Venus. Planet. Space Sci. 84, 66–92 (2013).
Crumpler, L. S., Head, J. W. & Aubele, J. C. Relation of major volcanic center concentration on Venus to global tectonic patterns. Science 261, 591–595 (1993).
Stofan, E. R., Smrekar, S. E., Bindschadler, D. L. & Senske, D. A. Large topographic rises on Venus: implications for mantle upwelling. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 23317–23327 (1995).
Ivanov, M. A. & Head, J. W. The history of tectonism on Venus: a stratigraphic analysis. Planet. Space Sci. 113, 10–32 (2015).
Guseva, E. N. & Ivanov, M. A. Spatiotemporal relationships of the Groove belts, coronal structures, and rift zones of Venus. Solar Syst. Res. 53, 411–422 (2019).
Gulcher, A. J. P. et al. Corona structures driven by plume-lithosphere interactions and evidence for ongoing plume activity on Venus. Nat. Geosci. 13, 547 (2020).
Smrekar, S. E., Ostberg, C. & O’Rourke, J. G. Earth-like lithospheric thickness and heat flow on Venus consistent with active rifting. Nat. Geosc. 16, 13–18 (2022).
Mouginis-Mark, P. J. Geomorphology and volcanology of Maat Mons, Venus. Icarus 277, 433–441 (2016).
El Bilali, H., Ernst, R. E. & Buchan, K. L. Maat Mons, Atla Regio, Venus: magmatic and tectonic history from detailed mapping. In 52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2021).
Magee, K. P. & Head, J. W. in Mantle Plumes: Their Identification through Time Special Paper 352 (eds Ernst, R. E. & Buchan, K. L.) (Geological Society of America, 2001).
Graff, J. R., Ernst, R. E. & Samson, C. Evidence for triple-junction rifting focussed on local magmatic centres along Parga Chasma, Venus. Icarus 306, 122–138 (2018).
Hamilton, V. E. & Stofan, E. R. The geomorphology and evolution of Hecate Chasma, Venus. Icarus 121, 171–194 (1996).
Smrekar, S. E., Hoogenboom, T., Stofan, E. R. & Martin, P. Gravity analysis of Parga and Hecate chasmata: Implications for rift and corona formation. J. Geophys. Res. 115, E07010 (2010).
Martin, P., Stofan, E. R., Glaze, L. S. & Smrekar, S. Coronae of Parga Chasma, Venus. J. Geophys. Res. 112, E04S03 (2007).
Hansen, V. L. & DeShon, H. R. Geologic map of the Diana Chasma Quadrangle (V- 37), Venus. U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series I-2752. https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/i2752/ (2003).
Shalygin, E. V. et al. Active volcanism on Venus in the Ganiki Chasma rift zone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 4762–4769 (2015).
Brossier, J., Gilmore, M. S. & Head, J. W. Extended rift-associated volcanism in Ganis Chasma, Venus detected from Magellan radar emissivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099765 (2022).
El, Bilali. et al. Atla Regio (Venus) plume head stage: insights from its dyke swarm history. In Lunar and Planetary Science LIII, Abstract #1256 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2022).
Brossier, J., Gilmore, M. S., Toner, K. & Stein, A. J. Distinct mineralogy 1 and age of individual lava flows in Atla Regio, Venus derived from Magellan radar emissivity. J. Geophys. Res. 126, e2020JE006722 (2021).
Herrick, R. R. & Hensley, S. Surface changes observed on a Venusian volcano during the Magellan mission. Science 379, 1205–1208 (2023).
Grosfils, E. B. & Head, J. W. The global distribution of giant radiating dike swarms on Venus: implications for the global stress state. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 701–704 (1994a).
Grosfils, E. B. & Head, J. W. Emplacement of a radiating dike swarmin western Vinmara Planatia, Venus: interpretation of the regional stress field orientation and subsurface magmatic configuration. Earth Moon Planets 66, 153–171 (1994b).
Ernst, R. E., Grosfils, E. B. & Mège, D. Giant dike swarms: Earth, Venus and Mars. Annual reviews Earth and Planetary. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 29, 489–534 (2001).
Ernst, R. E., Liikane, D. A., Jowitt, S. M., Buchan, K. L. & Blanchard, J. A. A new plumbing system framework for mantle plume-related continental large igneous provinces and their mafic-ultramafic intrusions. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 384, 75–84 (2019).
Ernst, R. E., Head, J. W., Parfitt, E., Grosfils, E. & Wilson, L. Giant radiating dyke swarms on Earth and Venus: Earth. Sci. Rev. 39, 1–58 (1995).
Aspler, B. & Ernst, R. E. Dyke-induced graben on Venus and Mars: analogues for Earth’s rock record. In Lunar and Planetary Science Conference XXXIV Abstr 1711. (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2003).
Magee, C. & Jackson, C. A.-L. Can we relate the surface expression of dike-induced normal faults to subsurface dike geometry? Geology 49, 366–371 (2021).
Ernst, R. E., Desnoyers, D. W., Head, J. W. & Grosfils, E. B. Graben-fissure systems in Guinevere Planitia and Beta Regio (264-312oE, 24-60oN), Venus, and implications for regional stratigraphy and mantle plumes. Icarus 164, 282–316 (2003).
Studd, D., Ernst, R. E. & Samson, C. Radiating graben–fissure systems in the Ulfrun Regio area, Venus. Icarus 215, 279–291 (2011).
Davey, S. C., Ernst, R. E., Samson, C. & Grosfils, E. B. Hierarchical clustering of pit crater chains on Venus. Can. J. Earth Sci. 50, 109–126 (2013).
Head, J. W. & Wilson, L. Generation, ascent and eruption of magma on the Moon: new insights into source depths, magma supply, intrusions and effusive/explosive eruptions (Part 2: Predicted emplacement processes and observations). Icarus 283, 176–223 (2017).
Wilson, L. & Head, J. W. Tharsis–radial graben systems as the surface manifestation of plume-related dike intrusion complexes: models and implications. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 5057 (2002).
Patterson, C. W., Ernst, R. E., Samson, C. Pit chains associated with radiating graben-fissure systems on Venus: formation during lateral dyke injection? In 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Abstract #2097 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2016).
Baragar, W. R. A., Ernst, R. E., Hulbert, L. & Peterson, T. Longitudinal petrochemical variation in the Mackenzie dyke swarm, northwestern Canadian Shield. J. Petrol. 37, 317–359 (1996).
Nagasawa, C., Sasaki, S. & Koyama, M. Change of stress field in Beta-Atla-Themis region on Venus, estimated from surface geometry of dike swarms, lava stratigraphy and crater density. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 4429–4432 (1998).
Schubert, G., Masters, G., Olson, P. & Tackley, P. Superplumes or plume clusters? Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. V. 146, 147–162 (2004).
Jiménez-Díaz, A. et al. Lithospheric structure of Venus from gravity and topography. Icarus 260, 215–231 (2015).
Partitt, E. A. & Head, J. W. Buffered and unbuffered dike emplacement on Earth and Venus: implications for magma reservoir size, depth, and rate of magma replenishment. Earth Moon Planets 61, 249–261 (1993).
Malin, M. C. Lengths of Hawaiian lava flows. Geology 8, 306–308 (1980).
Greeley, R. The Snake River Plain, Idaho: representative of a new category of volcanism. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 87, 2705–2712 (1982).
Pedersen, G. B. M. et al. Lava field evolution and emplacement dynamics of the 2014–2015 basaltic fissure eruption at Holuhraun, Iceland. J. Volcanol. Geother. Res. 340, 155–169 (2017).
Steinberger, B., Werner, S. C. & Torsvik, T. H. Deep versus shallow origin of gravity anomalies, topography and volcanism on Earth, Venus and Mars. Icarus 207, 564–577 (2010).
Huang, J.-S., Yang, A. & Zhong, S.-J. Constraints of the topography, gravity and volcanism on Venusian mantle dynamics and generation of plate tectonics. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 362, 207–214 (2013).
Richards, M. A., Hager, B. H. & Sleep, N. H. Dynamically supported geoid highs over hotspots: observation and theory. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 93, 7690–7708 (1988).
Davies, D. R., Rawlinson, N., Iaffaldano, G. & Campbell, I. H. Lithospheric controls on magma composition along Earth’s longest continental hotspot track. Nature 525, 511–514 (2015).
Christensen, U. Fixed hotspots gone with the wind. Nature 391, 739–740 (1998).
Ficini, E., Dal Zilio, L., Doglioni, C. & Gerya, T. V. Horizontal mantle flow controls subduction dynamics. Sci. Rep. 7, 7550 (2017).
Phillips, R. J. Convection-driven tectonics on Venus. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 1301–1316 (1990).
Harris, L. B. & Bédard, J. H. Interactions between continent-like “drift,” rifting and mantle flow on Venus: gravity interpretations and Earth analogues. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 401, 327–356 (2015).
Byrne, P. K. et al. A globally fragmented and mobile lithosphere on Venus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2025919118 (2021).
Furman, T. et al. Heads and tails: 30 million years of the Afar plume. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 259, 95–119 (2007).
Courtillot, V., Jaupart, C., Manighetti, I., Tapponier, P. & Besse, J. On causal links between flood basalts and continental breakup. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 166, 177–195 (1999).
Davaille, A., Smrekar, S. E. & Tomlinson, S. Experimental and observational evidence for plume-induced subduction on Venus”. Nat. Geosc. 10, 349 (2017).
Campbell, I. H. & Taylor, S. R. No water, no granites—no oceans, no continents. Geophys. Res. Lett. 10, 1061–1064 (1983).
Grove, T. L., Till, C. B. & Krawczynski, M. J. The role of H2O in subduction zone magmatism. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 40, 413–439 (2012).
Cai, C., Wiens, D. A., Shen, W. & Eimer, M. Water input into the Mariana subduction zone estimated from ocean-bottom seismic data. Nature 563, 389–392 (2018).
Cyr, K. & Melosh, H. Tectonic patterns and regional stresses near Venusian Coronae. Icarus 102, 175–184 (1993).
Konopliv, A. S., Banerdt, W. B. & Sjogren, W. L. Venus gravity: 180th degree and order model. Icarus 139, 3–18 (1999).
Herrick, R. R. Small mantle upwellings are pervasive on Venus and Earth. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 803–806 (1999).
Acknowledgements
Funding support from Canadian NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2020-06408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.E.B.: conceived the project, mapped the grabens (dykes) and generalised them, wrote the initial manuscript, revised and finalised the manuscript with the co-authors. R.E.E.: Co-wrote the initial manuscript and assisted with revisions. K.L.B.: provided input into the initial manuscript and assisted with revisions. J.W.H.: provided input into the initial manuscript and assisted with revisions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Earth & Environment thanks the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Joe Aslin.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
El Bilali, H., Ernst, R.E., Buchan, K.L. et al. Dyke swarms record the plume stage evolution of the Atla Regio superplume on Venus. Commun Earth Environ 4, 235 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00901-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00901-7
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Far-travelled 3700 km lateral magma propagation just below the surface of Venus
Nature Communications (2024)