Abstract
Single-layer membranes have emerged as promising candidates for applications requiring high transport rates due to their low resistance to molecular transport. Owing to their atomically thin structure, these membranes experience significant microscopic fluctuations, emphasizing the need to explore their impact on ion transport processes. In this study, we investigate the effects of membrane fluctuations on the elementary scaling behavior of ion conductance \(G\) as a function of ion concentration \(c_{0}\), represented as \(G = \beta c_{0}^{\alpha }\), using molecular dynamics simulations. Our findings reveal that membrane fluctuations not only alter the conductance coefficient \(\beta\) but also the power-law exponent \(\alpha\). We identify two distinct frequency regimes of membrane fluctuations, GHz-scale and THz-scale fluctuations, and examine their roles in conductance scaling. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the alteration of conductance scaling arises from the non-linearity between ion conductance and membrane shape. This work provides a fundamental understanding of ion transport in fluctuating membranes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The atomic thickness of 2D membranes offers minimal resistance to molecular transport, making them favorable for applications that demand a high transport rate. Hence, 2D membranes have been actively studied for a wide range of membrane applications such as water desalination1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, electricity generation from salinity gradient9,10,11,12, and separation of heterogeneous fluids13,14,15. In particular, the transport of charged particles, including ions, is of significant interest due to their relevance in energy applications9,10,11 and numerous biological processes16,17,18,19,20,21. Unlike the obvious linear scaling between conductance and concentration of ions in a macroscopic pore, \(G\propto {c}_{0}\), the transport of ions in a nanoscale pore involves unique scaling behavior at low concentration22,23,24,25,26, \(G\propto {c}_{0}^{\alpha }\), where \(G\) is the ion conductance, \({c}_{0}\) is the ion concentration, \(\alpha\) is the power-law exponent, and \(\beta\) is the coefficient. Understanding the scaling behavior is an elementary step towards understanding the nanoscale ion transport phenomena. However, the current understanding of conductance scaling is limited to rigid nanopores, where the structural flexibility of nanopore is neglected. Given their thinness, atomically-thin membranes exhibit significant structural fluctuations, which are known to considerably affect both water permeation1,27,28 and ion transport29,30. Thus, a fundamental understanding of how these fluctuations influence the scaling behavior of ion conductance is important, especially considering the growing interest in 2D membrane applications.
Ion conductance in a bulk solution exhibits linear scaling between conductance and ion concentration, represented by \(G\propto {c}_{0}\). However, ion conduction near a solid surface deviates from this linear scaling. For narrow pores or channels, various scaling behaviors have been reported, 23,31,32,33, especially where the surface contribution to ion conductance is significant. In 1993, Lev et al. reported deviations in the conductance scaling at low ion concentrations, attributing this phenomenon to various surface effects such as ion concentration differences due to surface charge, direct ion adsorption to the surface, and ordered structures of the ionic solution near the surface. Stein et al.23 in 2004 reported a fully saturated ion conductance at low ion concentration (i.e., zero power-law exponent, \(\alpha =0\)) in silica channels ranging from 1 µm to 70 nm. They demonstrated a direct relationship between the surface charge density of the channel and the saturated conductance, suggesting that saturation occurs due to the transport of counter-ions near the channel surface. Electrokinetic theories32,33 have been proposed and utilized to estimate the surface charge density of nanochannels and nanopores9,26,34,35,36. However, these models do not universally account for the observed behaviors in all systems. Notably, conductance does not always fully saturate.
Previous studies have identified a few attributes that influence the various scaling behavior of ion conductance. One attribute is the charge regulation, while another is the leakage of surface potential out of the pore. Charge regulation refers to the phenomenon at the solid–fluid interface where the surface charge density avries as a function of ion concentration and effects the scaling behavior of the surface conduction. Several charge regulation models have been proposed to explain the various power-law exponents measured24,25,37,38. Another phenomenon that affects the conductance scaling is the pore potential leakage. When the potential generated by the surface charge leaks, it leads to a distribution of counterions both inside and outside the pore. Counterions positioned outside the pore do not directly contribute to the surface conduction. This leads to diverse scaling behaviors, depending upon the extent of the potential leakage. Specifically, ion conductance scaling studies conducted using Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations have shown that the power-law exponent can vary from zero to one depending on the degree of electric potential leakage22. The simulations suggest that the power-law exponent approaches zero for nanotubes/pores with low radius/length ratio where the potential leakage is negligible. On the other hand, for nanotubes/pores with high radius/length ratio, such as 2D nanopore membranes with diameter larger than 2 nm, the pore potential leakage become significant, resulting in various power-law exponents depending on the degree of the potential leakage. It is noted that although many nanopores conform to this qualitative trend, including some biological nanopores—which are considered highly flexible compared to synthetic nanopores—the power-law exponent in biological nanopores25 is approximately 0.05–0.2 smaller than that in other nanopores with similar aspect ratios22. Some experimental data, such as those from CNT24 and nanofilters made of polyethylene terephthalate31 cannot be solely explained by this phenomenon, implying that the conductance scaling is a complicated phenomenon associated with multiple factors, such as charge regulation and nanopore flexibility.
In this work, we investigate the effect of membrane fluctuations on the scaling behavior of ion conductance using MD simulations. We demonstrate that nanopore membrane fluctuations can influence both the power-law exponent and coefficient of ion conductance. We introduce two distinct frequency regimes (GHz-scale and THz-scale) of membrane fluctuations and examine the contribution of each vibrational mode to the ion conductance.
Results and discussions
To investigate the impact of membrane fluctuations on the scaling of ion conductance, we conducted MD simulations of ion transport through a single layer of nanoporous membrane (Cu-HAB1,39,40) as shown in Fig. 1a, b. The nanoporous membrane is immersed in a KCl solution. The edges of the membrane are fixed, and the rest of the membrane experiences thermal fluctuations during the simulation. For comparison, we also considered a rigid counterpart where the membrane fluctuations are suppressed, maintaining a flat configuration throughout the simulation. To generate ion transport across the membrane, an electric field is applied perpendicular to the membrane. The ion conductance is obtained for various concentrations of KCl to investigate the scaling behavior between ion conductance and ion concentration. The details on MD simulations can be found in the “Methods” section. As stated in the introduction section, the relationship between ion conductance and concentration in nanopore membranes can be characterized by a power-law equation of the form, \(G=\beta {c}_{0}^{\alpha }\). Our simulations show that the membrane fluctuations alter both the coefficient of conductance \(\beta\) and the power-law exponent \(\alpha\), as shown in Fig. 1c. Specifically, the membrane fluctuation increases the coefficient \(\beta\) by approximately 100% and reduces the power-law exponent from 0.75 to 0.55. We note that the conductance scaling is reduced only in the low concentration regime where the surface conductance is dominant. In the high concentration regime, where the bulk transport mechanism is dominant, we observed a linear scaling (i.e., \(\alpha =1\)) for membranes with and without fluctuations. However, the power-law exponent is reduced in the low concentration regime where the surface transport mechanism is dominant. It is noted that this modification of power-law exponent results in a higher discrepancy in conductance with and without membrane fluctuations as the concentration decreases: 102% at 1.0 M, 221% at 0.1 M, and 409% at 0.01 M. These results suggest that the membrane fluctuations can significantly impact ionic conductance for low ion concentration environments.
To better understand the impact of membrane fluctuations on the scaling of ion conductance, we analyzed the fluctuations of the membrane and the hydrated ions. Figure 2a shows a visualization of membrane fluctuations obtained by superimposing multiple snapshots of membranes. The solid color represents the mean displacement of the membrane and the transparent color represents the fluctuations. The mean displacement of the membrane is approximately zero and the amplitude of fluctuation varies with the x-coordinate of the membrane. The maximum fluctuation in the amplitude is observed to be 4 Å, which is comparable to the diameter of the nanopore (6.8 Å). This implies that membrane fluctuations become important when the critical length scale involving transport processes is of the order of a few nanometers or below. In addition to the membrane fluctuations, we also examined the fluctuations of hydrated ions and their vibrational frequencies. Figure 2b shows the fluctuations of hydrated ions and Fig. 2c its vibrational density of states (VDOS). The fluctuations of ions surrounded by water molecules involves THz scale fluctuations41. Specifically, the vibrations of \({\mathrm{K}}^{+}\) and \({\mathrm{Cl}}^{-}\) exhibits their peaks at \(1.2 \mathrm{THz}\) and \(1.6 \mathrm{THz}\), respectively. Also, \({\mathrm{K}}^{+}-{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}\) and \({\mathrm{Cl}}^{-}-{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}\) stretching mode in the first hydration shell exhibit their peaks at \(6.2 \mathrm{THz}\) and \(6.4 \mathrm{THz}\), respectively.
To understand the effect of an individual vibrational mode of the membrane on the ion conductance, we first decomposed the membrane fluctuations into several individual modes. We investigated the trajectories of membranes at the picosecond to nanosecond scale and identified two separate frequency regimes of membrane fluctuations: gigahertz (GHz)-scale and terahertz (THz)-scale fluctuations. The GHz-scale fluctuations involve the wiggling motion of the membrane as a result of the collective motion of membrane atoms. This mode of fluctuation is much slower than the fluctuations of ions and its hydration water. On the other hand, THz-scale frequencies are due to the trembling oscillations of membrane atoms, and this scale of frequency is comparable to the frequency of the fluctuations of the hydrated ions. We found that GHz-scale fluctuations mainly involve the first and second modes of standing waves with fixed edges (i.e., the fundamental harmonic and second harmonic modes), as shown in Fig. 2d, e. To estimate the amplitude and the frequency of the fundamental harmonic mode, we analyzed the z-coordinate of the center of the membrane \({z}_{\mathrm{c}}\). Figure 2g shows the fluctuations of \({z}_{\mathrm{c}}\) over time and this indicates that the amplitude of the fundamental harmonic mode is approximately 4 Å. The fundamental harmonic frequency is approximately 1.5 GHz based on the average frequency of \({z}_{\mathrm{c}}\) alterations between 4 and − 4 Å. Similarly, we determined the amplitude and frequency of the second harmonic mode by analyzing \(z_{{\text{l}}} - z_{{\text{r}}}\) (see Fig. 2h). The estimated amplitude of the second harmonic mode is around 2 Å, with a frequency of approximately 3.0 GHz. Compared to the first harmonic mode, the amplitude of the second harmonic is halved, and its frequency is doubled. Note that this range of GHz frequency is three orders of magnitude slower than the frequency of the hydrated ions, indicating that the wiggling motion of membrane has a negligible vibrational coupling with the oscillation of hydrated ion. While there are also THz scale fluctuations of the membrane as illustrated in Fig. 2f, this scale of fluctuation is due to the thermal oscillation of membrane atoms. The typical scale of the amplitude and the frequency is ~ 0.1 Å and ~ 10 THz (see Fig. 2i), which is comparable to the fluctuations of ions and its hydration water. Therefore, the thermal oscillation of membrane atoms can create a meaningful vibrational coupling with nearby ions.
Next, we examined how the individual modes of membrane fluctuations influence the ion conductance and its scaling. Toward this, we designed conceptual studies for membranes with specific modes of fluctuation. Specifically, we first explored the effect of GHz-scale fluctuations on the scaling of ion conductance. The wiggling motion of membrane is modeled with the standing wave equation for a string with two fixed edges, which is given by \(A\mathrm{sin}\left\{n\pi \left(\frac{x}{L}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\right\}\mathrm{sin}\left(2\pi \omega t\right)\), where \(A\) is the amplitude, \(n\) is the mode number, \(L\) is the length of the membrane along the x-coordinate \(\left(-\frac{L}{2}\le x\le \frac{L}{2}\right)\), \(\omega\) is the frequency, and \(t\) is the time. Figure 3a, b show the conductance-concentration curves under the GHz-scale wiggling motions controlled by the standing wave equation, with amplitudes of 4 Å (Fig. 3a) and 2 Å (Fig. 3b) and L = 4.62 nm. Note that in these controlled wiggling motions, the trembling oscillations of atoms are suppressed, allowing us to exclusively study the effects of the membrane's wiggling motions on ion transport. Notably, the power-law exponent is reduced under the controlled wiggling motion for both the first and second harmonic modes, compared to its rigid counterpart where the thermal fluctuations are suppressed and the membrane remains flat during the simulation. This demonstrates that the wiggling motion of the membrane alters the scaling of ionic conductance. The wiggling motion of the membrane is in the GHz frequency range and that is significantly slower—by three orders of magnitude—compared to the frequencies associated with the fluctuations of hydrated ions which are in the THz-scale. Therefore, the reduced power-law exponent \(\alpha\) due to the GHz-scale wiggling motion does not appear to be a result of vibrational coupling between the membrane and nearby electrolyte.
Our next step will be to examine the physical mechanism underlying the reduced power-law exponent \(\alpha\), created by GHz-scale wiggling motion of the membrane. In these simulations, charge regulation is excluded (surface charge is fixed as a constant). Thus, we focused on the leakage of a surface potential, which is closely associated with the geometry of the pore/channel. In the case of long channel that has an enough space to accommodate counter ions attracted to the channel surface, the effect of surface potential leakage is trivial resulting in the saturation of ion conductance at low concentration (i.e., \(\alpha \approx 0\)). In contrast, a thin pore, such as a 2D membrane, lacks adequate space to accommodate the counter ions. As a result, the surface potential leaks out of the pore, resulting in various power-law exponents between zero and one, depending on the degree of leakage. Given the importance of nanopore geometry in ion conductance scaling, we investigated whether changes in membrane shape, resulting from GHz-scale wiggling motions, could impact the power-law exponent. Notably, the mean displacement of the GHz-scale fluctuation is zero. Therefore, the potential non-linearity between ion conductance scaling and membrane shape needs to be examined.
To test the linearity, we considered two membranes with opposite shapes, \(\delta z\left(x\right)\) and \(-\delta z\left(x\right)\) (see the subfigure of Fig. 3c, d), so that the summation of the displacements is zero (flat membrane). To exclusively study the effect of the membrane shape, we fixed the membrane shape during the simulation and suppressed thermal oscillations of the membrane atoms. This case study differs from the previous study of a wiggling membrane where the membrane shape changed over time. If the conductance is linear with the displacement of the membrane, the linear relation, \(G\left(z=\delta z\left(x\right)\right)+G\left(z=-\delta z\left(x\right)\right)=G\left(z=0\right)\), must hold. The simulation results for these two opposite shapes of membrane are shown in Fig. 3c, d. Both membranes yield a reduced power-law exponent compared to the flat membrane. Note that the linearity equation does not hold, which demonstrates non-linearity in the conductance scaling with respect to the membrane shape. This non-linearity explains that zero-mean wiggling motions of membrane can reduce the power-law exponent. To further understand how various shapes of membrane affect conductance scaling, we examined membranes with several different shapes. The results in Fig. 4 consistently show that the membrane shape can reduce the power-law exponent and slightly increase the coefficient of ion conductance \(\beta\). Our data shows that the amount of displacement is one of the factors for this effect (see Fig. 4b–d). We further analyzed the ion concentration at the pore, \({c}_{\mathrm{p}}\), and compared it to the concentration at the reservoir. Supplementary Fig. 1 indicates that the deformation of the membrane shape influences the scaling of ion concentration at the pore. This suggests that deformed membranes exhibit less electrical potential leakage compared to flat membranes22. These results suggest that ion conductance can be tuned by modifying membrane shape, which has potential applications in a variety of nanofluidic devices.
Finally, we studied the impact of THz-scale oscillations of membrane atoms on ion conductance. For this, we applied a sinusoidal function with a particular frequency and amplitude to oscillate the entire membrane. To investigate the effect of THz-scale oscillations of membrane, the shape of the membrane is fixed during the simulation. Figure 5 illustrates the effects of THz-scale membrane oscillations on the conductance-concentration curve. The simulation results indicate that the THz-scale oscillations of the membrane do not alter the power-law exponent \(\alpha\) (see Fig. 5a–c). Figure 5d shows a case with the same shape used in Fig. 4b, which yields the same power-law exponent \(\alpha =0.55\). This further supports the result that THz-scale oscillations of the membrane do not alter the power-law exponent, but they can considerably increase the coefficient of ionic conductance \(\beta\), in contrast with the GHz-scale wiggling motions of the membrane. The increase of the coefficient can be understood as a result of the vibrational coupling between the membrane and nearby hydrated ions as our earlier studies suggest30,42.
Conclusions
Scaling of ionic conductance in fluctuating 2D membranes is an important area of research due to its potential applications in membrane-based technologies. In this study, we investigated the effect of membrane fluctuations on ionic conductance using molecular dynamics simulations. Our findings indicate that fluctuations in 2D membranes have an impact on the scaling behavior of ion conductance. Specifically, we found that membranes experiencing fluctuations have a lower power-law exponent and a higher coefficient of conductance compared to those without fluctuations. To better understand how membrane fluctuations affect conductance, we first analyzed the membrane fluctuations and observed two distinct ranges of membrane fluctuations. One is GHz-scale frequency mode which is due to the wiggling motions of membrane and the second is THz-scale frequency mode that involves the thermal vibration of atoms. We then conducted conceptual studies with controlled membrane fluctuations with a specific vibrational mode. The results show that the GHz-scale wiggling motion of a membrane reduces the power-law exponent. Our simulations showed a non-linear relationship between the conductance scaling and the membrane shape, suggesting that the fluctuation of a membrane can alter the conductance scaling even though the mean displacement is zero. On the other hand, THz-scale fluctuations do not alter the power-law exponent, but considerably increase the coefficient of the ion conductance. This study provides a fundamental understanding of how different vibrational modes of the membrane effect ion transport. Our findings suggest that modifying the shape of membranes could be a feasible method for tuning ionic conductance in membrane applications.
Methods
We conducted molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the scaling of ion conductance in fluctuating 2D nanoporous membranes. Specifically, our simulations focused on a Cu-HAB membrane1,39 with dimensions of 4.62 nm by 4.00 nm, containing 12 pores in a periodic cell. The edges of the membrane were fixed, while the rest of the membrane was allowed to fluctuate during the simulations. To facilitate comparison, we also conducted ion transport simulations for a rigid membrane, where all membrane atoms were fixed. To generate an electric potential gradient, a uniform external electric field (0.08632 V/nm) perpendicular to the membrane was applied, and the system was maintained at a uniform dimension of 5.80 nm perpendicular to the membrane. We modeled the KCl solution using Coulombic and Lennard–Jones potentials, and the ReaxFF force field43 was used to model the membrane. The partial charges of the membrane are calculated by the charge equilibration (QEq) method44 and fixed them during the simulation. We used the particle–particle particle-mesh method45 to calculate long-range Coulombic interactions. We adopted LJ parameters from46,47,48 and calculated LJ parameters between two different atoms using the Lorentz-Berthelot combination rule, with the LJ potential cut-off distance set at 1.2 nm. The membrane-liquid interactions were modeled using LJ and Coulombic potentials, while we used the flexible simple point charge water model for water49. The potential parameters described by Joung et al.50 were used for ions. The system temperature is maintained using the Nosé–Hoover thermostat, and atomic trajectories were computed using an NVT ensemble with a time interval of 0.5 fs. We examined several cases where the membrane was subjected to a specific vibrational mode. To model GHz-scale fluctuations, we utilized the standing wave equation of the fundamental and second modes with the specific frequencies and amplitudes described in the main text. For THz-scale vibrations, the membrane was assumed to be rigid and excited sinusoidally with a particular amplitude and frequency described in the main text and Fig. 5. We measured ion current by counting the number of ions passing through the membrane, with equilibration conducted for 1 ns and data collection for 5–10 ns. Then the ion conductance is calculated as \(G = I/{\Delta }V\), where \(I\) is ion current and \({\Delta }V\) is cross-membrane electric potential difference. VDOS is calculated as \({\text{VDOS}}\left( \omega \right) = \mathop \smallint \limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty }\langle v\left( {t + t_{0} } \right)v\left( {t_{0} } \right)\rangle e^{ - 2\pi i\omega t} dt\) where \(v\) is the time derivative of position (e.g., relative position of ion and water in the first hydration shell for water-ion stretching mode), \(t_{0}\) is the reference time, \(\omega\) is the frequency, and the angle brackets denote the time and ensemble average. MD simulations are performed by LAMMPS and used OVITO51 for atomic visualizations.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
References
Noh, Y. & Aluru, N. R. Phonon-fluid coupling enhanced water desalination in flexible two-dimensional porous membranes. Nano Lett. 22(1), 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04155 (2022).
Cao, Z., Liu, V. & Barati Farimani, A. Water desalination with two-dimensional metal–organic framework membranes. Nano Lett. 19(12), 8638–8643. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03225 (2019).
Cohen-Tanugi, D. & Grossman, J. C. Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. Nano Lett. 12(7), 3602–3608. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3012853 (2012).
Heiranian, M., Farimani, A. B. & Aluru, N. R. Water desalination with a single-layer MoS 2 nanopore. Nat. Commun. 6, 8616 (2015).
Ramanathan, A. A., Aqra, M. W. & Al-Rawajfeh, A. E. Recent advances in 2D nanopores for desalination. Environ. Chem. Lett. 16(4), 1217–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0745-4 (2018).
Lin, L.-C., Choi, J. & Grossman, J. C. Two-dimensional covalent triazine framework as an ultrathin-film nanoporous membrane for desalination. Chem. Commun. 51(80), 14921–14924. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC05969K (2015).
Surwade, S. P. et al. Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(5), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.37 (2015).
Gupta, K. M., Zhang, K. & Jiang, J. Water desalination through zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes: Significant role of functional groups. Langmuir 31(48), 13230–13237. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03593 (2015).
Feng, J. et al. Single-layer MoS2 nanopores as nanopower generators. Nature 536(7615), 197. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18593 (2016).
Gao, J. et al. High-performance ionic diode membrane for salinity gradient power generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136(35), 12265–12272. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja503692z (2014).
Xin, W., Jiang, L. & Wen, L. Two-dimensional nanofluidic membranes toward harvesting salinity gradient power. Acc. Chem. Res. 54(22), 4154–4165. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00431 (2021).
Safaei, J. & Wang, G. Progress and prospects of two-dimensional materials for membrane-based osmotic power generation. Nano Res. Energy 1(1), 9120008. https://doi.org/10.26599/NRE.2022.9120008 (2022).
Gao, Z. et al. A hybrid zeolitic imidazolate framework Co-IM-mIM membrane for gas separation. J. Cent. South Univ. 24(8), 1727–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3580-z (2017).
Cheng, X. Q. et al. Towards sustainable ultrafast molecular-separation membranes: From conventional polymers to emerging materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 92, 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.006 (2018).
Xu, L.-H. et al. Highly flexible and superhydrophobic MOF nanosheet membrane for ultrafast alcohol-water separation. Science 378(6617), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo5680 (2022).
Amiri, H., Shepard, K. L., Nuckolls, C. & Hernández Sánchez, R. Single-walled carbon nanotubes: mimics of biological ion channels. Nano Lett. 17(2), 1204–1211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04967 (2017).
Ackerman, M. J. & Clapham, D. E. Ion channels—basic science and clinical disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 336(22), 1575–1586. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199705293362207 (1997).
Basu, D. & Haswell, E. S. Plant mechanosensitive ion channels: An ocean of possibilities. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 40, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2017.07.002 (2017).
Allen, T. W., Andersen, O. S. & Roux, B. On the importance of atomic fluctuations, protein flexibility, and solvent in ion permeation. J. Gen. Physiol. 124(6), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200409111 (2004).
Fang, A., Kroenlein, K., Riccardi, D. & Smolyanitsky, A. Highly mechanosensitive ion channels from graphene-embedded crown ethers. Nat. Mater 18(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0220-4 (2019).
Jiang, X. et al. Nonlinear electrohydrodynamic ion transport in graphene nanopores. Sci. Adv. 8(2), eabj2510. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj2510 (2022).
Noh, Y. & Aluru, N. R. Ion transport in electrically imperfect nanopores. ACS Nano 14(8), 10518–10526. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c04453 (2020).
Stein, D., Kruithof, M. & Dekker, C. Surface-charge-governed ion transport in nanofluidic channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(3), 035901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.035901 (2004).
Secchi, E., Niguès, A., Jubin, L., Siria, A. & Bocquet, L. Scaling behavior for ionic transport and its fluctuations in individual carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(15), 154501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.154501 (2016).
Queralt-Martín, M., López, M. L., Aguilella-Arzo, M., Aguilella, V. M. & Alcaraz, A. Scaling behavior of ionic transport in membrane nanochannels. Nano Lett. 18(10), 6604–6610. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03235 (2018).
Yao, Y.-C. et al. Strong electroosmotic coupling dominates ion conductance of 1.5 Nm diameter carbon nanotube porins. ACS Nano 13(11), 12851–12859. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b05118 (2019).
Ma, M. et al. Water transport inside carbon nanotubes mediated by phonon-induced oscillating friction. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(8), 692–695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.134 (2015).
Noh, Y. & Aluru, N. R. Effect of interfacial vibrational coupling on surface wettability and water transport. Phys. Rev. E 106(2), 025106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.025106 (2022).
Lyu, B., Wang, M., Jiang, Z. & Jiang, J. Microscopic insight into anion conduction in covalent−organic framework membranes: A molecular simulation study. J. Membr. Sci. 658, 120754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120754 (2022).
Noh, Y. & Aluru, N. R. Ion transport in two-dimensional flexible nanoporous membranes. Nanoscale 15(26), 11090–11098. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR00875D (2023).
Lev, A. A. et al. Rapid switching of ion current in narrow pores: Implications for biological ion channels. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 252(1335), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1993.0064 (1993).
Schoch, R. B., Han, J. & Renaud, P. Transport Phenomena in Nanofluidics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80(3), 839–883. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.839 (2008).
Bocquet, L. & Charlaix, E. Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39(3), 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1039/B909366B (2010).
Siria, A. et al. Giant osmotic energy conversion measured in a single transmembrane boron nitride nanotube. Nature 494(7438), 455–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11876 (2013).
Radha, B. et al. Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision. Nature 538(7624), 222–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19363 (2016).
Venkatesan, B. M. et al. Stacked graphene-Al2O3 nanopore sensors for sensitive detection of DNA and DNA–protein complexes. ACS Nano 6(1), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn203769e (2012).
Green, Y. Effects of surface-charge regulation, convection, and slip lengths on the electrical conductance of charged nanopores. Phys. Rev. Fluids 7(1), 013702. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.013702 (2022).
Manghi, M., Palmeri, J., Yazda, K., Henn, F. & Jourdain, V. Role of charge regulation and flow slip in the ionic conductance of nanopores: An analytical approach. Phys. Rev. E 98(1), 012605. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.012605 (2018).
Lahiri, N., Lotfizadeh, N., Tsuchikawa, R., Deshpande, V. V. & Louie, J. Hexaaminobenzene as a building block for a family of 2D coordination polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b09889 (2017).
Feng, D. et al. Robust and conductive two-dimensional metal−organic frameworks with exceptionally high volumetric and areal capacitance. Nat. Energy 3(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0044-5 (2018).
Funkner, S. et al. Watching the low-frequency motions in aqueous salt solutions: The terahertz vibrational signatures of hydrated ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(2), 1030–1035. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207929u (2012).
Noh, Y. & Aluru, N. R. Activation of atomic transport via vibrational coupling-induced force fluctuations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 123(9), 091601. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160780 (2023).
van Duin, A. C. T., Dasgupta, S., Lorant, F. & Goddard, W. A. ReaxFF: A reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Chem. A 105(41), 9396–9409. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp004368u (2001).
Rappe, A. K. & Goddard, W. A. Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 95(8), 3358–3363. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100161a070 (1991).
Hockney, R. W., Eastwood, J. W. Computer simulation using particles. in Computer Simulation Using Particles (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981).
Siu, S. W. I., Pluhackova, K. & Böckmann, R. A. Optimization of the OPLS-AA force field for long hydrocarbons. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8(4), 1459–1470. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct200908r (2012).
Jorgensen, W. L., Maxwell, D. S. & Tirado-Rives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118(45), 11225–11236. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9621760 (1996).
Heinz, H., Vaia, R. A., Farmer, B. L. & Naik, R. R. Accurate simulation of surfaces and interfaces of face-centered cubic metals using 12–6 and 9–6 Lennard-Jones potentials. J. Phys. Chem. C 112(44), 17281–17290. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp801931d (2008).
Wu, Y., Tepper, H. L. & Voth, G. A. Flexible simple point-charge water model with improved liquid-state properties. J. Chem. Phys. 124(2), 024503. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2136877 (2006).
Joung, I. S. & Cheatham, T. E. Determination of alkali and halide monovalent ion parameters for use in explicitly solvated biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8001614 (2008).
Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 (2010).
Acknowledgements
The work on fluctuating nanomembranes was supported by the Center for Enhanced Nanofluidic Transport (CENT), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (Award # DE-SC0019112). All other aspects of this work were supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grants 2140225 and 2137157. The computing power is provided by the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) granted by NSF Grant No. OCI1053575 and Blue Waters supercomputing center, awarded by the state of Illinois and NSF, OCI-0725070, ACI-1238993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.N. performed simulations, analysis, and wrote the manuscript under the guidance of N.A.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Noh, Y., Aluru, N.R. Scaling of ionic conductance in a fluctuating single-layer nanoporous membrane. Sci Rep 13, 19813 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46962-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46962-8
- Springer Nature Limited