Abstract
Both PD1/PD-L1 and CD47 blockades have demonstrated limited activity in most subtypes of NHL save NK/T-cell lymphoma. The hemotoxicity with anti-CD47 agents in the clinic has been speculated to account for their limitations. Herein we describe a first-in-class and rationally designed bispecific antibody (BsAb), HX009, targeting PD1 and CD47 but with weakened CD47 binding, which selectively hones the BsAb for tumor microenvironment through PD1 interaction, potentially reducing toxicity. In vitro characterization confirmed: (1) Both receptor binding/ligand blockade, with lowered CD47 affinity; (2) functional PD1/CD47 blockades by reporter assays; (3) T-cell activation in Staphylococcal-enterotoxin-B-pretreated PBMC and mixed-lymphocyte-reaction. In vivo modeling demonstrated antitumor activity in Raji-B and Karpass-229-T xenograft lymphomas. In the humanized mouse syngeneic A20 B-lymphoma (huCD47-A20) HuGEMM model, which has quadruple knocked-in hPD1xhPD-L1xhCD47xhSIRPα genes and an intact autologous immune-system, a contribution of effect is demonstrated for each targeted biologic (HX008 targeting PD1 and SIRPα-Fc targeting CD47), which is clearly augmented by the dual targeting with HX009. Lastly, the expression of the immune-checkpoints PD-L1/L2 and CD47 seemed co-regulated among a panel of lymphoma-derived-xenografts, where HX009 maybe more effective in those with upregulated CD47. Our data warrants HX009’s further clinical development for treating NHLs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of malignances comprised of both highly aggressive and indolent diseases. In general, the WHO Classification of Hematopoietic Tumors recognizes nearly 80 discrete subtypes of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), with an annual incidence of about 80,000 cases in the U.S. The emergence of biological therapies, as first shown with rituximab in 1998, have transformed the management of these complex diseases. Presently, a diverse spectrum of biological agents is used to treat these diseases, including monoclonal antibodies (mAb) (targeting CD20, PD1/PDL1), antibody drug conjugates (ADC) (Brentuximab vedotin, Polatuzumab vedotin), bispecific antibodies (BsAb) (blinatumomab) and CAR-T. While each treatment modality has exhibited marked activity in defined contexts, the activity seen with any one has been relatively restricted, with often less than promising activity across the majority of other NHL subtypes. Evolution of more recent treatment platforms is beginning to gradually integrate traditional chemotherapy and precision targeted drugs with different biologics, transforming the standard of care (SOC) for many subtypes of NHL in a relatively short timeframe.
PD1 and its ligands PD-L1/2 constitute an important pathway modulating host T-cell activity and antitumor cell mediated immunity1,2. In the case of lymphoma, the approval of PD1 targeted drugs including pembrolizumab and nivolumab for the treatment of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) and nasal NK-T cell lymphomas has represented an incremental improvement in these diseases, though the activity of these checkpoint inhibitors has not been seen across the greater diversity of NHL3,4,5.
Similarly, CD47, a “don’t eat me” receptor, is over-expressed in many human tumors, including hematological malignances6,7,8,9,10,11,12. CD47 and its ligand, signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα, residing on the surface of phagocytic cells, including macrophage and dendric cells, or DCs), constitutes a key innate, as well as adaptive, immune checkpoint13,14. High expression of CD47 in tumor cells has frequently been associated with poorer prognosis across many types of cancers12,15,16. Together, these proteins have been considered important immune-checkpoint targets for cancer therapy6,14,17,18, including aggressive lymphomas like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma8, and other hematological malignances like cutaneous T-cell lymphoma10,19,20. To date, targeting CD47 has been achieved with an investigational anti-CD47 mAb drug (e.g. magrolimab, also called Hu5F9-G4)8, and with a SIRPα fusion protein21,22, which blocks the CD47-SIRPα interaction. While both have demonstrated encouraging activity against a variety of hematological malignances, including lymphoma8,10,19,20,23, neither has been approved to date for any indication. The major challenges in the clinic have been largely attributed to the modest single agent antitumor activity24,25, and their association with a variety of dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Anemia and thrombocytopenia, common with anti-CD47 targeted therapies, are attributed to the broad CD47 expression on megakaryocytes and erythrocytes25. In theory, designing unique features of CD47 targeted therapies could circumvent some of these toxicities, and leverage any synergistic interaction that may exist with these two classes of checkpoint inhibitors.
A number of approaches have been considered to improve the activity of these agents. The first would be to create an ADC by conjugating the CD47 targeted antibody to a warhead like monomethylauristatin E (MMAE), as done with BV24. The second would be to design rational bispecific antibodies which might leverage a favorable drug:drug interaction that could augment the activity of the combination above that of the monotherapy13,26. Such an approach would allow one to engage aspects of both the innate and adaptive immune response13,27,28,29. The third consideration would be to engineer differential affinity for the alternative non-CD47 targeted component of the bispecific, allowing for greater binding interactions which should reduce binding to off-tumor CD4729,30.
Development of new drugs including immunotherapies relies heavily on the use of experimental models that allow for quantitating anti-tumor effect in the proper biological context. While no one model is absolutely predictive of clinical outcome, each has its own strengths and limitations, and can provide important insights into the drug mechanism of actions (MOAs)31. Herein, we report on the complimentary interactions of a rationally designed and dual targeted BsAb (CD47 x PD1), HX-009, which appears to exhibit superior activity over the monotherapies in various preclinical models of B- and T-cell lymphomas.
Results
Construct a new BsAb (CD47 × PD1), HX009
Dual targeting of both innate and adaptive checkpoints is theoretically attractive, also since data suggest that dual targeting of discrete checkpoints, e.g. CD47, PD1/PD-L1 or CTLA4, can be synergistic with regard to their anti-tumor effects13,27,29. We set out to create a BsAb targeting both human PD1 and CD47 in order to create a novel biologic with enhanced anti-tumor activity and reduced hemotoxicity based on rational design. We previously developed, and now approved, a humanized IgG4 PD1 mAb, HX008, which demonstrated strong antitumor activity across a variety of tumor types, a stable biochemical structure and a highly favorable pharmacokinetic property32,33,34,35. We used its molecular frame to create a new BsAb, HX009, by grafting the extracellular CD47-binding domain of human SIRPα protein at the C-terminus (Fc) of the heavy chain of HX008 as shown in Fig. 1A (The detailed construction will be published separately). The “2 × 2” symmetric format ensures that the high affinity PD1 binding is maintained while the SIRPα domain has significantly reduced CD47 binding affinity, aiming at reducing binding to CD47+ RBCs and megakaryocytes to minimize hemotoxicity (data not shown here), and also to reduce the anti-CD47 “antigen-sink” effect due to the broad expression of CD47 among normal tissues. PD1 has little systemic expression, but is expressed in tumor microenvironment (TME), so HX009 has tumor targeting effect30, helping the weakened SIRPα binding to CD47 on tumors. The detailed information of HX009 molecule, its production and the finished drug product (DP) as an IV injectable solution (10 mL/vial and 100 mg/vial) used in various preclinical investigations are separately described elsewhere.
Confirmation of HX009’s strong binding to PD1 and less potent binding to CD47
The primary feature of HX009 is its ability to bind and block pre-determined targets of interest. Figure 1B shows the binding, as measured by ELISA assay, confirming the binding interactions of HX009 to recombinant PD1-his and CD47-his proteins. HX009 exhibited identical specific binding to PD1 protein as the parental HX008 molecule, with an EC50 ~ 0.05 nM, confirming the maintained PD1 binding affinity with the addition of SIRPα domain at its Fc domain. HX009 also binds to CD47 with an EC50 of approximately 2.6 nM, which is about 50-times less potent than that observed with the anti-PD1 component. This is also in contrast to the binding affinity of Fc-SIRPα (EC50 ~ 0.24 nM), and magrolimab (Hu5F9-G4, EC50 ~ 0.085 nM in our hand, data not shown)8. These data underscore the intended HX009 design features, namely that the CD47 affinity is reduced compared to the PD1 targeted component (IC50 ratio ~ 52 × between PD1 and CD47), and in contrast to the molecule presently under study in the clinic.
Beside binding to the receptors, we sought to quantitate the blocking potential of HX009 against its target receptors’ binding to their respective ligands, recombinant PD-L1mFc, PD-L2-his and SIRPα-mFc, using a competitive ELISA assay. Figure 1C demonstrates that the PD-L1 blocking dose–response curve (IC50 ~1.6 nM) of HX009 are only slightly lower than that for HX008 (IC50 ~ 1.0 nM), while the PD-L2 binding blocking dose–response curve of HX009 (IC50 ~ 1.6 nM) is slightly greater than that of HX008 (IC50 ~ 3.62 nM). The SIRPα-mFc blocking IC50 of HX009 was shown to be approximately 23.4 nM, in contrast to the blocking dose–response curve of the native SIRPα-Fc with IC50 of approximately 1.4 nM and that of magrolimab with IC50 of approximately 1.1 nM8.
We also assessed HX009 binding to PD1+ cell line, engineered 293T cell over-expressing PD1, by flow cytometry measuring both mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and/or % positive cells. The dose–response curve, as shown in Fig. 1D, demonstrates that HX009 specifically binds this PD1+ cell line with EC50 of approximately 2.9 nM. We then went on to confirm HX009 binding to selected CD47+ lymphoma cells (Supplement Fig. S1 showing mRNA levels), Raji B- and Jurkat T-lymphoma lines by flow cytometry with the binding dose–response curves shown in Fig. 1D (EC50 21 nM for Raji), in contrast to the minimal binding seen with HX008.
In vitro functional characterization of HX009 using reporter cell lines
Following confirming biochemical binding/blocking, we sought to determine the HX009 binding’s impact on signaling in the respective biological pathways. While the biological function of anti-PD1 is likely maintained per design, confirming the biological function of the CD47 fragment is critical given the lower binding affinity. One of the approaches commonly adopted to understand functional interactions between ligands and receptors is to utilize a reporter system where the reporter readouts (e.g. luciferase activity) represent a surrogate function readout of ligand-receptor interaction. With that, we first tested HX009 in a reporter assay for PD1 blocking function, where Jurkat cell line was engineered to carry an IL-2 promoter-guided luciferase reporter gene36, and the luciferase signal mimics the T cell activation by blocking PD1/PD-L1 interaction, when this line is cocultured with a CHO cells expressing TCR stimulatory molecules (an OKT3 clone anti-CD3 single chain antibody fragment (ScFv)) and PD-L1. We confirmed and quantified the biological activity of HX009 PD1 blockade as shown in Fig. 2A using this assay. Interestingly, we have also noticed consistent higher functional readout (nearly 3 × EC50) for HX009 over HX008, in contrast to the same or even slightly lower binding/blockae as compared to HX008 (Fig. 1A,B). If this is true, it is possible that the CD47 engagement in T-cells by HX009 could potentially enhance the T-cell activation pathway by PD1 blockade as suggested by others recently37, and that HX009 maybe more effective as an ICI than PD1 mAb (e.g. HX008). All these would need to be confirmed with further experimentations.
Similarly, we also assessed the CD47 function blockade by HX009 using another specially designed reporter assay. In this assay, a Jurkat cell line (also called “Jurkat-CSR”) stably transfected with a chimeric-SIRPα-receptor (CSR) composed of CD47-binding domain of SIRPα, transmembrane domain of CD28 and the intracellular CD3ζ signal transducing domain. CD47 gene was removed from on Jurkat-CSR cell via gene knock-out (KO) to avoid self-binding within cell (https://patentscope2.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=CN297701761&_cid=JP1-LBPTA7-89214-1). When ligated with CD47, the cell triggers strong CD3 activation signal mediated cell death (AICD), which can be prevented by the anti-CD47 antibody or soluble SIRPα mediated neutralization. We, using this cell, confirmed the functional blockade of CD47 by HX009 as shown in Fig. 2A, although with lower potency as compared to magrolimab and SIRPα-Fc control.
In vitro assessment of T-cell activation by HX009 ant-PD1 function
To address the functional aspects of the PD1 component, we next assessed the T-cell activation function by PD1 blockade in two commonly used in vitro assays. First, we introduced HX009 to the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) pretreated with SEB (Staphylococcal enterotoxin B). As a super-antigen, SEB activates T-cells at low concentration and for a long time, rendering them exhausted. The exhausted T-cells can be reactivated by anti-PD1 antibody and produce IL-2/IFN-γ that can be measured as readouts for anti-PD1 functions. Using this assay and two donors’ human PBMC, our results revealed that HX009 can reactivate the exhausted T-cells (Fig. 2B), similarly as HX008, confirming PD1 functional blockade by HX009. Second, a standard mixed lymphocyte reaction assay (MLR) was used to assess HX009’s ability to enhance T-cell activation during the mix lymphocyte culture by direct measurement of IL-2 and IFN-γ productions. As shown in Fig. 2C, HX009 treatment further enhanced the production of both IL-2 and INF-γ in a concentration-dependent fashion, similar to that of HX008. These results confirmed the PD1 functional blockade and enhancement of T-cell activation by HX009. It worth mentioning that we have not seen apparent high activity for HX009 than for HX008 in these two assays.
HX009 demonstrated anti-tumor activity in two different lymphoma cell line derived xenograft models
Following the confirmation of the designed properties of HX009 in vitro, we evaluated the anti-lymphoma activity in vivo using various preclinical models with certain predictive power (Table 1)31. While there is no one perfect in vivo model to assess these types of immunotherapies, each type of mouse models can however assess certain aspects of drug’s antitumor activity. For instance, xenograft lymphomas can only grow in immunodeficient mice (which have no T-cells), so full assessment of the PD1 targeting cannot be determined. In contrast, xenografts are potentially adequate in assessing the CD47 targeting effect (Table 1). On the other hand, humanized mouse tumor models can also be adopted for evaluating PD1 and CD47 targeting in immune-competent mice (Table 1)31. To explore the potential anti-lymphoma effects of HX009, we conducted several sets of in vivo murine studies using multiple types of preclinical lymphoma models to answer specific questions, including: (i) Raji B-lymphoma (Burkitt’s) xenograft; (ii) Karpas-299T-lymphoma (an anaplastic large cell, or ALCL) xenograft, (iii) A20 syngeneic mouse B-lymphoma (homograft)31, and (iv) a small cohort of DLBCL PDXs (Table 1).
The principle basis for testing biologicals targeting human CD47 using xenograft tumor models revolves around the fact that the polymorphic SIRPα in NOD mice interacts with human CD47, supporting the growth of xenografts38,39. In the first study of a subcutaneous Raji xenograft lymphoma model26 in immuno-compromised NOD/SCID mice, HX009 (10 mg/kg) induced significant growth delay (approximately 54% TGI, or Tumor growth inhibition = (1 − Vtreatment/Vcontrol) × 100), similar to SIRPα-Fc (53% TGI) (Fig. 3A), confirming the anti-lymphoma effects of a CD47 directed biologic in this immunocompromised xenograft model. In this CD47+ xenograft model (Supplement Fig. S1), the absence of a functional human lymphoid immune system, coupled with identical dose response curves for HX009 and SIRPα-FC, suggests the activity seen was entirely attributed to the anti-CD47 effect, without any contribution from the anti-PD1 component of HX009. Furthermore, the observed anti-lymphoma activity in this xenograft study, along with those observed with the following lymphoma xenograft pharmacology studies, confirmed that direct targeting tumor cell CD47 by HX009 resulted in anti-lymphoma effects without targeting CD47 on TME (e.g. those on immune cell, vascular cells, stromal cells, etc.) since the TME belongs to mouse components.
In the second model, Karpas-299 (a T-cell lymphoma) was co-transplanted with human PBMC (Mixeno™)31,40, with the intent to measure the PD1 blockade effect beyond just CD47 blockade as in Raji modeling. HX009 induced remissions in a dose dependent fashion in this model (Fig. 3B), with statistical significance at both high dose levels (10 and 30 mg/kg, TGI: 60–64%). However, HX008 showed little anti-tumor effect, likely due to lack of an autologous anti-tumor immune system in this model31. That is, the observed response to HX009 was entirely attributed to the anti-CD47 effect in this scenario. Together, these data confirmed the anti-lymphoma activity of HX009 across both the CD47+ B- and T-cell lymphomas (Supplement Fig. S1), due to the contribution of the SIRPα fragment in HX009.
HX009 exhibits augmented anti-lymphoma activity in humanized syngeneic mouse lymphoma model, superior to the respective single targeting agents
Given the absence of a competent autologous immune system in conventional xenograft models, including MiXeno humanized mice as for above Karpas-299 model31, it is not possible to assess the activity of PD1 blocking effects of HX009. An alternative type of humanization is to substitute mouse gene targets by human counterparts via genetic engineering (knock in), both in syngeneic tumor cells (“HuCell”) and in mice (“HuGEMM”)31, creating a ‘new’ humanized mouse model. Recently, these models have been employed to understand the antitumor effects of biological therapeutic agents intended for human use31,41,42,43 (Table 1). To this end, we constructed a quadruple human gene knock-in (KI) Balb/c mice: PD1, PDL-1, CD47 and SIRPα (HuGEMM-PD1xPDL-1xCD47xSIRPα), similar to those used by others44 and a human CD47-KI mouse syngeneic A20 B-cell lymphoma, as schematic described in Supplement Fig. S2. This humanized syngeneic mouse B-lymphoma A20 model contains autologous tumor immunity that can be employed to assess dual targeting MOA simultaneously. Our results demonstrated that while the single agents targeting either PD1 (HX008) or CD47 (SIRPα) have anti-tumor activity, as shown in Fig. 3C, the dual targeting by HX009 induced a synergistic anti-tumor activity, as shown in Fig. 3C. These data, in this complex model system that leverages the need for host innate immunity, strongly supports the notion of enhanced treatment benefit through the dual targeting of both CD47 and PD1. Recently, a new mechanism of anti-PD1 mediated T-cell activation via SIRPα on tumor cells interacting with CD47 on CD8+ Teff in TME has been described37. It is possible that the observed anti-lymphoma activity from anti-CD47 function of HX009 could be the HX009-SIRPα interaction either with tumor cell CD47 or with the Teff CD47, or both. The present experiment cannot rule out either of the potential MOAs.
Immune checkpoints (ICs) seemed to be co-regulated in lymphoma-PDXs
With demonstrated anti-lymphoma activities in the above lymphoma cell derived preclinical models, we sought to determine if the same was true in models using patient derived xenograft (PDX45). In particular, a panel of PDX models, closely recapitulating specific human diseases and their heterogeneity, was used to evaluate HX009 under these conditions46,47,48,49. It is reasonable to speculate that the expression levels of the targets of HX009, the ICs PD1 or its ligands, PD-L1/2, and CD47, in lymphoma could be important parameters that influence HX009 efficacy. We first need to know if lymphoma PDXs, by mimicking patients, express these ICs. We recently described establishment and genomic profiling of a panel of lymphoma PDXs (Tables 1 and 2). We thus investigated molecular epidemiology of ICs in this cohort of PDXs, including PD-L1/L2 and CD47 gene expression, either mRNA levels by RNAseq or protein levels by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (CD47 and PD-L1 only, scored by H-scores) (Table 2). The representative images of lymphoma PDX CD47 and PD-L1 IHC are shown in Supplement Fig. S3A, demonstrating varying degree of CD47 protein expressions. Importantly, the H-scores of IHC are not well correlated with mRNA levels of these models by RNAseq for CD47, as per Spearman’s co-efficiency correlation (CC) analysis (Supplement Fig. S3B left panel), although a slight trend is there. In contrast, IHC H-scores using the commercially available Companion diagnostic kit (CDx) are correlated with mRNA levels by RNAseq for PD-L1 with statistical significance (Supplement Fig. S3B right panel). Most interestingly, the three ICs, PD-L1/L2 and CD47 mRNA levels are co-regulated among the cohort of lymphoma PDXs with statistical significance per Spearman’s CC analysis (Fig. 3E)(Table 2), although the underlying mechanisms still need to be elucidated. The similar trend of the co-regulation seems to be seen in DLBCL patients (Supplement Fig. S3C), although short of statistical significance due to small sample size. Altogether, this further supported the rationale of the dual PD1-CD47 targeting for treating lymphoma. IHC or RNAseq assays could be potentially developed as predictive biomarkers for HX009 treatment, if there is a robust correlation between the target expression and the pharmacology efficacy. It is worth noting that PD-L1 IHC companion diagnostics (CDx) are commercially available and are commonplace in the clinics for PD1 and PD-L1 treatments.
CD47hi PDXs seemed to be more sensitive to HX009
Our working hypothesis was that the expression levels of ICs predict HX009 efficacy in lymphoma. We tested this hypothesis by employing this same small cohort of lymphoma PDXs (Table 2) by pharmacologic-modeling HX009 in a “mouse clinical trial format”46,47. Due to the immunodeficient nature of PDX models, only CD47 targeting could be assessed as above xenograft modeling. The results are summarized in Table 2 and a representative tumor growth inhibition curves was shown in Fig. 3D and Supplement Fig. S3D, both suggest that CD47hi models may represent better responders to HX009, or CD47 expression could be a positive predicator for HX009 pharmacology. Although we could not demonstrate the influence of PD-L1/L2 levels on HX009 pharmacology in these PDX models due to their immune-deficiency, it may be reasonable to speculate that the high expression of PD-L1/L2 could potentially also be positive predictors for HX009 pharmacology in human. Due to the co-regulation described above (Table 2 and Fig. 3D, Supplement Fig. S3D), the dual targeting HX009 should likely be more effective than the respective single-targeting in human lymphoma patients.
Discussion
The blockade of PD1/PDL1 has been recognized as a significant incremental step in the successful treatment of solid tumors, though is often associated with far fewer compelling results in other hematologic malignancies. Combination therapies that integrate checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy or other biologics, including other checkpoint inhibitors, e.g. CTLA4 mAb, appear to be emerging as the next promising step in the development of this important class of drugs. The preclinical data presented herein appears to support the contention that combinations of checkpoint targeted drugs, in this case the dual targeting of PD1 and CD47, may be associated with improved activity in models of lymphoma not historically recognized to be sensitive to PD1 or CD47 blockade.
The first generation CD47-targeting agents, exemplified by CD47 mAbs8,50 and SIRPα fusion proteins21,26, are being tested in the patients, mostly in hematopoietic malignances. They generally exhibited only modest activity across the broader spectrum of these diseases8,23. Most of these trials have evolved to some combination strategy as the means to improve on the activity seen with the monotherapy targeting CD478,23,26. Emerging literature suggests rational combinations, particularly with other ICIs, likely to enhance efficacy because of the dual targeting of both innate and adaptive checkpoints13,14,27,29. These clinical and preclinical experiences again support the rationale of dual/multi-targeting, such as we have shown with HX009. In addition, many of the early CD47 targeting agents appear to be IgG1 based, which may create major safety challenges as described above, which may not be mitigated by simple combination strategies13,29,51. The rational engineering of specifically targeted bispecific antibodies may represent an opportunity to improve activity, while reducing toxicity.
Given HX009 itself represents a combination therapy within the single antibody design, our expectation is that this feature alone will improve on the activity of traditional monotherapies directed against these targets by fulfilling the theoretical benefits of targeting both the innate and adaptive immune system13,14. The characterization of the biophysical properties of HX009 in fact confirmed that the molecule exhibits all the pre-determined features as envisioned at the outset. Importantly these represent potent binding to PD1, with consequent functional effects similar to what one would expect with a traditional anti-PD1 directed mAb. Additionally, the CD47 targeted Fc-SIRPα component exhibited reduced affinity compared to the existing CD47 directed monotherapies by fusing to the C-terminus of heavy chain (Fc) of a clinically well vetted PD1 antibody molecule and reduce CD47 binding, thereby reducing binding to erythrocytes and megakaryocytes29,52. This combination of effects appears to have translated successfully in the humanized mouse model, which in fact established a complimentary effect of the dual targeted HX0098,21,50,52. The following two additional considerations of molecular design/engineering have been adopted in order to further improve the safety and pharmacologic profiles of HX009: (1) a PD1 antibody was used, instead of PD-L1 antibody, for two reasons. PD1 antibody has tendency to target high PD1 expressing tumors (TME), limiting interactions with non-malignant peripheral tissues30. While PD-L1 targeting could be an obvious component of a BsAb13,27 alterative to PD1 targeting, PD-L1 antibody is often associated with the “antigen sink” effect due to the broad expression found on normal tissues. In addition, PD-L1 antibody cannot block PD-L2 ligand, while PD1 antibody can. (2) IgG4, instead of IgG1, was chosen as the antibody backbone in order to reduce the toxicity.
The current paradigm regarding MOAs of CD47 targeting for cancer therapy is largely based on the tumor cell bearing CD47 targeting to block its binding to SIPRα ligand on macrophages and DCs13,14, which activate both anti-tumor innate and adaptive immunity. However, recent observations increasingly pointed to the role of CD47 targeting on TME, e.g. Teff cells37,53,54,55,56. With regard to the potential CD47 targeting MOAs of HX009, the anti-lymphoma effect could be attributed to targeting to CD47 either on tumor cells or on Teff CD47 (or even other immune cells in TME), or on both. We have confirmed anti-lymphoma activity of the tumor cell CD47 targeting as shown in xenograft modeling described in this report, although we have yet to demonstrate direct evidence of the role of Teff CD47 targeting in anti-lymphoma activity. However, in theory, HX009 has unique design particularly efficient dual target both PD1 and CD47 on the same cells due to high binding avidity, where PD1 engagement is the initial driving binding and results in subsequent efficient CD47 high avidity binding even with low affinity. Our Jurkat-T-cell reporter assay in vitro consistently demonstrated higher potency of HX009 over HX008 (PD1-mAb) (Fig. 2A), which suggested that anti-CD47 function of HX009 could indeed enhance PD1 mediated T-cell activation. Nevertheless, it would still be important to further investigate the relative contribution of potential targeting Teff CD47 MOAs37. Further HuGEMM experimentations using unmodified syngeneic cell, A20, for instance, can be used to confirm the role of Teff (or other TILs) CD47 targeting in HX009 pharmacology.
The data collected to date support the clinical development of HX009 for the treatment of different types of lymphoma. Given the reduced toxicity (unpublished) appreciated in the animal models, HX009 is unlikely to require priming doses which has been necessary with some of the first generation CD47 targeting agents8,23. It is also probably that combinations with other standard of care treatment such as rituximab could further enhance the efficacy of HX009 in the treatment of B-cell malignancies, similar as several early CD47-mAb therapies (NCT02663518, NCT03530683, NCT03717103, NCT02367196). Since many early clinical trials based on PD1 and CD47 targeting have not yet produced compelling results for the overwhelming majority of hematological malignances, it will be of interest to compare and contrast the merits of this bispecific approach over the single targeted directed antibodies studied to date. Presently, HX009 is undergoing extensive clinical study in patients with a variety of different types of NHLs (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05189093)57.
Finally, it is important to appreciate why certain tumors appear to respond to anti-PD1 and anti-CD47 directed therapies, and why others do not. The differences lie in the tumor cell proper, TME or the competency of the host immune response. Appreciating these differences, as might be revealed through a particular biomarker, could help tailor the use of these drugs in the future, and even inform the best combination partners. Our preclinical PDX trial on a small cohort of lymphoma models under immune deficiency seemed to inform that CD47hi should be a positive predictor for HX009 efficacy. Since CD47 seemingly co-regulated with PD-L1/L2 (Fig. 3 and Table 2), these CD47hi also express higher levels of PD-L1/L2 and should have additional efficacy contribution from anti-PD1 function of HX009 in patients in theory. In another word, companion diagnostics (CDx) based on the expression of these two ICs could be useful in guiding the future patient trials. There has already been marketed CDx based on IHC for PD-L1. CDx for CD47 based on the IHC can readily be developed as well. Since most readily accessible clinical samples of lymphoma is the FFPE, it is reasonable to develop and employ IHC based CDx for HX009 clinical development.
Materials and methods
Cell cultures and reagents
Raji, Jurkat A20 and Karpas-299 cells, from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Hyclone) with 10% FBS (Gibco). 293T-PD1 cell stably transfected of PD1 lentiviral vector was created in our laboratory by using 293T cells from ATCC and cultured in high glucose DMEM medium (Hyclone) with 10% FBS (Gibco) and puromycin. CHO-PDL1-CD3L and Jurkat-PD1-NFAT cell lines were obtained from National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (China), cultured in DMEM/F12 (Gibco) or RPMI-1640 (Gibco) medium containing 10% FBS, (Gibco), 1% NEAA (Gibco). Jurkat-CSR cells, from ImmuneOnco Biopharmaceuticals (Shanghai), were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) with 10% FBS (Gemini). Human PBMCs used in the studies were purchased from ALLCELL (https://allcells.com) where informed consent and approved procedures by its institution committee were used for sample collection and preparations. HX009, HX008, Magrolimab and hSirpα-Fc were constructed in-house in our laboratory. Magrolimab were constructed strictly according to the provided sequence from IMGT database (https://www.imgt.org/3Dstructure-DB/).
Target protein binding/ligand blocking assays based on ELISA
PD1-his or CD47-his recombinant protein (Genescript) was coated in 96-well plates at 40C overnight. Serial dilutions of HX009 or other proteins were applied to duplicate wells for 1 h. The bound antibodies were detected by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) and developed with 3,3′5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TIMB, Biosharp) substrates. Ligand blocking assay ELISA was performed according to Zhang et al.35 with minor modifications. Briefly, the IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) of HX009 competing with the PD-L1 to bind to PD1 was determined by ELISA by serially diluting HX009 (9 × dilution gradient) into binding samples containing defined amount of PDL-1-mFc or CD47-mFc. The binding EC50 of HX009 to PD1 protein or binding blocking were determined by fitting the dose–response data to a four-parameter simulation model.
Binding to target receptor+ cell surface by flow cytometry
PD1 stably transfected 293T cell was used to determine the PD1+ cell binding of a serially diluted HX009 samples using flow cytometry using CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman). Jurkat and Raji cells were used for CD47+ cell binding of a serially diluted HX009 similarly.
Reporter assays for functional interaction with PD1 and CD47
For assaying biological PD1 blocking, Jurkat-PD1 cells carrying an IL-2 promoter-guided luciferase reporter gene were in vitro cocultured with precoated CHO-PD-L1-CD3L cells expressing TCR stimulatory molecules and PD-L1, with addition of HX008 and HX009. The luciferase readout was detected by measuring chemiluminescence at 560 nM wave length using Bio-Lite™ Luciferase Assay System (Vazyme, Najing). Dose–response curve was fitted using four-parameter simulation equation.
For assay CD47 blocking, Jurkat-CSR cell were exposed to CD47-hFc (50 ng/mL), with the presence or absence of HX009 of serially diluted HX009, controlled by hSIRPα-Fc or Magrolimab. The cell viability was analyzed by CCK-8 reagent (Dojindo) after 48 h incubation. The experimental procedures follow the instructions from the manufacturer. The signal was obtained according to absorbance at 450 nm wave length (OD450). Cell death index (CDI) was calculated as CDI (%) = (1 − (OD450 sample − OD450 blank)/(OD450 positive control − OD450 blank))*100%.
Reactivation of SEB stimulated PBMC and mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays
Human PBMC were isolated from healthy donors using Ficoll density gradient separation. After a 4-h incubation at 37 °C, suspended T cells were taken and cultured in RPMI medium containing 10% FBS. T cells were treated with 50 ng/mL of SEB (Beijing Compro Benin) and then incubated with serial dilution of HX009 and HX008 for 3 days. Secretion levels of IFN-γ and IL-2 were analyzed using a commercial ELISA kit with the manufacturer’s instructions (Dakewei). The blank and only SEB treatment were also assessed to indicate the basal cytokine secretion level.
MLR assay was assessed according to protocol presented in Zhang et al.35 with minor modifications. Briefly, human PBMC were isolated from healthy donors using ficoll density gradient separation and monocytes were isolated using a CD14 positive selection kit (Miltenyi). Dendritic cell maturation was accomplished with cytokine cocktail treatment. Matured dendritic cells and T cells from another unrelated individual were mixed and incubated with serial dilution of HX009 and HX008. The effect of HX009 was indirectly evaluated by detecting the secretion levels of IFN-γ and IL-2 using commercially available ELISA kits in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Dakewei). The data is statistical (t-test) analyzed between HX009 and isotype control (hIgG4) to determine HX009 dose-dependent-stimulation of the IFN-γ and IL-2 cytokine secretion (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05).
In vivo mouse anti-tumor pharmacology modelling
All in vivo murine experiments were conducted under sterile conditions at Crown Bioscience SPF facility in strict accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Crown Bioscience (Crown Bioscience IACUC Committee). The study design all followed the ARRIVE Guideline. The antitumor treatment studies were conducted by following protocols described in detail elsewhere40,58 with certain modifications. For the Raji cell derived B-lymphoma xenograft model study, the tumor cells were subcutaneously implanted into NOD/SCID mice (GemPharmtech) whose polymorphic SIRPα efficiently interact with human CD47 proteins on the xenograft tumor cells38,39. The treatment groups include HX009 (100 mg/kg, intravenously or IV, twice weekly), SIRPα-Fc (positive control, 8.9 mg/kg, equal molar as HX009) and vehicle. When the average tumor volume reached ~ 100 mm3, the mice were randomly grouped and treated. Tumor growth inhibition (TGI) was calculated as TGI% = (1 − Vtreatment/Vcontrol) × 100.
For Karpas-299 MiXeno T-lymphoma model, Karpas-299 cells were transplanted subcutaneously followed by human PBMC (IV) engraftment four days later40 in NPG mice (VitalStar, Beijing). Tumor volume was monitored as described in the Raji experiment above, and the reconstitution of human immune cells were monitored by peripheral blood cell flow cytometry40,59.
Humanized syngeneic mouse A20-huCD47 B-lymphoma HuGEMM31,40 model was constructed by knock-in (KI) of the huCD47 gene into a mouse syngeneic B-lymphoma A20 cell line and four human genes, hPD1, hPDL1, hCD47, hSIRPα, were knocked-in Balb/c mice (HuGEMM™), similarly to that reported elsewhere44 (Supplement Fig. S2). Syngeneic A20-hCD47 cells were subcutaneously transplanted as similarly as above xenografts and the pharmacology evaluation of HX009 (10 mg/kg, IP), along with equal molar hSIRPα-Fc (8.8 mg/kg) and HX008 (8.6 mg/kg), in the similar described format.
DLBCL-PDX establishment and treatment pharmacology are described elsewhere, similar to the above xenograft pharmacology, except that tumor fragments are used for implantation widely described before40. The original PDX establishment followed the procedure approved by Crown’s relevant committees and the original lymphoma samples were obtained from collaborating hospitals whose institutional committee approved the sample collection and obtained informed consents.
CD47 and PD-L1 IHC assays of PDX samples
Tissue microarray (TMA) or FFPE slides of both lymphoma PDX models were prepared following standard histology procedure. A standard IHC staining protocol was performed in Bond Rx Automated IHC/ISH Slide Staining machine (Leica Biosystems) using commercial anti-CD47 antibody, clone EPR21794 (Abcam, ab218810) and anti-PD-L1 antibody, clone E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology, 13684). These staining were followed by whole slide imaging using the NanoZoomer NDP2.0-HT Digital Slide System (Hamamatsu) and quantified and calculated H-Score (see below) using HALO® image analysis software (Indica Labs) with pathologists' peer review. The necrotic tumor regions and blank space in the tissue were excluded and the intensity of positive staining on tumor cells was scored at four levels, 0 (negative), 1 + (weak staining), 2 + (medium staining), 3 + (strong staining). The percentages of tumor cells at different intensity levels were evaluated with formula as:
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to that they are yet to be organized for access, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Mahoney, K. M., Freeman, G. J. & McDermott, D. F. The next immune-checkpoint inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in melanoma. Clin. Ther. 37(4), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.018 (2015).
Zou, W., Wolchok, J. D. & Chen, L. PD-L1 (B7–H1) and PD-1 pathway blockade for cancer therapy: Mechanisms, response biomarkers, and combinations. Sci. Transl. Med. 8(328), 3284. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7118 (2016).
Merryman, R. W., Armand, P., Wright, K. T. & Rodig, S. J. Checkpoint blockade in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood Adv. 1(26), 2643–2654. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2017012534 (2017).
Ansell, S. M. Targeting immune checkpoints in lymphoma. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 22(4), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0000000000000158 (2015).
Ansell, S. M. et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 372(4), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411087 (2015).
Feng, M. et al. Phagocytosis checkpoints as new targets for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19(10), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0183-z (2019).
Liu, X., Kwon, H., Li, Z. & Fu, Y. X. Is CD47 an innate immune checkpoint for tumor evasion?. J. Hematol. Oncol. 10(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-016-0381-z (2017).
Advani, R. et al. CD47 Blockade by Hu5F9-G4 and rituximab in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 379(18), 1711–1721. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1807315 (2018).
Folkes, A. S. et al. Targeting CD47 as a cancer therapeutic strategy: The cutaneous T-cell lymphoma experience. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 30(5), 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000468 (2018).
Kim, D. et al. Anti-CD47 antibodies promote phagocytosis and inhibit the growth of human myeloma cells. Leukemia 26(12), 2538–2545. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2012.141 (2012).
Li, Y. CD47 blockade and rituximab in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 380(5), 497. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1816156 (2019).
Yang, K., Xu, J., Liu, Q., Li, J. & Xi, Y. Expression and significance of CD47, PD1 and PDL1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia. Pathol. Res. Pract. 215(2), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2018.10.021 (2019).
Liu, X. et al. Dual targeting of innate and adaptive checkpoints on tumor cells limits immune evasion. Cell Rep. 24(8), 2101–2111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.062 (2018).
Liu, X. et al. CD47 blockade triggers T cell-mediated destruction of immunogenic tumors. Nat. Med. 21(10), 1209–1215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3931 (2015).
Yuan, J. et al. High expression of CD47 in triple negative breast cancer is associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and poor prognosis. Oncol Lett. 18(3), 3249–3255. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10618 (2019).
Yuan, J. et al. Combined high expression of CD47 and CD68 is a novel prognostic factor for breast cancer patients. Cancer Cell Int 19, 238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0957-0 (2019).
Willingham, S. B. et al. The CD47-signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPa) interaction is a therapeutic target for human solid tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 109(17), 6662–6667. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121623109 (2012).
Kazama, R. et al. Combination of CD47 and signal-regulatory protein-alpha constituting the “don’t eat me signal” is a prognostic factor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Sci. 111(7), 2608–2619. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14437 (2020).
Chao, M. P. et al. Therapeutic antibody targeting of CD47 eliminates human acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res. 71(4), 1374–1384. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2238 (2011).
Chao, M. P. et al. Therapeutic targeting of the macrophage immune checkpoint CD47 in myeloid malignancies. Front. Oncol. 9, 1380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01380 (2019).
Lin, G. H. Y. et al. TTI-621 (SIRPalphaFc), a CD47-blocking cancer immunotherapeutic, triggers phagocytosis of lymphoma cells by multiple polarized macrophage subsets. PLoS ONE 12(10), e0187262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187262 (2017).
Yu, J. et al. SIRPalpha-Fc fusion protein IMM01 exhibits dual anti-tumor activities by targeting CD47/SIRPalpha signal pathway via blocking the “don’t eat me” signal and activating the “eat me” signal. J. Hematol. Oncol. 15(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01385-2 (2022).
Advani, R., Volkmer, J. P. & Chao, M. P. CD47 Blockade and rituximab in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 380(5), 497–498. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1816156 (2019).
Si, Y. et al. Anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate: A targeted therapy to treat triple-negative breast cancers. Vaccines 9(8), 882. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9080882 (2021).
Sikic, B. I. et al. First-in-human, first-in-class phase I trial of the anti-CD47 antibody Hu5F9-G4 in patients with advanced cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 37(12), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.02018 (2019).
Piccione, E. C. et al. SIRPalpha-antibody fusion proteins selectively bind and eliminate dual antigen-expressing tumor cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 22(20), 5109–5119. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2503 (2016).
Liu, B. et al. Elimination of tumor by CD47/PD-L1 dual-targeting fusion protein that engages innate and adaptive immune responses. MAbs 10(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2017.1409319 (2018).
Tao, H., Qian, P., Wang, F., Yu, H. & Guo, Y. Targeting CD47 enhances the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and CTLA-4 in an esophageal squamous cell cancer preclinical model. Oncol. Res. 25(9), 1579–1587. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504017X14900505020895 (2017).
Zhang, A. et al. Dual targeting of CTLA-4 and CD47 on Treg cells promotes immunity against solid tumors. Sci. Transl. Med. 13(605), 8693. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abg8693 (2021).
Ren, Z. et al. Selective delivery of low-affinity IL-2 to PD-1+ T cells rejuvenates antitumor immunity with reduced toxicity. J. Clin. Invest. 132(3), 53604. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI153604 (2022).
Li, Q. X., Feuer, G., Ouyang, X. & An, X. Experimental animal modeling for immuno-oncology. Pharmacol. Ther. 173, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.002 (2017).
Liu, R. et al. Phase I study of pucotenlimab (HX008), an anti-PD-1 antibody, for patients with advanced solid tumors. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 13, 17588359211020528. https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359211020528 (2021).
Song, Y. et al. HX008, an anti-PD1 antibody, plus irinotecan as second-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A multicenter, single-arm phase II trial. J. Immunother. Cancer 8(2), e001279. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001279 (2020).
Xu, J. et al. Anti-PD-1 antibody HX008 combined with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine for advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer: A multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase Ib trial. Oncoimmunology 10(1), 1864908. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1864908 (2020).
Zhang, J., Huang, Y., Xi, G. & Zhang, F. HX008: A humanized PD-1 blocking antibody with potent antitumor activity and superior pharmacologic properties. MAbs 12(1), 1724751. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1724751 (2020).
Wang, L., Yu, C., Yang, Y., Gao, K. & Wang, J. Development of a robust reporter gene assay to measure the bioactivity of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapeutic antibodies. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 145, 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2017.05.011 (2017).
Zhou, Z. et al. Tumor-intrinsic SIRPA promotes sensitivity to checkpoint inhibition immunotherapy in melanoma. Cancer Cell 40(11), 1324–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2022.10.012 (2022).
Iwamoto, C. et al. The BALB/c-specific polymorphic SIRPA enhances its affinity for human CD47, inhibiting phagocytosis against human cells to promote xenogeneic engraftment. Exp. Hematol. 42(3), 163–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2013.11.005 (2014).
Yamauchi, T. et al. Polymorphic Sirpa is the genetic determinant for NOD-based mouse lines to achieve efficient human cell engraftment. Blood 121(8), 1316–1325. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-06-440354 (2013).
Chen, D. X. A. In vivo pharmacology models for cancer target research. In Target Identification and Validation in Drug Discovery: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology Vol. 1953 (eds Moll, J. & Carotta, S.) (Springer Nature, 2019).
Lute, K. D. et al. Human CTLA4 knock-in mice unravel the quantitative link between tumor immunity and autoimmunity induced by anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. Blood 106(9), 3127–3133. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-06-2298 (2005).
Wang, J. et al. Durable blockade of PD-1 signaling links preclinical efficacy of sintilimab to its clinical benefit. MAbs 11(8), 1443–1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2019.1654303 (2019).
Du, X. et al. Uncoupling therapeutic from immunotherapy-related adverse effects for safer and effective anti-CTLA-4 antibodies in CTLA4 humanized mice. Cell Res. 28(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-0012-z (2018).
Liu, J. et al. Targeting macrophage checkpoint inhibitor SIRPalpha for anticancer therapy. JCI Insight 5(12), 134728. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.134728 (2020).
Tentler, J. J. et al. Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 9(6), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.61 (2012).
Chen, D. et al. A set of defined oncogenic mutation alleles seems to better predict the response to cetuximab in CRC patient-derived xenograft than KRAS 12/13 mutations. Oncotarget 6(38), 40815–40821. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5886 (2015).
Guo, S., Jiang, X., Mao, B. & Li, Q. X. The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development. BMC Cancer 19(1), 718. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5907-7 (2019).
Gao, H. et al. High-throughput screening using patient-derived tumor xenografts to predict clinical trial drug response. Nat. Med. 21(11), 1318–1325. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3954 (2015).
Guo, S. et al. Molecular pathology of patient tumors, patient-derived xenografts, and cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 76(16), 4619–4626. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3245 (2016).
Chao, M. P. et al. Anti-CD47 antibody synergizes with rituximab to promote phagocytosis and eradicate non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cell 142(5), 699–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.044 (2010).
Buatois, V. et al. Preclinical development of a bispecific antibody that safely and effectively targets CD19 and CD47 for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma and leukemia. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17(8), 1739–1751. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1095 (2018).
Piccione, E. C. et al. A bispecific antibody targeting CD47 and CD20 selectively binds and eliminates dual antigen expressing lymphoma cells. MAbs 7(5), 946–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2015.1062192 (2015).
Schwartz, A. L. et al. Antisense targeting of CD47 enhances human cytotoxic T-cell activity and increases survival of mice bearing B16 melanoma when combined with anti-CTLA4 and tumor irradiation. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 68(11), 1805–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-019-02397-7 (2019).
Nath, P. R. et al. Loss of CD47 alters CD8+ T cell activation in vitro and immunodynamics in mice. Oncoimmunology 11(1), 2111909. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2022.2111909 (2022).
Stirling, E. R. et al. Targeting the CD47/thrombospondin-1 signaling axis regulates immune cell bioenergetics in the tumor microenvironment to potentiate antitumor immune response. J. Immunother. Cancer 10(11), e004712. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-004712 (2022).
Soto-Pantoja, D. R. et al. CD47 in the tumor microenvironment limits cooperation between antitumor T-cell immunity and radiotherapy. Cancer Res. 74(23), 6771–6783. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0037-T (2014).
Roohullah, A. et al. First-in-Human Phase I Dose Escalation Study of HX009, a Novel Recombinant Humanized Anti-CD47/PD-1 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with Advanced Malignancies. https://www.ascopubsorg/doi/abs/101200/JCO20213915_suppl2517 (2021).
Yang, M. et al. Overcoming erlotinib resistance with tailored treatment regimen in patient-derived xenografts from naive Asian NSCLC patients. Int. J. Cancer 132(2), E74-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.27813 (2013).
An, X. et al. Immunophenotyping of Orthotopic homograft (syngeneic) of murine primary KPC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by flow cytometry. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/57460 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank technicians from both Hanx Biopharmaceuticals, Crown Bioscience, Inc., GemPhamatech, Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc. (SMOC) for their excellent technical supports for the studies described in this report. Dr. O’Connor is an American Cancer Society Research Professor. Other authors are all employees of either Hanx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. Crown Biosciences, Inc., GemPhamatech, Co., Ltd. or Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc. (SMOC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.K., F.Z., L.Z., S.G., C.J., X.H., R.S., Q.L. involved in study design and scientific discussion; Q.L., O.O., H.K. involved in manuscript writing. C.C.,J.W., L.X., X.A., X.T., Y.W., B.M.: involved in experiment conducts and data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ke, H., Zhang, F., Wang, J. et al. HX009, a novel BsAb dual targeting PD1 x CD47, demonstrates potent anti-lymphoma activity in preclinical models. Sci Rep 13, 5419 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32547-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32547-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Discovery of a novel small molecule as CD47/SIRPα and PD-1/PD-L1 dual inhibitor for cancer immunotherapy
Cell Communication and Signaling (2024)
-
Antigen presenting cells in cancer immunity and mediation of immune checkpoint blockade
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis (2024)