Abstract
The rise of anthelmintic resistance worldwide has led to the development of alternative control strategies for gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) infections, which are one of the main constraints on the health of grazing small ruminants. Presently, breeding schemes rely mainly on fecal egg count (FEC) measurements on infected animals which are time-consuming and requires expertise in parasitology. Identifying and understanding the role of immunoglobulins in the mechanisms of resistance could provide a more efficient and sustainable method of identifying nematode-resistant animals for selection. In this study we review the findings on immunoglobulin response to GIN in the literature published to date (june 2019) and discuss the potential to use immunoglobulins as biomarkers. The literature review revealed 41 studies which measured at least one immunoglobulin: 35 focused on lamb immune response (18 used non-naïve lambs) and 7 on yearlings. In this review we propose a conceptual model summarizing the role of immunoglobulins in resistance to GIN. We highlight the need for more carefully designed and documented studies to allow comparisons across different populations on the immunoglobulin response to GIN infection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Small ruminants are an important source of food and revenue1,2. The world’s sheep and goat populations have increased steadily over the past decades, especially in developing countries2. One of the main constraints on small ruminant production is management of animal health. Infection with gastrointestinal nematode parasites has the greatest impact upon animal health and productivity3. The control of GIN in sheep and goats has been dependent on the use of anthelmintic treatment, however their extensive use has resulted in the anthelmintic resistance4,5,6 which has been reported in multiple countries7. In addition, there is a growing demand from consumers to produce chemical-free food and increasing concern about animal welfare8.
Therefore, two main axes of research have been identified to develop alternative control strategies for GIN management. The first option is the reduction of parasite burden on the pasture through grazing management. However, nematode-free pastures are not readily available under intensive grazing conditions. The second option to reduce GIN infections is the improvement of the host immune response through the genetic selection of lines or breeds of resistant animals, nutritional supplementation and/or vaccination.
A number of studies have already identified sheep breeds, such as the Florida Native9,10, Santa Ines11,12, Texel13,14, St. Croix9,15,16 and Red Massai sheep17 that are resistant to various GIN species. There are also reports on differences between breeds in resistance to GIN infection in goats18,19,20. Moreover, variation among individuals within the same breed in response to GIN infection has been observed in sheep21 and goats22,23, which could be used to breed resistant lines for several breeds. These variations were often applied to breed diverse lines in experimental studies for the identification of mechanisms or genetic regions for GIN resistance.
Several studies have indicated that genetic resistance to GIN is associated with a protective immune response which is mediated, at least partly, by the humoral response24. Understanding the differences in the humoral response between resistant and susceptible breeds, lines or individuals could help to design and implement appropriate control programs and sustainable breeding for GIN resistance. To our knowledge, there is no recent review on the association of immunoglobulin responses and the intensity of GIN infection (based on FEC and/or parasite burden counts). The role of different immunoglobulins in immunity to nematodes needs to be confirmed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of immunoglobulin responses (especially IgA and IgE) against GIN and their potential use as biomarkers in breeding schemes.
Results and Discussion
Evaluation of the risk of bias
The results of the qualitative evaluation of the risk of bias are presented on Fig. 1. Ethical statement for the use of animal was specified in 26% of the studies. Indeed, this statement was not compulsory before the early 2000s, depending on the country. An adequate allocation sequence generation was specified in 74% of the studies, 88% used random housing and 91% reported the use of similar groups at baseline. However, allocation concealment was not performed in 60% of the studies. Random outcome assessment was specified in 84% of the studies but the outcome assessment was not blind in 56% of the studies. Incomplete outcome was adequately addressed in 91% of the studies and other sources of bias were reported in 98% of the studies. There was no indication of bias across studies reporting correlation coefficients based on the funnel plot (Fig. 2) analysis and the results of the Egger’s test (I2 = 10.1%, P = 0.304).
Immune response to GIN infection
Both cellular and humoral responses are actively involved in immune response against nematode infection. The main effectors of this immune response are T- and B-lymphocytes, plasma cells, mast cells, eosinophils, globule leukocytes, soluble cytokines and various immunoglobulin isotypes25. Incoming nematode larvae from GIN infection trigger local inflammation and mast cell degranulation, which damages the gastrointestinal mucosa26. Dendritic cells, macrophages and the other antigen-presenting cells, capture the nematode antigens within the intestinal mucosa and migrate to the regional lymph nodes to present these antigens to naïves T cells24. After T-cell differentiation, the secretion of type 1 T helper (Th1) or type 2 T helper (Th2)-associated cytokines induces the migration to the site of infection of activated effector cells such as eosinophils and mast cells24,27. The type of helper CD4 + T lymphocytes that develop following an infection with nematodes is critical for the ability of the host animal to overcome an infection28. The Th1 cells produce interferon-gamma (IFNγ), interleukin (IL-2) and tumor necrosis factor-beta (TNFβ) for the activation of macrophages and the initiation of the cell-mediated immunity and the phagocyte-dependent protective responses11,29. The Th1 cells develop mainly following infections by intracellular parasites (viruses and some bacteria). When GIN antigens penetrate the gastrointestinal tissues of the host, macrophages and other cells which have receptors for nematode cell surface molecules are activated and induce a specific but mostly ineffective immune response29.
The phagocyte-independent protective responses characterized by antibodies production, eosinophils activation and inhibition of several macrophage functions, are activated by the production of Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13)11,29. The Th1 response inhibits the Th2 response through IL-1030, which makes Th1 and Th2 responses antagonistic to each other. Results from studies in sheep showed that CD4 + lymphocytes increase during the experimental infection of both susceptible and resistant sheep with GIN31,32. But compared with resistant sheep, susceptible produce more interferon gamma (IFNγ), fewer parasite-specific serum antibodies, blood and abomasal eosinophils33. The role of the two major types of T helper cells distinguishes resistant from susceptible sheep.
The acquired immune response after infection with Haemonchus contortus was compared in Barbados Blackbelly sheep, which are generally defined as a resistant breed, and Columbia sheep, a breed classified as susceptible34. Sheep of the resistant breed developed and sustained a Th2 response through increasing and maintaining IgG and blood eosinophil levels. Meanwhile sheep of the susceptible breed showed changes in the response starting with an initial increase in IgG and blood eosinophils (Th2) but a later reduction in both, which suggests a switch to a Th1 response34. An earlier study suggested that in the relative absence of Th1 type secretions (i.e. cytokines), the Th2 cells secrete cytokines that promote mastocytosis, eosinophilia and the production of IgE and IgG135. Gulf coast native (resistant) lambs showed a significantly higher expression of IL-4 mRNA (Th2) on day 10 post exposure to the nematode compared to Suffolk lambs (susceptible). On the other hand, the expression of IFN-γ mRNA and IL-10 (Th1 and regulatory T) on days 7, 10 and 14 post exposure was higher in Suffolk lambs (susceptible) compared with native lambs25.
This confirms that if T helper cells of the Th2 type gain ascendancy after GIN infection, then a protective immune response ensues. In contrast, if an inappropriate Th1 type response predominates, effective resistance is unlikely to develop. The Th1 type response for GIN infection is most likely associated with susceptibility, while a Th2 type response is associated with resistant phenotypes in sheep25,33,34. As Th2-associated cytokines target plasma cells to produce nematode-specific antibodies and generate protective immune responses24, we focus here on the immunoglobulin response against GIN.
Immunoglobulin response in sheep (IgA, IgE, IgG and IgM)
The association between different immunoglobulin isotypes, including IgA, IgE, IgG and IgM and GIN resistance has been widely studied in sheep (Table 1). Studies which measured at least one immunoglobulin parameter during GIN infection (Table 1) differed in sheep breed used, type of breed (resistant or susceptible), age of animals in the experiment, immunological status (naïve or non-naïve), infected parasite genus and infection type (natural, artificial with single dose or artificial with trickle doses) which makes the comparison between them rather complex.
When comparing publications which measured different immunoglobulins levels against different larva stages during GIN infection in sheep it was found that the majority of the studies examined the presence of L3 antigen-specific immunoglobulins (Fig. 3). The third stage larva (L3) represents the stage with the first contact of the gastrointestinal nematodes with the host immune system. It can also be seen from the figure that IgA was the most commonly investigated immunoglobulin isoform in sheep.
Total antibody response
Results from Douch et al.36 and Gauly et al.37 suggested that resistant sheep have higher total antibody levels and that the antibody level could be used in selection for resistance. Romney rams, selected based on their serum antibody levels at an age of 6 months to reduce FEC, underwent a natural parasite challenge, and it was predicted that the genetic gain was 51 to 67% of the genetic gain achieved when FEC was directly used as a selection trait36. The total antibody level in both 4 and 5 months old Rhön (resistant) sheep were significantly higher compared to Merinoland (susceptible) lambs following experimental infection with H. contortus37.
The correlation between Trichostrongylus colubriformis-L3 or -adult total antibody and FEC (−0.62 and −0.55) or nematode burden (−0.56 and −0.63) was high in Romney progeny selected for low and high FEC following a natural GIN challenge38.
IgA response
It has been suggested that local immune effectors expressed in the abomasal mucosa, particularly IgA, play an important role in immunity acquired both naturally and experimentally39. In sheep, secretory and plasma IgA derive predominantly from the gastrointestinal tract24. The correlation between gastric mucus IgA and peripheral IgA is positive and highly significant, ranging from 0.618 to 0.77940,41. Several studies reported an increase of the IgA response after GIN infection, higher levels were recorded for resistant breeds16,39,42.
The level of IgA against the CarLA antigen (a carbohydrate larval surface antigen expressed on the L3 of all trichostrongylid nematode species) has been suggested to be a suitable means to measure the level of resistance to GIN43,44. Different studies found that CarLA is a target antigen for host IgA which binds to the larval surface antigen and prevents larvae from establishing at their preferred sites in the intestinal epithelial folds43,44,45. In this context, a different L3-specific surface antigen (CarLA) was detected from Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Haemonchus contortus and Ostertagia circumcincta with similar molecular weight (35-kDa), and from Cooperia curticei and Nematodirus spathiger with a different molecular weight (22-kDa on blots of L3 extracts)43. IgA in saliva had a negative genetic correlation with FEC (r = −0.5) and animals with high levels of anti-CarLA IgA have typically 20–30% lower FEC than animals with low or undetectable titers45. A simple way to use these results for the selection of animals resistant to parasite infection could be to measure anti-CarLA IgA in saliva.
The faecal egg output in St. Croix hair-type sheep (resistant breed) can rapidly reduce in response to H. contortus artificial infection following a 45-day breeding season, which was accompanied with higher levels of circulating antigen-specific antibody IgA compared to a susceptible composite line of wool-type sheep (50% Dorset, 25% Finnsheep and 25% Rambouillet breeding)16. The increase in anti-T. circumcincta IgA antibody and eosinophil concentrations were associated with an increase in the frequency of early L442. Also Ellis et al.39 found a correlation (r = 0.534, P = 0.007) between L3 antigen-specific IgA levels in efferent gastric lymph and the percentage of inhibited L4s. In addition, a negative correlation (r = −0.565, P = 0.005) between total T. circumcincta burden measured at necropsy and L3 antigen-specific IgA levels in efferent gastric lymph was reported..
A negative association was reported between IgA activity against L4 and both egg counts and worm length when studying resistance to T. circumcincta in Scottish Blackface and Churra sheep40,46. Gastric mucus IgA against L4 somatic antigen was highly and negatively correlated (r = −0.71, P < 0.01) with the number of eggs per female in utero and also with the length of adult females (r = −0.552, P < 0.01). Results for IgA against somatic antigen from the adult stage were similar to those with activity against L4, but correlations were somewhat weaker40. Negative genetic correlations were found between IgA and FEC, worm length, worm fecundity and worm burden (r = −0.78, −0.53 and −0.62, −0.36, respectively) in Scottish Blackface lambs exposed to natural mixed infection47. It was suggested that parasite development such as worm growth and fecundity in sheep can be regulated via an IgA response, possibly in conjunction with eosinophils11,41.
In this paper, we have collected data from previous studies that measured correlations between FEC and blood IgA levels against different larval stages. We also calculated correlations using raw data for FEC and blood IgA level from these studies before re-analyzing all the data. Figure 4 shows the correlations between FEC and blood IgA levels against different larval stages from different studies. The overall correlation between IgA in blood and FEC was negative (r = −0.36, 95% CI = −0.46, −0.26). Correlations between FEC and blood IgA activity against L3 or adult were −0.39 (95% CI = −0.51, −0.28) and −0.47 (95% CI = −0.85, −0.09), respectively. Only one study measured the correlation between FEC and blood IgA activity against L4, L5 or ESP. Although IgA is produced locally at the mucosal surfaces and serum IgA is derived from the gastrointestinal tract24, few studies measured mucosal IgA, possibly because of the difficulties in sampling mucus. Serum IgA is easier to measure and highly correlated with mucosal IgA40,41. We were not able to re-analyze mucosal IgA. Although CarLA saliva IgA antibody test is currently being marketed (CARLA® SALIVA TEST) as a powerful new tool for measuring parasite immunity in sheep (https://www.agresearch.co.nz/doing-business/products-and-services/carla-saliva-test/), no correlation was found between saliva IgA and serum or mucosal IgA40. However, antibodies in saliva may be binding directly to ingested L3.
IgE response
The degranulation of mucosal mast cells is induced by the cross-linking of IgE on their surface. Following reinfection, a negative correlation between the concentrations of globule leucocytes (intraepithelial mast cells) and the T. circumcincta worm burden have been shown in sheep48. Indeed, the IgE antibody response mainly directed against L3 antigens, would be more prominent in previously infected sheep49.
In Romney sheep selected for almost two decades for high or low FEC following T. colubriformis infection, sheep from the low FEC line had higher total IgE (97 to 103%) and T. colubriformis-specific IgE (59 to 98%) compared to sheep from the high FEC line50,51. Similarly, after 7 weeks of grazing on a contaminated pasture, low FEC (based on the accumulated weekly measure) lambs (Greyface × Suffolk) had significantly higher systemic levels of IgE anti-HMWTc (a major high molecular weight complex allergen from T. circumcincta L3) than high FEC lambs52. In addition, after 13 and 18 weeks on pasture, serum IgE anti-HMWTc assays demonstrated an even greater difference between low and high FEC lambs. We conclude from these studies that high levels of IgE are associated with low levels of FEC in sheep. Pettit et al.53 showed that during the first and second year on pasture a higher concentration of blood circulating IgE-bearing cells was associated with a lower FEC of Scottish Blackface lambs.
Other studies comparing resistant and susceptible sheep breeds confirm the role of IgE as an important effector of the immune response to nematode infection in sheep13,33. Sayers et al.13 reported that the most notable difference of mucosal antibody isotype when comparing Texel (GIN resistant breed) and Suffolk (GIN susceptible breed) is IgE, after natural GIN infection. Mucosal IgE in Texel was significantly negative correlated with FEC (r = −0.48) and abomasum worm burden (r = −0.47). Also, the total IgE content in 5-6 month old Gulf Coast Native lambs increased significantly and was highest 7-14 days after artificial infections with H. contortus compared to the level in Suffolk lambs, which was confirmed in a natural infection experiment with the highest level of IgE at 14-42 days post infection33.
IgG response
A review of studies investigating IgG and FEC after parasite infection in different sheep breeds12,34,38,54 suggested that IgG (especially IgG1) increases following infection and is associated with increased resistance to some GIN infections in sheep. Romney lambs had elevated levels of antibodies to T. colubriformis L3 excretory/secretory antigens which consisted predominantly of IgG1, reaching peak levels between days 42 and 77 post infection54. Bisset et al. (1996) found that the T. colubriformis-specific IgG1 response against both L3 and adult secretory/excretory antigens, was significantly higher in Romney lambs bred for low FEC compared to those selected for high FEC. IgG1 was negatively correlated with FEC (r = −0.60 and −0.48) and strongyle burden (r = −0.53 and −0.57) for both L3 and adult worm secretory/excretory antigens38.
Barbados Blackbelly lambs, which are resistant to H. contortus, had higher amounts of IgG anti-L3 between weeks 9 and 15 after infection. On the other hand, in the 9th week, sheep from the less resistant Columbia breed had lower IgG levels compared to the uninfected group34. An increase in IgG anti-L3 and IgG anti-adult H. contortus was also observed in Santa Ines ewes (a resistant breed) and its cross with Dorper, Ile de France, Suffolk and Texel, as a consequence of exposure to GIN larvae on pasture55. Santa Ines lambs had, after artificial infection with T. colubriformis, significantly higher specific serum levels of IgG anti-L3 and IgG anti-adult than the uninfected control group from week 4 (P < 0.05) to 13 (P < 0.01) post-infection56. A significant negative correlation was reported between H. contortus burden and IgG against L3 (r = −0.72), IgA against L5 (r = −0.61) and mast cells (r = −0.73) in Santa Ines male lambs, but not in Ile de France, which may be the reason that Santa Ines sheep had a lower FEC and worm burden than Ile de France sheep12. In a serial infection trial with Santa Ines crossbred lambs, H. placei infection induced high levels of IgG anti-L3 and IgG anti-adult compared with a control group, while animals serially infected with H. contortus induced high levels of IgG anti-adult but not IgG anti-L3 compared with the uninfected control group57.
IgM response
IgM has an important role in the immune response as it represents the first class of antibodies produced following the initial exposure to a foreign antigen58. However, it is not normally present in the gastrointestinal mucus59. Only a few studies have investigated the IgM response in sheep during GIN infection and the findings from two studies did not suggest a major effect of IgM in sheep33,38. In selected Romney ram progeny, bred for genetic divergence in FEC, the correlations between IgM and both FEC or GIN burden were weak following an extended period of exposure to naturally contaminated pasture38. IgM did not differ between Gulf Coast Native (a resistant breed) and Suffolk lambs (a susceptible breed) in both artificial infections with H. contortus and natural infection experiments25.
In contrast, GIN challenge in Romney lambs gave rise to elevated levels of IgM anti-L3 after artificial infection with T. colubriformis L354. A moderate increase of IgM serum antibody levels against both larval and adult antigens was found in Texel lambs in both primary infections and challenge infections with H. contortus60. Jejunal IgM anti-L3, after T. colubriformis infection, was the highest in resistant Merino animals with a tertiary infection, whereas susceptible animals with one infection had the lowest titres. This difference was not observed for abomasal IgM anti-L3 after H. contortus infection61.
Immunoglobulin response in goats
The strategies developed by goats appear to be different from those observed in sheep, to regulate GIN infections62 and to establish immunity63, but only few studies have investigated the immune response against GIN in goats. Bambou et al.64 found that serum antibodies IgA anti-L3, IgE anti-L3 and IgA anti-ESP, IgE anti-ESP increased significantly after L3 H. contortus infection in both susceptible and resistant 11 months old Creole kids. At the same time IgG anti-L3 and IgG anti-ESP levels were weak in both groups. Similarly, McBean et al.23 reported no consistent differences in IgA, IgE or IgG levels between Scottish Cashmere goats selected for low FEC (generations F2 to F9) and control lines (unselected) after artificial infection with T. circumcincta and during the grazing season. On the other hand, IgA anti-ESP, IgA anti-L3 and IgE anti-L3 were genetically correlated with FEC (0.84 ± 0.13, 0.72 ± 0.18 and −0.32 ± 0.08, respectively), while they did not find any phenotypic correlation between them65. A phenotypic correlation is the correlation between records of two traits on the same animal. Genetic correlation, traditionally calculated from pedigree data, is a measure of the genetic relationship between two traits66. A high genetic correlation between two traits is generally supported by genes that are usually co-inherited. The phenotypic correlation estimate the correlation between two traits and is depend both on additive genetic and of environmental effects66. Recently, it has been suggested that the lack of functionality of the immune response mediated by IgA and eosinophil against natural nematode infection in Boer goats would be due to a dysfunctional transmembrane domain of the high affinity IgA receptor67. Altogether these results indicate that the humoral response against GIN infection is less effective in goats than sheep and does not probably play a major role in resistance to nematode infections in goats.
Genomic studies on GIN resistance
Identifying genetic markers of resistance and/or susceptibility could improve the efficiency of breeding programs. The first approach used to search for genetic markers associated with host resistance was a study of associations between variants of genes related to the host immune response and phenotypic resistant traits68. The genetic markers that have been most frequently associated with nematode resistant are those from the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region on Ovis aries chromosome 2069,70,71,72,73,74. MHC genes are highly polymorphic69,74 and play important roles in presenting processed antigens to host T lymphocytes, causing T cell activation. The second most frequently region identified in studies for resistance to GIN infection is the interferon ɣ (IFNG) gene on O. aries chromosome 375,76. The majority of studies of quantitative trait loci (QTL) focused on the association/ linkage between genomic regions and FEC. Only few studies examined the association between genomic regions and immunoglobulins level during GIN infection. Table 2 shows the genomic regions that were reported to be linked or associated with immunoglobulin-mediated resistance to GIN infection. Similarly to phenotypic studies, the majority of genomic studies focussed on the IgA response during GIN infection73,75,77,78,79, two studies considered the IgG response80,81 and only one study examined the IgE response80.
Factors that impact animal response to GIN infection
A number of factors impact the immune response to parasite infection. We focus here on the factors of the animal itself, such as genetic differences, age of the animal and immunological experience, infection period, or type of infection (i.e. natural or experimental).
Age of the animal and immunological experience
Our review on immune responses to parasite infection in sheep suggests that the age of the animal influences the immune response to GIN infection. Even though the traits investigated were different, three studies have identified age-related differences in the immune response82,83,84. High eosinophil counts were significantly correlated with low FEC in naturally infected with T. circumcincta Scottish Blackface lambs which were at least 3 months of age, where the correlations were −0.33, −0.14 and −0.24 after 3, 4 and 5 months of age, respectively83. Also the correlations between IgE activity and FEC in Texel lambs following 4 weeks of natural mixed nematode infection were only significant at 5 and 6 months, while it was not significant at 7 months of age when natural exposure would be declining due to the onset of late autumn and winter82. We found that many studies discussed their results without taking the age structure of the chosen experimental cohort as an important factor into account. However, from the studies using age different cohorts, we conclude that differences in immune reactivity might be partly explained by age.
Immunological experience has a huge impact on the response to parasite infection and is partly confounded with animal age. Immune response was reported to be low and delayed in primary-infected lambs while it is higher and rapid in previously-infected animals60,85,86. The majority of the studies (85%, n = 35) focus on lamb immune response as model for nematode infection and half of these studies (n = 18) used non-naïve lambs. It has been shown that genetic variation in resistance to GIN is associated with the development of an acquired immune response, which explains why the pathophysiological impact of these parasitic infections is more important in growing lambs compared to mature sheep87. Also, in lambs genetic variation in FEC is not correlated with genetic variation in the total number of worms but rather to female worms length and consequently their fecundity88. In contrast to lambs, mature sheep may have the ability to limit both fecundity and worm numbers87. Hence the immune mechanisms could differ.
Infection period
Days post infection (d.p.i) represents also a very important factor that may affect the results obtained. The majority of the research measured host immune response within 0 to 6 weeks post infection, while other studies indicate that they did not find significant immune response until about 9 weeks post infection34,37,42.
IgG level at 60 d.p.i was significantly correlated with worm burden (r = 0.235 to 0.247) and total antibody level was significantly correlated with worm length (r = 0.316) and FEC (r = −0.148), whereas the correlations were not significant at 30 d.p.i in Merinoland sheep infected with H. contortus37. A similar difference was also observed in Rhön sheep, the total antibody value was significantly correlated with worm burden (r = 0.372 to 0.378) at 60 d.p.i but not at 30 d.p.i37. Similarly, in Blackface lambs exposed continuously to infection of T. circumcincta, anti-T. circumcincta IgA levels were inversely correlated with FEC and increased with time from r = −0.17 (NS) at 14 d.p.i to r = −0.44 at 84 d.p.i (P < 0.001)42. Moreover, the difference of the anti-T. circumcincta IgA level between resistant and susceptible sheep diverged with time and was significant from 56 d.p.i. onwards42.
Comparing immune response to GIN in resistant and susceptible sheep breeds, sheep of both Barbados Blackbelly (resistant) and Columbia (susceptible) breeds showed a significant increase in blood eosinophils from 1 to 9 weeks post infection, these levels decreased suddenly thereafter in Columbia lambs34. A similar pattern was observed in the same study for IgG anti-L3 levels, Barbados Blackbelly lambs had a higher amount of IgG anti-L3 between weeks 9 and 15 after infection with a positive significant regression (0.79), while the regression in Columbian lambs was negative and not significant (−0.59) at week 9. These results suggest that at the beginning of the infection the immune response may not differ a lot between resistant and susceptible animals but differences become more apparent 9 weeks after infection.
An interlaced issue is the effect of age and infection period, significantly greater nematode-specific serum antibody activities were reported in Texel compared to Suffolk sheep for all isotypes (IgG1, IgG2, IgA and IgE) at 14 and 17 weeks of age with increasing divergence between the breeds as age increased13. Meanwhile these differences could be explained as the effect of infection period as in this experiment the lambs were exposed to natural infection after staying on pasture within 1 to 3 days of birth, so these differences in response could be due to age or infection period or a combination of both.
Infection type (natural/artificial)
The majority of the studies measuring at least one immunoglobulin as a response to GIN infection used single infections (n = 25, 59.5%) with high number of GIN larvae or natural infections (n = 10, 24%). A natural infection occurs gradually and results from large single infections may not reflect the pattern of a natural infection34. However, in a natural infection, we cannot control infection dose or determine the exact time of infection; consequently the results may not accurately reflect the difference between susceptible and resistant animals. A suggested solution is to use artificial infection of different doses with a low number of larvae weekly (trickle infection) with which infection dose, the time of infection and infection specificity are controlled34. We only found 12% (n = 5) of the studies used trickle infection for their experimental design when measuring immunoglobulin response to GIN infection. The only study that measured the immune response to GIN infection under single and trickle infection found that mean optical densities for serum IgG in naïve lambs (resistant) was significantly higher than in Suffolk lambs (susceptible) in single infection groups at 14 and 21 d.p.i with no significant difference between these breeds in trickle infection groups at same time points33.
Summary for immunoglobulins role against GIN infection
Results from published studies, which have reported significant correlations between different immunoglobulins and parasite parameters (FEC, worm burden and worm length) are summarized in Table 3. These studies suggest a role for L3 antigen-specific IgA, IgE and IgG responses in resistance to GIN in sheep. Also the role of L4 antigen-specific IgA for the resistance to GIN in sheep appears more important than the role of IgA against L3.
Three major mechanisms of immunity to nematodes have been described in sheep, regulation of the establishment rate of infective larvae, suppressed nematode growth and thus fecundity, and the expulsion of adult worms; a combination of these mechanisms is possible24. Figure 5 shows the gastrointestinal nematode life cycle and summarizes the suggested role of different immunoglobulins in the three major mechanisms of immunity to nematodes. Reduced parasite establishment and survival is associated with IgE activity mainly against incoming third stage larvae (L3) in concert with mast cells as cross-linking of IgE on the mast cell surface leading to mast cell degranulation82,89 with more prominent response in previously infected animals49. Reduced parasite growth and fecundity is correlated with increased local IgA activity against fourth stage larvae59,89,90. Increased number of inhibited larvae is correlated with IgG1 activity against the third stage larvae54,60 beside IgA activity against the third and fourth stage larvae89,90.
Conclusions
The selection of animals with a high immune response to GIN infection is a promising method of reducing the negative impact of these infections on grazing small ruminants. We have highlighted factors that differ across studies and affect the immune response to GIN infection. Indeed, it is essential that future studies take into account and mention the age of the animals, the infection experience and the type of infection (i.e. single vs trickle). One another important point is the need to normalize the measurements of immunoglobulin concentrations. The use of different units and/or optical density to measure immunoglobulin levels at different time post-infection produces results that are incomparable between studies. One way to overcome this issue is to use the change ratio between day 0 or an uninfected group and different time post-infection or to develop methods for the quantification of the immunoglobulins with standard curves. This effort for standardization should potentially allow to take advantage of the research results produced by implementing breeding programs for higher resistance to GIN infection.
Material and Methods
The study methodology followed the guideline of “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement”91. The literature search had been conducted using electronic databases. Web of Science and PubMed were used as databases to cover the literature on small ruminants and parasites. Besides, the reference lists from five literature reviews, all published after 2008, were additionally searched24,28,29,89,92. Studies were closely evaluated and selected for inclusion if they measured at least one immunoglobulin type and the data were extractable. The literature review revealed 41 studies which measured at least one immunoglobulin: 35 focused on lamb immune response (18 used non-naïve lambs) and 7 on yearlings. Overall, the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated qualitatively with an 9-point scoring system based on SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool93: (1) Statement on ethical approval or guidelines followed for using animals in the study clearly mentioned, (2) Adequate allocation sequence generation, (3) similar groups at baseline, (4) Allocation concealment, (5) Random housing, (6) Random outcome assessment, (7) Outcome assessment blinded and (8) incomplete outcome adequately addressed (Fig. 1).
Information extracted from each study included nematode genus, host (sheep or goat), infected breed, host classification (resistant or susceptible), host sex, host age (months), age at weaning (weeks), infection period (days post infection), sample tissue, infection type (artificial or natural), number of animals per group, immunological state (naïve or non-naïve), total number of infected larvae, larval details and infection method for artificial infection (single or trickle). Measured traits of interest included both parasitological and immunological parameters. If data were provided in graphical form, traits means were extracted using WebPlotDigitizer (version 3.8)93. These summary measures beside the study information previously mentioned were entered into an electronic spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel and a dataset was built. The Metafor package in R (version 3.5.1) was used to analyze the correlation coefficient between FEC and immunoglobulins. A REML model was used in which the effect size was calculated according to the number of animals used in each study with 95% confidence interval. The possibility of publication bias across studies reporting correlation coefficients was assessed by a visual analysis of a funnel plot of the standard error by the Fischer’s Z transformed correlation coefficients and formally by using Egger weighted regression test (Metafor package in R version 3.5.1).
References
Terrill, T. H., Miller, J. E., Burke, J. M., Mosjidis, J. A. & Kaplan, R. M. Experiences with integrated concepts for the control of Haemonchus contortus in sheep and goats in the United States. Vet. Parasitol. 186, 28–37 (2012).
Zvinorova, P. I. et al. Breeding for resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes – the potential in low-input / output small ruminant production systems. Vet. Parasitol. 225, 19–28 (2016).
Mavrot, F., Hertzberg, H. & Torgerson, P. Effect of gastro-intestinal nematode infection on sheep performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasit. Vectors 8, 557 (2015).
Papadopoulos, E. Anthelmintic resistance in sheep nematodes. Small Rumin. Res. 76, 99–103 (2008).
Dolinská, M., Ivanisinova, O., Konigova, A. & Várady, M. Anthelmintic resistance in sheep gastrointestinal nematodes in Slovakia detected by in-vitro methods. BMC Vet. Res. 10, 233 (2014).
Geurden, T. et al. Anthelmintic resistance and multidrug resistance in sheep gastro-intestinal nematodes in France, Greece and Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 201, 59–66 (2014).
Jabbar, A. et al. Anthelmintic resistance: The state of play revisited. Life Sci. 79, 2413–2431 (2006).
Dalton, J. P. & Mulcahy, G. Parasite vaccines - A reality? Vet. Parasitol. 98, 149–167 (2001).
Zajac, A. M., Krakowka, S., Herd, R. P. & McClure, K. E. Experimental Haemonchus contortus infection in three breeds of sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 36, 221–235 (1990).
Amarante, A. F. T., Craig, T. M., Ramsey, W. S., Davis, S. K. & Bazer, F. W. Nematode burdens and cellular responses in the abomasal mucosa and blood of Florida Native, Rambouillet and crossbreed lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 80, 311–324 (1999).
Amarante, A. F. T., Bricarello, P. A., Huntley, J. F., Mazzolin, L. P. & Gomes, J. C. Relationship of abomasal histology and parasite-specific immunoglobulin A with the resistance to Haemonchus contortus infection in three breeds of sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 128, 99–107 (2005).
Silva, B. F., Bassetto, C. C. & Amarante, A. F. T. Immune responses in sheep naturally infected with Oestrus ovis (Diptera: Oestridae) and gastrointestinal nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 190, 120–126 (2012).
Sayers, G. et al. Breed differences in mucosal and systemic antibody response to nematode infection in sheep: an important role for IgE? Parasitology 135, 71–80 (2007).
Ahmed, A. M. et al. Variation in the Ovine abomasal lymph node transcriptome between breeds known to differ in resistance to the gastrointestinal nematode. PLoS One 10, 1–17 (2015).
MacKinnon, K. M., Zajac, A. M., Kooyman, F. N. J. & Notter, D. R. Differences in immune parameters are associated with resistance to Haemonchus contortus in Caribbean hair sheep. Parasite Immunol. 32, 484–493 (2010).
Bowdridge, S., MacKinnon, K., McCann, J. C., Zajac, A. M. & Notter, D. R. Hair-type sheep generate an accelerated and longer-lived humoral immune response to Haemonchus contortus infection. Vet. Parasitol. 196, 172–178 (2013).
Baker, R. L. et al. Resistance and resilience to gastro-intestinal nematode parasites and relationships with productivity of Red Maasai, Dorper and Red Maasai × Dorper crossbred lambs in the sub-humid tropics. Anim. Sci. 76, 119–136 (2003).
Baker, R. L., Mwamachi, D. M., Audho, J. O., Aduda, E. O. & Thorpe, W. Resistance of Galla and Small East African goats in the sub-humid tropics to gastrointestinal nematode infections and the peri-parturient rise in faecal egg counts. Vet. Parasitol. 79, 53–64 (1998).
Costa, C. A. F. et al. Variability of resistance in goats infected with Haemonchus contortus in Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 88, 153–158 (2000).
Rout, P. K., Chauhan, K. K., Matika, O. & Bishop, S. C. Exploring the genetic resistance to natural gastrointestinal nematode infection in Indian goats. Vet. Parasitol. 180, 315–322 (2011).
McRae, K. M. et al. Response to Teladorsagia circumcincta infection in Scottish Blackface lambs with divergent phenotypes for nematode resistance. Vet. Parasitol. 206, 200–207 (2014).
Bambou, J. C., Larcher, T., Cei, W., Dumoulin, P. J. & Mandonnet, N. Effect of experimental infection with Haemonchus contortus on parasitological and local cellular responses in resistant and susceptible young creole goats. Biomed Res. Int. 2013, 9 (2013).
McBean, D. et al. Faecal egg counts and immune markers in a line of Scottish Cashmere goats selected for resistance to gastrointestinal nematode parasite infection. Vet. Parasitol. 229, 1–8 (2016).
McRae, K. M., Stear, M. J., Good, B. & Keane, O. M. The host immune response to gastrointestinal nematode infection in sheep. Parasite Immunol. 37, 605–613 (2015).
Shakya, K. Evaluation of selected immune response to Haemonchus contortus in Gulf Coast native compared to Suffolk lambs. Zhurnal Eksp. i Teor. Fiz. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 (2007).
Stear, M. J., Bishop, S. C., Henderson, N. G. & Scott, I. A key mechanism of pathogenesis in sheep infected with the nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta. Anim. Heal. Res. Rev. 4, 45–52 (2003).
Jacobs, H. J., Ashman, K. & Meeusen, E. Humoral and cellular responses following local immunization with a surface antigen of the gastrointestinal parasite Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 48, 323–332 (1995).
Alba-Hurtado, F. & Muñoz-Guzmán, M. A. Immune Responses Associated with Resistance to Haemonchosis in Sheep. Biomed Res. Int. 2013, (2013).
Sykes, A. Host immune responses to nematodes: benefit or cost? Implications for future development of sustainable methods of control. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 39, 376–382 (2010).
Lin, T. J. & Befus, A. D. Differential regulation of mast cell function by IL-10 and stem cell factor. J. Immunol. 159, 4015–4023 (1997).
Balic, A., Bowles, V. M. & Meeusen, E. N. T. Mechanisms of immunity to Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep. Parasite Immunol. 24, 39–46 (2002).
Muñoz-Guzmán, M. A., Cuenca-Verde, C., Valdivia-Anda, G., Cuéllar-Ordaz, J. A. & Alba-Hurtado, F. Differential immune response between fundic and pyloric abomasal regions upon experimental ovine infection with Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 185, 175–180 (2012).
Shakya, K. P., Miller, J. E., Lomax, L. G. & Burnett, D. D. Evaluation of immune response to artificial infections of Haemonchus contortus in Gulf Coast Native compared with Suffolk lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 181, 239–247 (2011).
Munoz-Guzman, M. A., Cuellar-Ordaz, J. A., Valdivia-Anda, A. G., Buendia-Jimenez, J. A. & Alba-Hurtado, F. Correlation of parasitological and immunological parameters in sheep with high and low resistance to haemonchosis. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 86, 363–371 (2006).
Else, K. J. & Finkelman, F. D. Intestinal nematode parasites, cytokines and effector mechanisms. Int. J. Parasitol. 28, 1145–1158 (1998).
Douch, P. G. C. et al. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among anti-Trichostrongylus colubriformis antibody level, faecal egg count and body weight traits in grazing Rornney sheep. Livest. Prod. Sci. 41, 121–132 (1995).
Gauly, M., Kraus, M., Vervelde, L., Van Leeuwen, M. A. W. & Erhardt, G. Estimating genetic differences in natural resistance in Rhӧn and Merinoland sheep following experimental Haemonchus contortus infection. Vet. Parasitol. 106, 55–67 (2002).
Bisset, S. A. et al. Nematode burdens and immunological responses following natural challenge in Romney lambs selectively bred for low or high faecal worm egg count. Vet. Parasitol. 61, 249–263 (1996).
Ellis, S. et al. Ovine IgA-reactive proteins from Teladorsagia circumcincta infective larvae. Int. J. Parasitol. 44, 743–750 (2014).
Martinez-Valladares, M., Vara-Del Rio, M. P., Cruz-Rojo, M. A. & Rojo-Vazquez, F. A. Genetic resistance to Teladorsagia circumcincta: IgA and parameters at slaughter in Churra sheep. Parasite Immunol. 27, 213–218 (2005).
Henderson, N. G. & Stear, M. J. Eosinophil and IgA responses in sheep infected with Teladorsagia circumcincta. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 112, 62–66 (2006).
Beraldi, D., Craig, B. H., Bishop, S. C., Hopkins, J. & Pemberton, J. M. Phenotypic analysis of host-parasite interactions in lambs infected with Teladorsagia circumcincta. Int. J. Parasitol. 38, 1567–1577 (2008).
Harrison, G. B. L. et al. Immune rejection of Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep; a possible role for intestinal mucus antibody against an L3-specific surface antigen. Parasite Immunol. 25, 45–53 (2003).
Harrison, G. B. L., Pulford, H. D., Hein, W. R., Severn, W. B. & Shoemaker, C. B. Characterization of a 35-kDA carbohydrate larval antigen (CarLA) from Trichostrongylus colubriformis; a potential target for host immunity. Parasite Immunol. 25, 79–86 (2003).
Shaw, R. J., Morris, C. A., Wheeler, M., Tate, M. & Sutherland, I. A. Salivary IgA: A suitable measure of immunity to gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 186, 109–117 (2012).
Strain, Sa. J. et al. The genetic control of IgA activity against Teladorsagia circumcincta and its association with parasite resistance in naturally infected sheep. Parasitology 124, 545–552 (2002).
Davies, G., Stear, M. J. & Bishop, S. C. Genetic relationships between indicator traits and parasitic nematode infection in sheep. Meet. EAAP, Bled, Slov. 5-9 Sept. (2004).
Stear, M. J., Bishop, S. C., Duncan, J. L., McKellar, Q. A. & Murray, M. The repeatability of faecal egg counts, peripheral eosinophil counts, and plasma pepsinogen concentrations during deliberate infections with Ostertagia circumcincta. Int. J. Parasitol. 25, 375–380 (1995).
Huntley, J. F. et al. IgE antibody during infection with the ovine abomasal nematode, Teladorsagia circumcincta: Primary and secondary responses in serum and gastric lymph of sheep. Parasite Immunol. 20, 565–571 (1998).
Shaw, R. J. et al. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among Trichostrongylus colubriformis-specific immunoglobulin E, anti-Trichostrongylus colubriformis antibody, immunoglobulin G1, faecal egg count and body weight traits in grazing Romney lambs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 58, 25–32 (1999).
Pernthaner, A., Shaw, R. J., McNeill, M. M., Morrison, L. & Hein, W. R. Total and nematode-specific IgE responses in intestinal lymph of genetically resistant and susceptible sheep during infection with Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 104, 69–80 (2005).
Huntley, J. F. et al. Studies on the immunoglobulin E responses to Teladorsagia circumcincta in sheep: Purification of a major high molecular weight allergen. Parasite Immunol. 23, 227–235 (2001).
Pettit, J. J., Jackson, F., Rocchi, M. & Huntley, J. F. The relationship between responsiveness against gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and the numbers of circulating IgE-bearing cells. Vet. Parasitol. 134, 131–139 (2005).
Douch, P. G. C., Green, R. S. & Risdon, P. L. Antibody responses of sheep to challenge with Trichostrongylus colubriformis and the effect of dexamethasone treatment. Int. J. Parasitol. 24, 921–928 (1994).
Amarante, A. F. T. et al. Resistance of Santa Ines and crossbred ewes to naturally acquired gastrointestinal nematode infections. Vet. Parasitol. 165, 273–280 (2009).
Cardia, D. F. F., Rocha-Oliveira, R. A., Tsunemi, M. H. & Amarante, A. F. T. Immune response and performance of growing Santa Ines lambs to artificial Trichostrongylus colubriformis infections. Vet. Parasitol. 182, 248–258 (2011).
Santos, M. C. et al. Immune response to Haemonchus contortus and Haemonchus placei in sheep and its role on parasite specificity. Vet. Parasitol. 203, 127–138 (2014).
Boes, M. Role of natural and immune IgM antibodies in immune responses. Mol. Immunol. 37, 1141–1149 (2000).
Stear, M. J. et al. Regulation of egg production, worm burden, worm length and worm fecundity by host responses in sheep infected with Ostertagia circumcincta. Parasite Immunol. 17, 643–652 (1995).
Schallig, H. D. F. H., van Leeuwen, M. A. W. & Hendrikx, W. M. L. Isotype-specific serum antibody responses of sheep to Haemonchus contortus antigens. Vet. Parasitol. 56, 149–162 (1995).
Andronicos, N., Hunt, P. & Windon, R. Expression of genes in gastrointestinal and lymphatic tissues during parasite infection in sheep genetically resistant or susceptible to Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Haemonchus contortus. Int. J. Parasitol. 40, 417–429 (2010).
Hoste, H., Torres-Acosta, J. F. J. & Aguilar-Caballero, A. J. Nutrition-parasite interactions in goats: Is immunoregulation involved in the control of gastrointestinal nematodes? Parasite Immunol. 30, 79–88 (2008).
Pomroy, W. E., Lambert, M. G. & Betteridge, K. Comparison of faecal strongylate egg counts of goats and sheep on the same pasture. N. Z. Vet. J. 34, 36–37 (1986).
Bambou, J. C. et al. Serum antibody responses in Creole kids experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 158, 311–318 (2008).
De La Chevrotière, C. et al. Detection of quantitative trait loci for resistance to gastrointestinal nematode infections in Creole goats. Anim. Genet. 43, 768–775 (2012).
Searle, S. R. Phenotypic, Genetic and Environmental Correlations. Biometrics 17, 474–480 (1961).
Basripuzi, N. H. et al. Boer goats appear to lack a functional IgA and eosinophil response against natural nematode infection. Vet. Parasitol. 264, 18–25 (2018).
Outteridge, P. M., Windon, R. G., Dineen, J. K. & Smith, E. F. The relationship between ovine lymphocyte antigens and faecal egg count of sheep selected for responsiveness to vaccination against Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Int. J. Parasitol. 16, 369–374 (1986).
Schwaiger, F. W. et al. An ovine Major histocompatibility complex DRB1 allele is associated with low faecal egg counts following natural, predominantly Ostertagia circumcincta infection. Int. J. Parasitol. 25, 815–822 (1995).
Buitkamp, J., Filmether, P., Stear, M. J., Epplen, J. T. & Class, I. and class II major histocompatibility complex alleles are associated with faecal egg counts following natural, predominantly Ostertagia circumcincta infection. Parasitol. Res. 82, 693–696 (1996).
Janssen, M., Weimann, C., Gauly, M. & Erhardt, G. Associations between infections with Haemonchus contortus and genetic markers on ovine chromosome 20. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. to Livest. Prod. August 19-, (2002).
Sayers, G. et al. Major Histocompatibility Complex DRB1 gene: its role in nematode resistance in Suffolk and Textel sheep breeds. Parasitology 131, 403–409 (2005).
Davies, G. et al. Quantitative trait loci associated with parasitic infection in Scottish blackface sheep. Heredity (Edinb). 96, 252–258 (2006).
Valilou, R. H. et al. Fecal egg counts for gastrointestinal nematodes are associated with a polymorphism in the MHC-DRB1 gene in the Iranian Ghezel sheep breed. Front. Genet. 6, 1–11 (2015).
Coltman, D. W., Wilson, K., Pilkington, J. G., Stear, M. J. & Pemberton, J. M. A microsatellite polymorphism in the gamma interferon gene is associated with resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in a naturally-parasitized population of Soay sheep. Parasitology 122, 571–582 (2001).
Sayers, G., Good, B., Hanrahan, J. P., Ryan, M. & Sweeney, T. Intron 1 of the interferon γ gene: Its role in nematode resistance in Suffolk and Texel sheep breeds. Res. Vet. Sci. 79, 191–196 (2005).
Gutiérrez-Gil, B. et al. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to trichostrongylid infection in Spanish Churra sheep. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41, 46 (2009).
Riggio, V., Matika, O., Pong-Wong, R., Stear, M. J. & Bishop, S. C. Genome-wide association and regional heritability mapping to identify loci underlying variation in nematode resistance and body weight in Scottish Blackface lambs. Heredity (Edinb). 110, 420–9 (2013).
Atlija, M., Arranz, J. J., Martinez-Valladares, M. & Gutiérrez-Gil, B. Detection and replication of QTL underlying resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in adult sheep using the ovine 50K SNP array. Genet. Sel. Evol. 48, 1–16 (2016).
Crawford, A. M. et al. Discovery of quantitative trait loci for resistance to parasitic nematode infection in sheep: I. Analysis of outcross pedigrees. BMC Genomics 7, 178 (2006).
Sallé, G. et al. A genome scan for QTL affecting resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 90, 4690–4705 (2012).
Murphy, L. et al. Genetic variation among lambs in peripheral IgE activity against the larval stages of Teladorsagia circumcincta. Parasitology 137, 1249–1260 (2010).
Stear, M. J. et al. Eosinophilia as a marker of resistance to Teladorsagia circumcincta in Scottish Blackface lambs. Parasitology 124, 553–60 (2002).
Smith, W. D., Jackson, F., Jackson, E. & Williams, J. Age immunity to Ostertagia circumcincta: Comparison of the local immune responses of 4 1 2- and 10-month-old lambs. J. Comp. Pathol. 95, 235–245 (1985).
Gomez-Munoz, M. T. et al. Serum antibody response of Castellana sheep to Haemonchus contortus infection and challenge: Relationship to abomasal worm burdens. Vet. Parasitol. 81, 281–293 (1999).
Lacroux, C. et al. Haemonchus contortus (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) infection in lambs elicits an unequivocal Th2 immune response. Vet. Res. 37, 607–622 (2006).
Stear, M. J., Strain, S. & Bishop, S. C. Mechanisms underlying resistance to nematode infection. Int. J. Parasitol. 29, 51–56 (1999).
Stear, M. J. et al. How hosts control worms. Nature 389, 27 (1997).
Stear, M. J., Boag, B., Cattadori, I. & Murphy, L. Genetic variation in resistance to mixed, predominantly Teladorsagia circumcincta nematode infections of sheep: From heritabilities to gene identification. Parasite Immunol. 31, 274–282 (2009).
Stear, M. J. et al. The relationship between IgA activity against 4th-stage larvae and density-dependent effects on the number of 4th-stage larvae of Teladorsagia circumcincta in naturally infected sheep. Parasitology 129, 363–369 (2004).
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & Grp, P. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (Reprinted from Annals of Internal Medicine). Phys. Ther. 89, 873–880 (2009).
Venturina, V. M., Gossner, A. G. & Hopkins, J. The immunology and genetics of resistance of sheep to Teladorsagia circumcincta. Vet. Res. Commun. 37, 171–181 (2013).
Hooijmans, C. R. et al. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 14, (2014).
Rohatgi, A. WebPlotDigitizer. Ref Type: Online Source. Available at: https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer/ (2014).
Ahmed, A. M. et al. Breed differences in humoral and cellular responses of lambs to experimental infection with the gastrointestinal nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta. Vet. Res. 46, 1–9 (2015).
Bowdridge, S. A., Zajac, A. M. & Notter, D. R. St. Croix sheep produce a rapid and greater cellular immune response contributing to reduced establishment of Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 208, 204–210 (2015).
Cuquerella, M., Gómez-Muñoz, M. T. & Alunda, J. M. Serum IgG response of Manchego lambs to infections with Haemonchus contortus and preliminary characterization of adult antigens. Vet. Parasitol. 38, 131–143 (1991).
Gomez-Munoz, M. T., Cuquerella, M., de la Fuente, C., Gomez-Iglesias, L. A. & Alunda, J. M. Infection-induced Protection Against Haemonchus contortus in Merino and Manchego Sheep. Relationship to Serum Antibody Response. J. Vet. Med. 45, 449–459 (1998).
Gómez Muñoz, M. T. Experimental Haemonchus contortus infection and challenge in the Churra sheep breed: immunological and pathophysiological parameters. Rev. Ibérica Parasitol. 61, 83–89 (2001).
Garduño, R. G., Arellano, M. E. L., Mendoza-de-Gives, P., Robertos, N. F. O. & Canul, A. J. C. Temporary Immunity of Blackbelly Lambs Reinfected with Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Acta Sci. Vet. 1407 (2016).
Halliday, A. M., Routledge, C. M., Smith, S. K., Matthews, J. B. & Smith, W. D. Parasite loss and inhibited development of Teladorsagia circumcincta in relation to the kinetics of the local IgA response in sheep. Parasite Immunol. 29, 425–434 (2007).
Hernández, J. N. et al. Potential role for mucosal IgA in modulating Haemonchus contortus adult worm infection in sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 223, 153–158 (2016).
Huntley, J. F. et al. IgE responses in the serum and gastric lymph of sheep infected with Teladorsagia circumcincta. Parasite Immunol. 163–168 (1998).
Kooyman, F. N. J. et al. Production of a monoclonal antibody specific for ovine immunoglobulin E and its application to monitor serum IgE responses to Haemonchus contortus infection. Parasitology 114, 395–406 (1997).
Terefe, G. et al. Immune response to Haemonchus contortus infection in susceptible (INRA 401) and resistant (Barbados Black Belly) breeds of lambs. Parasite Immunol. 415–424, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.2007.00958.x (2007).
Williams, A. R., Greeff, J. C., Vercoe, P. E., Dobson, R. J. & Karlsson, L. J. E. Merino ewes bred for parasite resistance reduce larval contamination onto pasture during the peri-parturient period. Animal 4, 122–127 (2010).
Arranz, J. J. et al. Búsqueda de regiones genómicas con influencia sobre la resistencia a las tricostrongilidosis en el ganado ovino de raza churra. ITEA 100A, 197–201 (2004).
Coltman, D. W., Wilson, K., Pilkington, J. G., Stear, M. J. & Pemberton, J. M. A microsatellite polymorphism in the gamma interferon gene is associated with resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in a naturally-parasitized population of Soay sheep. Parasitology 122, 571–582 (2001).
Palomo-Couoh, J. G., Aguilar-Caballero, A. J., Torres-Acosta, J. F. J. & González-Garduño, R. Comparing the phenotypic susceptibility of Pelibuey and Katahdin female lambs against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections under hot humid tropical conditions. Parasitol. Res. 116, 1627–1636 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Project MALIN (La Région Guadeloupe and Fonds Européens FEDER). H.M.A. was supported by a doctoral fellowship from the project European Graduate School in Animal Breeding and Genetics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.M.A. performed the litterature search, the statistical analysis and contributed to interpretation of the data and to writing of the manuscript. M.J.S. contributed to the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. A.J. and E.J. had full access to all the study data and contributed to the study quality assessment and writing the manuscript. J.C.B. developed the hypothesis, performed the litterature search, screening of the papers and contributed to interpretation of the data and to writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aboshady, H.M., Stear, M.J., Johansson, A. et al. Immunoglobulins as Biomarkers for Gastrointestinal Nematodes Resistance in Small Ruminants: A systematic review. Sci Rep 10, 7765 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64775-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64775-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Local immune response of Canarian Majorera goats infected with Teladorsagia circumcincta
Parasites & Vectors (2022)
-
Microbial community in resistant and susceptible Churra sheep infected by Teladorsagia circumcincta
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Status of gastrointestinal nematode infections and associated epidemiological factors in sheep from Córdoba, Colombia
Tropical Animal Health and Production (2022)
-
Genome-wide insights on gastrointestinal nematode resistance in autochthonous Tunisian sheep
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
In vitro anthelmintic activity of Pimienta dioica and Origanum vulgare essential oils on gastrointestinal nematodes from sheep and cattle
Journal of Parasitic Diseases (2021)