Abstract
We report here the sequence and functional characterization of a recombinantly expressed autoantibody (mAb 131) previously isolated from a myasthenia gravis patient by immortalization of thymic B cells using Epstein-Barr virus and TLR9 activation. The antibody is characterized by a high degree of somatic mutations as well as a 6 amino acid insertion within the VHCDR2. The recombinant mAb 131 is specific for the γ-subunit of the fetal AChR to which it bound with sub-nanomolar apparent affinity, and detected the presence of fetal AChR on a number of rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines. Mab 131 blocked one of the two α-bungarotoxin binding sites on the fetal AChR, and partially blocked the binding of an antibody (mAb 637) to the α-subunit of the AChR, suggesting that both antibodies bind at or near one ACh binding site at the α/γ subunit interface. However, mAb 131 did not reduce fetal AChR ion channel currents in electrophysiological experiments. These results indicate that mAb 131, although generated from an MG patient, is unlikely to be pathogenic and may make it a potentially useful reagent for studies of myasthenia gravis, rhabdomyosarcoma and arthrogryposis multiplex congenita which can be caused by fetal-specific AChR-blocking autoantibodies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) is an autoimmune disease of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ)1,2,3. The anti-AChR-autoantibodies cause loss of AChRs from the postsynaptic muscle membrane of the NMJ, resulting in failure of neuromuscular transmission and muscle weakness. The AChR is a ligand-gated ion channel and exists in fetal and adult forms each comprising four homologous subunits. Two α1, one β1 and one δ-subunit are expressed in combination with either the γ (“fetal” form, predominantly in developing muscle fibers) or the ε-subunit (“adult” form, at the NMJ in innervated muscle fibers). The AChR opens upon binding of acetylcholine (ACh) molecules to sites located on the α/ε (or α/γ) and α/δ interfaces. Antibodies against both the fetal (α2βγδ) and the adult (α2βεδ) AChR are found in MG patients, many binding to the shared α-subunits, but some patients have additional antibodies specific for the fetal γ-subunit, or more rarely the adult ε-subunit4,5,6,7.
AChR autoantibodies are predominantly IgG1 with some IgG3, and little IgG4. They lead to a decrease of AChR numbers and/or loss of function by three mechanisms8: antigenic modulation, in which antibodies divalently cross-link adjacent receptors leading to internalization and degradation of antibody/antigen complexes; complement-dependent damage caused by IgG1 and IgG3 subclass antibodies9,10; and less commonly functional inhibition of the ACh binding site so that the AChR channel does not open in response to released ACh8. During human development, the fetal AChR is expressed at the NMJ, and only replaced by the adult form from about 30 weeks gestation. In rare cases fetal-specific antibodies in a mother (with or without adult AChR antibodies and clinical MG) cross the placenta and inhibit the function of the fetal AChR leading to arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC), a condition resulting from lack of fetal movement. AMC comprises multiple joint contractures, lung hypoplasia and profound respiratory impairment with the risk of fetal death or neonatal mortality7,11,12,13,14.
The fetal AChR (α2βγδ) is also expressed in human rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) cells, which is the most common type of soft tissue malignancy in children15. Most patients with RMS respond well to available standard treatments including chemotherapy and irradiation, with 5-year survival rates of >70%16. In an experimental model, RMS cells proved sensitive to treatment with an immunotoxin-labeled human anti-γ-AChR scFv antibody fragment; possibly this finding opens a new approach for efficient, highly specific treatment17.
Monoclonal/recombinant (auto)antibodies against the AChR are essential tools for the study of MG, AMC and RMS. One suitable source for cloning AChR antibodies are the B cells derived from the thymus removed from patients with MG18,19,20,21.
In a previous study using the thymus of an early-onset MG patient, we generated a monoclonal B-cell line against the γ-subunit of the fetal AChR (clone P90-131)20. The monoclonal antibody (IgG1 isotype, mAb 131) did not cross-react with AChRs of mouse, rat or rhesus monkey muscle which are of the adult type and also did not bind to AChR from Torpedo electric organ which is of the gamma type (independent of development). In view of the possible application in RMS, we characterized the cloned anti-γ-AChR antibody in more detail. We used the B-cell receptor DNA sequence of clone P90-131 to produce the corresponding recombinant IgG1-131 and IgG4-131 antibodies, in order to determine their properties in relation to AChR-MG, AMC and RMS.
Results
Analysis of the mAb 131 sequence
The complete sequences of the VH and Vκ chains of mAb 131 annotated with the complementarity-determining regions (CDR)s are shown in Fig. 1. The replacement to silent (R/S) mutation ratio, amino acid changes and mutational hotspot analysis of V gene segments of mAb 131 are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 respectively. The VH gene segment of mAb 131 differentiated from the V3-30*03 (L26401) and IGHJ5*02 germline genes as suggested by 55.7% and 82.9% homology, respectively. The sequence encoding the CDR 1, 2 and the framework regions (FR) of the VH gene had a high replacement to silent (R/S) mutation ratio. There were a large number of mutations in the RGYW and WRCY hotspot region of the VH including an 18 bp (6 AA) insertion in the CDR2. The Vκ and Jκ sequence shared 89.1% and 92.9% homology to V1-9*01 (K02096) and IGKJ4*01 alleles, respectively, with multiple mutations observed in VκCDR1 and VκCDR3 while the VκCDR2 used the conserved sequence from V1-9*01. Comparing the IgV gene of mAb 131 to the IgV genes of previously described anti-AChR antibodies7,20,22,23,24,25, no V gene was preferentially/ dominantly used between the different antibodies.
Production and validation of recombinant human IgG1 and IgG4 isotypes of mAb 131
For recombinant expression of mAb 131, the V regions of heavy and light chains were synthesized de novo and cloned into plasmids for the transient expression of IgG1 and IgG4 isotypes in HEK293 cells (see Fig. 2a and b for schematic representations of the constructs for VH-CH and Vκ-Cκ, respectively). The successful secretion of the antibodies into the medium was verified by dot-blot with anti-human IgG, IgG1 and 4 isotype-specific HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Fig. 2c).
IgG1-131 binds the γ-subunit of fetal AChR with high specificity and affinity
IgG1-131 specifically recognized the recombinant γ-subunit of the AChR in Western blots (Fig. 3a) of recombinant α, β and γ extracellular domains of the AChR (produced in yeast). The γ-subunit specificity was confirmed by ELISA, where IgG1-131 bound to recombinantly expressed γ-subunit, but not to the α or β subunit (Fig. 3b). By radioimmunoprecipitation using cell extracts containing the complete AChR radiolabeled with 125I-α-bungarotoxin (125I-α-BT), IgG1-131 precipitated the fetal AChR, but not the adult AChR (Fig. 3c). More than half of the fetal AChR in the assay could be precipitated by 1 nM IgG1-131, suggesting a subnanomolar apparent affinity of the antibody. The recombinant antibody IgG1-131 did not show any cross-reactivity with AChR derived from extracts of rat and mouse denervated muscles or Torpedo californica electric organ (Fig. 3d), as previously demonstrated with the original P90-131 B-cell line20. In a radioimmunoprecipitation assay, mAb 131 binding to the γ-subunit partially prevented binding of α-BT to the fetal AChR: the 125I-α-BT bound to fetal AChR in the presence of IgG1-131 (10 nM) was approximately 60% less when compared to a control mAb IgG1-637 that is specific for the α-subunit of the AChR (p < 0.001, Fig. 3e).
The results in Fig. 3e were consistent with the notion that IgG1-131 displaced 125I-α-BT from one of its two binding sites, similar to that seen with AMC serum which displaced ~50% of 125I-α-BT from the fetal AChR26. To investigate this we used a clinical diagnostic assay to test displacement of 125I-α-BT from the AChR. In line with the findings by Riemersma et al.26, we found that serum from a patient with a history of 4 pregnancies affected by AMC blocked ~50% of 125I-α-BT binding to the AChR. IgG1-131 blocked 125I-α-BT binding to a similar degree (Fig. 3f). As expected, the negative control and IgG1-637 did not block 125I-α-BT binding to the AChR. Accordingly, there was a significant difference between IgG1-131 and the negative control (p < 0.001), and also between IgG1-131 and IgG1-637 (p < 0.001). Since bungarotoxin binds to the α-subunit, while IgG1-131 binds to the γ-subunit, the results also suggested that IgG1-131 binds near the α/γ subunit interface. To see whether this was the case, we performed a competition experiment with IgG1-131 and IgG1-637 in a radioimmunoprecipitation assay: In comparison to IgG1-637 alone, adding an excess of IgG1-131 significantly decreased 125I-α-BT-binding to the precipitated AChR (Fig. 3g). Using IgG1-131 alone decreased 125I-α-BT-binding to the AChR even further, suggesting that the binding epitopes of both antibodies are too close for simultaneous binding near the α/γ subunit interface, and that only IgG1-131 has a 125I-α-BT blocking effect (schematically shown in Fig. 3h).
Anti-AChR monoclonal antibodies target RMS cell lines
Since the fetal AChR is a diagnostic marker of RMS27, we were interested to see whether IgG1-131 binding to the 5 well-characterized RMS lines could be detected by immunofluorescence. These included the embryonal lines TE671 and RD, and the alveolar lines RH30, RH41 and CRL2061. As a control for AChR expression, mAb 637 was used in parallel. Immunoreactivity to TE671, RD, RH41 and CRL2061 cells was observed for both AChR antibodies; in contrast, no immunofluorescence was detected in RH30 cells stained by either antibody (Fig. 4a). Moreover, we cultured cells with or without these antibodies and subsequently measured the remaining 125I-α-BT binding sites on the cell surface. Binding of 125I-α-BT to TE671, RD, RH41 and CRL2061 was observed (Fig. 4b), while binding to RH30 cells was very low. Both AChR antibodies (at a concentration of 10 nM) significantly reduced 125I-α-BT binding to TE671, RD, RH41 and CRL2061 cells (p < 0.001), while in RH30, no effect was observed. The low 125I-α-BT and IgG binding to RH30 cells suggests lower AChR expression as compared to the other cell lines17.
IgG1-131 does not modulate cell surface AChR
Many AChR antibodies have been shown to cause modulation of cell surface AChRs which is dependent on cross-linking between molecules. Antigenic modulation was initially measured by quantifying the release of 125I following the degradation of 125I-α-BT-labelled AChRs28,29. As explained above for RMS cell lines, we used an alternative method23,24,30,31 in which we first incubated the cells with antibody and subsequently with 125I-α-BT, to measure the bound 125I-α-BT on the surface of the cells. The degradation of AChR can be conveniently detected by reduction of 125I-α-BT binding sites, but can be confounded by antibodies that directly block 125I-α-BT binding to AChRs32. Concentrations of ≥1 nM IgG1-637 or IgG4-637 (unmodified mAb/ not Fab-arm exchanged) both reduced α-BT binding well below 20% of the levels on the cell surface of untreated TE671 and CN21 cells (Fig. 5a/5b) within 3 h at 37 °C, in line with the strong antigenic modulation capacity of this antibody33. However, at a concentration of 0.1 nM or higher, IgG1-131 and IgG4-131 both caused ~50% reduction in binding of 125I-α-BT to the TE671 RMS cell (Fig. 5c/5d), in agreement with its ability to block one of the two α-BT binding sites. IgG1-131 had no effect on α-BT binding to the adult AChR (expressed on the CN21 cells), confirming its γ-subunit specificity. Already after 1 h of incubation, both IgG1-131 and IgG1-637 (at 10 nM) reduced α-BT binding to the surface of TE671 by 50% (Fig. 5e). The reduction by IgG1-131 is thought to derive from displacement of one of the two 125I-α-BT from the AChR. During the following 2 hours, α-BT binding continued to decrease significantly in IgG1-637-treated cells. In contrast, during this time period, α-BT binding remained stable in IgG1-131-treated cells, suggesting that it did not induce antigenic modulation.
To further study a potential modulation effect of mAb 131, we generated a monovalent IgG4 version of the antibody by Fab arm-exchange (FAE), as described33,34. During FAE, mono-specific IgG4 antibodies randomly exchange “half-molecules” (consisting of a heavy chain – light chain pair) giving rise to bispecific IgG4 molecules (Fig. 5f) that lose the ability to cross-link the same antigen and can be considered as functionally monovalent. To set up an in vitro FAE reaction, IgG4 was purified from normal human serum and validated by a dot blot assay along with IgG1-637 and IgG4-637 (Fig. 5g). As expected, the modulatory effect of control antibody IgG1-637 (which does not block 125I-α-BT binding) was completely neutralized by a 99 fold excess of FAE IgG4-637 antibody (p < 0.001, Fig. 5h). Similar to IgG1-131, Fab-arm exchanged IgG4-131 strongly reduced 125I-α-BT binding to TE671 cells (Fig. 5h). A 99-fold molar excess of Fab-arm exchanged IgG4-131 antibody did not significantly counteract the reduction of 125I-α-BT binding sites on TE671 cells caused by 1 nM IgG1-131. This suggests that the antigenic modulation capacity of IgG1-131 is absent or very low and that instead it mainly reduced 125I-α-BT binding to the fetal AChR.
IgG1-131 does not inhibit fetal AChR currents in transfected HEK293 cells
As IgG1-131 partially blocked binding of α-BT, which is well known to compete with ACh and other agonists or competitive antagonists for the ACh binding site, we asked whether IgG1-131 itself inhibited AChR function. To this end, whole-cell currents were measured in transfected HEK293 cells expressing fetal AChR in the presence or absence of IgG1-131. ACh applications of 1 s duration were performed to elicit AChR currents. All recordings were started with control solutions lacking IgG1-131 (“control solution”) followed by the “test solution” containing 33 nM IgG1-131. Compared to control solution there was no current reduction during a 2.5 min application of the test solution (peak current amplitude of −5.4 ± 1.2 nA and −5.1 ± 1.1 nA, respectively; p = 0.87; Fig. 6a). Even continuous perfusion with IgG1-131 containing test solution for more than 20 min did not result in any significant current reduction (Fig. 6b), suggesting that mAb131 did not block AChR function.
Discussion
The fetal AChR is expressed mainly during development and has relevance for human disease. In a rare form of AMC, fetal-specific inhibitory antibodies from the mother cause fetal paralysis and often fetal death during gestation. In RMS, the fetal AChR is expressed on the cell surface and may provide a target for specific immunotoxins. In this study the patient-derived recombinant IgG1-131, cloned by B cell immortalization from the thymus of an MG patient, was shown to bind to the fetal AChR with high apparent affinity, to prevent binding of α-BT to one of its two sites on the fetal AChR, but not to cause internalization or inhibit the ion channel-function of the fetal AChR.
Since mAb 131 was isolated by B cell immortalization, this specificity is associated with the original heavy and light chain partners. The antibody V genes had accumulated a large number of overt mutations in the CDRs. The high replacement to silent (R/S) mutation ratio among V genes indicated that the somatic hypermutation of the antibody was driven by its antigen35,36.
Our results also showed that mAb 131 has only a weak capacity for antigen modulation and merely displaces one of the 125I-α-BT molecules. Apparently, in our previous study20, we had incorrectly interpreted the loss of cell bound α-BT induced by mAb 131 as due to antigen modulation.
IgG1-131 bound specifically to the γ-subunit of the fetal AChR, but partially competed with α-subunit-specific IgG1-637. Since IgG1-131 did not affect the ACh-induced receptor currents, the results suggest that the antibody binding site is located on the α/γ interface and overlaps with the α-BT binding site, but not with the binding site for ACh. Previous reports showed that the sera of healthy mothers with obstetric history of AMC7,26 and sera of 5 out of 12 parous women with MG7 contained antibodies that inhibited α-BT binding to the fetal AChR by ~50% and also blocked the fetal AChR response to ACh in electrophysiological and22Na flux studies. However, the administration of α-BT blocking anti-AChR antibodies purified from MG serum has also been reported to protect mice from in vivo toxicity of α-BT without inducing any of the clinical MG symptoms in the animals37. In another study, the α-BT blocking antibody titers correlated less with the changes in muscle weakness when compared to the binding antibody titers38. These observations suggest additional antigenic epitopes on the fetal specific gamma subunit, and at the alpha/gamma interface; antibodies binding to these epitopes do not have pathogenic effects but could protect against pathogenic antibodies.
Since α-BT has a size of ~8000 Da, in comparison with 162 Da for ACh, it is perhaps not surprising that antibodies, when binding to various subunits of the AChR, more commonly block α-BT rather than ACh binding and that these two blocking effects do not always coincide. So far, monoclonal antibodies generated using thymic B cells from MG patients7,22,24, including some that are specific for the fetal AChR have not been reported to interfere with AChR function, but the example of mAb 131 and several other antibodies7 confirms that the fetal AChR is a major target of B cells in the thymus of EOMG patients.
While it is clear that mAb 131 is not pathogenic by antigenic modulation, it could, being of the IgG1 isotype, still damage the fotus by activation of complement. It is known that the early gestation stage (12 weeks) is marked by the maturation of the neuromuscular junction in the masseters (and presumably other muscles) of the human fetus39 and, therefore, overactivation of the complement system, associated with normal pregnancies40,41,42 might potentially contribute to a pathogenic effect of mAb 131. In other antibody-mediated diseases, such as antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the complement system is involved in transfer of the disease from mother to child: a pathogenic effect of APS antibodies due to complement activation has been shown in a mouse model and in human placental tissue of SLE and APS subjects43.
A ‘non-pathogenic’ role of mAb 131 could be of interest for RMS diagnosis and therapy15,17, because this cancer type expresses high amounts of AChRs of the fetal type. Indeed, mAb 131 was found to bind specifically, in the nanomolar range, to various human RMS cell lines of embryonal and alveolar origin as seen with immunofluorescent staining. This suggests that mAb 131 could be of diagnostic or clinical relevance and encourages further development for use of this antibody to target RMS.
Methods
Sequence analysis
The variable heavy and light chain genes of mAb 131 were PCR amplified with VH/JH and Vκ/Jκ primer and sequenced20. The sequences were analyzed by comparison with human germline alleles using the IMGT/V-QUEST program (http://www.imgt.org/IMGT_vquest/share/textes/).
Cloning and expression of fully human IgG1-131 and IgG4-131
The VH and Vκ expression cassettes were designed by the incorporation of the restriction sites (5′EcoRI/3′NheI for VH and 5′AgeI/3′BsiWI for Vκ respectively) compatible with the pFUSE expression system (Invivogen/Life Technologies), Kozak translation initiation sequence, and a signal peptide from pIgG1-63733; both constructs were chemically synthesized by GeneArt. The VH and Vκ genes were sub-cloned respectively into the pFUSE-CHIg-hG1, pFUSE-CHIg-hG4 and pFUSE-CLIg-hκ vectors (Fig. 2a/b). HEK293 cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco, Cat No. 10938-025) supplemented with 50 U/mL penicillin, 50 U/mL streptomycin & 1% L-glutamine and co-transfected with heavy and light chain plasmids (1 μg:1.5 μg/106 cells) using 1:3 ratio of DNA and linear polyethylenimine (PEI, Polyscience Inc, Cat No. 23966). An equivalent amount of medium with 10% FCS was added to the cultures 4 h after the transfection. The cells were cultured for 5 to 7 days. To verify successful expression, the secreted IgG in the supernatant was concentrated by Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter units (MWCO of 100 kDa, Millipore, Cat No. UFC910024) and measured with a sandwich ELISA using goat F(ab’)2 anti-human IgG-Fcγ (Jackson Immuno-Research, Cat No. 109-006-008; diluted 1:200) for coating, and bound IgG was detected with HRP-conjugated goat F(ab’)2 anti-human IgG-Fcγ (Jackson Immuno-Research, Cat No. 109-036-008; diluted 1:20,000). The concentration of the expressed antibody was calculated relative to the human serum IgG standards as μg/mL.
IgG was purified from 50 mL culture supernatant using a HiTrap Protein G HP column (GE Healthcare Life Science, Cat No. 17-0404-01) in an AKTA explorer 900 system (GE Healthcare Life Science), eluted with 0.2 M sodium citrate pH 3.0, and concentrated using a Centricon Plus-20 centrifugal filter device (MWCO of 30 kDa, Millipore, Cat No. UFC2 LTK 08). Purified mAbs IgG1-131, IgG4-131, as well as mAbs IgG1-637 & IgG4-637 as controls, were blotted on nitrocellulose membranes (Biorad, Cat No. 162-0116) for 1 h at 37 °C, blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in 1x PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, washed with PBS-T (containing 0.05% Tween20) and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat F(ab’)2 anti-human IgG-Fcγ (Jackson Immuno-Research, Cat No. 109-036-008; diluted 1:2500) or mouse anti-human IgG1 (Invitrogen, Cat No. 05-3320; diluted 1:2500) or mouse anti-human IgG4 (AbD serotec, Cat No. MCA2098P; diluted 1:2500) secondary antibody. The blots were developed with 20% DAB in sodium acetate citric acid buffer pH 5.5 activated by 5 μL 30% H2O2.
Analysis of antibody binding to AChRs
The binding of antibodies to cell membrane extracts containing the fetal AChR (expressed on the TE671 rhabdomyosarcoma cells) and the adult AChR (expressed on the CN21 cells) was detected in a standard radio-immunoprecipitation assay. 10 nM each of IgG1-131 and IgG1-637 were incubated overnight at 4 °C with respective cell extracts (~3 fM of human AChR) labelled with an excess of 125I-α-BT (3.4 TBq/mM, Perkin Elmer, Cat No. NEX126) and normal human serum as a co-precipitant/carrier. The immune-complexes were precipitated by adding 150 μL of goat serum with anti-human IgG at 4 °C and gamma counts were recorded after 4 h. Results were expressed as normalized values or as co-precipitated 125I-α-BT binding sites per liter of sample in nmol/L.
IgG1-131 and α-BT competition was also tested using ARAb blocking RIA following the manufacturer’s instructions (IBL International, Cat No. RE21033). The assay is based on competitive binding of anti-AChR antibodies in a sample and 125I-α-BT to the AChR. Results were expressed as percentage inhibition of 125I-α-BT binding to AChRs.
The binding of IgG1-131 to AChR in membrane extracts from rat denervated muscle (100 μL), mouse denervated muscle (50 μL) and Torpedo electric organ (0.05 μg) was determined by radio-immunoprecipitation as described above. Normal human and rat sera were included as negative controls while EAMG (experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis) rat serum was included as a positive control for murine and Torpedo AChR detection.
The specificity of IgG1-131 was further determined by Western blot analysis using 5 μg recombinantly expressed extracellular domains (ECD) of the human AChR subunits from the yeast Pichia pastoris 44, that were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing condition and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Cat No. IPFL00010). The blotted subunits were blocked with 1:2 dilution of OdysseyTM blocking buffer (LI-COR, Cat No. P/N 927-40100), incubated with 1:100 dilution of IgG1-131 for 1 h and then incubated with IRDye 800CW goat anti-human IgG (H + L) (LI-COR, Cat No. 926-32232) for 1 h at a dilution of 1:5000. The membrane was scanned using the Odyssey CLx imaging system. Additionally, the affinity of IgG1-131 against the fetal AChR and recombinant subunits of human muscle AChR was determined at varying antibody concentrations (0.01 nM - 10 nM) by radio-immunoprecipitation assay and an indirect antigen ELISA, respectively23.
AChR staining on RMS cell lines
RMS cell lines were cultured on poly-D-lysine-coated (1%) glass coverslips (12 mm diameter, n = 6) in a six well tissue culture plate up to 75% confluence. Thereafter, medium was removed; cells were washed once with PBS, fixed using 3% paraformaldehyde solution for 5 min, washed once with PBS and blocked with 5% goat serum for 30 min. The coverslips were then removed from the culture plate and incubated upside-down on a 50 μL drop of PBS with 3 μg/mL of IgG1-131, IgG1-637, normal human serum IgG or 1% BSA along with 2 μg/mL Hoechst stain (Sigma Aldrich, Cat No. B2261) for 1 h. The coverslips were washed sequentially three times by dipping in 1x PBS followed by incubation on 50 μL drops of 1:1000 diluted goat anti-human IgG-Alexa 488 antibody (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen, Cat No. A11013). Coverslips were mounted on gelatin coated glass slides using 10 μL of 80% glycerol in PBS and analyzed at 20x magnification on an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope.
In vitro cell surface 125I-α-BT binding and AChR antigenic modulation assay
RMS cell lines of alveolar origin (RH30, RH41 & CRL2061) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Cat No. 12633-012) with 10% FCS and embryonal RMS cell lines (TE 671,CN21 & RD) were maintained in DMEM (Gibco, Cat No. 10938-025) supplemented with 10% FCS. Other supplements included 50 U/mL penicillin and streptomycin, 1% L-glutamine, 1% sodium pyruvate and 0.1% dexamethasone. The cells were seeded into a 48 well tissue culture plate and grown to confluence for 4 days. The confluent cultures were incubated with different molar concentrations (0.001 nM–10 nM) of test and control mAbs diluted in an incubation medium (DMEM supplemented with 40 μM cycloheximide) for 1–3 h at 37 °C/5% CO2. Cells were washed once with 1x PBS and further incubated with the labeling medium (100 μL DMEM containing 1:5000 125I-α-BT) for 1 h at 37 °C/5% CO2. The cells were washed three times with 1x PBS and then lysed by 0.5 N NaOH for 10 min before measuring 125I gamma counts. The non-specific binding of 125I-α-BT to the cells was measured as gamma counts in samples that had been pre-incubated with 25 nM unlabeled α-BT. The residual cell bound radioactivity (125I-α-BT) was normalized to the 125I-α-BT CPM of the cells incubated with the corresponding culture medium only.
In vitro Fab arm-exchange and cell surface fetal AChR protection
IgG4 from 1:2 diluted normal human serum was purified by AKTA explorer 900 through a CaptureSelect human IgG4 affinity matrix (Life Technologies, Cat No. 290005) and analyzed by dot blot as described in “Cloning and expression of full IgGs” section (Fig. 5g). In vitro FAE was induced by co-incubating 10 μg/mL IgG4-131 or IgG4-637 with 500 μg/mL IgG4 (1:50) purified from normal human serum with 0.5 mM reduced glutathione (Merck, Cat No. 1040900005) at 37 °C for 24 h34,45. The samples from the FAE reactions were desalted using Amicon Ultra-0.5 centrifugal filter units (MWCO 30 kDa, Millipore, Cat No. UFC503024). Exchanged IgG4 were used to test competition with unmodified IgG1-131 or 637 in antigenic modulation experiments with TE671 cells. Exchanged (monovalent) IgG4 samples contained a 99 fold excess molar concentration of AChR-binding antibody (measured by radio-immunoprecipitation) compared to unmodified (cross-linking) AChR antibodies. Relevant controls in the form of normal human IgG4 and only Fab arm-exchanged IgG4 were included.
Cell surface fetal AChR functional assay
Patch clamp experiments were performed on HEK293 cells transiently transfected with fetal AChR subunits and EGFP using PEI, with cells at ~70% confluence one day after plating in six well tissue culture dishes. Briefly, cDNA encoding the human muscle AChR α, β, δ, and γ-subunits were cloned into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen). These were co-transfected with pEGFP-N1 (Invitrogen), which contains cDNA encoding EGFP. After 5–7 h of exposure to a mix of 3 μg cDNA, 20% glucose and PEI in 2 mL of culture medium, the cells were plated onto poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips, and patch-clamped between two and three days later.
All experiments were performed at room temperature using the whole-cell patch clamp configuration. Recording pipettes were made of thin-walled borosilicate glass (GC150TF-10, Harvard Apparatus). Pipette tips were fire-polished to a final resistance of 2–4 MΩ (MF-900 Microforge, Narishige). Extracellular solutions contained (in mM): NaCl 150, KCl 2.8, HEPES 10, MgCl2 2, CaCl2 2 and glucose 10 with pH adjusted to 7.4 using NaOH. Pipette solutions contained (in mM): NaCl 4, KCl 144, HEPES 10, MgCl2 2, ATP 2 and EGTA 10 with pH adjusted to 7.2 using KOH. All measurements were performed at a holding potential of −60mV. Currents were amplified using an Axopatch-1D amplifier (Molecular Devices) and, after filtering at 5 kHz, sampled to hard disk at 25 kHz. Data analysis was performed with pClamp 10.5 (Molecular Devices).
Fast solution exchange was accomplished using the modified HSSE-2/3 application system (ALA Scientific Instruments). A four-barrel perfusion pipette with a tip diameter of around 300 μm was used to switch between control and test solutions, both of which consisted of an agonist containing solution for receptor stimulation (extracellular solution with 1 mM acetylcholine) and an agonist-free solution for agonist removal (extracellular solution). In contrast to the control solution, the test solution additionally contained 5 μg/mL purified IgG1-131 in both the agonist containing and the agonist-free solution.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done using Prism software version 5.00 (GraphPad). Binding of IgG1-131 and IgG1-637 to fetal and adult AChR extracts and RMS cell modulation was analyzed by a two way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest. Data from IgG-131/IgG-637 competition, the AChR blocking RIA and antigenic modulation of Fab arm-exchanged samples were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison test. AChR currents in individual cells were analyzed by t-test, while repetitive AChR current measurements were analyzed by regression analysis. P values equal to or less than 0.05 were considered as significant.
References
Lindstrom, J. M., Seybold, M. E., Lennon, V. A., Whittingham, S. & Duane, D. D. Antibody to acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis. Prevalence, clinical correlates, and diagnostic value. Neurology 26, 1054–1059 (1976).
Phillips, W. D. & Vincent, A. Pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis: update on disease types, models, and mechanisms. F1000Research 5(F1000 Faculty Rev), 1513, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8206.1 (2016).
Toyka, K. V. et al. Myasthenia gravis. Study of humoral immune mechanisms by passive transfer to mice. N Engl J Med. 296, 125–131, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197701202960301 (1977).
Wekerle, H., Ketelsen, U. P., Zurn, A. D. & Fulpius, B. W. Intrathymic pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis: transient expression of acetylcholine receptors on thymus-derived myogenic cells. Eur J Immunol. 8, 579–582, https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830080808 (1978).
Wakkach, A. et al. Expression of acetylcholine receptor genes in human thymic epithelial cells: implications for myasthenia gravis. J Immunol. 157, 3752–3760 (1996).
Polizzi, A., Huson, S. M. & Vincent, A. Teratogen update: maternal myasthenia gravis as a cause of congenital arthrogryposis. Teratology. 62, 332–341, https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9926(200011)62:5 < 332::AID-TERA7 > 3.0.CO;2-E (2000).
Matthews, I. et al. Antibodies to acetylcholine receptor in parous women with myasthenia: evidence for immunization by fetal antigen. Lab Invest. 82, 1407–1417 (2002).
Gomez, A. M. et al. Antibody effector mechanisms in myasthenia gravis-pathogenesis at the neuromuscular junction. Autoimmunity 43, 353–370, https://doi.org/10.3109/08916930903555943 (2010).
Rodgaard, A., Nielsen, F. C., Djurup, R., Somnier, F. & Gammeltoft, S. Acetylcholine receptor antibody in myasthenia gravis: predominance of IgG subclasses 1 and 3. Clinical and experimental immunology 67, 82–88 (1987).
Engel, A. G., Lambert, E. H. & Howard, F. M. Immune complexes (IgG and C3) at the motor end-plate in myasthenia gravis: ultrastructural and light microscopic localization and electrophysiologic correlations. Mayo Clinic proceedings 52, 267–280 (1977).
D’Amico, A. et al. Fetal acetylcholine receptor inactivation syndrome and maternal myasthenia gravis: a case report. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD 22, 546–548, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2012.01.002 (2012).
Hacohen, Y. et al. Fetal acetylcholine receptor inactivation syndrome: A myopathy due to maternal antibodies. Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation 2, e57, https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000057 (2015).
Jacobson, L., Polizzi, A., Morriss-Kay, G. & Vincent, A. Plasma from human mothers of fetuses with severe arthrogryposis multiplex congenita causes deformities in mice. J Clin Invest. 103, 1031–1038, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI5943 (1999).
Vincent, A. et al. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita with maternal autoantibodies specific for a fetal antigen. Lancet 346, 24–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92652-6 (1995).
Gattenloehner, S. et al. The fetal form of the acetylcholine receptor distinguishes rhabdomyosarcomas from other childhood tumors. Am J Pathol. 152, 437–444 (1998).
Stiff, P. J. et al. Highdose chemotherapy with blood or bone marrow transplants for rhabdomyosarcoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 16, 525–532, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.11.020. (2010).
Gattenlöhner, S. et al. A Human Recombinant Autoantibody-Based Immunotoxin Specific for the Fetal Acetylcholine Receptor Inhibits Rhabdomyosarcoma Growth In Vitro and in a Murine Transplantation Model. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2010, 187621, https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/187621 (2010).
Gomez, A. M. et al. Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib depletes plasma cells and specific autoantibody production in primary thymic cell cultures from early-onset myasthenia gravis patients. J Immunol. 193, 1055–1063, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1301555 (2014).
Melms, A. et al. Thymus in myasthenia gravis. Isolation of T-lymphocyte lines specific for the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from thymuses of myasthenic patients. J Clin Invest. 81, 902–908, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI113401 (1988).
Vrolix, K. et al. Clonal heterogeneity of thymic B cells from early-onset myasthenia gravis patients with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor. J Autoimmu. 52, 101–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2013.12.008. (2014).
Nogales-Gadea, G. et al. Generation of Recombinant Human IgG Monoclonal Antibodies from Immortalized Sorted B Cells. J Vis Exp 100, e52830, https://doi.org/10.3791/52830 (2015).
Farrar, J. et al. Diverse Fab specific for acetylcholine receptor epitopes from a myasthenia gravis thymus combinatorial library. Int Immunol. 9, 1311–1318, https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/9.9.1311 (1997).
Fostieri, E., Tzartos, S. J., Berrih-Aknin, S., Beeson, D. & Mamalaki, A. Isolation of potent human Fab fragments against a novel highly immunogenic region on human muscle acetylcholine receptor which protect the receptor from myasthenic autoantibodies. Eur J Immunol. 35, 632–643, https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200425671 (2005).
Graus, Y. F. et al. Human anti-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor recombinant Fab fragments isolated from thymus-derived phage display libraries from myasthenia gravis patients reflect predominant specificities in serum and block the action of pathogenic serum antibodies. J Immunol. 158, 1919–1929 (1997).
Sims, G. P., Shiono, H., Willcox, N. & Stott, D. I. Somatic hypermutation and selection of B cells in thymic germinal centers responding toacetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis. J Immunol. 167, 1935–1944, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.4.1935 (2001).
Riemersma, S. et al. Association of arthrogryposis multiplex congenita with maternal antibodies inhibiting fetal acetylcholine receptor function. J Clin Invest 98, 2358–2363, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI119048 (1996).
Gattenloehner, S., Müller-Hermelink, H. K. & Marx, A. Polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcomas: comparison of fetal type acetylcholine receptor subunits and myogenin. Diagn Mol Pathol. 7, 129–134 (1998).
Heinemann, S., Bevan, S., Kullberg, R., Lindstrom, J. & Rice, J. Modulation of acetylcholine receptor by antibody against the receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74, 3090–3094 (1977).
Kao, I. & Drachman, D. Myasthenic immunoglobulin accelerates acetylcholine receptor degradation. Science. 196, 527–529, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.850793 (1977).
Losen, M. et al. Hinge-deleted IgG4 blocker therapy for acetylcholine receptor myasthenia gravis in rhesus monkeys. Scientific Reports 7, 992, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01019-5 (2017).
Fulpius, B., Miskin, R. & Reich, E. Antibodies from myasthenic patients that compete with cholinergic agents for binding to nicotinic receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77, 4326–4330 (1980).
Tzartos, S. J. & Starzinski-Powitz, A. Decrease in acetylcholine-receptor content of human myotube cultures mediated by monoclonal antibodies to alpha, beta and gamma subunits. FEBS letters 196, 91–95 (1986).
van der Neut Kolfschoten, M. et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of human IgG4 antibodies by dynamic Fab arm exchange. Science 317, 1554–1557, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144603 (2007).
Koneczny, I. et al. IgG4 autoantibodies against muscle-specific kinase undergo Fab-arm exchange in myasthenia gravis patients. J Autoimmun. 77, 104–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2016.11.005 (2017).
Behrendt, M. et al. The role of somatic mutation in determining the affinity of anti-DNA antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol. 131, 182–189 (2003).
Ikematsu, W., Kobarg, J., Ikematsu, H., Ichiyoshi, Y. & Casali, P. Clonal analysis of a human antibody response. III. Nucleotide sequences of monoclonal IgM, IgG, and IgA to rabies virus reveal restricted V kappa gene utilization, junctional V kappa J kappa and V lambda J lambda diversity, and somatic hypermutation. J Immunol. 161, 2895–2905 (1998).
Vernet-der Garabedian, b, Bach, J. F. & Morel, E. Protective effect of myasthenic immunoglobulins against the lethal toxicity of alpha bungarotoxin. Clin Exp Immunol. 68, 130–137 (1987).
Besinger, U. A. et al. Myasthenia gravis: long-term correlation of binding and bungarotoxin blocking antibodies against acetylcholine receptors with changes in disease severity. Neurology. 33, 1316–1321 (1983).
Molina, W., Reyes, E., Joshi, N., Barrios, A. & Hernandez, L. Maturation of the neuromuscular junction in masseters of human fetus. Rom J Morphol Embryol 51, 537–541 (2010).
Girardi, G., Prohaszka, Z., Bulla, R., Tedesco, F. & Scherjon, S. Complement activation in animal and human pregnancies as a model for immunological recognition. Mol Immunol 48, 1621–1630, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2011.04.011 (2011).
Hopkins, N. D. & Powell, R. J. Classical complement activation induced by pregnancy: implications for management of connective tissue diseases. J Clin Pathol 45, 66–67 (1992).
Richani, K. et al. Normal pregnancy is characterized by systemic activation of the complement system. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 17, 239–245 (2005).
Cohen, D. et al. Classical complement activation as a footprint for murine and human antiphospholipid antibody-induced fetal loss. J Pathol 225, 502–511, https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2893 (2011).
Lazaridis, K. et al. Expression of human AChR extracellular domain mutants with improved characteristics. Int J Biol Macromol. 63, 210–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.11.003 (2014).
Labrijn, A. F. et al. Efficient generation of stable bispecific IgG1 by controlled Fab-arm exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 5145–5150, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220145110 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for financial support offered by the following funding agencies: I. K. was supported by an Erwin Schrödinger Fellowship (J 3545-B13) by the Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung Österreich (FWF). GNG was supported by Miguel Servet Fellowship from the ISCIII (CP14/00032) and a Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias Grant (PI15/01756), both are part-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER). M.L. was supported by a Veni Fellowship of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (916.10.148), the Prinses Beatrix Fonds (Project WAR08-12) and a fellowship of the Brain Foundation of the Netherlands (KS2012(1)-157). P.M.M. was supported by L’Association Française contre les Myopathies (15853), a fellowship of the Brain Foundation of the Netherlands (FS2008(1)-28), the ZonMW NWO Program Translationeel onderzoek (40-41200-98-9257) and an Aspasia/NWO grant (015.011.033). H.C. was supported by an Erwin Schrödinger Fellowship (J3589) by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.S. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data and co-wrote the manuscript. J.S. assisted in IgG purification experiments and co-wrote the manuscript. H.C. conducted AChR functional assays and wrote parts of the manuscript. I.K. wrote parts of the manuscript. R.W. supervised AChR functional assays and co-wrote the manuscript. K.L. contributed recombinant human AChR subunits and provided inputs on manuscript. draft S.T. contributed recombinant human. AChR subunits and provided inputs on manuscript draft. K.V. contributed original sequence of the B-cell line for p90-131 and provided inputs on manuscript draft. G.N.-G. designed the experiments and wrote parts of the manuscript. B.M. designed and performed experiments and provided inputs on the revised manuscript. P.C.M. wrote parts of the manuscript. J.D. contributed blocking RIA data and provided inputs on manuscript draft. M.H.d.B. designed experiments and wrote parts of the manuscript. K.S.-K. provided rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines and provided inputs on manuscript draft. A.M. provided rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines and provided inputs on manuscript draft. A.V. designed the experiments, analyzed data and wrote parts of the manuscript. M.L. designed experiments, analyzed data, co-supervised research and co-wrote the manuscript. P.M.-M. designed experiments, analyzed data, co-supervised research and co-wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Saxena, A., Stevens, J., Cetin, H. et al. Characterization of an anti-fetal AChR monoclonal antibody isolated from a myasthenia gravis patient. Sci Rep 7, 14426 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14350-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14350-8
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Complement and MHC patterns can provide the diagnostic framework for inflammatory neuromuscular diseases
Acta Neuropathologica (2024)