Abstract
Results of a 3D modeling study inspired by recent seismic tomography of the Northern Atlantic mantle suggest that a complex pattern of hot mantle distribution with long horizontal flows originating from the Iceland mantle plume has been the norm in the geological past. In the Northern Atlantic the Iceland plume has a strong long-distance impact on intraplate deformation affecting both onshore and offshore parts of Norway’s rifted margin. As a result, this margin is characterized by large magnitude differential topography sustained over at least several tens of Myr. Here we use high-resolution 3D thermo-mechanical modeling to demonstrate that the long-distance plume impact can be explained by its fast lateral propagation controlled by pre-existing lithosphere structures. Numerical models show that these structures strongly affect the style of horizontal flow of plume head material. This results in long-distance propagation of hot material emplaced at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary causing long-wavelength anomalies in onshore topography of Norway’s rifted margin. Short-wavelength offshore topographic domes are likely caused by joint occurrence of plume-related thermal perturbations and gravitational forces related to plate thickening (ridge push). Our 3D modeling brings together plume impingement, spreading ridge dynamics, and the formation of anomalous intraplate structures offshore Norway in one scenario.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Rifted continental margins form as a consequence of continental break-up. A number of factors, including the rigidity of the extending continent, the presence of thermal anomalies in the upper mantle, changes in plate-tectonic forces affecting stress levels and strain rates in the lithosphere are likely to have contributed to the observed spectrum in margin formation and evolution1,2,3. Many rifted margins are characterized by pronounced differential topography4.
A growing body of high quality new data is accumulating for the deep structure and vertical motions of rifted margins1, 5. These new data sets demonstrate pronounced deviations from classic rifting models, predicting steady post-rift subsidence patterns, controlled by thermal cooling during the post-rift phase. Post-rift erosion of sediments appears also to be more common than expected on the base of classic rifting models4. At the same time, a large body of new observations for in particular the Northern Atlantic margins and the margins of the Mediterranean6 provides ample evidence for post-rift compressional reactivation of rifted margins. Another striking observation in many rifted margin systems is the frequent close association with major thermal perturbations and associated volcanism at the transition of syn-rift and post-rift phase1, 2. The consequences of such perturbations, with characteristic time scales of several tens of Myr obviously are also manifest in the post-rift stage1.
Plume-lithosphere interactions also have a profound impact on the dynamics and topographic expression of rifting7,8,9. It appears that plume emplacement affects not only the area overlying the initial position of the plume but impacts a much wider area. For example, Cenozoic magmatism in the African continent has been explained by impact of a single superplume10. An even more challenging example for testing models for plume-lithosphere interaction is the Northern Atlantic11, 12. This area has been affected by Late Cretaceous-Early Cenozoic continental break-up preceded by more than 200 Myr of rifting and is probably the best-documented volcanic rifted margin in the world13, 14. Striking lithospheric-scale contrasts occur between areas underlain by continental lithosphere including Iceland and surrounding areas15 and newly-created oceanic lithosphere, often subjected to jumps of spreading ridges and segmented by transform faults (Fig. 1). Enigmatic features in the Northern Atlantic margin system, especially in view of the overall success of classic rifting models to assess the first order features of rifted margin evolution, include the North Atlantic Large Igneous Province along both margins16,17,18, anomalous elevated topography4, 19, 20 and Mid-Cenozoic compressional domes offshore the Mid-Norway margin21 and the British Isles22.
A qualitative model has been proposed23 for asthenospheric diapirism as an explanation for Cenozoic post-rift domal uplift of North Atlantic margins. Since this early work significant advances have been made in quantitative studies of upper mantle and crustal structure of the Northern Atlantic as well as in new concepts of thermo-mechanical modelling including implementation in 3D fully-coupled lithosphere-scale models7,8,9.
Seismic tomography24 has demonstrated that the Iceland plume is not only extending along the mid-oceanic ridge but also in perpendicular directions, with sidelobes of the Iceland plume detected below the southern Scandes and British Isles (Fig. 1), whereas other studies have emphasized plume material moving northward towards the Greenland margin25,26,27.
Two models have been proposed to explain mantle-lithosphere interaction: a “bottom-up” model referring to a vertical upwelling of deep hot material28 probably anchored in the lowermost mantle29, and a “top-down” plate-driven model in which rifting of the lithosphere is controlled by shallow mantle processes30. The nature of plume-lithosphere interactions in the Northern Atlantic is not only bottom-up controlled by spatial and time-varying distributions of plume-related mantle thermal anomalies, but also in a top-down mode1, 10 by spatial variations in overlying lithospheric structure. The commonly made assumption of a uniform lithosphere at the site of future break-up7, 31,32,33,34 that could result in symmetrical radial patterns35 sometimes complicated by viscous fingering12 is not realistic in view of abundant evidence from the geological record that incipient rifts and rifted margins are usually localized at suture zones separating stronger lithosphere. Examples include the Caledonides suture, adjacent to cratonic lithosphere, localizing Devonian and Permo-Triassic rifting and subsequent continental break-up around 55 Ma in the Northern Atlantic13, 36 and the rift systems created at the edges of the African cratonic lithosphere8, 9, 37, 38.
So far these bottom-up7 and top-down10 controls on plume emplacement have been pursued separately. Our study is a first attempt to combine bottom-up and top-down approaches for volcanic rifted margin systems by fully-coupled 3D thermo-mechanical models of plume-lithosphere interactions7,8,9, 39.
Our main objective is to quantify the consequences of initial rifted margin lithospheric structure and configuration for onshore and offshore segments of the margin system affected by multidirectional mantle flow in the asthenosphere, propagating over hundreds kilometers from the area of initial plume emplacement. To this aim we first present the generic features of the model, followed by a comparison of our model findings with pertinent observations from the well-studied Northern Atlantic volcanic rifted margin province13,14,15,16,17,18, 22, 36.
To investigate the impact of the Iceland plume on post-breakup evolution of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea after its opening in the Early Eocene, the setup of the performed 3D models mimics roughly the relative position of continental and oceanic lithosphere in the Northern Atlantic region at 30–35 Ma. At this time the center of the Iceland plume has been aligned with the Reykjanes Ridge evolving during the Early Eocene (ref. 22; Supplementary Figure 1). The numerical model relies on two main assumptions: (1) that two main fracture zones (the East Jan Mayen Fracture Zone (EJMFZ) and the Denmark Strait Fracture Zone (DSFZ), as shown in Fig. 1) were active in Oligocene, and (2) the tomographic model24 images the main characteristics of the present day extent of the sublithospheric plume material. We realize that both assumptions have their shortcomings. For example, it is well known that the EJMFZ is long lived, and it can be observed in all remote sensing and geophysical data40. On the opposite, although a shorter eastern segment – the Iceland-Faroe Fracture Zone (IFFZ) –can be followed on present day oceanic crust, most of the DSFZ is less expressed in the present day bathymetry. Note, however, that despite the DSFZ cannot be mapped directly, it corresponds for most of its length to significant (several hundred km) horizontal offsets (Fig. 1).
The model geometry is made up of three 1000 km-wide segments of oceanic lithosphere created by sea-floor spreading embedded into surrounding continents, whereas the central segment is shifted to the south-east with respect to the western and the eastern segments (Figs 2 and 3a,b). The mantle plume has been seeded by a thermal anomaly at the model box bottom underneath the transition zone between continental and oceanic lithosphere in the central segment. Following evidence for localized lithosphere-scale weaknesses above mantle plumes resulting in a plume-related jump of spreading axis from the Aegir ridge to the Kolbeinsey ridge, we have incorporated a 200 km-wide weak zone corresponding to thinner (90 km) lithosphere above the initial mantle plume. As shown by previous numerical models41, the thermal structure beneath oceanic transform faults is characterized by elevated temperatures associated to enhanced mantle upwelling that permits to sustain localized deformation within transforms for a long-time. Thus, another two 100 km-wide zones of local lithospheric thinning have been incorporated within the western and eastern segments of continental and oceanic lithosphere along transform faults south of the mantle plume corresponding to the East Jan Mayen Fracture Zone and the Denmark Strait Fracture Zone14. As shown in previous numerical studies7, interaction of an upwelling mantle plume with homogenous lithosphere leads to axisymmetric flow of plume head material emplaced at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary. Thus, incorporation of these pre-imposed weak zones appears to be a top-down prerequisite for localized flow of mantle plume material manifested by spatial patterns of low seismic velocities inferred from tomography24. The mechanical boundary conditions of the model are free slip at all boundaries that refers to absence of any pre-imposed specific kinematics.
After quick (~0.5 Myr) upwelling up to the lithospheric bottom (Fig. 3c), the mantle plume spreads laterally underneath continental lithosphere (Fig. 3d) following a pre-defined NE-SW “weak” zone in the central part of the model (Fig. 2). Once the plume has reached adjacent oceanic segments, it starts to propagate in two perpendicular directions: one part of plume material continues to spread in a NE-SW direction along mid-oceanic ridges, but another one flows to the south-east along transform faults (Fig. 3e) following two NW-SE zones of pre-imposed lithospheric thinning (Fig. 2).
In the central part of the model domain, plume-induced continental break-up (Fig. 3e) leads to formation of a new spreading axis following pre-imposed NE-SW “weak” zone and resulting in separation of a continental micro-block from the northern continent (Figs 3f and 4). This reproduces in detail the north-east propagation of the Kolbeinsey Ridge and separation of the Jan Mayen micro-continent from East Greenland at ~30 Ma (refs 22 and 36 and references therein). Note, however, that modelling of post-breakup spreading and rift jump processes (see e.g. refs 42 and 43) is beyond the scope of this paper. As shown by previous studies on basic fluid mechanics of plume-ridge interaction, seafloor spreading can restrict the along-axis flow of the plume material44,45,46,47,48. Despite possible limitations due to neglecting of seafloor spreading in our study, a strong contrast between extremely high velocity of plume propagation (that is in the order of 20–40 cm/year) and slow spreading rate of the Kolbeinsey Ridge (<2 cm/year since 9.5 Ma; see refs 49–51) makes this assumption reasonable. Open questions remain also on critical weakness of pre-imposed zones required to evolve into new spreading centres and on the nature of the time lag between ridge relocation around Jan Mayen. Our modelling provides a set of snapshots illustrating the first-order features of North-Atlantic plate tectonic regimes, and it is not targeting for detailed time evolution. It is also noteworthy that northward penetration of hot plume into continental lithosphere results in downward displacement of lithospheric mantle material of the northern continental plate corresponding to plume-induced initiation of continental subduction39, 52 (Fig. 3f). Note, however, that this prediction appears at first sight not be applicable for the North Atlantic region.
The resulting distribution of plume material shows its distant (~1000 km) south-eastward propagation along transform faults (Figs 3f and 4) up to southern continental segments. Our overall findings are thus largely in agreement with patterns inferred from seismic tomography data mapping present-day Iceland plume material not only along the mid-ocean ridge but also extending into southern Norway and the British Isles along two ridge-perpendicular zones24 (Fig. 1). Note, however, that the extent of the mantle plume material as depicted by tomography24 (Fig. 1), is not flowing along the DSFZ but slightly south of it, which points to a more complex distribution of the actual weak zones channeling plume material than adopted in the present modeling.
A distant propagation of the Iceland plume head in the Northern Atlantic can be just an example of a more general phenomenon related to fast flow in the shallow mantle. For example, extremely high velocities (>10 cm/year) for lateral migration of plume-related hot material have been also reported in the Arabia-Anatolia-Aegean system53.
In plan-view comparison of modelling results with the geometry reconstructed for time-slices corresponding to tipping points in the evolution of the Northern Atlantic shows a striking similarity in terms of key features so far not linked in a quantitative framework (Fig. 4). These include the appearance of a newly-formed spreading axis, the separation of a micro-continent, fast along-axis flow (resulting in giant V-shaped features observed along the Reykjanes Ridge)54,55,56,57 and south-eastern propagation of two lobes of partially molten mantle plume material underneath the adjacent volcanic rifted Norway margin and the southern Scandes. This lateral penetration of the plume head into the south-eastern segments of the continental lithosphere (Figs 2 and 3a,b) has reached 400 km in length and several tens km in width, corresponding to observed spatial dimensions of lithospheric thinning under the southern Scandes detected by deep seismic profiling58, mantle seismic tomography24 and topography anomalies19. Our findings support a causal link between upper mantle “asthenospheric” flow and domal uplift of the Northern Atlantic margin proposed earlier23, providing a self-consistent quantitative mechanism incorporating the mode of upper mantle-lithosphere interaction in a rifted margin setting.
It is explicitly not our aim to reproduce crustal deformation and topography in detail given the resolution of the 3D models (about 10 km per grid cell). Nevertheless, the overall patterns predicted by the model appear to be interesting in view of providing a first-order explanation for some current enigmatic observations. This includes presence of long-wavelength (hundreds of km) anomalies in onshore topography of Norway’s rifted margin and short-wavelength offshore topographic domes with characteristic wavelengths of several tens of km (Fig. 1). Combination of ridge-push related NW-SE oriented compressional forcing with lithospheric weakening due to plume-related thermal perturbations might well be able to explain these long- and short-wavelength intraplate deformation features (Supplementary Figure 3). Spatial variations of the orientations of these structures suggest a 3D nature of their causal controls including rotation of the main axes of compression. In this context, ridge push forces will contribute to a transition to a compressional stress regime, as will be the effect of rift shoulder topography, promoting compression in the adjacent offshore depocentre59. In addition, plate reorganizations encountered in the post-rift evolution associated to continuous opening of the Northern Atlantic with changes in spreading rates also can lead to a further increase in the level of the stress field in this region22. Compressional structures offshore6, 21 have been widely documented with their wavelengths of the order of several tens of km, typical for crustal scale folding. As pointed out by several authors59, 60, stresses induced by topography build-up along margins can lead to strong feed-backs with plate motion changes. Lateral variations in mechanical structure across rifted margins as well as along strike segmentation inherited from the pre-rift phase probably play an important role, not only in their formation but also in their subsequent deformation history.
Both plume activity and resulting compressional reactivation can result in short-term and long-term deviations in vertical motions from predictions of classical rifting models. The initiation of differential topography and accelerations in subsidence and uplift can be of very short-term nature, with typical time scales in the order of a few Myr.
Modeling results presented here and their possible implication in the context of the Northern Atlantic rifted margin system are probably more than of only regional significance. Onshore deformation and uplift have been reported in many areas affected by continental rifting and it appears that outward flow of hot and shallow mantle after plume emplacement may propagate at high velocities in other parts of the globe such as the Afar-Arabia region53.
Methods
General overview
Investigating plume-lithosphere interactions requires a model that incorporates a thermo-rheologically realistic lithosphere fully coupled to mantle dynamics in three dimensions, encompasses a wide region, and includes the entire upper mantle. This infers large-scale 3D models with high tectonic-scale spatial resolution (of at least 10 × 10 × 10 km). The corresponding mesh dimensions are very important, on the order of 5 × 106 elements, which implies unprecedented numerical efforts. We meet this challenge using and optimizing the staggered grid/particle-in cell viscous-plastic 3D code I3DELVIS61.
Governing equations
The momentum, continuity and energy equations are solved by the numerical code I3ELVIS61. Its numerical schema is based on finite-differences with a marker-in-cell technique where physical properties are transported by Lagrangian markers that move according to the velocities field interpolated from the fixed fully staggered Eulerian grid61, 62.
The momentum equations are solved in the form of Stokes flow approximation:
where \({\sigma }_{ij}^{^{\prime} }\) are the components of the viscous deviatoric stress tensor, P is the dynamic pressure, ρ is the density and g is the acceleration due to gravity.
Conservation of mass is approximated by the continuity equation:
where V x , V y and V z indicate the components of velocity vector.
The components of the deviatoric stress tensor are calculated using the viscous constitutive relationship between stress and strain rate for a compressible fluid62:
where the components of shear strain rate tensor are:
The model uses non-Newtonian visco-plastic rheologies where the viscosity for dislocation creep is defined as follow63, 64:
where T is temperature, \({\dot{\varepsilon }}_{II}=\sqrt{1/2{\dot{\varepsilon }}_{ij}{\dot{\varepsilon }}_{ij}}\) is the second invariant of the strain rate tensor and A D , E, V, n and R are the material constant, the activation energy, the activation volume, the stress exponent and the gas constant respectively. The power-law rheology is key in the strong channeling behavior of the mantle plume.
Plasticity is implemented using the Drucker-Prager yield criterion64:
where C and φ the residual rock strength and the internal frictional angle respectively that depend on the total plastic strain65, 66.
The mechanical equations are coupled with heat conservation equations:
where C p is the heat capacity; k is the thermal conductivity, H r is the radiogenic heat production and H a and H s are the contributions due to isothermal (de)compression (i.e., adiabatic heating/cooling) and the shear heating, respectively.
The code is fully thermo-dynamically coupled and accounts for mineralogical phase changes by thermodynamic solution for density, \(\rho \) = f (P, T) obtained from optimization of Gibbs free energy for a typical mineralogical composition of the mantle, plume and lithosphere material67. Partial melting is taken into account using the most common parameterization68, 69 of hydrous mantle melting processes. For crustal rocks we use a simple Boussinesq approximation since phase transformations in these rocks are of minor importance for the geodynamic settings explored here.
The effectively free surface topography is reproduced by emplacement at the top of upper crust a 30 km-thick low-viscosity “sticky air” layer70, 71.
More detailed information on rheological and material properties can be found in our previous studies7,8,9.
Model setup
3D model box is characterized by horizontal dimensions of 3000 × 2600 × 635 km and consists of 297 × 257 × 67 nodes offering spatial resolution of ca. 10 × 10 × 10 km per grid cell.
The initial setup consists of three 1000 km-wide zones, each of which contains oceanic lithosphere embedded into surrounding continents. Position of oceanic lithosphere within different zones refers to northern shift of western (500 km) and eastern (400 km) oceanic segments with respect to central one (Fig. 2a). Initial thickness of the oceanic lithosphere varies from 10 km underneath of the mid-ocean ridge up to 75–100 km near continental margin. Continental lithosphere has thickened from 75–100 km to 200 km within 500 km-long area adjacent to oceanic segments. Mantle plume has been seeded 200 km to north of the northern boundary of the central oceanic segment by a spherical (radius of 250 km) thermal anomaly of 370 °C temperature excess at the base of the model domain. In doing so, we have adopted the simplest symmetrical scenario. A stratified three-layer continental lithosphere is composed of an upper and lower crust and lithospheric mantle. Total thickness of bi-layer continental crust changes from 18 km to 36 km synchronously with lithospheric thickness variations (Fig. 2b). Felsic (wet quartzite flow law) and mafic (plagioclase flow law) rheology has been employed for upper and lower crust, respectively. Monolayer oceanic crust is characterized by mafic composition and constant thickness of 8 km. The ductile rheology of both continental and oceanic lithospheric mantle is controlled by dry olivine dislocation (dry olivine flow law), while sublithospheric mantle deforms predominantly by diffusion creep (dry olivine flow law as well). The initial thermal structure refers to a linear vertical gradient with 0 °C at the surface, 700 °C at the continental Moho, and 1630 °C at the model box bottom. The bottom of the continental and oceanic lithosphere corresponds to an initial isotherm of 1300 °C. We apply insulating (zero conductive heat flux) for all vertical boundaries. Free slip has been adopted as common boundary condition for all boundary elements. Free slip condition requires that the two non-orthogonal components of velocity do not change across the boundary whereas the normal one is zero61.
We have assumed a 200 km-wide weak zone corresponding to thinner (90 km) lithosphere above the initial mantle plume consistent with evidence for a lithosphere weakness zone above the Iceland plume resulting in a plume-related jump of spreading axis from the Aegir ridge to the Kolbeinsey ridge at 35 Ma (ref. 22). Another two 100 km-wide zones of local lithospheric thinning have been incorporated within western and eastern segments of continental and oceanic lithosphere along transform faults to the south of the mantle plume, that correspond to two main fracture zones within the studied area: the East Jan Mayen Fracture Zone and the Denmark Strait Fracture Zone (Fig. 1).
Prescribing of “weak seeds” by thermal perturbation associated to localized lithosphere necking is a standard approach for both analogue and numerical models of rifting and spreading66, 72,73,74,75,76,77,78.
Geometrical parameters of these weak zones including their width have been defined by detailed 2D and 3D parametrical analysis (see Supplementary Figure 4).
References
Franke, D. Rifting, lithosphere breakup and volcanism: Comparison of magma-poor and volcanic rifted margins. Marine and Petroleum geology 43, 63–87 (2013).
Ziegler, P. A. & Cloetingh, S. Dynamic processes controlling evolution of rifted basins. Earth-Science Reviews 64, 1–50 (2004).
Cloetingh, S. et al. The Moho in extensional tectonic settings: Insights from thermo-mechanical models. Tectonophysics 609, 558–604 (2013).
Japsen, P., Green, P. F., Bonow, J. M., Nielsen, T. F. & Chalmers, J. A. From volcanic plains to glaciated peaks: Burial, uplift and exhumation history of southern East Greenland after opening of the NE Atlantic. Global and Planetary Change 116, 91–114 (2014).
Unternehr, P., Péron-Pinvidic, G., Manatschal, G. & Sutra, E. Hyper-extended crust in the south Atlantic: In search of a model. Petroleum Geoscience 16, 207–215 (2010).
Johnson, H. et al. The nature and origin of compression in passive margins. Geological Society of London, 214 p. (2008).
Burov, E. & Gerya, T. Asymmetric three-dimensional topography over mantle plumes. Nature 513, 85–89 (2014).
Koptev, A., Calais, E., Burov, E., Leroy, S. & Gerya, T. Dual continental rift systems generated by plume-lithosphere interaction. Nature Geoscience 8, 388–392 (2015).
Koptev, A. et al. Contrasted continental rifting via plume-craton interaction: Applications to Central East African Rift. Geoscience Frontiers 7, 221–236 (2016).
Ebinger, C. J. & Sleep, N. H. Cenozoic magmatism throughout east Africa resulting from impact of a single plume. Nature 395, 788–791 (1998).
Howell, S. M. et al. The origin of the asymmetry in the Iceland hotspot along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge from continental breakup to present-day. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 392, 143–153 (2014).
Schoonman, C. M., White, N. J. & Pritchard, D. Radial viscous fingering of hot asthenosphere within the Icelandic plume beneath the North Atlantic Ocean. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 468, 51–61 (2017).
Abdelmalak, M. M. et al. The ocean-continent transition in the mid-Norwegian margin: Insight from seismic data and an onshore Caledonian field analogue. Geology 43, 1011–1014 (2015).
Abdelmalak, M. M. et al. The development of volcanic sequences at rifted margins: new insights from the structure and morphology of the Vøring Escarpment, mid‐Norwegian Margin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 121, 5212–5236 (2016).
Torsvik, T. H. et al. Continental crust beneath southeast Iceland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, E1818–E1827 (2015).
White, R. & McKenzie, D. Magmatism at rift zones: the generation of volcanic continental margins and flood basalts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 94, 7685–7729 (1989).
Ernst, R. & Bleeker, W. Large igneous provinces (LIPs), giant dyke swarms, and mantle plumes: significance for breakup events within Canada and adjacent regions from 2.5 Ga to the Present. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 47, 695–739 (2010).
Brown, E. L. & Lesher, C. E. North Atlantic magmatism controlled by temperature, mantle composition and buoyancy. Nature Geoscience 7, 820–824 (2014).
Rohrman, M., Beek, P., Andriessen, P. & Cloetingh, S. Meso‐Cenozoic morphotectonic evolution of southern Norway: Neogene domal uplift inferred from apatite fission track thermochronology. Tectonics 14, 704–718 (1995).
White, N. & Lovell, B. Measuring the pulse of a plume with the sedimentary record. Nature 387, 888 (1997).
Vâgnes, E., Gabrielsen, R. & Haremo, P. Late Cretaceous-Cenozoic intraplate contractional deformation at the Norwegian continental shelf: Timing, magnitude and regional implications. Tectonophysics 300, 29–46 (1998).
Lundin, E. & Doré, A. G. Mid-Cenozoic post-breakup deformation in the ‘passive’ margins bordering the Norwegian–Greenland Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology 19, 79–93 (2002).
Rohrman, M. & van der Beek, P. Cenozoic postrift domal uplift of North Atlantic margins: an asthenospheric diapirism model. Geology 24, 901–904 (1996).
Rickers, F., Fichtner, A. & Trampert, J. The Iceland–Jan Mayen plume system and its impact on mantle dynamics in the North Atlantic region: evidence from full-waveform inversion. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 367, 39–51 (2013).
Marquart, G. & Schmeling, H. A dynamic model for the Iceland Plume and the North Atlantic based on tomography and gravity data. Geophysical Journal International 159, 40–52 (2004).
Ruedas, T., Marquart, G. & Schmeling, H. Iceland: The current picture of a ridge-centred mantle plume. In Mantle Plumes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 71–126 (2007).
Steinberger, B., Spakman, W., Japsen, P. & Torsvik, T. H. The key role of global solid‐Earth processes in preconditioning Greenland’s glaciation since the Pliocene. Terra Nova 27, 1–8 (2015).
Morgan, W. J. Deep mantle convection plumes and plate motions. AAPG bulletin 56, 203–213 (1972).
Dziewonski, A. M., Lekic, V. & Romanowicz, B. A. Mantle anchor structure: an argument for bottom up tectonics. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 299, 69–79 (2010).
Anderson, D. L. The thermal state of the upper mantle; no role for mantle plumes. Geophysical Research Letters 27, 3623–3626 (2000).
d’Acremont, E., Leroy, S. & Burov, E. B. Numerical modelling of a mantle plume: the plume head–lithosphere interaction in the formation of an oceanic large igneous province. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 206, 379–396 (2003).
Brune, S., Popov, A. A. & Sobolev, S. V. Quantifying the thermo-mechanical impact of plume arrival on continental break-up. Tectonophysics 604, 51–59 (2013).
Beniest, A., Koptev, A. & Burov, E. Numerical models for continental break-up: Implications for the South Atlantic. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 461, 176–189 (2017).
Koptev, A., et al. Plume-induced continental rifting and break-up in ultra-slow extension context: Insights from 3D numerical modeling. Tectonophysics (2017).
Poore, H., White, N. & Maclennan, J. Ocean circulation and mantle melting controlled by radial flow of hot pulses in the Iceland plume. Nature Geoscience 4, 558–561 (2011).
Gaina, C., Gernigon, L. & Ball, P. Palaeocene-Recent plate boundaries in the NE Atlantic and the formation of the Jan Mayen microcontinent. Journal of the Geological Society 166, 601–616 (2009).
Corti, G., van Wijk, J., Cloetingh, S. & Morley, C. K. Tectonic inheritance and continental rift architecture: Numerical and analogue models of the East African Rift system. Tectonics 26 (2007).
Janssen, M., Stephenson, R. & Cloetingh, S. Temporal and spatial correlations between changes in plate motions and the evolution of rifted basins in Africa. Geological Society of America Bulletin 107, 1317–1332 (1995).
Burov, E. & Cloetingh, S. Controls of mantle plumes and lithospheric folding on modes of intraplate continental tectonics: Differences and similarities. Geophysical Journal International 178, 1691–1722 (2009).
Blischke, A. et al. The Jan Mayen microcontinent: an update of its architecture, structural development and role during the transition from the Ægir Ridge to the mid-oceanic Kolbeinsey Ridge. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 447, SP447–5 (2016).
Behn, M. D., Boettcher, M. S. & Hirth, G. Thermal structure of oceanic transform faults. Geology 35, 307–310 (2007).
Yamasaki, T. & Gernigon, L. Redistribution of the lithosphere deformation by the emplacement of underplated mafic bodies: implications for microcontinent formation. Journal of the Geological Society 167, 961–971 (2010).
Mittelstaedt, E., Ito, G. & van Hunen, J. Repeat ridge jumps associated with plume‐ridge interaction, melt transport, and ridge migration. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 116 (2011).
Ribe, N. M., Christensen, U. R. & Theissing, J. The dynamics of plume-ridge interaction, 1: Ridge-centered plumes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 134, 155–168 (1995).
Ribe, N. M. The dynamics of plume‐ridge interaction: 2. Off‐ridge plumes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 101, 16195–16204 (1996).
Ribe, N. M. & Delattre, W. L. The dynamics of plume-ridge interaction - III. The effects of ridge migration. Geophysical Journal International 133, 511–518 (1998).
Albers, M. & Christensen, U. R. Channeling of plume flow beneath mid-ocean ridges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 187, 207–220 (2001).
Ito, G., Lin, J. & Graham, D. Observational and theoretical studies of the dynamics of mantle plume–mid‐ocean ridge interaction. Reviews of Geophysics 41 (2003).
Vogt, P., Johnson, G. L. & Kristjansson, L. Morphology and magnetic-anomalies north of Iceland. Journal of Geophysics 47, 67–80 (1980).
Kodaira, S., Mjelde, R., Gunnarsson, K., Shiobara, H. & Shimamura, H. Evolution of oceanic crust on the Kolbeinsey Ridge, north of Iceland, over the past 22 Myr. Terra Nova 10, 27–31 (1998).
Yeo, I. A., CW, D., Le Bas, T. P., Augustin, N. & Steinführer, A. Segment-scale volcanic episodicity: evidence from the North Kolbeinsey Ridge, Atlantic. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 439, 81–87 (2016).
Baes, M., Gerya, T. & Sobolev, S. V. 3-D thermo-mechanical modeling of plume-induced subduction initiation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 453, 193–203 (2016).
Faccenna, C., Becker, T. W., Jolivet, L. & Keskin, M. Mantle convection in the Middle East: Reconciling Afar upwelling, Arabia indentation and Aegean trench rollback. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 375, 254–269 (2013).
Vogt, P. R. Asthenosphere motion recorded by the ocean floor south of Iceland. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 13, 153–160 (1971).
Vogt, P. R. Plumes, subaxial pipe flow, and topography along the mid-oceanic ridge. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 29, 309–325 (1976).
Ito, G. Reykjanes ‘V’-shaped ridges originating from a pulsing and dehydrating mantle plume. Nature 411, 681 (2001).
Jones, S. M., White, N., Clarke, B. J., Rowley, E. & Gallagher, K. Present and past influence of the Iceland Plume on sedimentation. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 196, 13–25 (2002).
Maupin, V. et al. The deep structure of the Scandes and its relation to tectonic history and present-day topography. Tectonophysics 602, 15–37 (2013).
Pascal, C. & Cloetingh, S. Gravitational potential stresses and stress field of passive continental margins: Insights from the south-Norway shelf. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 277, 464–473 (2009).
Iaffaldano, G. & Bunge, H. Strong plate coupling along the Nazca-South America convergent margin. Geology 36, 443–446 (2008).
Gerya, T. V. Introduction to Numerical Geodynamic Modelling, 358 pp. (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Gerya, T. V. & Yuen, D. A. Robust characteristics method for modelling multiphase visco-elasto-plastic thermo-mechanical problems. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 163, 83–105 (2007).
Karato, S. I. & Wu, P. Rheology of the upper mantle: A synthesis. Science 260, 771–778 (1993).
Ranalli, G. Rheology of the Earth, 413 pp (Chapman and Hall, London, 1995).
Huismans, R. S. & Beaumont, C. Asymmetric lithospheric extension: The role of frictional plastic strain softening inferred from numerical experiments. Geology 30, 211–214 (2002).
Gerya, T. V. Three-dimensional thermomechanical modeling of oceanic spreading initiation and evolution. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 214, 35–52 (2013).
Connolly, J. A. D. Computation of phase equilibria by linear programming: a tool for geodynamic modeling and its application to subduction zone decarbonation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 236, 524–541 (2005).
Katz, R.F., Spiegelman, M. & Langmuir, C.H. A new parameterization of hydrous mantle melting. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 4 (2003).
Gerya, T. Initiation of Transform Faults at Rifted Continental Margins: 3D Petrological-Thermomechanical Modeling and Comparison to the Woodlark Basin. Petrology 21, 550–560 (2013).
Duretz, T., May, D. A., Gerya, T. V. & Tackley, P. J. Discretization errors and free surface stabilization in the finite difference and marker-in-cell method for applied geodynamics: a numerical study. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 12, Q07004 (2011).
Crameri, F. et al. A comparison of numerical surface topography calculations in geodynamic modelling: an evaluation of the ‘sticky air’ method. Geophysical Journal International 189, 38–54 (2012).
Hieronymus, C. F. Control on seafloor spreading geometries by stress-and strain-induced lithospheric weakening. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 222, 177–189 (2004).
Choi, E. S., Lavier, L. & Gurnis, M. Thermomechanics of mid-ocean ridge segmentation. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 171, 374–386 (2008).
Tentler, T. & Acocella, V. How does the initial configuration of oceanic ridge segments affect their interaction? Insights from analogue models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 115 (2010).
Allken, V., Huismans, R.S. & Thieulot, C. Three‐dimensional numerical modeling of upper crustal extensional systems. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 116 (2011).
Allken, V., Huismans, R. S. & Thieulot, C. Factors controlling the mode of rift interaction in brittle‐ductile coupled systems: A 3D numerical study. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 13 (2012).
Brune, S. & Autin, J. The rift to break-up evolution of the Gulf of Aden: Insights from 3D numerical lithospheric-scale modelling. Tectonophysics 607, 65–79 (2013).
Brune, S. Evolution of stress and fault patterns in oblique rift systems: 3‐D numerical lithospheric‐scale experiments from rift to breakup. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 15, 3392–3415 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We thank Claudio Faccenna and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments in the preparation of this article. This study is co-funded by the Advanced ERC Grant 290864 RHEOLITH to A. Koptev and E. Burov and by the UPMC visiting professor grant to S. Cloetingh. Numerical simulations were performed on the ERC-funded SGI Ulysse cluster of ISTEP. Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 1 are modified from Lundin, E. & Doré, A.G. Mid-Cenozoic post-breakup deformation in the ‘passive’ margins bordering the Norwegian–Greenland Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology 19, 79–93 (2002), with permission from Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.K., S.C. and E.B. developed the conceptual idea and model. A.K. designed and conducted 3D experiments; T.F. conducted 2D test experiments. S.C. provided geophysical and geological context. T.G. designed the 3D thermo-mechanical code and conducted test experiments. All authors discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages. Constructive reviewers’ comments on an earlier version of the manuscript are gratefully acknowledged.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Koptev, A., Cloetingh, S., Burov, E. et al. Long-distance impact of Iceland plume on Norway’s rifted margin. Sci Rep 7, 10408 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07523-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07523-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Role of Large Igneous Provinces in continental break-up varying from “Shirker” to “Producer”
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
-
Tracing the Iceland plume and North East Atlantic breakup in the lithosphere
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
-
Plume–MOR decoupling and the timing of India–Eurasia collision
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
TOPO-EUROPE — ILP’s Program on Coupled Deep Earth and Surface Processes in Continental Europe and its Margins
Journal of the Geological Society of India (2020)
-
Transient mantle cooling linked to regional volcanic shut-down and early rifting in the North Atlantic Igneous Province
Bulletin of Volcanology (2020)