Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sexual and ejaculatory function after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate: a single-center experience

  • Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Impotence Research Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently available surgical treatments for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) are associated with an increased risk of sexual dysfunction. The aim of our study is to compare sexual and ejaculatory function after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate (B-TUEP). We performed a retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected from 62 (44.9%) and 76 (55.1%) patients who underwent HoLEP and B-TUEP, respectively. Erectile function and ejaculation characteristics were assessed with the International Index of Erectile Function–Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain and the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory function (MSHQ-EJ) questionnaires. Our study recorded no change in erectile function and no significant difference in rates of preserved antegrade ejaculation after both surgeries. One month after surgery, rates of physical pain/discomfort and perceived decreased physical pleasure during ejaculation were higher in HoLEP than B-TUEP patients (all p < 0.03). Moreover, HoLEP patients were more bothered by their ejaculatory difficulties than B-TUEP men (p = 0.03). At 3- and 12-months follow-up, all ejaculation-related differences disappeared. In conclusion, both procedures are valid alternatives for BPO treatment as they offer comparable urinary and sexual outcomes in the long term. However, in the first month after surgery, HoLEP patients present with more ejaculatory difficulties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Physical pain or discomfort during ejaculation at baseline and at 1, 3, 12 months follow-up assessment after HoLEP and B-TUEP.
Fig. 2: Reduced volume of semen at baseline and at 1, 3, 12 months follow-up assessment after HoLEP and B-TUEP.
Fig. 3: Decreased physical pleasure during ejaculation at baseline and at 1, 3, 12 months follow-up assessment after HoLEP and B-TUEP.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marra G, Sturch P, Oderda M, Tabatabaei S, Muir G, Gontero P. Systematic review of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatments on men’s ejaculatory function: time for a bespoke approach? Int J Urol. 2016;23:22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leong JY, Patel AS, Ramasamy R. Minimizing sexual dysfunction in BPH surgery. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2019;11:190–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Briganti A, Naspro R, Gallina A, Salonia A, Vavassori I, Hurle R, et al. Impact on sexual function of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a prospective, 2-center, randomized trial. J Urol. 2006;175:1817–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brookes ST, Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Abrams P, Neal DE. Sexual dysfunction in men after treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms: evidence from randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;324:1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, Suardi N, Briganti A, Zanoni M, et al. Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center prospective randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2008;179:S87–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carmignani L, Bozzini G, Macchi A, Maruccia S, Picozzi S, Casellato S. Sexual outcome of patients undergoing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:802–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lebdai S, Chevrot A, Doizi S, Pradere B, Delongchamps NB, Benchikh A, et al. Do patients have to choose between ejaculation and miction? A systematic review about ejaculation preservation technics for benign prostatic obstruction surgical treatment. World J Urol. 2019;37:299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung A, Woo H. Preservation of sexual function when relieving benign prostatic obstruction surgically: can a trade-off be considered? Curr Opin Urol. 2016;26:42–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gu C, Zhou N, Gurung P, Kou Y, Luo Y, Wang Y, et al. Lasers versus bipolar technology in the transurethral treatment of benign prostatic enlargement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol. 2020;38:907–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahokehr A, Gilling PJ. Enucleation techniques for benign prostate obstruction: which one and why? Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24:49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qian X, Liu H, Xu D, Xu L, Huang F, He W, et al. Functional outcomes and complications following B-TURP versus HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review of the literature and meta-analysis. Aging Male. 2017;20:184–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cornu J-N, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol. 2015;67:1066–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mavuduru RM, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Acharya N, Agarwal M, Garg S, et al. Comparison of HoLEP and TURP in terms of efficacy in the early postoperative period and perioperative morbidity. Urol Int. 2009;82:130–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilling P. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int. 2008;101:131–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giulianelli R, Gentile B, Albanesi L, Tariciotti P, Mirabile G. Bipolar button transurethral enucleation of prostate in benign prostate hypertrophy treatment: a new surgical technique. Urology 2015;86:407–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao Z, Ma W, Xuan X, Ou L, Liang Y, Zeng G. Impact of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) on sexual function: results of a prospective trial. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1473–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giulianelli R, Gentile BC, Mirabile G, Albanesi L, Tariciotti P, Rizzo G, et al. Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) in benign prostate hypertrophy treatment: 3-year results. Urology. 2017;107:190–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Badía X, García-Losa M, Dal-Ré R. Ten-language translation and harmonization of the International Prostate Symptom Score: developing a methodology for multinational clinical trials. Eur Urol. 1997;31:129–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Elia C, Cerruto MA, Cavicchioli FM, Cardarelli S, Molinari A, Artibani W. Critical points in understanding the Italian version of the IIEF 5 questionnaire. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2012;84:197–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ugolini V, Pescatori ES. Presentazione della versione italiana del Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ). GIMSeR. 2005;12:215–6. http://www.andrologiaitaliana.it/upload/content/docs/gimser_4_05.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tubaro A, Zattoni F, Prezioso D, Scarpa RM, Pesce F, Rizzi CA, et al. Italian validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires. BJU Int. 2006;97:101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Professionals S-O. EAU guidelines: management of non-neurogenic male LUTS. Uroweb. https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/#note_354.

  24. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson LC, Gilling PJ, Williams A, Kennett KM, Frampton CM, Westenberg AM, et al. A randomised trial comparing holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in the treatment of prostates larger than 40 grams: results at 2 years. Eur Urol. 2006;50:569–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, Okhunov Z, O’Leary M, Potoldykova N, et al. Impact of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with thulium fiber laser on the erectile function. BMC Urol. 2018;18:87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P, Kirby RS, Lukacs B, Meuleman E, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol. 2003;44:637–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Meng F, Gao B, Fu Q, Chen J, Liu Y, Shi B, et al. Change of sexual function in patients before and after Ho:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate. J Androl. 2007;28:259–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alloussi SH, Lang C, Eichel R, Alloussi S. Ejaculation-preserving transurethral resection of prostate and bladder neck: short- and long-term results of a new innovative resection technique. J Endourol. 2014;28:84–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gil-Vernet JM, Alvarez-Vijande R, Gil-Vernet A, Gil-Vernet JM. Ejaculation in men: a dynamic endorectal ultrasonographical study. Br J Urol. 1994;73:442–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim M, Song SH, Ku JH, Kim H-J, Paick J-S. Pilot study of the clinical efficacy of ejaculatory hood sparing technique for ejaculation preservation in Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Int J Impot Res. 2015;27:20–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Paduch DA, Polzer P, Morgentaler A, Althof S, Donatucci C, Ni X, et al. Clinical and demographic correlates of ejaculatory dysfunctions other than premature ejaculation: a prospective, observational study. J Sex Med. 2015;12:2276–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Placer J, Salvador C, Planas J, Trilla E, Lorente D, Celma A, et al. Effects of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate on sexual function. J Endourol. 2014;29:332–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Burri A, Buchmeier J, Porst H. The importance of male ejaculation for female sexual satisfaction and function. J Sexual Med. 2018;15:1600–8.

  35. Pushkar P, Taneja R, Agarwal A. A prospective study to compare changes in male sexual function following holmium laser enucleation of prostate versus transurethral resection of prostate. Urol Ann. 2019;11:27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. De Nunzio C, Roehrborn CG, Andersson K-E, McVary KT. Erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3:352–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Boeri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bebi, C., Turetti, M., Lievore, E. et al. Sexual and ejaculatory function after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate: a single-center experience. Int J Impot Res 34, 71–80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00366-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00366-8

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation