Abstract
Cabozantinib is an orally available, multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of several solid tumours and known to inhibit KIT tyrosine kinase. In acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), aberrant KIT tyrosine kinase often coexists with t(8;21) to drive leukaemogenesis. Here we evaluated the potential therapeutic effect of cabozantinib on a selected AML subtype characterised by t(8;21) coupled with KIT mutation. Cabozantinib exerted substantial cytotoxicity in Kasumi-1 cells with an IC50 of 88.06 ± 4.32 nM, which was well within clinically achievable plasma levels. The suppression of KIT phosphorylation and its downstream signals, including AKT/mTOR, STAT3, and ERK1/2, was elicited by cabozantinib treatment and associated with subsequent alterations of cell cycle- and apoptosis-related molecules. Cabozantinib also disrupted the synthesis of an AML1-ETO fusion protein in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In a mouse xenograft model, cabozantinib suppressed tumourigenesis at 10 mg/kg and significantly prolonged survival of the mice. Further RNA-sequencing analysis revealed that mTOR-mediated signalling pathways were substantially inactivated by cabozantinib treatment, causing the downregulation of ribosome biogenesis and glycolysis, along with myeloid leukocyte activation. We suggest that cabozantinib may be effective in the treatment of AML with t(8;21) and KIT mutation. Relevant clinical trials are warranted.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Differentiation arrest and uncontrollable proliferation of myeloid progenitor cells induce acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), a genetically heterogeneous clonal malignancy [1]. The t(8; 21) (q22; q22) reciprocal chromosome translocation is one of the most common chromosomal abnormalities in AML, accounting for ~13% of all AML cases and up to 40% of AML M2 subtype (FAB classification) [2, 3]. Chromosome translocation t(8;21) generates an aberrant fusion protein RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (AML1-ETO), which causes differentiation blockage [4].
AML1-ETO alone fails to induce leukaemogenesis; an additional coinciding mutation such as KIT, FLT3, JAK2, RAS, and PDGFR, is needed for full-blown leukaemia [5]. The KIT mutation frequency in t(8;21) leukaemia can be as high as 50% [6]; the coexistence of the two alterations is linked to a higher incidence of relapse after intensive chemotherapy and associated with adverse prognosis [3, 7].
Cabozantinib (XL-184) is an ATP-competitive multi-kinase inhibitor targeting MET, VEGFR2, RET, KIT, TIE-2, and FLT3, all of which are involved in cancer pathophysiology [8]. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved cabozantinib as a treatment for progressive metastatic medullar thyroid cancer, advanced renal cell carcinoma, and advanced hepatocellular carcinomas [9,10,11]. We utillised a large-scale integrated cancer cell line compound database, Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC, https://www.cancerrxgene.org/), to assess the activity of cabozantinib against haematological malignancies. Among these malignancies, cabozantinib was especially effective against AML, according to low IC50 values (Supplementary Fig. 1A–C). Our previous sensitivity assessment of leukaemic cell lines (MV4-11, MOLM13, OCI-AML3, THP-1, RS4;11, K562, U937, and HL60) indicated that nanomolar cabozantinib was selectively cytotoxic in leukaemic cells with FLT3-ITD [12]. Subsequently, Klaeger also got similar results [13]. Fathi et al. [14] observed that cabozantinib was well tolerated in AML patients with FLT3-ITD and effectively inhibited the FLT3-mutated AML, demonstrating the feasibility of cabozantinib for AML treatment.
Based on the pharmacological potential of cabozantinib, we investigated the anti-leukaemia effect of cabozantinib on another subtype AML harbouring both KIT mutation and t(8;21).
Materials and methods
Cell culture and chemicals
Three human AML cell lines, Kasumi-1 (ATCC, Manassas, VA) with t(8;21) and heterozygous KIT N822K mutation, SKNO-1 (JCRB, Osaka, Japan) with t(8;21) and homozygous KIT N822K mutation, and OCI-AML3 (DSMZ, Brauschweig, Germany) with NPM1 mutation and DNMT3A mutation, were used in this study. Kasumi-1 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (ThermoFisher Scientific/GIBCO, Waltham, MA) containing 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS), SKNO-1 cells in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS containing 10 ng/ml granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN), and OCI-AML3 cells in αMEM medium (GIBCO) containing 20% FBS. Cultures were grown at 37 °C in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. These cell lines were authenticated (16-Markers STR) by the Food Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan. Their genetic profiles were identical to reported information.
Cabozantinib-malate was purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX) and dissolved in DMSO for storage at −20 °C. Cycloheximide (CHX), MG-132, Z-VAD-FMK, and puromycin were purchased from TargetMol (Boston, MA), Tocris Bioscience (Abingdon, UK), Abcam (Cambridge, MA), and GIBCO, respectively.
Cellular growth assays
After 72-h drug treatments, cell viability was assessed with CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS assay; Promega, Madison, WI), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated using the CalcuSyn software (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK).
Trypan blue exclusion assay was used for evaluating cell proliferation curves after drug treatment. Six-well plates were seeded with 2 × 105 cells/well. After indicated treatment periods, the number of viable cells was determined using trypan blue dye (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ).
Glucose uptake assay
Six-well plates were seeded with 1 × 106 cells/well; control wells were loaded with cell-free culture medium for initial glucose measurements. After 16 h incubation, double-concentrated drug solutions were added for 24 h drug treatments. Then, plates were centrifuged at 400 × g, 4 °C, for 5 min. Supernatants were collected and mixed with equal volume of 1X Reaction buffer for measuring glucose with ACCU-CHEK glucose metre (Accu-Chek Performa, Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland). Glucose uptake was calculated by subtracting glucose values measured after 24-h drug treatment from initial glucose values: Glucose uptake = concentration of glucosecell-free medium − concentration of glucosedrug-treatment.
Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation
Nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction was performed using NE-PER® Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (ThermoFisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blot, surface sensing of translation (SUnSET) method, co-immunoprecipitation
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Samples were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Sigma/Millipore, St. Louis, MO). Membranes were blocked with BlockPRO™ 1 min Protein-Free Blocking Buffer (Visual Protein), incubated with primary antibody (Supplementary Table 1) at 4 °C overnight, washed three times with 1× TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20, and probed with horseradish peroxide-conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signalling Technology, Beverly, MA). Blots were developed using Enhanced Chemiluminescence reagent (Millipore).
SUnSET method measures global protein synthesis by labelling nascent polypeptides with puromycin. Kasumi‐1 cells were treated with different cabozantinib concentrations for 24 h, followed by incubation with 200 nM puromycin for 1 h. Then, cells were lysed and subjected to western blotting as described above; membranes were probed using an anti-puromycin antibody.
For co-immunoprecipitation, puromycin-labelled nascent polypeptides were pulled down using 4 μg of mouse anti-puromycin antibody; anti-AML1 antibody was used for detecting AML1-ETO in subsequent immunoblot analysis.
Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)
After indicated treatment steps, total RNA was isolated using Nucleospin RNA kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA, which was used as a template for SYBR-green-based qPCR amplification of genes of interest as previously described [12]. Primer specificity was confirmed by melting curves obtained following the reaction (for primer sequences, see Supplementary Table 2).
RNA-sequencing analysis
Total RNA was extracted using Nucleospin RNA kit (Macherey-Nagel) after 4-h and 24-h treatments with DMSO or 100 nM cabozantinib. Sequencing was performed using an Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencer. Fastqc files of RNA-seq were sent to FastQC for a quality check; Trimmomatic was used for adapter and low-quality bases trimming. Sequencing alignment and gene expression counting was conducted using R package Rsubread with reference genome GRC37.13 from Genecode (https://www.gencodegenes.org/). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between DMSO and cabozantinib were identified by EBseq. A threshold of fold change ≥2 or ≤0.5 and p ≤ 0.05 was used to select the DEGs. Transcriptome files are provided in the GEO database (ID: GSE153853). Pathway enrichment was analysed by Metascape or gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using the Hallmark collections of the GSEA MSigDB 7.0.
Immunofluorescence assay
After 4 h drug treatment, cells were harvested by Cytospin (800 × g, 5 min), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and blocked in blocking buffer (PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100, 0.3 M glycine, and 5% FBS) for 1 h. Then, cells were washed three times with 1× PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (PBST) and incubated with anti-FOXO3a antibody at 4 °C overnight. Cells were washed again and incubated with Alexa-Fluor-labelled, goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody for 1 h in the dark at room temperature. Cells were rinsed in 1× PBST and mounted on slides in EverBrite™ Hardset Mounting Medium containing DAPI for analysis using Laser TIRF (Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence) confocal microscope with 63x magnification objective.
Flow cytometry
For cell-cycle analysis, 6-well plates were seeded with 5 × 105 cells/well and incubated for 16 h before initiating the 24-h cabozantinib treatment. Then, cells were harvested, fixed in 70% ethanol for at least 16 h, and resuspended in 495 μl PBS and 5 μl RNase A (1 mg/ml) at 37 °C. Subsequent staining with DNA-binding propidium iodide (PI) was visualised by measuring fluorescence using CYTOFLEXTM Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA). The cell-cycle distribution was analysed using CytExpert software.
Cell apoptosis was assessed using Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (FITC) Annexin-V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences). After 72-h cabozantinib treatment, cells were washed with cold PBS and resuspended in 1× binding buffer containing Annexin-V-FITC and PI. Cell suspensions were incubated in the dark for 15 min at room temperature and measured with CYTOFLEXTM Flow Cytometer. Apoptotic analysis using CytExpert software differentiates between viable (AV−/PI−), early (AV+/PI−), and late (AV+/PI+) apoptotic cells.
In vivo efficacy of cabozantinib in murine model
Kasumi-1 cells (2 × 107) were inoculated subcutaneously into the right flank of CAnN.Cg-Foxn1nu/CrlNarl mice (purchased from the National Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Research Centre, Taipei, Taiwan). When tumour size reached 100–200 mm3, mice were randomly divided into two groups receiving oral cabozantinib (10 mg/kg cabozantinib, n = 14; 30 mg/kg cabozantinib, n = 15) and one vehicle group (n = 12). Treatments were administered on 6 days, followed by a 1-day rest for a total course of three cycles. All mice were regularly monitored for body weight and tumour growth. Tumour volumes were calculated with the following formula: (length × width2) × 0.5 in millimetres. Tumour samples were fixed in formalin for histological examination. Mice were euthanised when tumour volume nearly reached 2000 mm3. Tissue samples were fixed in formaldehyde for H&E staining, as reported previously [15]. The xenograft experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, and conformed to the criteria outlined in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health.
Statistical analysis
All quantitative data are expressed as means ± SDs. Differences between the treatment groups and DMSO controls were compared by Student’s t-test, and differences with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Comparisons of survival curves estimated by Kaplan–Meier plots using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 were analysed by log-rank test.
Results
Cabozantinib inhibited growth and triggered apoptosis of Kasumi-1 cells
Significant cytotoxicity of cabozantinib was detected in Kasumi-1 and SKNO-1 with IC50 values of 88.06 and 503.55 nM, respectively (Fig. 1A), which were within clinically achievable plasma levels [16, 17]. Evaluation of the cell proliferation kinetics with the trypan blue exclusion assay revealed that cabozantinib inhibited the proliferation of Kasumi-1 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The doubling time of 36.95 h in DMSO was increased to 51.52 and 83.66 h in 50 and 100 nM cabozantinib, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2A); growth inhibition and prolonged doubling time were also observed in cabozantinib-treated SKNO-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 2B). To elucidate the molecular mechanism of the antiproliferative effects of cabozantinib, cell cycle and apoptosis analyses were performed. We found that treatment of Kasumi-1 cells with 50 nM cabozantinib induced significant G0/G1 cell-cycle arrest within 24 h in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B). Cabozantinib downregulated the G1/S transition regulator cyclin E and upregulated the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p27 (Fig. 1C), which led to G0/G1 cell-cycle arrest, suggesting that their dysregulation contributed to the inhibitory effects.
The apoptosis analysis detected dose-dependently increased percentages of annexin-V and PI double-positive Kasumi-1 cells following a 72-h cabozantinib treatment (Fig. 1D). Immunoblotting analysis indicated that cabozantinib treatment increased cleavage of caspase-3 and PARP-1 (Fig. 1E), implying the treatment induced the caspase-3-dependent proteolytic cascade. Further analysis of apoptosis-associated proteins revealed that cabozantinib treatment upregulated pro-apoptotic proteins BAX and PUMA but hardly affected BAK (Fig. 1F). Moreover, cabozantinib treatment downregulated anti-apoptotic proteins survivin and MCL-1, whereas BCL-2 remained unchanged. The treatment also significantly inhibited survivin mRNA expression and induced PUMA (BBC3) mRNA expression (Fig. 1G), denoting that BBC3 and survivin might be under transcriptional control. These findings suggested that the increase in cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP-1, as well as in apoptosis-related proteins, could contribute to mediating apoptosis in cabozantinib-treated Kasumi-1 cells.
Cabozantinib exerted inhibitory activity against KIT and its downstream signals
Because of the constitutive ligand-independent activation of KIT-induced downstream oncogenic signalling pathways, including the STAT3, PI3K/AKT, and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathways [18], we initially examined the cabozantinib-induced inhibition of the phosphorylation of KIT and downstream signalling pathways. A 4-h cabozantinib treatment decreased phosphorylation of KIT and its downstream signalling pathways, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, ERK1/2, and STAT3, in Kasumi-1 cells (Fig. 2A). However, the inhibitor’s effect on SKNO-1 cells was limited to a decreased KIT phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. 3A), indicating that SKNO-1 cells might be less sensitive to cabozantinib than Kasumi-1 cells.
Forkhead box O3a (FOXO3a), a member of the FOXO subfamily of forkhead transcription factors, is a canonical downstream target of the PI3K/AKT pathway involved in the cell cycle [19,20,21]. AKT phosphorylates FOXO3a at serine-253, disrupting its rate of nuclear export [22]. To elucidate whether the effect of cabozantinib on Kasumi-1 cells involved FOXO3a, an analysis of whole extracts of DMSO- or cabozantinib-treated Kasumi-1 cells revealed that the latter had lower levels of phosphorylated FOXO3a than the former (Fig. 2B). We further assessed the subcellular distribution of FOXO3a by examining cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts of pre-treated and treated Kasumi-1 cells. Western blotting revealed that cabozantinib treatment diminished the FOXO3a level in the cytoplasmic fraction, while the FOXO3a level in the nuclear fraction was dose-dependently increased (Fig. 2C). Additionally, confocal immunofluorescence analysis also revealed that endogenous FOXO3a resided almost exclusively in the cytoplasm of untreated cells, whereas nuclear staining was negligible. The subcellular distribution of FOXO3a became increasingly localised to the nucleus after cabozantinib treatment (Fig. 2D), although some punctate perinuclear FOXO3a staining remained apparent; indicating FOXO3a was redistributed from cytoplasm to nucleus. Nuclear FOXO3a localisation can promote CDK inhibitor p27 expression, preventing the activation of G1/S regulator cyclin E-CDK2 complexes [23], which induced cell-cycle arrest. We concluded that cabozantinib could translocate FOXO3a protein from the cytoplasm to the nucleus by inhibiting PI3K/AKT signalling, promoting p27 expression, and inhibiting cyclin E (Fig. 1C), which in turn induced cell-cycle arrest.
Cabozantinib downregulated AML1-ETO protein expression by interfering with oncofusion protein synthesis
AML1-ETO is an oncofusion protein critical for leukaemogenesis through impeding normal AML1 function [24]. We observed dose- and time-dependent dysregulation of AML1-ETO in cabozantinib-treated Kasumi-1 cells (Fig. 3A). To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of cabozantinib-induced AML1-ETO downregulation, AML1-ETO mRNA expression in cabozantinib-treated cells was quantified by RT-qPCR. Interestingly, cabozantinib did not affect the AML1-ETO expression at mRNA levels (Supplementary Fig. 4A), suggesting a transcription-independent regulation.
Protein abundance mirrors the integration of protein degradation and protein synthesis rates [25]. We disrupted de novo protein synthesis with CHX and found that the AML1-ETO protein half-life was barely altered after cabozantinib treatment (Fig. 3B), excluding the possibility that cabozantinib-associated AML1-ETO reduction was due to an accelerated turnover. MG-132, a proteasome inhibitor, was used to block proteasome-dependent degradation. AML1-ETO accumulation was less reduced by MG-132/cabozantinib co-treatment than by MG-132 alone, suggesting a potential role of cabozantinib in hindering protein synthesis (Fig. 3C). Protein synthesis quantification using SUnSET assay [26]. revealed that cabozantinib dose-dependently reduced global protein synthesis in Kasumi-1 cells but not in cabozantinib-nonresponsive OCI-AML3 (KIT wild type) cells (Fig. 3D). Further immunoprecipitation followed by puromycin-labelling method directly assessed AML1-ETO synthesis, demonstrating that cabozantinib reduced the AML1-ETO protein synthesis (Fig. 3E). It is known that caspase-3 and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) can trigger AML-ETO oncoprotein degradation [27, 28]. Our results demonstrated that Z-VAD-FMK, a pan-caspase inhibitor, inhibited cabozantinib-induced caspase-3 cleavage but could not rescue cabozantinib-induced AML1-ETO downregulation in Kasumi-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 4B). Furthermore, cabozantinib failed to affect HSP90 protein expression (Supplementary Fig. 4C). Thus, cabozantinib treatment downregulated AML1-ETO protein expression by impairing oncofusion protein synthesis rather than enhancing proteasome-dependent degradation.
Transcriptomic analyses indicated that cabozantinib could repress glycolytic features in Kasumi-1 cells
We searched for global transcriptomic changes in cabozantinib-treated Kasumi-1 cells to identify any additional mechanism induced by cabozantinib treatment. We conducted an RNA-seq analysis of cells treated with 100 nM cabozantinib or DMSO for 4 and 24 h, representing short-term and long-term responses, respectively. We identified 538 and 253 DEGs between cabozantinib-treated and control cells after the 4 and 24-h treatment, respectively. By using the gene ontology (GO) approach to identify enriched pathways in Metascape, we found that the top-ranked enriched pathways after the 4 and 24-h cabozantinib treatment were related to ribosome biogenesis (Fig. 4A) and myeloid leukocyte activation, respectively (Fig. 4B).
Besides Metascape, GSEA was applied as another pathway enrichment analysis tool for transcriptomic data interpretation. Intriguingly, functional analysis of Kasumi-1 cells after the 4 and 24-h cabozantinib treatment identified three significantly downregulated gene sets—MYC_targets_V2, MYC_targets_V1, and MTORC1 signalling. These three gene sets, which are strongly linked to cell metabolism [29,30,31,32], were similarly enriched regardless of the treatment period (Fig. 4C), suggesting that cabozantinib affected metabolic activity. Subsequently, we examined glycolysis-related genes and protein expression levels after 24-h cabozantinib treatment by RT-qPCR and western blotting, respectively. Interestingly, glycolysis-related genes, including PKM2, LDHA, and GLUT1, were suppressed by cabozantinib exposure (Fig. 4D), and the protein expression profiles were similar (Fig. 4E). Consistent with reduced GLUT1 mRNA expression induced by cabozantinib, a tendency to less glucose uptake activity following cabozantinib treatment was observed (Fig. 4F). Consequently, we suggest that cabozantinib triggered p-mTOR inhibition following KIT suppression, which then abrogated downstream glycolysis target genes and deprived leukaemic cells of intracellular glucose transport necessary for cell survival and proliferation.
Cabozantinib inhibited AML1-ETO-mediated transcriptome
Our Metascape analyses unravelled the ribosome biogenesis inhibition after cabozantinib treatment (Fig. 4A). Generally, uncontrolled cellular proliferation is a hallmark of cancer, maintained through high levels of protein synthesis and ribosome biogenesis. Therefore, we investigated two key modulators of ribosome biogenesis, the RP S6 kinases (S6K1/2) and the protein initiation factor 4E binding proteins (4E-BP1/2/3). Immunoblotting showed that 4-h cabozantinib treatment decreased S6K and 4E-BP1 phosphorylation (Fig. 5A), consistent with previous results about disrupting oncofusion protein synthesis (Fig. 3E).
Additionally, GSEA against a ranked list of known AML1-ETO-targeted genes generated from siRNA-mediated AML1-ETO knockdown in Kasumi-1 cells [33] was compatible with our transcriptomic results obtained from 24-h cabozantinib-treated Kasumi-1 cells (Fig. 5B), confirming that cabozantinib treatment resembled the effect of AML1-ETO knockdown. Furthermore, several myeloid differentiation-related genes originally suppressed by AML1-ETO were dose-dependently upregulated after a 24-h cabozantinib treatment (Fig. 5C), consistent with the transcriptomic results (Fig. 4B). In summary, cabozantinib not only diminished AML1-ETO protein synthesis, possibly through the mTOR/S6K/4E-BP1 axis, but also upregulated myeloid differentiation-related gene expression.
Cabozantinib suppressed the growth of subcutaneous Kasumi-1 xenograft tumours
We established Kasumi-1 xenografts in nude mice to assess the potential in vivo antitumor efficacy of cabozantinib. In agreement with in vitro results, once-daily gavage of 10 or 30 mg/kg of cabozantinib apparently retarded tumour growth and prolonged survival (Fig. 6A–C) without obvious changes in body weight throughout the treatment course (Fig. 6D). Western blot analysis of the expression of KIT-mediated signalling pathways in tumour tissues demonstrated that cabozantinib treatment also decreased p-KIT, p-STAT3, p-AKT, p-mTOR, and p-ERK1/2 expression levels in vivo (Fig. 6E). After the three-cycle cabozantinib treatment, tumour cells were shrunk and loosely arranged, compared with the observations in vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 6F).
Discussion
In AML, KIT mutation is the most common cooperating mutation in AML1-ETO leukaemia, adversely affecting the disease outcome [3, 34]. Due to the high incidence of activating KIT mutations in AML1-ETO leukaemia, KIT signalling is considered a superb target. Presently, clinical trials of dasatinib, a known KIT inhibitor in AML, are being conducted [35]; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms employed by KIT inhibitors in AML remain obscure. Over the past decades, TKIs have been developed as critical cancer therapy components based on the discovery that most disease situations emanate from signal transduction pathways gone awry. To date, more than 130 emerging TKIs exhibiting great efficacy are approved for clinical trials [16, 36], of which are KIT-targeted drugs [37]. In the present study, we initially elucidated that cabozantinib inhibited KIT phosphorylation and its downstream signalling, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, as well as suppressed ribosome biogenesis and AML1-ETO protein synthesis, which subsequently increased the expression of AML1-ETO target genes.
Our global transcriptomic analysis based on Metascape enrichment analyses found that the top pathway associated with those downregulated DEGs was ribosome biogenesis. The ribosome is a complex molecular machine responsible for protein synthesis in every living cell; additionally, ribosome biogenesis is the machinery that performs protein synthesis. Here we found that cabozantinib inhibited phosphorylation of p70S6K and 4E-BP1, and reduced the protein synthesis of AML1-ETO without increasing its degradation, unlike several anticancer agents that facilitate proteasomal degradation of AML1-ETO oncoprotein [38,39,40]. In addition, we clearly excluded the possibility that AML1-ETO dysregulation could be attributed to the cabozantinib-mediated acceleration of the turnover rate by using protein synthesis inhibitor CHX. We further proved that cabozantinib caused AML1-ETO reduction through interference with oncofusion protein synthesis based on experiments using proteasome inhibitor MG-132 and the SUnSET method. A similar drug effect on fusion protein synthesis was also noted in chronic myeloid leukaemia [41]. Specifically, homoharringtonine, a cephalotaxine ester derived from the evergreen tree Cephalotaxus harringtonia [42], inhibited protein synthesis and reduced the BCR-ABL protein level. Here, we inferred that cabozantinib interfered with AML1-ETO protein synthesis, likely by blocking the KIT/mTOR/S6K/4E-BP1 pathway.
In association with the KIT mutation, a study on transformed isogenic BaF3 cells whose proliferation depends on the wild type or oncogenic KIT mutants revealed that cabozantinib was effective against the N822K activation mutants which were resistant to imatinib and sunitinib in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating the efficacy of cabozantinib to cells carrying only KIT N822K [43]. As stated above, cabozantinib abolished KIT-mediated signalling, hampered ribosome biogenesis and AML1-ETO protein synthesis, and increased the expression of AML1-ETO target genes. We thus concluded that cabozantinib targeted KIT mutants and inhibited ribosome biogenesis directly or indirectly, along with AML1-ETO protein synthesis, and eventually reactivated the expression of those differentiation-related genes suppressed by AML1-ETO.
Our study, including deep transcriptome analysis via RNA-seq to provide unparalleled insights, along with the opportunity to assess the novel effect of cabozantinib, which underpinned our drug repurposing strategy. GSEA analyses identified the downregulation of mTOR- and MYC-related signalling pathways in Kasumi-1 cells after 4 or 24-h treatment with cabozantinib. Of note, these are compatible with the observations about glycolysis perturbation and AML1-ETO protein synthesis interference caused by cabozantinib.
High glycolytic metabolism, along with mTORC1 hyperactivation, is common in AML [44]. Here we specifically detected the downregulation of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), pyruvate kinase isoform 2 (PKM2), and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), which were c-MYC-transcriptionally modulated downstream glycolytic genes that reportedly function as oncogenic drivers of glycolysis with augmented glucose uptake and fast glucose-to-lactate conversion [32]. GLUT1 is a cellular transmembrane glucose transporter with a relatively high glucose affinity, which is vital for tumour cells that are highly glucose-dependent for energy [45]. As a notorious hallmark of cancer, unbridled cellular proliferation is sustained by increasing the metabolism of glucose and addiction to a high level of protein synthesis, as well as ribosome biogenesis [46, 47]. mTOR and MYC are pivotal modulators in these oncogenic transformation events [48,49,50]. Increasing evidence suggests that oncogene-driven metabolic alterations create a distinct metabolic state that can potentially targeted by anticancer agents [51, 52]. As reported previously, compound 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2-DG), a glycolysis inhibitor [53], exhibited marked cytotoxicity in KIT-mutated Kasumi-1 cells compared with other leukaemic cell lines [54], implying that Kasumi-1 cells might be particularly vulnerable to glycolysis inhibition. As such, inhibitory effects of cabozantinib on glycolysis would aggregate vulnerabilities and merit further combination therapies.
In this study, cabozantinib displayed cytotoxic efficacy in two human AML cell lines, Kasumi-1 and SKNO-1, carrying the t(8;21) and KIT N822K mutation, but the susceptibility of the two cell lines to cabozantinib differed, with IC50 values of 88.06 and 503.55 nM, respectively. The factors causing substantially different responses in the two cell lines should be explored further.
In conclusion, our study not only provides a rationale for cabozantinib-based therapy but also reveals a novel mechanism by which cabozantinib exerts therapeutic efficacy in KIT-driven t(8;21) AML. Through inhibiting KIT tyrosine kinase, downstream AKT/mTOR, STAT3 and ERK were suppressed. Subsequent c-MYC downregulation was probably linked to anti-leukaemia activities, including cell-cycle arrest and glycolysis inhibition, along with ribosome biogenesis repression, which diminished AML1-ETO protein synthesis.
References
Shipley JL, Butera JN. Acute myelogenous leukemia. Exp Hematol. 2009;37:649–58.
Short NJ, Rytting ME, Cortes JE. Acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet. 2018;392:593–606.
Christen F, Hoyer K, Yoshida K, Hou HA, Waldhueter N, Heuser M, et al. Genomic landscape and clonal evolution of acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21): a international study on 331 patients. Blood. 2019;133:1140–51.
Mulloy JC, Cammenga J, MacKenzie KL, Berguido FJ, Moore MA, Nimer SD. The AML1-ETO fusion protein promotes the expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2002;99:15–23.
Kelly LM, Gilliland DG. Genetics of myeloid leukemias. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2002;3:179–98.
Reikvam H, Hatfield KJ, Kittang AO, Hovland R, Bruserud O. Acute myeloid leukemia with the t(8;21) translocation: clinical consequences and biological implications. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:104631.
Schlenk RF. Post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2014;99:1663–70.
Yakes FM, Chen J, Tan J, Yamaguchi K, Shi Y, Yu P, et al. Cabozantinib (XL184), a novel MET and VEGFR2 inhibitor, simultaneously suppresses metastasis, angiogenesis, and tumor growth. Mol Cancer Therap. 2011;10:2298–308.
Viola D, Cappagli V, Elisei R. Cabozantinib (XL184) for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic progressive medullary thyroid cancer. Future Oncol. 2013;9:1083–92.
Abdelaziz A, Vaishampayan U. Cabozantinib for the treatment of kidney cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017;17:577–84.
Abou-Alfa GK, Meyer T, Cheng AL, El-Khoueiry AB, Rimassa L, Ryoo BY, et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl J Med. 2018;379:54–63.
Lu JW, Wang AN, Liao HA, Chen CY, Hou HA, Hu CY, et al. Cabozantinib is selectively cytotoxic in acute myeloid leukemia cells with FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD). Cancer Lett. 2016;376:218–25.
Klaeger S, Heinzlmeir S, Wilhelm M, Polzer H, Vick B, Koenig PA, et al. The target landscape of clinical kinase drugs. Science. 2017;358:eaan4368.
Fathi AT, Blonquist TM, Hernandez D, Amrein PC, Ballen KK, McMasters M, et al. Cabozantinib is well tolerated in acute myeloid leukemia and effectively inhibits the resistance-conferring FLT3/tyrosine kinase domain/F691 mutation. Cancer. 2018;124:306–14.
Ou DL, Chang CJ, Jeng YM, Lin YJ, Lin ZZ, Gandhi AK, et al. Potential synergistic anti-tumor activity between lenalidomide and sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:2021–31.
Lacy S, Yang B, Nielsen J, Miles D, Nguyen L, Hutmacher M. A population pharmacokinetic model of cabozantinib in healthy volunteers and patients with various cancer types. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;81:1071–82.
Nguyen L, Benrimoh N, Xie Y, Offman E, Lacy S. Pharmacokinetics of cabozantinib tablet and capsule formulations in healthy adults. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2016;27:669–78.
Larizza L, Magnani I, Beghini A. The Kasumi-1 cell line: a t(8;21)-kit mutant model for acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymph. 2005;46:247–55.
Santo EE, Stroeken P, Sluis PV, Koster J, Versteeg R, Westerhout EM. FOXO3a is a major target of inactivation by PI3K/AKT signaling in aggressive neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2013;73:2189–98.
Liu P, Kao TP, Huang H. CDK1 promotes cell proliferation and survival via phosphorylation and inhibition of FOXO1 transcription factor. Oncogene. 2008;27:4733–44.
Li CJ, Chang JK, Chou CH, Wang GJ, Ho ML. The PI3K/Akt/FOXO3a/p27Kip1 signaling contributes to anti-inflammatory drug-suppressed proliferation of human osteoblasts. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;79:926–37.
Wang X, Hu S, Liu L. Phosphorylation and acetylation modifications of FOXO3a: Independently or synergistically? Oncol Lett. 2017;13:2867–72.
Chu IM, Hengst L, Slingerland JM. The Cdk inhibitor p27 in human cancer: prognostic potential and relevance to anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:253–67.
Yuan Y, Zhou L, Miyamoto T, Iwasaki H, Harakawa N, Hetherington CJ, et al. AML1-ETO expression is directly involved in the development of acute myeloid leukemia in the presence of additional mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10398–403.
Buchanan BW, Lloyd ME, Engle SM, Rubenstein EM. Cycloheximide chase analysis of protein degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Visual Exp. 2016;110:53975.
Schmidt EK, Clavarino G, Ceppi M, Pierre P. SUnSET, a nonradioactive method to monitor protein synthesis. Nat Methods. 2009;6:275–7.
Lu Y, Peng ZG, Yuan TT, Yin QQ, Xia L, Chen GQ. Multi-sites cleavage of leukemogenic AML1-ETO fusion protein by caspase-3 and its contribution to increased apoptotic sensitivity. Leukemia. 2008;22:378–86.
Yang G, Thompson MA, Brandt SJ, Hiebert SW. Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce the degradation of the t(8;21) fusion oncoprotein. Oncogene. 2007;26:91–101.
Saxton RA, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 2017;168:960–76.
Miller DM, Thomas SD, Islam A, Muench D, Sedoris K. c-Myc and cancer metabolism. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:5546–53.
Dang CV. MYC, metabolism, cell growth, and tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3:a014217.
Kleszcz R, Paluszczak J, Krajka-Kuzniak V, Baer-Dubowska W. The inhibition of c-MYC transcription factor modulates the expression of glycolytic and glutaminolytic enzymes in FaDu hypopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018;27:735–42.
Dunne J, Cullmann C, Ritter M, Soria NM, Drescher B, Debernardi S, et al. siRNA-mediated AML1/MTG8 depletion affects differentiation and proliferation-associated gene expression in t(8;21)-positive cell lines and primary AML blasts. Oncogene. 2006;25:6067–78.
Krauth MT, Eder C, Alpermann T, Bacher U, Nadarajah N, Kern W, et al. High number of additional genetic lesions in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1: frequency and impact on clinical outcome. Leukemia. 2014;28:1449–58.
Marcucci G, Geyer S, Laumann K, Zhao W, Bucci D, Uy GL, et al. Combination of dasatinib with chemotherapy in previously untreated core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: CALGB 10801. Blood Adv. 2020;4:696–705.
Rask-Andersen M, Zhang J, Fabbro D, Schioth HB. Advances in kinase targeting: current clinical use and clinical trials. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2014;35:604–20.
Abbaspour Babaei M, Kamalidehghan B, Saleem M, Huri HZ, Ahmadipour F. Receptor tyrosine kinase (c-Kit) inhibitors: a potential therapeutic target in cancer cells. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2016;10:2443–59.
Zhou B, Ye H, Xing C, Liang B, Li H, Chen L, et al. Targeting miR-193a-AML1-ETO-beta-catenin axis by melatonin suppresses the self-renewal of leukaemia stem cells in leukaemia with t (8;21) translocation. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:5246–58.
Zhen T, Wu CF, Liu P, Wu HY, Zhou GB, Lu Y, et al. Targeting of AML1-ETO in t(8;21) leukemia by oridonin generates a tumor suppressor-like protein. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:127ra38.
Wang L, Zhao WL, Yan JS, Liu P, Sun HP, Zhou GB, et al. Eriocalyxin B induces apoptosis of t(8;21) leukemia cells through NF-kappaB and MAPK signaling pathways and triggers degradation of AML1-ETO oncoprotein in a caspase-3-dependent manner. Cell death Differ. 2007;14:306–17.
Chen R, Gandhi V, Plunkett W. A sequential blockade strategy for the design of combination therapies to overcome oncogene addiction in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Cancer Res. 2006;66:10959–66.
Kantarjian HM, Talpaz M, Santini V, Murgo A, Cheson B, O’Brien SM. Homoharringtonine: history, current research, and future direction. Cancer. 2001;92:1591–605.
Lu T, Chen C, Wang A, Jiang Z, Qi Z, Hu Z, et al. Repurposing cabozantinib to GISTs: overcoming multiple imatinib-resistant cKIT mutations including gatekeeper and activation loop mutants in GISTs preclinical models. Cancer Lett. 2019;447:105–14.
Poulain L, Sujobert P, Zylbersztejn F, Barreau S, Stuani L, Lambert M, et al. High mTORC1 activity drives glycolysis addiction and sensitivity to G6PD inhibition in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Leukemia. 2017;31:2326–35.
Olson AL, Pessin JE. Structure, function, and regulation of the mammalian facilitative glucose transporter gene family. Annu Rev Nutr. 1996;16:235–56.
Pelletier J, Thomas G, Volarević S. Ribosome biogenesis in cancer: new players and therapeutic avenues. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:51–63.
Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–33.
Pourdehnad M, Truitt ML, Siddiqi IN, Ducker GS, Shokat KM, Ruggero D. Myc and mTOR converge on a common node in protein synthesis control that confers synthetic lethality in Myc-driven cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:11988–93.
Dong Y, Tu R, Liu H, Qing G. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism: oncogenic MYC in the driver’s seat. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:124.
Magaway C, Kim E, Jacinto E. Targeting mTOR and metabolism in cancer: lessons and innovations. Cells. 2019;8:1584.
Sun H, Zhou Y, Skaro MF, Wu Y, Qu Z, Mao F, et al. Metabolic reprogramming in cancer is induced to increase proton production. Cancer Res. 2020;80:1143–55.
Lapa B, Gonçalves AC, Jorge J, Alves R, Pires AS, Abrantes AM, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia sensitivity to metabolic inhibitors: glycolysis showed to be a better therapeutic target. Med Oncol. 2020;37:72.
Aft RL, Zhang FW, Gius D. Evaluation of 2-deoxy-D-glucose as a chemotherapeutic agent: mechanism of cell death. Br J Cancer. 2002;87:805–12.
Larrue C, Saland E, Vergez F, Serhan N, Delabesse E, Mansat-De Mas V, et al. Antileukemic activity of 2-deoxy-d-glucose through inhibition of N-linked glycosylation in acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-ITD or c-KIT mutations. Mol Cancer Therap. 2015;14:2364–73.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by research grants from the Taiwan Health Foundation, The National Taiwan University Hospital (UN109-062 and 110-S4893), the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW109-TDU-B-211-134009), and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 108-2320-B-002-050-MY3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Su, KW., Ou, DL., Fu, YH. et al. Repurposing cabozantinib with therapeutic potential in KIT-driven t(8;21) acute myeloid leukaemias. Cancer Gene Ther 29, 519–532 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-021-00329-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-021-00329-1
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
Anti-leukemia effects of omipalisib in acute myeloid leukemia: inhibition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling and suppression of mitochondrial biogenesis
Cancer Gene Therapy (2023)
-
Cabozantinib promotes erythroid differentiation in K562 erythroleukemia cells through global changes in gene expression and JNK activation
Cancer Gene Therapy (2022)