Abstract
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective therapy for depression, but its cellular effects on the human brain remain elusive. In rodents, electroconvulsive shocks increase proliferation and the expression of plasticity markers in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG), suggesting increased neurogenesis. Furthermore, MRI studies in depressed patients have demonstrated increases in DG volume after ECT, that were notably paralleled by a decrease in depressive mood scores. Whether ECT also triggers cellular plasticity, inflammation or possibly injury in the human hippocampus, was unknown. We here performed a first explorative, anatomical study on the human post-mortem hippocampus of a unique, well-documented cohort of bipolar or unipolar depressed patients, who had received ECT in the 5 years prior to their death. They were compared to age-matched patients with a depressive disorder who had not received ECT and to matched healthy controls. Upon histopathological examination, no indications were observed for major hippocampal cell loss, overt cytoarchitectural changes or classic neuropathology in these 3 groups, nor were obvious differences present in inflammatory markers for astrocytes or microglia. Whereas the numbers of proliferating cells expressing Ki-67 was not different, we found a significantly higher percentage of cells positive for Doublecortin, a marker commonly used for young neurons and cellular plasticity, in the subgranular zone and CA4 / hilus of the hippocampus of ECT patients. Also, the percentage of positive Stathmin 1 cells was significantly higher in the subgranular zone of ECT patients, indicating neuroplasticity. These first post-mortem observations suggest that ECT has no damaging effects but may rather have induced neuroplasticity in the DG of depressed patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment modality in psychiatry, that is mostly prescribed for treatment-resistant, major depressed patients, with response rates of up to 85% [1, 2]. While its exact mechanisms of action and cellular effects remain elusive, human and animal studies have suggested a possible role for changes in neuroplasticity (e.g. neurogenesis or gliogenesis) [3]. Although it is generally considered a safe treatment [4,5,6,7], some clinicians and patients may be reluctant to start ECT in view of suspected injury, possible cognitive impairment or inflammation of the brain [8,9,10,11], also since it was so far unknown whether ECT elicits any inflammation, damage and/or neuropathological changes.
Much research into possible ECT mechanisms has focused on the hippocampus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have shown reductions in hippocampal volume in patients with depression [12], which might be due to reductions in neurogenesis in aspects of depression [11, 13,14,15,16,17,18]. The occurrence of neurogenesis in the human hippocampus has recently been heavily debated, and both a general absence [19,20,21] as well as a prominent presence have been reported [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Next to anatomical studies, other approaches like C14 carbon dating [29], magnetic resonance spectroscopy [30], in vitro studies and recently also single-cell sequencing date [31], all support the existence of neurogenesis in the human brain, as discussed recently [22, 32]. Furthermore, MRI studies on psychiatric patients have recently shown increases in hippocampal volume after ECT that were modified by electrode placement and the number of ECT sessions [4, 33, 34]. Interestingly, while the increase in the volume of the entire hippocampus was not associated with clinical outcome [33, 35], high-resolution, 7 T imaging of the hippocampal subfields revealed that a selective increase in the volume of the dentate gyrus (DG) contributed most to the overall change in hippocampal volume. Notably, this volume increase in the DG was significantly correlated with a decrease in depression scores [36], highlighting a possible role for DG plasticity in the recovery of major depressive disorder (MDD) after ECT.
These DG changes have also been supported by animal data. In a rat model, electroconvulsive stimulation (ECS) induced hippocampal mossy fiber sprouting in the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the DG, and increases in ECS frequency lead to more sprouting in the DG [37], suggesting that ECS promotes DG plasticity and possibly neurogenesis in rats. Indeed, this was confirmed by significant increases shortly after ECS in the number of proliferating cells in the rat DG, based on bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) studies [38]. Furthermore, the epileptic responses induced by ECS were associated with increases in the expression of Doublecortin (DCX), a microtubule-associated protein expressed in migrating neuroblasts, that is often used as marker for immature neurons or neurogenesis [39, 40], both in the DG of rodents [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48] and humans [23, 27, 49, 50]. Research in rats has further shown that ECS treatment induced an immediate glial response in several brain areas, an activation that was again diminished four weeks later [51].
It remained so far unclear, however, whether ECT also induces changes in cellular plasticity in the human hippocampus. Consistent with investigations in non-human primates [52], the typical time-to-effect of antidepressant treatment and/or ECT is generally less than two months, in line with a time frame that activated stem cells would likely need to develop into new neurons and integrate in the DG circuit. Alternatively, the volume changes after ECT could possible also relate to inflammatory changes due to e.g. activation of (astro)glia [53].
Effects of ECT on hippocampal plasticity measures have so far been mainly examined in animal models, and by means of imaging volume changes only in patients, but not in the human post-mortem brain. In order to bridge this gap, we here studied a unique cohort of depressed patients who had received varying ECT treatment regimens during their lives and investigated whether changes in proliferation and DCX expression were present in the DG. Importantly, to control for the possible influence of medication or depression on proliferation and DCX, the hippocampi of ECT-treated patients were compared to the hippocampi of medicated depressed patients not treated with ECT and neurologically healthy controls. We further assessed whether there is a relation to the number of ECT sessions and/or the time interval to the last ECT session, and explored possible neuropathological and glial changes in the hippocampi of these 3 groups.
Methods
Subjects
Post-mortem hippocampi were selected from the Netherlands Brain Bank (NBB), from; a) 12 depressed donors who had received ECT in the 5 years prior to their death (ECT; mean age = 54.25), b) 10 age-matched depressed donors (DC; mean age = 66.90) who did not receive ECT, and c) 15 age-matched healthy control donors (HC; mean age = 68.87) without any neurological or psychiatric history. All data and material collected by the NBB are obtained on the basis of written informed consent. All procedures involving patients were approved by the ethics committees of Amsterdam University Medical Center. Detailed clinical records were requested from the NBB to gather all possible information concerning the ECT course. The donors in the ECT group had varying durations between their last ECT and their deaths, varying from 45 months of receiving their last ECT to less than one month prior to death (Table 1). Donors in the DC group had experienced at least one reported depressive episode in the 5 years prior to their death. Most subjects with available electrode placement information had received both right unilateral (RUL) and bilateral (BL) ECT sequentially. Therefore, no clear distinction was made between RUL and BL ECT.
Based on the information in their clinical records, donors who had received ECT were subdivided over either a remitted, a partially remitted or a nonresponse group. If no validated depression severity scale was available, the ECT donor was classified by a trained psychiatrist based on the descriptive outcome in his/her clinical records. When available, both the left and right hippocampus of the ECT donors were included and then averaged for quantitative analysis. This method was chosen to maximize the inclusion of these unique cases, as both hemispheres were not always available for all ECT donors.
Except for 1 donor whose medication status was unknown, all donors with a depressive disorder (both ECT donors and depressive control donors) received antidepressant medication and/or mood stabilizers. In the last 5 years prior to their death, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors and monoamine oxidase inhibitors were only taken by donors in the ECT group, whereas both the DC and ECT groups had been treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, atypical antidepressants, lithium, and antipsychotics at similar stages in their disease process. Therefore, given their similarity in antidepressant medication history, these groups could be compared to examine the effects of ECT per se.
Immunohistochemistry
For our immunocytochemical studies, we studied 8 µm thick sections of the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded hippocampus from donors of all 3 groups. Brains were fixed for 4 weeks in neutral buffered 10% formalin. For most donors, the mid-level of the hippocampus was studied, but in 21.6% of cases (HC: 2 out of 15; DC: 3 out of 10; ECT: 3 out of 12) this region was not available and an adjacent more anterior part was included for analysis, except for 1 ECT donor were a more posterior part was studied.
Cytoarchitectural and neuropathological changes of all hippocampi were examined in detail by an experienced neuropathologist (AR) according to the standard NBB protocol [54, 55], and any specific remarks regarding their histo/neuropathological details are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Using classic conventional histological and neuropathological staining for H&E, Nissl, Bodian Silver, Amyloid beta, phosphorylated tau (AT8)), and according to standard protocols, brain sections from all donor groups were studied for gross morphological aberrations in cytoarchitecture, such as a possible ectopic location of cells, overt malformations or region-specific cell loss, and for the presence of neurodegenerative changes, such as amyloid deposits or neurofibrillary tau.
Immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against DCX to visualize immature/young neurons (Mab Signaling Technologies, batch #4604, Danvers, MA, USA), against Stathmin 1 (STMN1) to visualize cells in transition from neuronal precursors to postmitotic neurons (ab52630; Abcam) [56], and against Ki-67 to visualize cell proliferation (MIB-1: DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) in the granule cell layer (GCL) and SGZ of the DG. DCX is a microtubule-associated protein expressed in migrating neuroblasts that is frequently used as a proxy to detect neurogenesis in rodents [46,47,48] and that is also expressed in the human hippocampus, for which post-mortem delay and fixation can affect immunoreactive signal quality, as discussed elsewhere [23, 24, 57,58,59]. Notable, due to their rapid autopsy program, tissues from the NBB generally have a relatively short post-mortem delay, benefitting tissue and antigen preservation.
STMN1 is a phosphoprotein that plays a critically important role in the regulation of the microtubule cytoskeleton and the cell cycle, particularly during cell division [60]. STMN1 expression has a positive correlation with cellular proliferation, as interfering with its function by forced expression or inhibition leads to decreased cellular proliferation [60]. Furthermore, STMN1 is upregulated during neuronal differentiation and plasticity [61].
The Ki-67 antigen is a DNA-binding protein complex present in the nucleus of all proliferating cells during the G1, S, G2 and M, but not G0, phases of the cell cycle. Its deletion suppresses cell division in cell lines, indicating an important role in cell cycle control [62]. Ki-67 exhibits phase-specific staining patterns [24, 63] and is generally absent from quiescent, apoptotic or post-mitotic cells [58, 64, 65].
Furthermore, we explored whether possible inflammatory changes had been induced after ECT and used immunocytochemistry for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP: clone EP672Y, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) to visualize astrocytes, and for ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1: Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) to identify microglia.
Briefly, for all antibodies, slides were first deparaffinized, washed in phosphate buffer saline (PBS; pH 7.4) (3 × 5 minutes) and incubated in 0.3% H2O2 in PBS for 30 minutes to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Sections were then washed in PBS (3 × 5 minutes) and heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) using an autoclave (121 °C for 5 minutes) and then cooled to room temperature for another 20 minutes. After washing with PBS, sections were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at room temperature (DCX: 1:1000; STMN1 1:80.000; Ki-67 1:2500; GFAP: 1:2500; Iba1: 1:1000). After another wash, sections were incubated with HRP-labelled Envision (K5007; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). Immunostaining was visualized with chromogen 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB; K5007; DAKO). Finally, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and coverslipped with Quick D (Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands). Negative controls for each primary antibody were included by omitting the primary antibody and all showed no immunoreactivity. Per antibody, sections from all brain donors were included in one staining session in order to minimize variability between groups. Examples of cells positive for either DCX, STMN1 or Ki-67 immunoreactive signal are shown in Fig. 1. Furthermore, for images of the DCX stain of the complete granule layer see Supplementary Fig. 1.
Quantification
The immunoreactive signals for DCX, GFAP and Iba1 were studied in the GCL, SGZ, and in the cornu ammonis 4 (CA4) / hilar region of the hippocampus. For quantification, images of the DAB-stained sections were collected using an Olympus BX4q microscope with a Leica MC 170HD digital camera with a 10x objective. Two photographs of the immunostainings of the DG (2592 ×1944 pixels; 10x) per slide were imported in ImageJ, and the surface area of the immunocytochemical detected threshold of the cellular signal occupied by immunoreactive signal, i.e. the DAB deposit, was quantified by means of ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) using the plug-in color deconvolution, as follows. The surface areas of the DG subregions were delineated in the section using the Haematoxylin counterstain, quantified, and expressed in µm2. Pixels with a value within the established threshold were then included in the percentage of positive area occupied by DAB (%AO) relative to the surface area of the outlined DG. For the thresholds, a value that made a clear distinction between positive cells and the background was selected and subsequently validated by an experienced neuropathologist, which resulted in a threshold of 135 for DCX, 147 for GFAP, and 181 for Iba1 of the maximum threshold of 255. The results of the two photographs per slide were averaged. Also, in donors where both hippocampi were available, results from the two hemispheres were averaged.
For STMN1 and Ki-67, whole-slide images were taken from the entire hippocampal surface at 20x magnification using an Olympus VS200 slide scanner. The GCL and SGZ of the DG were delineated and then quantified to calculate %AO (for STMN1 and Ki-67) using QuPath software (version v0.3.2; https://qupath.github.io/) [66]. For the percentage of positive cells, ROIs were drawn on the DG and SGZ and quantified using the positive cell detection workflow. The positive cells were then manually quantified per ROI and divided over the total number of cells present. This process with QuPath was also executed on the DCX images to calculate the percentage of positive DCX cells relative to the total number of cells present.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using the software “Statistical Package for the Social Sciences” (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 27.0, 2020). The analyses were performed using an ANOVA F-test to compare differences of means among the HC, DC and ECT group. When a significant difference between means was observed, Tukey’s HSD multiple comparisons were used to pairwise compare each group. Linear regression analyses were then used to assess associations between the markers DCX, STMN1, and Ki-67 consecutively as dependent variables and remission status, the number of ECT sessions, and the time interval between the last ECT and death as independent variables. All linear regression analyses were corrected for age of death to account for a possible age effect. As remission status was unknown for 3 ECT patients, linear regression analyses were executed both with remission status as an independent variable including a total of 9 ECT patients and without remission status as an independent variable including a total of 12 ECT patients. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Descriptive statistics and pathology
The mean age of death of the donors was 68.87 (SD = 16.02) years for the HC group, 66.90 (SD = 13.47) for the DC group, and 54.25 (SD = 21.85) for the ECT group. There was no significant difference in age at death between the groups (F(2, 34) = 2.55, p = 0.093). Also, no significant difference was found in post-mortem delay (PMD) between the groups (F(2,34) = 1.12, p = 0.337), with a mean PMD of 7.30 hours (SD = 2.69) in the HC group, 6.13 hours (SD = 1.39) in the DC group and 7.65 hours (SD = 2.80) in the ECT group. In the HC group 46.7% was male, which was 40.0% for the DC group and 58.3% for the ECT group.
Importantly, a histopathological study by our NBB neuropathologist found no indications for major cell loss, nor for gross cytoarchitectural malformations in any of the cell layers of the main hippocampal DG and CA subregions of the ECT, DC, or HC group (Fig. 2). The thickness of the GCL, as determined by averaging two measurements per case, was not significantly different between the groups (F(2, 34) = 0.33, p = 0.724). The cytoarchitecture of all hippocampal subareas appeared normal. There was a presence of mild age-related changes in neurofibrillary tangles or amyloid deposits in the hippocampus of most donors, which were matched between groups (Supplementary Table 1).
Proliferation and neuronal maturation
The differences between groups in the mean percentage of positive DCX cells in the GCL (mean HC = 0.52, mean DC = 0.49, mean ECT = 1.03) was not significant (F(2, 34) = 2.90, p = 0.069, η²=0.15). However, these differences between groups were significant for both the SGZ (F(2, 34) = 7.14, p = 0.003, η²=0.30) and CA4 (F(2, 34) = 3.68, p = 0.036, η²=0.18). Next, Tukey’s HDS post hoc pairwise comparisons showed that in the SGZ, the mean percentage of positive DCX cells was significantly higher in ECT donors (mean=6.48) than in both the HC (mean=2.25, p = 0.002) and DC (mean = 3.26, p = 0.040) groups (Fig. 3). Additionally, in CA4, the mean percentage of positive DCX cells of the ECT donors (mean = 2.50) was significantly different compared to the HC donors (mean = 1.29, p = 0.027), but not compared to the DC donors (mean=1.88, p = 0.429). Furthermore, no significant difference was found between the HC and DC groups in the SGZ (p = 0.683) or CA4 (p = 0.431). Regarding the mean %AO by DCX, the ANOVA showed significant differences between groups in the GCL (F(2, 34) = 3.73, p = 0.034, η²=0.18), SGZ (F(2, 34) = 5.76, p = 0.007, η²=0.25), and CA4 (F(2, 34) = 4.90, p = 0.014, η²=0.22). Next, pairwise comparisons showed that in the GCL, the mean %AO by DCX was significantly different between the healthy control donors and ECT donors (mean HC = 0.09, mean ECT = 0.39, p = 0.037). Moreover, in the GCL, no significant differences were found in the mean %AO by DCX between the DC group (mean=0.12) and the HC group (p = 0.959), or the ECT group (p = 0.111). In the SGZ, a significantly higher %AO by DCX was also observed in ECT donors (mean ECT = 1.02) compared to healthy control donors (mean HC = 0.16, p = 0.007). The difference in %AO by DCX between the ECT group and the DC group (mean=0.31) was close to significance (p = 0.051). No significant difference in %AO by DCX in the SGZ was found between both control groups (p = 0.855). Finally, in CA4, the mean %AO by DCX was also significantly higher in ECT donors (mean ECT = 0.59) compared to the HC group (mean HC = 0.07, p = 0.011). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in CA4 in the mean %AO by DCX between the DC group (mean = 0.22) and the HC group (p = 0.696), or the ECT group (p = 0.125). In order to investigate the potential impact of age, ANCOVA’s were executed with age as covariate, which showed no significant effect of age on the DCX results. Therefore, the results of the ANOVA were displayed in order to also assess the Tukey’s HSD post-hoc pairwise comparisons between the groups.
For the analyses of STMN1, data of one ECT donor had to be excluded due to poor tissue quality. No significant differences were found between groups in the mean %AO by STMN1 in both the GCL (mean HC = 1.84, mean DC = 0.30, mean ECT = 3.67; F(2, 33) = 1.45, p = 0.248, η²=0.08) and SGZ (mean HC = 1.09, mean DC = 0.23, mean ECT = 1.51; F(2, 32) = 1.78, p = 0.186, η²=0.10). However, the mean percentage of positive STMN1 cells was significantly different between the groups in the SGZ F(2, 32) = 8.15, p = 0.001, η²=0.34. Tukey’s HSD post-hoc pairwise comparisons showed that in the SGZ, the mean percentage of positive STMN1 cells was significantly increased in the ECT group (mean = 1.97) compared to both the HC group (mean = 0.79; p = 0.004) and the DC group (mean = 0.69; p = 0.004; Fig. 3). This mean percentage was not significantly different between the HC and DC group (p = 0.953). In the GCL, the mean percentage of positive STMN1 cells was also higher in the ECT group (mean=0.74) than in the HC (mean = 0.36) and DC (mean = 0.12) group, which was close to significance F(2, 33) = 3.23, p = 0.052, η²=0.16).
For the analyses of the proliferation marker Ki-67, data of one ECT donor and one healthy control donor had to be excluded due to poor tissue quality. After exclusion, the percentage of positive Ki-67 cells was not significantly different between the groups in both the GCL (mean HC = 0.044, mean DC = 0.015, mean ECT = 0.018; F(2, 32) = 1.53, p = 0.233, η²=0.09) and SGZ (mean HC = 0.121, mean DC = 0.046, mean ECT = 0.195; F(2, 32) = 2.94, p = 0.067, η²=0.16), indicating no significant differences between the three groups in cell proliferation (Fig. 4). Furthermore, no significant differences were found between groups in the mean %AO for the number of cells that were immune-positive for the proliferation marker Ki-67 in both the GCL (mean HC = 0.023, mean DC = 0.003, mean ECT = 0.010; F(2, 32) = 1.53, p = 0.233, η²=0.09) and SGZ (mean HC = 0.029, mean DC = 0.005, mean ECT = 0.011; F(2, 32) = 1.62, p = 0.213, η²=0.09).
Within the ECT group, none of the independent variables (remission status, number of ECT sessions, and time interval between the last ECT and death of the patient) were significantly associated with a percentage of positive DCX, STMN1, or Ki-67 cells in either the GCL or SGZ (Supplementary Table 2).
Inflammation and immune response
For our analyses of inflammatory changes, data of one healthy control donor had to be excluded due to poor tissue quality. No differences were found in %AO in the GCL (Iba1: F(2, 33) = 1.01, p = 0.375, η²=0.06; GFAP: F(2, 33) = 2.04, p = 0.147, η²=0.11), SGZ (Iba1: F(2, 33) = 1.18, p = 0.321, η²=0.07; GFAP: F(2, 32) = 2.81, p = 0.075, η²=0.15) or CA4 (Iba1: F(2, 32) = 1.36, p = 0.272, η²=0.08, GFAP: F(2, 32) = 1.96, p = 0.157, η²=0.11) between donor groups (Fig. 5), indicating no signs for a strong inflammatory activation as a result of ECT, as reflected by conventional microglia and astrocyte markers.
Discussion
For the first time, cytoarchitectural, neuropathological, glia- and neuroplasticity-related changes were explored in the human post-mortem hippocampus in a unique group depressed donors treated with ECT (ECT), compared with depressed donors who had not received ECT (DC) and neurologically healthy control donors (HC). We found no apparent structural damage of the ECT treatment in the hippocampus. While the numbers of proliferating cells did not differ between the groups, we found DCX expression to be significantly higher in the DG of ECT patients relative to neurologically healthy control donors. Moreover, in the SGZ, where most proliferation and differentiation is expected to occur [22, 23, 25, 26], the ECT donors even had a significantly higher percentage of cells expressing DCX compared to the depressed controls. Furthermore, the percentage of cells expressing STMN1 in the SGZ was significantly higher in ECT donors compared to both healthy control donors and depressed controls.
Neuropathology
Importantly, we found no evidence for overt neuropathology, neuroinflammation or changes in cytoarchitecture in the hippocampi of ECT-treated donors. This is in line with three case reports showing neither neuronal damage nor significant abnormalities in the brains of old donors aged 84-92, who received 91-1250 ECT sessions during their lives [5,6,7]. Similar age-related pathological changes were found in all groups, including hippocampal tau and amyloid pathology.
Hippocampal neuroplasticity
The significant increase in the percentage of cells expressing STMN1 and DCX in ECT donors supports the concept that hippocampal neuroplasticity is involved in the ECT treatment [37, 67]. This increased expression in the ECT group indicates that also the human hippocampal DG of depressed patients retains considerable structural plasticity. We did find Ki-67 expression in the hippocampus in our donors, showing that neurogenesis occurs in the adult human brain [58, 63, 68,69,70,71,72]. Furthermore, we saw no differences in Ki-67 immunoreactivity and percentage of cells expressing Ki-67 between our groups, which may indicate that neurogenesis was not increased as a result of ECT in our sample. However, this could also be due to the low frequency of this particular proliferation marker in thin sections of human hippocampi of subjects this age, which is also reported in previous studies [58, 63, 68,69,70,71,72]. Another explanation could be that as the expression of Ki-67 is short-lived [73], we were not able to pick up possible differences induced by ECT. Our donors had varying and rather long delays between their ECT sessions and time of death, and neurogenesis could thus have taken place, but is likely not reflected by Ki-67 signal in these tissues. An alternative explanation could be that as a potent stimulus, ECT might also have enabled existing neurons in the DG and SGZ to undergo ‘de-maturation’, i.e. in the absence of active new cell formation, via which route, mature cells could possibly become activated and rewire again, as proposed before [67]. Furthermore, the increased DCX expression in the ECT group is also present in the CA4, which aligns with some of the changes found after epileptic activity in rodent models, such as the migration of newborn neurons into the hilus [3], and also in humans [49].
The findings regarding DCX and the higher percentage of STMN1 positive cells in the SGZ in ECT donors may together indicate an increase in neuronal plasticity after ECT [61]. While both the STMN1 immunoreactivity and the percentage of cells expressing STMN1 was higher in the ECT donors, this difference was not significant for the STMN1 immunoreactivity. This could be due to various reasons, such as cell density and clustering, differences in staining intensity, cell morphology and their distribution. Furthermore, due to the small sample sizes in each group, statistical significance may not be reached, even if there are substantial differences. Due to the nature of these marker proteins and the neurogenic stages they reflect, the current data suggests that in the SGZ more cells may be transitioning from a neuronal precursor to a young neuronal stage after ECT. Whether these cells will actually all develop into functional DG neurons and whether it is indeed adult neurogenesis that contributes to the structural and functional changes seen after ECT in depression [36, 74], awaits further studies.
In the present study, characteristics such as remission status after ECT, the total number of ECT sessions and the interval between the last ECT and death of the patient were not correlated with the expression of the markers studied. This could be due to various reasons including our current sample size and variation between the patients in bilateral vs unilateral placement, and to differences in subsequent ECT (maintenance) treatment regimes. Future studies with a larger sample size and more homogenous and/or better-stratified ECT patient groups are needed to explore such relations in more detail.
Although DCX expression was higher in depressed donors with ECT treatment than in depressed donors without ECT treatment, this difference was only significant in the SGZ. It is likely that the use of antidepressants in both groups influenced DCX, since antidepressants can stimulate neuroplasticity, as reported before mostly in young individuals [14,15,16,17, 63, 75]. However, we found a significantly higher expression of DCX in the DG of the ECT group than in the HC group, while no difference in DCX results were found between the HC and DC group, indicating the effect of ECT rather than antidepressants. Additionally, the presence of STMN1-positive cells in the SGZ was significantly higher in the ECT group compared to both the HC and DC groups. To truly understand the contribution of medication on DCX expression, an additional group of non-medicated depressed controls is needed which is not available.
Neuroinflammation
No significant differences in the expression of immune-related or inflammatory markers were found between ECT and control donors in the present study. A systematic review showed that an acute and peripheral immuno-inflammatory response is present immediately after an ECT session, while over the long term, at the end of the ECT course, this inflammatory response is absent and may even be reversed [53]. Therefore, our results demonstrate that increased hippocampal volume following ECT is possibly related to effects on neuroplasticity and is less likely due to inflammation.
Limitations and considerations
In this archival human post-mortem study, the mid-level region of the hippocampus was unavailable in 21.6% of cases since this NBB tissue is also used by other research groups. The tissue that was used instead in those cases was however adjacent to the midlevel region and hence quite comparable. We therefore do not expect that anatomical differences will have contributed much to our results. Overall, we expect effects of a general stimulus like ECT on neuroplasticity to be similar from the anterior through the posterior part of the hippocampus.
The types of antidepressant drugs taken by the patients in our current DC and ECT groups, differed slightly; the serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors and monoamine oxidase inhibitors had only been taken by the ECT group. While some exceptions exist [18], rodent studies have generally shown comparable effects of different types of antidepressant medication; when prescribed for a sufficiently long period of time, they almost all stimulate hippocampal proliferation and/or neurogenesis, parallel to a suppression of the depressive and/or anxiety-like behaviors [11, 13]. Furthermore, the ECT and DC groups were comparable in terms of the total number of life-time depressive episodes (ECT: mean = 3.38, (n = 8); DC: mean = 4.11 (n = 9); p = 0.477) and age at first depressive episode (ECT: mean = 31.55, (n = 11); DC: mean = 34.67, (n = 9), p = 0.614), showing no significant differences between the groups using ANOVA. Nonetheless, it remains possible that during an episode, the depression in the ECT group was more severe, which is hard to compare with our current data and hence remains a limitation of this study.
Although age is likely to be a contributing factor to differences in neurogenesis [23, 24, 63], the average ages in our cohort were not significantly different between the groups. Neurogenesis had been reported to gradually decrease with advancing age, but the extent of neurogenesis that is expected to be present between the mean ages of 54 and 69, i.e. of the patients that were studied here, probably did not change substantially between these ages and is likely quite comparable [23]. As such, age is unlikely to have contributed much to our current results.
Technical aspects can also influence the expression of neuroplasticity markers. In comparison to Ki-67 that is present in proliferating cells for a short period of time with a half-life of approximately 90 minutes [73], STMN1 has a broader role in cellular processes and its presence and detection may not be as tightly linked to specific time frames [60, 61]. DCX is a maturation marker that is also present for a longer period of time; i.e. between 2 and 14 days after birth of a newly generated cell, at least in rodents [46, 48] and a DCX signal thus has a higher chance of being detected in thin tissue sections than Ki-67. The expression of DCX is initiated at varying times after cell cycle exit with variable timeframes, but with an average duration of approximately three weeks [46,47,48, 76]. Although other studies have carefully compared tissue conditions and have reported that DCX can be optimally detected in post-mortem tissue with a short fixation of 24 hours [23, 77], we and others have used optimized protocols and could still detect DCX signal in human brains fixed for a longer period [27, 49, 50, 78].
The differences between studies might thus be due to (combinations of) different epitopes of DCX, the use of different antibodies, differences in tissue handling and fixation, and also to variations in post-mortem delay. Although no such correlation was found in a human study with short fixation times [77], an increase in PMD reduced DCX immunoreactive signal, especially in older post-mortem rat brains [58, 77]. Importantly, the mean PMD in our current sample is 7.10 hours (SD = 2.50) which is relatively short compared to other human post-mortem studies and can thus be seen as a major advantage with respect to tissue and antigen preservation, especially when compared to studies with much longer PMDs [19, 57].
Conclusions
We reported for the first time an upregulation of the percentage of cells expressing STMN1 and DCX, but not of proliferation, in the DG of donors who had received ECT during their lives, notably in the absence of any indications for major hippocampal injury, for classic neuropathology or neuroinflammation. These first, explorative results on the human hippocampus support the involvement of neuroplasticity in the antidepressant effects of ECT and are in line with earlier rodent and human MRI studies. As such, they provide new insights into the role of brain plasticity in depression and in the antidepressant action of ECT.
References
Husain MM, Rush AJ, Fink M, Knapp R, Petrides G, Rummans T, et al. Speed of response and remission in major depressive disorder with acute electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): a Consortium for Research in ECT (CORE) report. J Clin psychiatry. 2004;65:485–91.
Dierckx B, Heijnen WT, van den Broek WW, Birkenhäger TK. Efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in bipolar versus unipolar major depression: a meta-analysis. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:146–50.
Jessberger S, Zhao C, Toni N, Clemenson GD Jr., Li Y, Gage FH. Seizure-associated, aberrant neurogenesis in adult rats characterized with retrovirus-mediated cell labeling. J Neurosci. 2007;27:9400–7.
Bouckaert F, Sienaert P, Obbels J, Dols A, Vandenbulcke M, Stek M, et al. ECT: its brain enabling effects: a review of electroconvulsive therapy-induced structural brain plasticity. J ECT. 2014;30:143–51.
Anderson D, Wollmann R, Dinwiddie SH. Neuropathological evaluation of an 84-year-old man after 422 ECT treatments. J ECT. 2014;30:248–50.
Lippman S, Manshadi M, Wehry M, Byrd R, Past W, Keller W, et al. 1,250 electroconvulsive treatments without evidence of brain injury. Br J psychiatry : J Ment Sci. 1985;147:203–4.
Scalia J, Lisanby SH, Dwork AJ, Johnson JE, Bernhardt ER, Arango V, et al. Neuropathologic examination after 91 ECT treatments in a 92-year-old woman with late-onset depression. J ECT. 2007;23:96–8.
Laroy M, Bouckaert F, Vansteelandt K, Obbels J, Dols A, Emsell L, et al. Association between hippocampal volume change and change in memory following electroconvulsive therapy in late-life depression. Acta Psychiatr Scandinavica. 2019;140:435–45.
Carlier A, Rhebergen D, Veerhuis R, Schouws S, Oudega ML, Eikelenboom P, et al. Inflammation and Cognitive Functioning in Depressed Older Adults Treated With Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin psychiatry. 2021;82:20m13631.
Wagenmakers MJ, Vansteelandt K, van Exel E, Postma R, Schouws S, Obbels J, et al. Transient Cognitive Impairment and White Matter Hyperintensities in Severely Depressed Older Patients Treated With Electroconvulsive Therapy. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;29:1117–28.
Hill AS, Sahay A, Hen R. Increasing Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis is Sufficient to Reduce Anxiety and Depression-Like Behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;40:2368–78.
Schmaal L, Veltman DJ, van Erp TG, Sämann PG, Frodl T, Jahanshad N, et al. Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group. Mol psychiatry. 2016;21:806–12.
Malberg JE, Hen R, Madsen TM. Adult Neurogenesis and Antidepressant Treatment: The Surprise Finding by Ron Duman and the Field 20 Years Later. Biol psychiatry. 2021;90:96–101.
Malberg JE, Schechter LE. Increasing hippocampal neurogenesis: a novel mechanism for antidepressant drugs. Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11:145–55.
Serafini G. Neuroplasticity and major depression, the role of modern antidepressant drugs. World J Psychiatry. 2012;2:49–57.
Van Bokhoven P, Oomen CA, Hoogendijk WJ, Smit AB, Lucassen PJ, Spijker S. Reduction in hippocampal neurogenesis after social defeat is long-lasting and responsive to late antidepressant treatment. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33:1833–40.
Tartt AN, Mariani MB, Hen R, Mann JJ, Boldrini M. Dysregulation of adult hippocampal neuroplasticity in major depression: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications. Mol psychiatry. 2022;27:2689–99.
David DJ, Samuels BA, Rainer Q, Wang JW, Marsteller D, Mendez I, et al. Neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of fluoxetine in an animal model of anxiety/depression. Neuron. 2009;62:479–93.
Sorrells SF, Paredes MF, Cebrian-Silla A, Sandoval K, Qi D, Kelley KW, et al. Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults. Nature. 2018;555:377–81.
Sorrells SF, Paredes MF, Zhang Z, Kang G, Pastor-Alonso O, Biagiotti S, et al. Positive Controls in Adults and Children Support That Very Few, If Any, New Neurons Are Born in the Adult Human Hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2021;41:2554–65.
Paredes MF, Sorrells SF, Cebrian-Silla A, Sandoval K, Qi D, Kelley KW, et al. Does Adult Neurogenesis Persist in the Human Hippocampus? Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23:780–1.
Kempermann G, Gage FH, Aigner L, Song H, Curtis MA, Thuret S, et al. Human Adult Neurogenesis: Evidence and Remaining Questions. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23:25–30.
Moreno-Jiménez EP, Flor-García M, Terreros-Roncal J, Rábano A, Cafini F, Pallas-Bazarra N, et al. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is abundant in neurologically healthy subjects and drops sharply in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med. 2019;25:554–60.
Boldrini M, Fulmore CA, Tartt AN, Simeon LR, Pavlova I, Poposka V, et al. Human Hippocampal Neurogenesis Persists throughout Aging. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22:589–99.e5.
Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Björk-Eriksson T, Alborn AM, Nordborg C, Peterson DA, et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med. 1998;4:1313–7.
Gonçalves JT, Schafer ST, Gage FH. Adult Neurogenesis in the Hippocampus: From Stem Cells to Behavior. Cell. 2016;167:897–914.
Tobin MK, Musaraca K, Disouky A, Shetti A, Bheri A, Honer WG, et al. Human Hippocampal Neurogenesis Persists in Aged Adults and Alzheimer’s Disease Patients. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24:974–82.e3.
Moreno-Jiménez EP, Terreros-Roncal J, Flor-García M, Rábano A, Llorens-Martín M. Evidences for Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Humans. J Neurosci : Off J Soc Neurosci. 2021;41:2541–53.
Spalding KL, Bergmann O, Alkass K, Bernard S, Salehpour M, Huttner HB, et al. Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell. 2013;153:1219–27.
Manganas LN, Zhang X, Li Y, Hazel RD, Smith SD, Wagshul ME, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy identifies neural progenitor cells in the live human brain. Science. 2007;318:980–5.
Tosoni G, Ayyildiz D, Bryois J, Macnair W, Fitzsimons CP, Lucassen PJ, et al. Mapping human adult hippocampal neurogenesis with single-cell transcriptomics: Reconciling controversy or fueling the debate? Neuron. 2023;111:1714–31.e3.
Lucassen PJ, Fitzsimons CP, Salta E, Maletic-Savatic M. Adult neurogenesis, human after all (again): Classic, optimized, and future approaches. Behav Brain Res. 2020;381:112458.
Oltedal L, Narr KL, Abbott C, Anand A, Argyelan M, Bartsch H, et al. Volume of the Human Hippocampus and Clinical Response Following Electroconvulsive Therapy. Biol psychiatry. 2018;84:574–81.
Ousdal OT, Argyelan M, Narr KL, Abbott C, Wade B, Vandenbulcke M, et al. Brain Changes Induced by Electroconvulsive Therapy Are Broadly Distributed. Biol psychiatry. 2020;87:451–61.
Bouckaert F, Dols A, Emsell L, De Winter FL, Vansteelandt K, Claes L, et al. Relationship Between Hippocampal Volume, Serum BDNF, and Depression Severity Following Electroconvulsive Therapy in Late-Life Depression. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;41:2741–8.
Nuninga JO, Mandl RCW, Boks MP, Bakker S, Somers M, Heringa SM, et al. Volume increase in the dentate gyrus after electroconvulsive therapy in depressed patients as measured with 7T. Mol psychiatry. 2020;25:1559–68.
Vaidya VA, Siuciak JA, Du F, Duman RS. Hippocampal mossy fiber sprouting induced by chronic electroconvulsive seizures. Neuroscience. 1999;89:157–66.
Madsen TM, Treschow A, Bengzon J, Bolwig TG, Lindvall O, Tingström A. Increased neurogenesis in a model of electroconvulsive therapy. Biol psychiatry. 2000;47:1043–9.
Francis F, Koulakoff A, Boucher D, Chafey P, Schaar B, Vinet MC, et al. Doublecortin is a developmentally regulated, microtubule-associated protein expressed in migrating and differentiating neurons. Neuron. 1999;23:247–56.
Gleeson JG, Lin PT, Flanagan LA, Walsh CA. Doublecortin is a microtubule-associated protein and is expressed widely by migrating neurons. Neuron. 1999;23:257–71.
Arisi GM, Garcia-Cairasco N. Doublecortin-positive newly born granule cells of hippocampus have abnormal apical dendritic morphology in the pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Res. 2007;1165:126–34.
Botterill JJ, Brymer KJ, Caruncho HJ, Kalynchuk LE. Aberrant hippocampal neurogenesis after limbic kindling: Relationship to BDNF and hippocampal-dependent memory. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;47:83–92.
Jiruska P, Shtaya AB, Bodansky DM, Chang WC, Gray WP, Jefferys JG. Dentate gyrus progenitor cell proliferation after the onset of spontaneous seizures in the tetanus toxin model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis. 2013;54:492–8.
Jessberger S, Parent JM. Epilepsy and Adult Neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a020677.
Jessberger S, Römer B, Babu H, Kempermann G. Seizures induce proliferation and dispersion of doublecortin-positive hippocampal progenitor cells. Exp Neurol. 2005;196:342–51.
Brown JP, Couillard-Després S, Cooper-Kuhn CM, Winkler J, Aigner L, Kuhn HG. Transient expression of doublecortin during adult neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol. 2003;467:1–10.
Rao MS, Shetty AK. Efficacy of doublecortin as a marker to analyse the absolute number and dendritic growth of newly generated neurons in the adult dentate gyrus. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19:234–46.
Couillard-Despres S, Winner B, Schaubeck S, Aigner R, Vroemen M, Weidner N, et al. Doublecortin expression levels in adult brain reflect neurogenesis. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:1–14.
Liu YW, Curtis MA, Gibbons HM, Mee EW, Bergin PS, Teoh HH, et al. Doublecortin expression in the normal and epileptic adult human brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28:2254–65.
Ammothumkandy A, Ravina K, Wolseley V, Tartt AN, Yu PN, Corona L, et al. Altered adult neurogenesis and gliogenesis in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:493–503.
Jansson L, Wennström M, Johanson A, Tingström A. Glial cell activation in response to electroconvulsive seizures. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009;33:1119–28.
Kohler SJ, Williams NI, Stanton GB, Cameron JL, Greenough WT. Maturation time of new granule cells in the dentate gyrus of adult macaque monkeys exceeds six months. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:10326–31.
Yrondi A, Sporer M, Péran P, Schmitt L, Arbus C, Sauvaget A. Electroconvulsive therapy, depression, the immune system and inflammation: A systematic review. Brain Stimulation. 2018;11:29–51.
Klioueva N, Bovenberg J, Huitinga I. Banking brain tissue for research. Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;145:9–12.
van de Nes JA, Konermann S, Nafe R, Swaab DF. Beta-protein/A4 deposits are not associated with hyperphosphorylated tau in somatostatin neurons in the hypothalamus of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;111:126–38.
Boekhoorn K, van Dis V, Goedknegt E, Sobel A, Lucassen PJ, Hoogenraad CC. The microtubule destabilizing protein stathmin controls the transition from dividing neuronal precursors to postmitotic neurons during adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Dev Neurobiol. 2014;74:1226–42.
Lucassen PJ, Toni N, Kempermann G, Frisen J, Gage FH, Swaab DF. Limits to human neurogenesis-really? Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:2207–9.
Boekhoorn K, Joels M, Lucassen PJ. Increased proliferation reflects glial and vascular-associated changes, but not neurogenesis in the presenile Alzheimer hippocampus. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;24:1–14.
Terreros-Roncal J, Flor-García M, Moreno-Jiménez EP, Rodríguez-Moreno CB, Márquez-Valadez B, Gallardo-Caballero M, et al. Methods to study adult hippocampal neurogenesis in humans and across the phylogeny. Hippocampus. 2023;33:271–306.
Rubin CI, Atweh GF. The role of stathmin in the regulation of the cell cycle. J Cell Biochem. 2004;93:242–50.
Chauvin S, Sobel A. Neuronal stathmins: a family of phosphoproteins cooperating for neuronal development, plasticity and regeneration. Prog Neurobiol. 2015;126:1–18.
Duchrow M, Schmidt MHH, Zingler M, Anemüller S, Bruch HP, Broll R. Suppression of cell division by pKi-67 antisense-RNA and recombinant protein. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2001;11:331–8.
Boldrini M, Hen R, Underwood MD, Rosoklija GB, Dwork AJ, Mann JJ, et al. Hippocampal angiogenesis and progenitor cell proliferation are increased with antidepressant use in major depression. Biol psychiatry. 2012;72:562–71.
Endl E, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: fascinating forms and an unknown function. Exp Cell Res. 2000;257:231–7.
Kee N, Sivalingam S, Boonstra R, Wojtowicz JM. The utility of Ki-67 and BrdU as proliferative markers of adult neurogenesis. J Neurosci Methods. 2002;115:97–105.
Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernández JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16878.
Imoto Y, Segi-Nishida E, Suzuki H, Kobayashi K. Rapid and stable changes in maturation-related phenotypes of the adult hippocampal neurons by electroconvulsive treatment. Mol Brain. 2017;10:8.
Martí-Mengual U, Varea E, Crespo C, Blasco-Ibáñez JM, Nacher J. Cells expressing markers of immature neurons in the amygdala of adult humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37:10–22.
Allen KM, Fung SJ, Weickert CS. Cell proliferation is reduced in the hippocampus in schizophrenia. Aust N. Z J Psychiatry. 2016;50:473–80.
Mathews KJ, Allen KM, Boerrigter D, Ball H, Shannon Weickert C, Double KL. Evidence for reduced neurogenesis in the aging human hippocampus despite stable stem cell markers. Aging Cell. 2017;16:1195–9.
von Bohlen und Halbach O. Immunohistological markers for proliferative events, gliogenesis, and neurogenesis within the adult hippocampus. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;345:1–19.
Seki T, Hori T, Miyata H, Maehara M, Namba T. Analysis of proliferating neuronal progenitors and immature neurons in the human hippocampus surgically removed from control and epileptic patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9:18194.
Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000;182:311–22.
Nuninga JO, Mandl RCW, Froeling M, Siero JCW, Somers M, Boks MP, et al. Vasogenic edema versus neuroplasticity as neural correlates of hippocampal volume increase following electroconvulsive therapy. Brain Stimulation. 2020;13:1080–6.
Anacker C, Zunszain PA, Cattaneo A, Carvalho LA, Garabedian MJ, Thuret S, et al. Antidepressants increase human hippocampal neurogenesis by activating the glucocorticoid receptor. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:738–50.
Plümpe T, Ehninger D, Steiner B, Klempin F, Jessberger S, Brandt M, et al. Variability of doublecortin-associated dendrite maturation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis is independent of the regulation of precursor cell proliferation. BMC Neurosci. 2006;7:77.
Terstege DJ, Addo-Osafo K, Campbell Teskey G, Epp JR. New neurons in old brains: implications of age in the analysis of neurogenesis in post-mortem tissue. Mol Brain. 2022;15:38.
Liu JYW, Matarin M, Reeves C, McEvoy AW, Miserocchi A, Thompson P, et al. Doublecortin-expressing cell types in temporal lobe epilepsy. Acta Neuropathologica Commun. 2018;6:60.
Acknowledgements
We thank the brain tissue donors and their families and acknowledge the Netherlands Brain Bank in Amsterdam (coordinator prof.dr. I. Huitinga) for provision of the brain tissue. PJL is supported by Alzheimer Nederland, by Zon-MW Memorabel, and by the Center for Urban Mental Health of the University of Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Concept and design: Annemiek Dols, Anke Dijkstra. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Anke Dijkstra, DL, IT, Annemiek Dols, PL, PvE, JH, MO, AR. First draft: DL, Annemiek Dols, Anke Dijkstra. Critical revision of the manuscript: all authors. Supervision: Annemiek Dols, Anke Dijkstra, IT. All authors have approved the final article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Loef, D., Tendolkar, I., van Eijndhoven, P.F.P. et al. Electroconvulsive therapy is associated with increased immunoreactivity of neuroplasticity markers in the hippocampus of depressed patients. Transl Psychiatry 13, 355 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-023-02658-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-023-02658-1
- Springer Nature Limited