Abstract
Longitudinal connectivity studies might guide our understanding of the underlying neurodegenerative processes. We report the results of a longitudinal study in patients at different stages of Parkinson’s disease (PD), who performed motor and non-motor evaluations and serial resting state (RS) functional MRI (fMRI). Cluster analysis was applied to demographic and clinical data of 146 PD patients to define disease subtypes. Brain network functional alterations were assessed at baseline in PD relative to 60 healthy controls and every year for a maximum of 4 years in PD groups. Progression of brain network changes were compared between patient clusters using RS fMRI. The contribution of network changes in predicting clinical deterioration was explored. Two main PD clusters were identified: mild PD (86 patients) and moderate-to-severe PD (60 patients), with the latter group being older and having earlier onset, longer PD duration, more severe motor, non-motor and cognitive deficits. Within the mild patient cluster, two clinical subtypes were further identified: mild motor-predominant (43) and mild-diffuse (43), with the latter being older and having more frequent non-motor symptoms. Longitudinal functional connectivity changes vary across patients in different disease stages with the coexistence of hypo- and hyper-connectivity in all subtypes. RS fMRI changes were associated with motor, cognitive and non-motor evolution in PD patients. Baseline RS fMRI presaged clinical and cognitive evolution. Our network perspective was able to define trajectories of functional architecture changes according to PD stages and prognosis. RS fMRI may be an early biomarker of PD motor and non-motor progression.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Poewe W, Seppi K, Tanner CM, Halliday GM, Brundin P, Volkmann J, et al. Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3:17013.
Greenland JC, Williams-Gray CH, Barker RA. The clinical heterogeneity of Parkinson’s disease and its therapeutic implications. Eur J Neurosci. 2019;49:328–38.
Dickson DW, Braak H, Duda JE, Duyckaerts C, Gasser T, Halliday GM, et al. Neuropathological assessment of Parkinson’s disease: refining the diagnostic criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:1150–7.
Goedert M, Masuda-Suzukake M, Falcon B. Like prions: the propagation of aggregated tau and alpha-synuclein in neurodegeneration. Brain. 2017;140:266–78.
Yau Y, Zeighami Y, Baker TE, Larcher K, Vainik U, Dadar M, et al. Network connectivity determines cortical thinning in early Parkinson’s disease progression. Nat Commun. 2018;9:12.
Cerasa A, Novellino F, Quattrone A. Connectivity changes in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016;16:91.
Tahmasian M, Eickhoff SB, Giehl K, Schwartz F, Herz DM, Drzezga A, et al. Resting-state functional reorganization in Parkinson’s disease: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Cortex. 2017;92:119–38.
Filippi M, Sarasso E, Agosta F. Resting-state functional MRI in Parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord Clin Pr. 2019;6:104–17.
Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2010;52:1059–69.
Crossley NA, Mechelli A, Scott J, Carletti F, Fox PT, McGuire P, et al. The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 8):2382–95.
Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:159–72.
Skidmore F, Korenkevych D, Liu Y, He G, Bullmore E, Pardalos PM. Connectivity brain networks based on wavelet correlation analysis in Parkinson fMRI data. Neurosci Lett. 2011;499:47–51.
Gottlich M, Munte TF, Heldmann M, Kasten M, Hagenah J, Kramer UM. Altered resting state brain networks in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e77336.
Baggio HC, Sala-Llonch R, Segura B, Marti MJ, Valldeoriola F, Compta Y, et al. Functional brain networks and cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:4620–34.
Fang J, Chen H, Cao Z, Jiang Y, Ma L, Ma H, et al. Impaired brain network architecture in newly diagnosed Parkinson’s disease based on graph theoretical analysis. Neurosci Lett. 2017;657:151–8.
Suo X, Lei D, Li N, Cheng L, Chen F, Wang M, et al. Functional brain connectome and its relation to Hoehn and Yahr stage in Parkinson disease. Radiology. 2017;285:904–13.
Abos A, Baggio HC, Segura B, Garcia-Diaz AI, Compta Y, Marti MJ, et al. Discriminating cognitive status in Parkinson’s disease through functional connectomics and machine learning. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45347.
Gratton C, Koller JM, Shannon W, Greene DJ, Maiti B, Snyder AZ, et al. Emergent functional network effects in Parkinson disease. Cereb Cortex. 2019;29:1701.
Lopes R, Delmaire C, Defebvre L, Moonen AJ, Duits AA, Hofman P, et al. Cognitive phenotypes in parkinson’s disease differ in terms of brain-network organization and connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38:1604–21.
de Schipper LJ, Hafkemeijer A, van der Grond J, Marinus J, Henselmans JML, van Hilten JJ. Altered whole-brain and network-based functional connectivity in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. 2018;9:419.
Luo CY, Guo XY, Song W, Chen Q, Cao B, Yang J, et al. Functional connectome assessed using graph theory in drug-naive Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol. 2015;262:1557–67.
Lin SJ, Baumeister TR, Garg S, McKeown MJ. Cognitive profiles and hub vulnerability in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. 2018;9:482.
Olde Dubbelink KT, Schoonheim MM, Deijen JB, Twisk JW, Barkhof F, Berendse HW. Functional connectivity and cognitive decline over 3 years in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2014;83:2046–53.
Zeng Q, Guan X, Law Yan Lun JCF, Shen Z, Guo T, Xuan M, et al. Longitudinal alterations of local spontaneous brain activity in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Bull. 2017;33:501–9.
Tuovinen N, Seppi K, de Pasquale F, Muller C, Nocker M, Schocke M, et al. The reorganization of functional architecture in the early-stages of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;50:61–8.
Sporns O, Chialvo DR, Kaiser M, Hilgetag CC. Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8:418–25.
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature. 1998;393:440–2.
Zalesky A, Fornito A, Bullmore ET. Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. Neuroimage. 2010;53:1197–207.
Wolters AF, van de Weijer SCF, Leentjens AFG, Duits AA, Jacobs HIL, Kuijf ML. Resting-state fMRI in Parkinson’s disease patients with cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019;62:16–27.
Rolinski M, Griffanti L, Piccini P, Roussakis AA, Szewczyk-Krolikowski K, Menke RA. et al. Basal ganglia dysfunction in idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder parallels that in early Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2016;139:2224–34.
Hepp DH, Foncke EMJ, Olde Dubbelink KTE, van de Berg WDJ, Berendse HW, Schoonheim MM. Loss of functional connectivity in patients with Parkinson disease and visual hallucinations. Radiology. 2017;285:896–903.
Chung SJ, Bae YJ, Jun S, Yoo HS, Kim SW, Lee YH et al. Dysautonomia is associated with structural and functional alterations in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2019;92:e1456–67.
Braak H, Bohl JR, Muller CM, Rub U, de Vos RA, Del Tredici K. Stanley Fahn Lecture 2005: The staging procedure for the inclusion body pathology associated with sporadic Parkinson’s disease reconsidered. Mov Disord. 2006;21:2042–51.
Pagano G, Ferrara N, Brooks DJ, Pavese N. Age at onset and Parkinson disease phenotype. Neurology. 2016;86:1400–7.
Darweesh SK, Koudstaal PJ, Stricker BH, Hofman A, Ikram MA. Trends in the incidence of Parkinson disease in the general population: the Rotterdam study. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183:1018–26.
Kempster PA, O’Sullivan SS, Holton JL, Revesz T, Lees AJ. Relationships between age and late progression of Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 6):1755–62.
Greenland JC, Williams-Gray CH, Barker RA. The clinical heterogeneity of Parkinson’s disease and its therapeutic implications. Eur J Neurosci. 2019;49:328–38.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the patients and their families for the time and effort they dedicated to the research, and Dr. Homa Zahedmanesh, Dr. Marta Gandolla and Prof. Alessandra Pedrocchi from Politecnico di Milano, Italy for the fruitful discussion.
Funding
Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (project #175090).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.F. is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology; received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; and receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Roche, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, and ARiSLA (Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA). S.B., E.S., I.S., A.F., A.T., N.P. and V.M. report no disclosures. T.S. has received speaker honoraria from Actavis and Alzheimer’s Association International Research Grant. E.S. has received speaker honoraria from Actavis. V.S.K. has received speaker honoraria from Actavis and Solveo. F.A. is Section Editor of NeuroImage: Clinical; has received speaker honoraria from Novartis, Biogen Idec and Philips; and receives or has received research supports from the Italian Ministry of Health, AriSLA (Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA), and the European Research Council.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filippi, M., Basaia, S., Sarasso, E. et al. Longitudinal brain connectivity changes and clinical evolution in Parkinson’s disease. Mol Psychiatry 26, 5429–5440 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0770-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0770-0
- Springer Nature Limited