Skip to main content
Log in

Neurobehavior of preterm infants from 32 to 48 weeks post-menstrual age

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Perinatology Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim:

Evaluate prospectively the neurobehavior of preterm infants (PT).

Study design:

Cohort of PT (gestational age(GA) <32weeks), evaluated biweekly from 32 to 48 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) by NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). Scores were compared by repeated Measures ANOVA. Scores of PT were compared to those of full-term infants, matched for gender by ANOVA.

Results:

39 PT (mean ± SD: GA 29.2 ± 2.0 weeks; birthweight 1100 ± 331g) were studied. As PMA progressed, PT showed increasing scores in habituation, attention, arousal, regulation, maneuvers for orientation, quality of movements and hypertonicity, and decreasing scores in excitability, lethargy, non-optimal reflexes, asymmetry, hypotonicity, and signs of stress/withdrawal. At 40 weeks PMA, PT were similar to term neonates assessed in the first days of life, except for less habituation, regulation capacity and excitability, and more hypotonia.

Conclusion:

At 40 weeks PMA, PT reached the performance of full-term neonates evaluated in the first days of life in most neurobehavior domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Center for disease Control and Prevention, 2015. [homepageon the Internet]. Access 17 March 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/preterm_births/preterm.htm

  2. Blencowe H, Lee AC, Counsens S, Bahalim A, Narwal R, Zhong N, et al. Preterm birth-associated neurodevelopmental impairment estimates at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res. 2013;74(Suppl 1):17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Vohr BR, Poole K, Higgins RD. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Changes in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months’ corrected age among infants of less than 25 weeks’ gestational age born in 1993-1999. Pediatrics. 2005;115:1645–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Woodward LJ, Anderson PJ, Austin NC, Howard K, Inder TE. Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:685–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lester BM, Tronick EZ. History and description of the neonatal intensive care unit network neurobehavioral scale. Pediatrics. 2004;113:634–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tronick E, Lester BM. Grandchild of the NBAS: the NICU network neurobehavioral scale (NNNS): a review of the research using the NNNS. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2013;26:193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eeles AL, Olsen JE, Walsh JM, McInnes EK, Molesworth CM, Cheong JL, et al. Reliability of neurobehavioral assessments from birth to term equivalent age in preterm and term born infants. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017;37:108–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tronick EZ, Olson K, Rosenberg R, Bohne L, Lu J, Lester BM. Normative neurobehavioral performance of healthy infants on the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale. Pediatrics. 2004;113:676–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Moraes Barros MC, Guinsburg R, Mitsuhiro S, Chalem E, Laranjeira RR. Neurobehavioral profile of healthy full-term newborn infants of adolescent mothers. Early Hum Dev. 2008;84:281–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fink N, Tronick E, Olson K, Lester B. Healthy newborns’ neurobehavior: norms and relations to medical and demographic factors. J Pediatr. 2012;161:1073–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spittle AJ, Walsh JM, Olsen JE, McInnes E, Eeles AL, Brown NC, et al. Neurobehaviour and neurological development in the firts month after birth for infants born between 32-42 weeks’ gestation. Ealy Hum Dev. 2016;96:7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown NC, Doyle LW, Bear MJ, Inder TE. Alterations in neurobehavior at term reflect differing perinatal exposures in very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2461–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pineda RG, Tjoeng TH, Vavasseur C, Kidikoro H, Neil JJ, Inder TE. Patterns of altered neurobehavior in preterm infants within the neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr. 2013;162:470–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stephens BE, Liu J, Lester B, Lagasse L, Shankaran S, Bada H, et al. Neurobehavioral assessment predicts motor outcome in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2010;156:366–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Dib M, Massaro AN, Glass P, Aly H. Neurobehavioral assessment as a predictor neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2012;32:299–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sucharew H, Khoury JC, Xu Y, Succop P, Yolton K. NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale profiles predict developmental outcomes in a low-risk sample. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26:344–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spittle AJ, Walsh JM, Potter C, Mcinnes E, Olsen JE, Lee KJ, et al. Neurobehavior at term-equivalent age and neurodevelopment outcomes at 2 years in infants born moderate-to-late preterm. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:207–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infant with birth weights less than 1500g. J Pediatr. 1978;92:529–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Inder TE, Wells SJ, Mogridge NB, Spencer C, Volpe JJ. Defining the nature of the cerebral abnormalities in the premature infant: a qualitative magnetic resonance imaging study. J Pediatr. 2003;143:171–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lester BM, Tronick EZ. The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale procedures. Pediatrics. 2004;113:641–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brazelton TB, Nugent JK. Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. 3rd ed. London: Cambridge University Press; 1995. p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boukydis CFZ, Bigsby R, Lester BM. Clinical use of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale. Pediatrics. 2004;113:679–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barros MCM, Guinsburg R, Mitsuhiro SS, Chalem E, Laranjeira RR. Neurobehavior of late preterm infants of adolescent mothers. Neonatology. 2011;99:133–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ABEP. Critério Brasil 2015 e atualização da distribuição de classes para 2016. Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa 2016;1–6. [homepage on the internet]. Access on 2019, Apr 1. Available from: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil.

  25. Pickler RH, McGrath JM, Reyna BA, McCain N, Lewis M, Cone S. et al. A model of neurodevelopmental risk and protection for preterm infants. J Pediatr Neonatal Nurs. 2010;24:356–65.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Als H, Lester BM, Tronick EC, Brazelton TB. Towards a research instrument for the assessment of preterm infants’ behavior (APIB). In: Fitzgerald HE, Lester BM, Yogman MW. Theory and research in behavioral pediatrics. New York: Plenun Press; 1982. pp. 85–132.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Sweeney JK, Blackburn S. Neonatal physiological and behavioral stress during neurologic assessment. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2013;27:242–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Amiel-Tison C. Neurologic evaluation of the maturity of newborn infants. Arch Dis Child. 1968;43:89–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zernicke RF, Schneider K. Biomechanics and developmental neuromotor control. Child Dev. 1993;64:982–1004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu WF, Laudert S, Perkins B, MacMillan EY, Martin S, Grave S. The development of potentially better practices to support the neurodevelopment of infants in the NICU. J Perinatol. 2007;27:548–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Colombo J, Mitchell DW. Infant visual habituation. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92:225–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leslie ATFS, Akers KG, Martinez-Canabal A, Mello LEA, Covolan L, Guinsburg R. Neonatal inflammatory pain increases hippocampal neurogenesis in rat pups. Neurosci Lett. 2011;501:78–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Leijon I. Assessment of behavior on the Brazelton scale in healthy preterm infants from 32 conceptional weeks until full-term age. Early Hum Dev. 1982;7:109–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Castillo MU, Barros MCM, Guinsburg R. Habituation responses to external stimuli: is the habituation of preterm infants at a post-conceptual age of 40 weeks equal to that of term infants? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F402–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Olsen IE, Groveman AS, Lawson ML, Clark RH, Zemel S. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States. Data Pediatrics. 2010;125:214–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - Fapesp) - Grant No 2013/05647-2

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barros Marina Carvalho de Moraes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Souza Perrella, V.V., Marina Carvalho de Moraes, B., Sañudo, A. et al. Neurobehavior of preterm infants from 32 to 48 weeks post-menstrual age. J Perinatol 39, 800–807 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0376-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0376-z

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation