Skip to main content
Log in

Blood pressure levels and control in Italy: comprehensive analysis of clinical data from 2000–2005 and 2005–2011 hypertension surveys

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Human Hypertension Submit manuscript

Abstract

This analysis is aimed to determine blood pressure (BP) levels and BP control rates in a large population of hypertensive patients in Italy. Data were taken from two large and inclusive cross-sectional surveys, which covered two distinct and subsequent time periods (2000–2005 and 2005–2011, respectively). Observational clinical studies and surveys, which reported average systolic/diastolic clinic BP levels, proportions of treated/untreated and controlled/uncontrolled patients, and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in hypertensive patients followed in either outpatient clinics, hypertension centres or general practice, were considered for the analyses. The overall sample included 211 591 hypertensive patients (119 997 (56.7%) women, age 57.0±10.0 years, body mass index 26.9±4.0 kg m−2, BP levels 146.9±16.7/88.7±9.6 mm Hg). BP levels were 148.2±15.4/87.5±9.3 mm Hg in patients followed by general practitioners (n=168 313, 79.5%), 148.1±17.3/90.1±9.7 mm Hg in those followed by hypertension centres (n=28 180, 13.3%), and 142.4±17.6/86.6±9.8 mm Hg in those followed by outpatient clinics and hospital divisions (n=15 098, 7.1%). Among treated hypertensive patients (n=128 079; 60.5%), 43 008 (33.6%) were reported to have controlled BP levels. Over one decade of observation, we reported that ~60% of hypertensive patients were treated and among these only 33% achieved effective BP control. These findings highlight the need for more effective interventions to improve management of hypertension in Italy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whyte JL, Lapuerta P, L'Italien GJ, Franklin SS . The challenge of controlling systolic blood pressure: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988–1994. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2001; 3 (4): 211–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, Pyorala K, Keil U . EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2009; 16 (2): 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dallongeville J, Banegas JR, Tubach F, Guallar E, Borghi C, Backer GD et al. Survey of physicians' practices in the control of cardiovascular risk factors: the EURIKA study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012; 19 (3): 541–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364 (9438): 937–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lin JK, Singh GM, Paciorek CJ, Cowan MJ et al. National, regional, and global trends in systolic blood pressure since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 786 country-years and 5.4 million participants. Lancet 2011; 377 (9765): 568–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chobanian AV . Shattuck Lecture. The hypertension paradox–more uncontrolled disease despite improved therapy. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (9): 878–887.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J . Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005; 365 (9455): 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Volpe M . The changing role of hypertension societies: shifting gears in Italy. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2012; 19 (1): 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Burgos-Lunar C, Jimenez-Garcia R, Salinero-Fort MA, Gomez-Campelo P, Gil A, Abanades-Herranz JC et al. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in an adult type 2 diabetes Spanish population between 2003 and 2009. PLoS One 2014; 9 (1): e86713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bromfield SG, Bowling CB, Tanner RM, Peralta CA, Odden MC, Oparil S et al. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control among US adults 80 years and older, 1988–2010. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2014; 16 (4): 270–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Corrao G, Parodi A, Zambon A, Heiman F, Filippi A, Cricelli C et al. Reduced discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment by two-drug combination as first step. Evidence from daily life practice. J Hypertens 2010; 28 (7): 1584–1590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Corrao G, Zambon A, Parodi A, Poluzzi E, Baldi I, Merlino L et al. Discontinuation of and changes in drug therapy for hypertension among newly treated patients: a population-based study in Italy. J Hypertens 2008; 26 (4): 819–824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Volpe M, Tocci G, Trimarco B, Rosei EA, Borghi C, Ambrosioni E et al. Blood pressure control in Italy: results of recent surveys on hypertension. J Hypertens 2007; 25 (7): 1491–1498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tocci G, Rosei EA, Ambrosioni E, Borghi C, Ferri C, Ferrucci A et al. Blood pressure control in Italy: analysis of clinical data from 2005-2011 surveys on hypertension. J Hypertens 2012; 30 (6): 1065–1074.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003; 21 (5): 821–848.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mancia G, Mengden T et al. Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2005; 23 (4): 697–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thijs L, Celis H, Clement D, Gil-Extremera B, Kawecka-Jaszcz K, Mancia G et al. Conventional and ambulatory blood pressure measurement in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension: second progress report on the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring project in the Syst-Eur trial. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1 (2): 95–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Whitworth JA, World Health Organization ISoHWG. 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21 (11): 1983–1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G et al2007 ESH-ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: ESH-ESC Task Force on the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 2007; 25 (9): 1751–1762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Bohm M et al2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2013; 34 (28): 2159–2219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mancia G, Facchetti R, Bombelli M, Polo Friz H, Grassi G, Giannattasio C et al. Relationship of office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure to blood glucose and lipid variables in the PAMELA population. Hypertension 2005; 45 (6): 1072–1077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Volpe M, Tocci G, Avogaro A, Comaschi M, Corsini A, Cortese C et al. Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Different Clinical Settings: Basal Results of the EFFECTUS (Evaluation of Final Feasible Effect of Control Training and Ultra-Sensitisation) Programme. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2009; 16 (2): 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leoncini G, Viazzi F, Rosei EA, Ambrosioni E, Costa FV, Leonetti G et al. Chronic kidney disease in hypertension under specialist care: the I-DEMAND study. J Hypertens 2010; 28 (1): 156–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Volpe M, Rosei EA, Ambrosioni E, Cottone S, Cuspidi C, Borghi C et al2012 consensus document of the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA): strategies to improve blood pressure control in Italy: from global cardiovascular risk stratification to combination therapy. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2013; 20 (1): 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zanchetti A, Facchetti R, Cesana GC, Modena MG, Pirrelli A, Sega R . Menopause-related blood pressure increase and its relationship to age and body mass index: the SIMONA epidemiological study. J Hypertens 2005; 23 (12): 2269–2276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been endorsed by the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Volpe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Journal of Human Hypertension website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tocci, G., Ferrucci, A., Pontremoli, R. et al. Blood pressure levels and control in Italy: comprehensive analysis of clinical data from 2000–2005 and 2005–2011 hypertension surveys. J Hum Hypertens 29, 696–701 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2015.4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2015.4

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation