Skip to main content
Log in

2012 Consensus Document of the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA): Strategies to Improve Blood Pressure Control in Italy

From Global Cardiovascular Risk Stratification to Combination Therapy

  • Consensus Document
  • Published:
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Observational clinical studies have demonstrated that only 30–40 % of patients with arterial hypertension achieve the recommended blood pressure goals (below 140/90 mmHg). In contrast, interventional trials consistently showed that it is possible to achieve effective blood pressure targets in about 70 % of treated hypertensive patients with different cardiovascular risk profiles, especially through the use of rational, effective and well tolerated combination therapies. In order to bridge the gap between current and desired blood pressure control and to achieve more effective prevention of cardiovascular diseases, the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA) has developed an interventional strategy aimed at reaching nearly 70 % of treated controlled hypertensive patients by 2015. This ambitious goal can be realistically achieved by a more rational use of modern tools and supports, and also through the use of combination therapy in hypertension in daily clinical practice, especially if this approach can be simplified into a single pill (fixed combination therapy), which is a therapeutic option now also available in Italy. Since about 70–80 % of treated hypertensive patients require a combination therapy based on at least two classes of drugs in order to achieve the recommended blood pressure goals, it is of key importance to implement this strategy in routine clinical practice. Amongst the various combination therapies currently available for hypertension treatment and control, the use of those strategies based on drugs that antagonize the renin-angiotensin system, such as angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers) and ACE inhibitors, in combination with diuretics and/or calcium channel blockers, has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events and to improve patient compliance to treatment, resulting in a greater antihypertensive efficacy and better tolerability compared with monotherapy. The present document of the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) aims to gather the main indications for the implementation of combination therapy in the treatment of hypertension, in order to improve blood pressure control in Italy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bramlage P, Bohm M, Volpe M, Khan BV, Paar WD, Tebbe U, et al. A global perspective on blood pressure treatment and control in a referred cohort of hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12(9):666–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dallongeville J, Banegas JR, Tubach F, Guallar E, Borghi C, Backer GD, et al. Survey of physicians’ practices in the control of cardiovascular risk factors: the EURIKA study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(3):541–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prugger C, Keil U, Wellmann J, de Bacquer D, de Backer G, Ambrosio GB, et al. Blood pressure control and knowledge of target blood pressure in coronary patients across Europe: results from the EUROASPIRE III survey. J Hypertens. 2011;29(8):1641–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chobanian AV. Shattuck lecture. The hypertension paradox—more uncontrolled disease despite improved therapy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(9):878–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Volpe M, Tocci G, Trimarco B, Rosei EA, Borghi C, Ambrosioni E, et al. Blood pressure control in Italy: results of recent surveys on hypertension. J Hypertens. 2007;25(7):1491–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tocci G, Rosei EA, Ambrosioni E, Borghi C, Ferri C, Ferrucci A, et al. Blood pressure control in Italy: analysis of clinical data from 2005–2011 surveys on hypertension. J Hypertens. 2012;30(6):1065–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, et al. 2007 ESH–ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: ESH–ESC Task Force on the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2007;25(9):1751–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, Burnier M, Caulfield MJ, et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens. 2009;27(11):2121–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, Celis H, Arabidze GG, Birkenhager WH, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Lancet. 1997;350(9080):757–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, Staessen JA, Liu L, Dumitrascu D, et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(18):1887–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu L, Wang JG, Gong L, Liu G, Staessen JA. Comparison of active treatment and placebo in older Chinese patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) Collaborative Group. J Hypertens. 1998;16(12 Pt 1):1823–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. The ALLHAT Officers, Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002;288(23):2981–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahlof B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo–Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial-blood pressure lowering arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9489):895–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, Dahlof B, Pitt B, Shi V, et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(23):2417–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Volpe M. The changing role of hypertension societies: shifting gears in Italy. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2012;19(1):1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(20):2043–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bajekal M, Scholes S, Love H, Hawkins N, O’Flaherty M, Raine R, et al. Analysing recent socioeconomic trends in coronary heart disease mortality in England, 2000–2007: a population modelling study. PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mancia G, Mengden T, et al. Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2005;23(4):697–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Corrao G, Parodi A, Zambon A, Heiman F, Filippi A, Cricelli C, et al. Reduced discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment by two-drug combination as first step. Evidence from daily life practice. J Hypertens. 2010;28(7):1584–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Corrao G, Zambon A, Parodi A, Poluzzi E, Baldi I, Merlino L, et al. Discontinuation of and changes in drug therapy for hypertension among newly-treated patients: a population-based study in Italy. J Hypertens. 2008;26(4):819–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chapman N, Dobson J, Wilson S, Dahlof B, Sever PS, Wedel H, et al. Effect of spironolactone on blood pressure in subjects with resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2007;49(4):839–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaclavik J, Sedlak R, Plachy M, Navratil K, Plasek J, Jarkovsky J, et al. Addition of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (ASPIRANT): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hypertension. 2011;57(6):1069–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK, Bestwick JP, Wald NJ. Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: meta-analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):290–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE. Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. BMJ. 2003;326(7404):1427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Turnbull F, Neal B, Pfeffer M, Kostis J, Algert C, Woodward M, et al. Blood pressure-dependent and independent effects of agents that inhibit the renin–angiotensin system. J Hypertens. 2007;25(5):951–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mann JF, Schmieder RE, McQueen M, Dyal L, Schumacher H, Pogue J, et al. Renal outcomes with telmisartan, ramipril, or both, in people at high vascular risk (the ONTARGET study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9638):547–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Parving HH, Brenner BM, McMurray JJ, de Zeeuw D, Haffner SM, Solomon SD, et al. Aliskiren trial in type 2 diabetes using cardio-renal endpoints (ALTITUDE): rationale and study design. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(5):1663–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Volpe M, Tocci G, Bianchini F, De Rosa M, Fedozzi E, Covezzoli A, et al. Use of aliskiren in a ‘real-life’ model of hypertension management: analysis of national web-based drug-monitoring system in Italy. J Hypertens. 2012;30(1):194–203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Elliott WJ, Meyer PM. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;369(9557):201–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marazzi G, Volterrani M, Caminiti G, Iaia L, Cacciotti L, Massaro R, et al. Effectiveness of nebivolol and hydrochlorothiazide association on blood pressure, glucose, and lipid metabolism in hypertensive patients. Adv Ther. 2010;27(9):655–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ehmer B, van der Does R, Rudorf J. Influence of carvedilol on blood glucose and glycohaemoglobin A1 in non-insulin-dependent diabetics. Drugs. 1988;36(Suppl 6):136–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Owada A, Suda S, Hata T, Miyake S. The effects of bisoprolol, a selective beta1-blocker, on glucose metabolism by long-term administration in essential hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2001;23(4):305–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gupta AK, Arshad S, Poulter NR. Compliance, safety, and effectiveness of fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive agents: a meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2010;55(2):399–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Volpe M, Italian Society of Cardiovascular Prevention (SIPREC). 2008 white paper for implementing strategies and interventions for cardiovascular prevention in Italy. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2008;15(2):63–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been endorsed by the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA). The Italian version of the document has been published in Italian language in the Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia and the Ipertensione & Prevenzione Cardiovascolare journals. The authors wish to thank Diana Chin, MD, for her help in preparing the English version of the document. There are no conflicts of interest and no sources of funding to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Volpe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volpe, M., Rosei, E.A., Ambrosioni, E. et al. 2012 Consensus Document of the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA): Strategies to Improve Blood Pressure Control in Italy. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 20, 45–52 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-013-0007-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-013-0007-2

Keywords

Navigation