Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy for localized chemotherapeutics in allograft and xenograft tumor models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Gene Therapy Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most chemotherapy regimens rely on systemic administration of drugs leading to a wide array of toxicities. Using viral-vector-mediated gene modification of muscle tissues, we have developed a method for gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy that allows for localized drug administration. An inactive prodrug of geldanamycin was activated locally for inhibition of tumor growth without systemic toxicities. A recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) was used to deliver β-galactosidase (LacZ) to the treatment group and green fluorescent protein to the control group. After 1 week, both groups received adenocarcinoma cells in the same location as the previous rAAV injection. The geldanamycin prodrug was administered 1 h later via intraperitoneal injection. Tumor growth was significantly suppressed in animals whose muscles were gene modified to express β-galactosidase compared with the control. Serum assay to access hepatotoxicity resulted in no significant differences between the animals treated with the inactive or activated form of geldanamycin, indicating minimal damage to non-target organs. Using gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy, in combination with novel recombinant AAV vectors, we have developed a method for localized activation of chemotherapeutic agents that limits the toxicities seen with traditional systemic administration of these potent drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seo SI, Lim SB, Yoon YS, Kim CW, Yu CS, Kim TW et al. Comparison of recurrence patterns between ⩽5 years and >5 years after curative operations in colorectal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 2013; 108: 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heald RJ, Ryall RD . Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986; 1: 1479–1482.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Obrand DI, Gordon PH . Incidence and patterns of recurrence following curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 15–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK . Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1783–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tepper OM, Mehrara BJ . Gene therapy in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 716–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Michaels J, Dobryansky M, Galiano RD, Ceradini DJ, Bonillas R, Jones D et al. Ex vivo transduction of microvascular free flaps for localized peptide delivery. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52: 581–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Michaels JV, Levine JP, Hazen A, Ceradini DJ, Galiano RD, Soltanian H et al. Biologic brachytherapy: ex vivo transduction of microvascular beds for efficient, targeted gene therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 54–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghali S, Dempsey MP, Jones DM, Grogan RH, Butler PE, Gurtner GC . Plastic surgical delivery systems for targeted gene therapy. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60: 323–332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dempsey MP, Hamou C, Michaels JV, Ghali S, Jazayeri L, Grogan RH et al. Using genetically modified microvascular free flaps to deliver local cancer immunotherapy with minimal systemic toxicity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 1541–1553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghali S, Bhatt KA, Dempsey MP, Jones DM, Singh S, Aarabi S et al. Treating chronic wound infections with genetically modified free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 1157–1168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang L, Sun D . Predictive physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy. Drug Metab Dispos 2008; 36: 1153–1165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tychopoulos M, Corcos L, Genne P, Beaune P, de Waziers I . A virus-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (VDEPT) strategy for lung cancer using a CYP2B6/NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase fusion protein. Cancer Gene Ther 2005; 12: 497–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tietze LF, Schmuck K . Prodrugs for targeted tumor therapies: recent developments in ADEPT, GDEPT and PMT. Curr Pharm Des 2011; 17: 3527–3547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng H, Cao X, Xian M, Fang L, Cai TB, Ji JJ et al. Synthesis and enzyme-specific activation of carbohydrate–geldanamycin conjugates with potent anticancer activity. J Med Chem 2005; 48: 645–652.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang L, Battisti RF, Cheng H, Reigan P, Xin Y, Shen J et al. Enzyme specific activation of benzoquinone ansamycin prodrugs using HuCC49DeltaCH2-beta-galactosidase conjugates. J Med Chem 2006; 49: 6290–6297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. During MJ . Adeno-associated virus as a gene delivery system. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 1997; 27: 83–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawlor PA, Bland RJ, Mouravlev A, Young D, During MJ . Efficient gene delivery and selective transduction of glial cells in the mammalian brain by AAV serotypes isolated from nonhuman primates. Mol Ther 2009; 17: 1692–1702.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Noe F, Frasca A, Balducci C, Carli M, Sperk G, Ferraguti F et al. Neuropeptide Y overexpression using recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors. Neurotherapeutics 2009; 6: 300–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Noe F, Vaghi V, Balducci C, Fitzsimons H, Bland R, Zardoni D et al. Anticonvulsant effects and behavioural outcomes of rAAV serotype 1 vector-mediated neuropeptide Y overexpression in rat hippocampus. Gene Therapy 2010; 17: 643–652.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaplitt MG, Leone P, Samulski RJ, Xiao X, Pfaff DW, O'Malley KL et al. Long-term gene expression and phenotypic correction using adeno-associated virus vectors in the mammalian brain. Nat Genet. 1994; 8: 148–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carruthers KH, During MJ, Muravlev A, Wang C, Kocak E . Fat grafting as a vehicle for the delivery of recombinant adenoassociated viral vectors to achieve gene modification of muscle flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70: 726–731.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schnell MA, Hardy C, Hawley M, Propert KJ, Wilson JM . Effect of blood collection technique in mice on clinical pathology parameters. Hum Gene Ther 2002; 13: 155–161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Supko JG, Hickman RL, Grever MR, Malspeis L . Preclinical pharmacologic evaluation of geldanamycin as an antitumor agent. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995; 36: 305–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernandes BF, Nikolitch K, Coates J, Novais G, Odashiro A, Odashiro PP et al. Local chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of ocular malignancies. Surv Ophthalmol 2013; 59: 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ponnazhagan S . Adenoassociated virus vectors for genetic immunization. Immunol Res 2002; 26: 247–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Peng George Wang, PhD, of the Ohio State University Department of Chemistry, for his efforts constructing the geldanamycin prodrug (Compound 25). The project described was supported by Pilot Project No. 11876 Grant UL1TR001070 from the National Center For Advancing Translational Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center For Advancing Translational Sciences or the National Institutes of Health. This project was supported by the National Center for Research Resources, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, through UCSF-CTSI Grant Number KL2 (K12) RR024130. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. This study supported through the Institutional Research Grant Number IRG-67-003-47 from the American Cancer Society, administered through the Comprehensive Cancer Center at The Ohio State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E Kocak.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors KHC, GM, MJD, AM, CW and EK have no commercial associations or financial disclosures that might pose or create a conflict of interest with information presented in the attached manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carruthers, K., Metzger, G., During, M. et al. Gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy for localized chemotherapeutics in allograft and xenograft tumor models. Cancer Gene Ther 21, 434–440 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2014.47

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2014.47

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation