Abstract
Body size is one of the most influential life history traits, often covarying with population density. While decreasing in some organisms, such as large herbivores, body size may increase with population density in small ones, such as voles. Unlike small voles, the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus L.), the endangered Eurasian rodent, does not exhibit cyclic population dynamics but it does have large variation in population numbers and high reproductive capacity; yet, its density-related processes which affect morphological traits are still poorly understood. We analysed density-related changes in body growth rates and body size (length and weight) collected in a natural population over 9 years, separately for each sex and age category (subadult/adult). Annual population density, the maximum Jolly–Seber estimate of population size per hectare reached in that year, was found to increase linearly with productivity index and with the length of the breeding season. Body length growth rates increased with population density in adults, but not in subadults. In adults, body length was found to increase with population density; however, we found no relationship between body weight and population density. The evidence for changes in subadults’ body size with population density was weak. These results suggest that, in years of peak numbers, adult hamsters grow faster, are longer and breed for longer time periods, thus having higher productivity index. Body size is therefore positively related to variation in population density, commonly referred to as the Chitty effect. Based on our findings, we conclude that variation in individual’s body growth rate and size drives the variation in productivity which in turn causes the changes in hamster population density.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albon, S.D., Mitchell, B., Staines, B.W., 1983. Fertility and body weight in female red deer: a density-dependent relationship. J. Anim. Ecol. 52, 969–980.
Blanckenhorn, W.U., 2000. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small. Quart. Rev. Biol. 75, 385–407.
Boonstra, R., Krebs, C.J., 1979. Viability of large- and small-sized adults in fluctuating vole populations. Ecology 60, 567–573.
Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
Burthe, S.J., Lambin, X., Telfer, S., Douglas, A., Beldomenico, P., Smith, A., Begon, M., 2010. Individual growth rates in natural field vole (Microtus agrestis) populations exhibiting cyclic population dynamics. Oecologia 162, 653–661.
Chitty, D., 1952. Mortality among voles (Microtus agrestis) at lake Vyrnwy, Montgomeryshire in 1936–9. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B—Biol. Sci. 36, 505–552.
Couturier, S., Otto, R.D., Côté, S.D., Luther, G., Mahoney, S.P., 2010. Body size variations in caribou ecotypes and relationships with demography. J. Wildl. Manage. 74, 395–404.
Dantzer, B., Newman, A.E.M., Boonstra, R., Palme, R., Boutin, S., Humphries, M.M., McAdam, A.G., 2013. Density triggers maternal hormones that increase adaptive offspring growth in a wild mammal. Science 340, 1215–1217.
Forbes, K.M., Stuart, P., Mappes, T., Hoset, K.S., Henttonen, H., Huitu, O., 2014. Diet quality limits summer growth of field vole populations. PLoS One 9 (3), e91113.
Franceschini-Zink, C., Millesi, E., 2008. Reproductive performance in female common hamsters. Zoology (Jena) 111, 76–83.
Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Delorme, D., Jorgenson, J., 2000. Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B—Biol. Sci. 267, 471–477.
Garel, M., Gaillard, J.-M., Jullien, J.-M., Dubray, D., Maillard, D., Loison, A., 2011. Population abundance and early spring conditions determine variation in body mass of juvenile chamois. J. Mammal. 92, 1112–1117.
Grulich, I., 1986. The reproduction of Cricetus cricetus (Rodentia) in Czechoslovakia. Acta Sci. Nat. Brno 20, 1–56.
Hansson, L., 1984. Composition of cyclic and non-cyclic vole populations: on the causes of variation in individual quality among Clethrionomys glareolus in Sweden. Oecologia 63, 199–206.
Kjellander, P., Gaillard, J.-M., Hewison, A.J.M., 2006. Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations. Oecologia 146, 521–530.
Krebs, C.J., 1996. Population cycles revisited. J. Mammal. 77, 8–24.
Krebs, C.J., 2013. Population Fluctuations in Rodents. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lidicker, W.Z., Ostfeld, R.S., 1991. Extra-large body size in California voles: causes and fitness consequences. Oikos 61, 108–121.
Mazerolle, M.J., 2017. AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2. 1-1.
Mutze, G.J., 2009. Changes in body condition and body size affect breeding and recruitment in fluctuating mouse populations in south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecol. 34, 278–293.
Mysterud, A., Yoccoz, N.G., Stenseth, N.C., Langvatn, V., 2001. Effects of age, sex and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density-dependent senescence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B—Biol. Sci. 268, 911–919.
Oli, M.K., 1999. The Chitty effect: a consequence of dynamic energy allocation in a fluctuating environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 56, 293–300.
Peters, R.H., 1983. The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., R Core Team, 2017. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3. 1–131.
Pinot, A., Gauffre, B., Bretagnolle, V., 2014. The interplay between seasonality and density: consequences for female breeding decision in a small cyclic herbivore. BMC Ecol. 14, 17–33.
Pollock, K.H., Nichols, J.D., Brownie, C., Hines, J.E., 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildl. Monogr. 107, 1–97.
R Development Core Team, 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Richard, E., Gaillard, J.M., Saïd, S., Hamann, J.L., Klein, F., 2010. High red deer density depresses body mass of roe deer fawns. Oecologia 163, 91–97.
Rodriguez-Hidalgo, P., Gortazar, C., Tortosa, F.S., Rodriguez-Vigal, C., Fierro, Y., Vicente, J., 2010. Effects of density, climate, and supplementary forage on body mass and pregnancy rates of female red deer in Spain. Oecologia 164, 389–398.
Rusin, M.Y., Banaszek, A., Mishta, A.V., 2013. The common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in Ukraine: evidence for population decline. Folia Zool. 62, 207–213.
Swaton, C., Grimm, J.M., Siutz, C., Millesi, E., 2014. Effects of food supplements on reproductive performance and juvenile development in Common hamsters. In: Abstract Book and Programme from the 21st Annual Meeting of the International Hamster Workgroup, Senckenberg Research Institute, Gelnhausen, p. 43.
Tkadlec, E., Zejda, J., 1998. Small rodent population fluctuations: the effects of age structure and seasonality. Evol. Ecol. 12, 191–210.
Tkadlec, E., Zbořil, J., Losík, J., Gregor, P., Lisická, L., 2006. Winter climate and plant productivity predict abundances of small herbivores in central Europe. Clim. Res. 32, 99–108.
Tkadlec, E., Heroldová, M., Víšková, V., Bednář, M., Zejda, J., 2012. Distribution of the common hamster in the Czech Republic after 2000: retreating to optimum lowland habitats. Folia Zool. 61, 246–253.
Ulbrich, K., Kayser, A., 2004. A risk analysis for the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus). Biol. Conserv. 117, 263–270.
Wauters, L.A., Dhondt, A.A., 1995. Lifetime reproductive success and its correlates in female Eurasian red squirrels. Oikos 72, 402–410.
White, T.C.R., 1993. The Inadequate Environment: Nitrogen and the Abundance of Animals. Springer, Berlin.
Wolff, J.O., 1993. Does the Chitty effect occur in Peromyscus? J. Mammal. 74, 846–851.
Yan, C., Xu, T., Cao, X., Wang, F., Wang, S., Hao, S., Yang, H., Li, H., Zhang, Z., 2014. Temporal change in body mass of two sympatric hamster species and implications for population dynamics. Can. J. Zool. 298, 112–120.
Ziomek, J., Banaszek, A., 2007. The common hamster, Cricetus cricetus in Poland: status and current range. Folia Zool. 56, 235–242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petrová, I., Petriláková, M., Losík, J. et al. Density-related pattern of variation in body growth, body size and annual productivity in the common hamster. Mamm Biol 91, 34–40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.03.006
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.03.006