Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the influence of population density on juvenile body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations, in Sweden (Bogesund) and France (Chizé), in which density was monitored for ≥15 years. We investigated the effect of population density and climatic conditions on cohort performance. We predicted that: (1) body mass of growing fawns should be sensitive to environmental changes, showing marked between-year variation (i.e., cohort effects), (2) fawns in the less productive (weakly seasonal, weakly predictable summer weather) habitat of Chizé should show stronger density-dependent responses due to more severe food competition during summer than fawns in the more productive (markedly seasonal, moderately predictable summer weather) habitat of Bogesund, and (3) fawns at Bogesund should be heavier both in absolute terms and relative to their size than their conspecifics in Chizé due to a higher degree of fat accumulation in northern environments. In both study sites we found marked cohort variation and clear effects of density, with body mass varying by as much as 29% over years. While neither summer nor winter climate influenced fawn body mass at Bogesund, fawns tended to be lighter after summers with high temperatures at Chizé. In addition, fawns were heavier after acorn mast years experienced in utero at Bogesund. As expected, the strength of the density-dependent response of fawn body mass was greater at Chizé than at Bogesund. For a given density, male fawns were consistently heavier than females in both sites. Lastly, both sexes at Bogesund had higher absolute body mass and were larger for a given body size than in Chizé. Our results clearly demonstrate that absolute density is a poor predictor of roe deer performance and supports the view that habitat quality has an overwhelming importance for determining fawn body mass in roe deer populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albon SD, Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH (1983) The influence of climatic variation on the birth weights of red deer (Cervus elaphus). J Zool 200:295–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albon SD, Clutton-Brock TH, Guinnes FE (1987) Early development and population dynamics in red deer. II. Density-independent effects and cohort variation. J Anim Ecol 56:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R, Gaillard JM, Liberg O, San José C (1998) Variation in life-history parameters in roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 285–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R, Gaillard JM, Linnell JDC, Duncan P (2000) Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer. J Anim Ecol 69:672–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman ATG, Benton T, Ranta E, Kaitala V, Lundberg P (2002) Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects. TREE 17:263–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1990) Ecology individuals, populations and communities, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin JM, Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Van Laere G (1987) Suivi de l’évolution de la fècondité chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) par l’observation des groupes familiaux. Gibier Faune Sauvage 4:255–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederlund G, Lindström E (1983) Effects of severe winters and fox predation on roe deer mortality. Acta Theriol 28:129–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1987) Reproductive success in male and female red deer. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 325–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Price OF, Albon SD, Jewell PA, (1992) Early development and population fluctuations in Soay sheep. J Anim Ecol 65:675–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook JG, Quinlan LJ, Irwin LL, Bryant LD, Riggs RA, Thomas JW (1996) Nutrition–growth relations of elk calves during late summer and fall. J Wildl Manag 60:528–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson T, Catchpole EA, Albon SD, Morgan BJT, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Crawley MJ, Grenfell BT (2001) Age, sex, density, winter weather and population crashes in Soay sheep. Science 292:1528–1531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dooney JM, Gunn RG (1981) Nutritional and other factors in breeding performance of ewes. In: Gilmore D, Cook B (eds) Environmental factors in mammal reproduction. Macmillan, London, pp 169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, King WJ, Smith KG, Wishart WD (1996) The development of sexual dimorphism: seasonal and lifetime mass change of bighorn sheep. Can J Zool 74:330–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson JT (1998) Mass- and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder. Am Nat 152:367–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forchhammer MC, Clutton-Brock TH, Lindström J, Albon SD (2001) Climate and population density induce long-term cohort variation in a northern ungulate. J Anim Ecol 70:721–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1987) A review of density dependence in populations of large mammals. In: Genoways HH (ed) Current mammalogy. Plenum, New York, pp 401–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Lebreton JD, Pontier D, Landry P (1992a) Demographic sensitivity and population management: an application to roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). In: Proceedings of the International Union of the Game Biologists Congress 18:547–550

  • Gaillard JM, Sempéré AJS, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B (1992b) Effects of age and body weight on the proportion of females breeding in a population of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Can J Zool 70:1541–1545

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Jullien JM (1993) Effects of cohort, sex, and birth date on body development of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) fawns. Oecologia 94:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B (1996) Body mass of roe deer fawns during winter in 2 contrasting populations. J Wildl Manag 60:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Boutin JM, Delorme D, Van Laer G, Duncan P, Lebreton JD (1997) Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations. Oecologia 112:502–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Delorme D, Jorgenson J (2000) Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:471–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Duncan P, Delorme D, Van Laere G, Pettorelli N, Maillard D, Renaud G (2003b) Effects of Hurricane Lothar on the population dynamics of European roe deer. J Wildl Manag 67:767–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Loison A, Toïgo C, Delorme D, Van Laere G (2003a) Cohort effects and deer population dynamics. Ecoscience 10:312–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist V (1987) Bergmann’s rule is invalid. Can J Zool 65:1035–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM (1996) Variation in the fecundity of roe deer in Britain: effects of age and body weight. Acta Theriol 41:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM, Vincent JP, Bideau E, Angibault JM, Putman RJ (1996) Variation in cohort mandible size as an index of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) densities and population trends. J Zool (Lond) 239:573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM, Gaillard JM, Angibault JM, Van Laere G, Vincent JP (2002) The influence of density on post-weaning growth in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) fawns. J Zool (Lond) 257:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holand Ø, Mysterud A, Wannag A, Linnell JDC (1998) Roe deer in northern environments: physiology and behaviour. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 117–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson KI (1997) Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. OIKOS 78:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellander P (2000) Density dependence in roe deer population dynamics. PhD Thesis. Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. Silvestria 154

  • Langvatn R, Albon SD, Burkey T, Clutton-Brock TH (1996) Climate, plant phenology and variation in age of first reproduction in a temperate herbivore. J Anim Ecol 65:653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesage L, Crête M, Huot J, Ouellet JP (2001) Evidence for a trade-off between growth and body reserves in northern white-tailed deer. Oecologia 126:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstedt SL, Boyce MS (1985) Seasonality, fasting endurance, and body size in mammals. Am Nat 125:873–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström J (1999) Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. TREE 14:343–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loe LE, Bonenfant C, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Langvatn R, Stenseth NC, Klein F, Pettorelli N (2005) Climate predictability and breeding phenology in red deer: timing and synchrony of rutting and calving in Norway and France. J Anim Ecol (in press)

  • Mauget C, Mauget R, Sempere A (1999) Energy expenditure in European roe deer fawns during the suckling period and its relationship with maternal reproductive cost. Can J Zool 77:389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Jennions MD (2002) How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists. Oecologia 132:492–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC (2002) Large-scale habitat variability, delayed density effects and red deer populations in Norway. J Anim Ecol 71:569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek MS, Leffler AJ, Flint SD, Ryel RJ (2003) How much variance is explained by ecologists? Additional perspectives. Oecologia 137:161–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Duncan P, Oullet JP, Van Laer G (2001) Population density and small-scale variation in habitat quality affect phenotypic quality in roe deer. Oecologia 128:400–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Van Laer G, Duncan P, Kjellander P, Liberg O, Delorme D, Maillard D (2002) Density at birth and habitat quality affects adult body mass in roe deer. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:747–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Dray S, Gaillard JM, Chessel D, Duncan P, Illius A, Guillon N, Klein F, Van Laere G (2003a) Spatial variation in springtime food resources influences the winter body mass of roe deer fawns. Oecologia 137:363–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Duncan P, Maillard D, Van Laere G, Delorme D (2003b) Habitat quality influences both survival and movements of juvenile roe deer. Ecology 84:3307–3316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portier C, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson JT, Yoccoz NG (1998) Effects of density and weather on survival of bighorn sheep lambs (Ovis canadensis). J Zool Lond 245:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post E, Stenseth NC (1999) Climatic variability, plant phenology, and northern ungulates. Ecology 80:1322–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R-Development Core Team (2004) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org http://r.project.org/

  • Rose KE, Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE (1998) Cohort variation in male survival and lifetime breeding success in red deer. J Anim Ecol 67:979–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE (1997) Environmental stochasticity and population dynamics of large herbivores: a search for mechanisms. TREE 12:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand H, Pehrson Å, Cederlund G (1996) Annual variation in body mass and reproductive traits in mouse Alces alces—the effects of weather conditions and food quality. In: Life history strategies in moose (Alces alces): geographical and temporal variation in body growth and reproduction. PhD Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala

  • Sinclair ARE (1989) Population regulation in animals. In: Cherrett JM (ed) Ecological concepts. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 197–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogland T (1983) The effects of density dependent resource limitation on size of wild reindeer. Oecologia 60:156–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogland T (1990) Density-dependence in a fluctuating wild rein deer herd; maternal vs. offspring effects. Oecologia 84:442–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Strandgaard H (1972) The roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population at Kalø and the factors regulating its size. Dan Rev Game Biol 7:1–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs M (1977) Density dependence in the life-cycles of animals and its importance in K- and r-strategies. J Anim Ecol 46:677–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne B (1984) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J Wildl Manag 4:893–901

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Johan Månsson, Jonas Nordström, Lennart Pettersson, Leif Rooth, Gunnar Schön and Pia-Lena Widén for doing most of the field work in Sweden and to Olof Liberg for suggestions and ideas on earlier drafts of the manuscripts. The Bogesund study in Sweden, is a part of a long-term study of population demography in roe deer, initiated, lead and supervised by Olof Liberg and later together with P. Kjellander both at SLU, Grimsö, Sweden. The Swedish study was financed by the Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management and by the private foundations of “Oscar och Lilli Lamm stiftelser”, “Olle och Signhild Engkvist stiftelser” and FORMAS. We are grateful to Bernard Boisaubert, Jean-Marie Boutin and Carole Toïgo for organizing the capture sessions, Daniel Delorme and Guy Van Laere for help in the field and we thank all volunteers who had helped us to catch roe deer at Chizé for more than 20 years. We also thank Atle Mysterud, Tim Coulson and an anonymous referee for useful comments on previous drafts of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Conservation Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, 730 91, Riddarhyttan, Sweden

    Petter Kjellander

  2. UMR-CNRS 5558, Laboratoire de Biomètrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université Lyon 1, 69622, Villeurbanne, Cedex, France

    Jean-Michel Gaillard

  3. Comportement et Ecologie de la Faune Sauvage (CEFS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), BP 52627, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France

    A. J. Mark Hewison

Authors
  1. Petter Kjellander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Michel Gaillard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. J. Mark Hewison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petter Kjellander.

Additional information

Communicated by Roland Brandl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kjellander, P., Gaillard, JM. & Hewison, A.J.M. Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations. Oecologia 146, 521–530 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0188-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0188-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation