Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Methodological challenges in monitoring bat population- and assemblage-level changes for anthropogenic impact assessment

  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent years have seen increased attention to bats as an effective bioindicator group for assessing responses to drivers of global change, which concurrently has led to a revived interest in establishing a global bat monitoring network. To be effective and efficient, global-scale monitoring of bats will largely have to rely on integrating data collected as part of a network of regional monitoring schemes. Herein, I highlight and discuss some of the principal challenges faced in the monitoring of population-and assemblage-level changes of bats, focusing mainly on methodological and statistical issues and the selection of suitable state variables for quantifying regional trends in bat biodiversity. Particularly in the tropics, where detailed single-species monitoring is challenging due to high species richness, I recommend that monitoring programs focus on tracking changes in species turnover and composition as more informative measures of anthropogenic impact than species richness. Imperfect species detection is an important source of variation and uncertainty associated with animal count data. Bat monitoring programs need to correct for this, most importantly through the use of sampling protocols that rely on strictly standardized approaches and a well-balanced design, or a posteriori by using appropriate statistical models so as to avoid the detection of spurious trends. Multi-species occupancy models that allow for simultaneous assemblage- and species-level inference about occurrence and detection probabilities provide a suitable analysis framework for monitoring data, and are a comparatively low-cost approach that should prove useful especially in the regional monitoring of bats in the tropics. To ensure robust inference about temporal and spatial trend estimates in the state variables of interest, the efficacy of sampling designs should be carefully gauged at the design stage to ensure sufficient statistical power, and data should be collected according to a formal randomized design to allow for regional-scale inference. I stress the importance for long-term bat monitoring programs to have sustained funding, the need to establish trigger points for the application of appropriate mitigation measures, and for monitoring to be adaptive so as to maximize effectiveness and efficiency based on the data collected. Finally, I argue that to overcome the challenges associated with initiating monitoring networks in tropical countries - a major step towards the realization of global-scale bat monitoring - reliance on citizen scientists and participatory monitoring will be key.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, L.L., MacKenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., 2013. Advances and applications of occupancy models. Methods Ecol. Evol., http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-1210x.12100

  • Banks-Leite, C., Ewers, R.M., Metzger, J.P., 2012. Unraveling the drivers of community dissimilarity and species extinction in fragmented landscapes, Ecology 93, 2560–2569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banks-Leite, C., Pardini, R., Boscolo, D., Cassano, C.R., Püttker, T., Barros, C.S., Barlow, J., 2014. Assessing the utility of statistical adjustments for imperfect detection in tropical conservation science, J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 849–859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, J., Gardner, T.A., Araujo, I.S., Avila-Pires, T.C, Bonaldo, A.B., Costa, J.E., Esposito, M.C., Ferreira, L.V., Hawes, M.I.M., Hernandez, M.I.M., Hoogmoed, M.S., Leite, R.N., Lo-Man-Hung, N.F., Malcolm, J.R., Martins, M.B., Mestre, L.A.M., Miranda-Santos, R., Nunes-Gutjahr, A.L., Overal, W.L., Parry, L., Peters, S.L., Ribeiro-Junior, M.A., da Silva, M.N.F., da Silva Motta, C., Peres, C.A., 2007. Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary and plantation forest, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 18555–18560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Battersby, J., 2010. Guidelines for surveillance and monitoring of European bats. UNEP/EUROBATS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier, T., Nichols, J.D., Sauer, J.R., Hines, J.E., Pollock, K.H., 1998. Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability, Ecology 79, 1018–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, C.J.A., Sodhi, N.S., Brook, B.W., 2009. Tropical turmoil: a biodiversity tragedy in progress, Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T., Baillie, S.R., Dick, J.M., Elston, D.A., Magurran, A.E., Scott, E.M., Smith, R.I., Somerfield, P.J., Studeny, A.C., Watt, A., 2012. How should regional biodiversity be monitored? Environ, Ecol. Stat. 19, 601–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T., Magurran, A.E., Green, R.E., Fewster, R.M., 2005. Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 243–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S.T., Studeny, A.C., Magurran, A.E., Illian, J.B., Newson, S.E., 2011. The geometric mean of relative abundance indices: a biodiversity measure with a difference. Ecosphere 2 (art100). DOI: 110.1890/ES1811-00186.00181.

  • Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Almond, R.E.A., Baillie, J.E.M., Bomhard, B., Brown, C., Bruno, J., Carpenter, K.E., Carr, G.M., Chanson, J., Chenery, A.M., Csirke, J., Davidson, N.C., Dentener, F., Foster, M., Galli, A., Galloway, J.N., Genovesi, P., Gregory, R.D., Hockings, M., Kapos, V., Lamarque, J.F., Leverington, F., Loh, J., McGeoch, M.A., McRae, L, Minasyan, A., Morcillo, M.H., Oldfield, T.E.E., Pauly, D., Quader, S., Revenga, C., Sauer, J.R., Skolnik, B., Spear, D., Stanwell-Smith, D., Stuart, S.N., Symes, A., Tierney, M., Tyrrell, T.D., Vié, J.-C., Watson, R., 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines, Science 328, 1164–1168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros, L.M., Fagan, M.E.,Willig, M.R., 2014. Effects of human-modified landscapes on taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic dimensions of bat biodiversity. Divers. Distrib., http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12277

  • Clark, J.S., Bjørnstad, O.N., 2004. Population time series: process variability, observation errors, missing values, lags, and hidden states, Ecology 85, 3140–3150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M.J., Rodhouse, T.J., Ormsbee, P.C., Szewczak, J.M., Nichols, J.D., 2014. Accounting for false-positive acoustic detections of bats using occupancy models, J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1460–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Eon-Eggertson, F., Dulvy, N.K., Peterman, R.M., 2014. Reliable identification of declining populations in an uncertain world. Conserv. Lett, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12123

  • Danielsen, F., Jensen, P.M., Burgess, N.D., Altamirano, R., Alviola, P.A., Andrianan-drasana, H., Brashares, J.S., Burton, A.C., Coronado, I., Corpuz, N., Enghoff, M., Fjeldså, J., Funder, M., Holt, S., Hübertz, H., Jensen, A.E., Lewis, R., Massao, J., Mendoza, M.M., Ngaga, Y., Pipper, C.B., Poulsen, M.K., Rueda, R.M., Sam, M.K., Skielboe, T., Sørensen, M., Young, R., 2014. A multicountry assessment of tropical resource monitoring by local communities, Bioscience 64, 236–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWan, A., Zipkin, E., 2010. An integrated sampling and analysis approach for improved biodiversity monitoring, Environ. Manag. 45, 1223–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano, J., 2001. Power analysis and sustainable forest management, For. Ecol. Manag. 154, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano, J., 2003. How much power is enough? Against the development of an arbitrary convention for statistical power calculations, Funct. Ecol. 17, 707–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirzo, R., Young, H.S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N.J.B., Collen, B., 2014. Defaunation in the Anthropocene, Science 345, 401–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dorazio, R.M., Gotelli, N.J., Ellison, A.M., 2011. Modern methods of estimating biodiversity from presence-absence surveys. In: Grillo, O., Venora, G. (Eds.), Biodiversity loss in a changing planet. InTech, pp. 277–302, http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/23881

  • Dorazio, R.M., Royle, J.A., 2005. Estimating size and composition of biological communities by modeling the occurrence of species, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100, 389–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorazio, R.M., Royle, J.A., Söderström, B., Glimskär, A., 2006. Estimating species richness and accumulation by modeling species occurrence and detectability, Ecology 87, 842–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dornelas, M., Gotelli, N.J., McGill, B., Shimadzu, H., Moyes, F., Sievers, C., Magurran, A.E., 2014. Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss, Science 344, 296–299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duchamp, J.E., Yates, M., Muzika, R.M., Swihart, R.K., 2006. Estimating probabilities of detection for bat echolocation calls: an application of the double-observer method, Wildl. Soc. Bull. 34, 408–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P., 2013. Biodiversity and evolutionary history: useful extensions of the PD phylogenetic diversity assessment framework, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1289, 69–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz, G., Marinelli, C.E., Lovejoy, T.E., 2008. Biological monitoring in the Amazon: recent progress and future needs, Biotropica 40, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, I., Chandler, R.B., 2011. Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance, J. Stat. Softw. 43, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaquer, C., Puig-Montserrat, X., 2012. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Importance of Bats as Bioindicators. Museum of Natural Sciences Edicions, Granollers, Catalonia, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, D.F.B., Gogol-Prokurat, M., Nogeire, T., Molinari, N., Trautman Richers, B., Lin, B.B., Simpson, N., Mayfield, M.M., DeClerck, F., 2009. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa, Ecol. Lett. 12, 22–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, W., 2013. Acoustic monitoring of bats, considerations of options for long-term monitoring, Therya 4, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, W.F., Pollock, J.F., Hicks, A.C., Langwig, K.E., Reynolds, D.S., Turner, G.G., Butchkoski, C.M., Kunz, T.H., 2010. An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common north American bat species, Science 329, 679–682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García-Morales, R., Badano, E.I., Moreno, C.E., 2013. Response of neotropical bat assemblages to human land use, Conserv. Biol. 27, 1096–1106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrodette, T., 1987. A power analysis for detecting trends, Ecology 68, 1364–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitzen, R.A., Millspaugh, J.J., Cooper, A.B., Licht, D.S., 2012. Design and Analysis of Long-Term Ecological Monitoring Studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 560.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorresen, P.M., Miles, A.C., Todd, C.M., Bonaccorso, F.M., Weller, T.J., 2008. Assessing bat detectability and occupancy with multiple automated echolocation detectors, J. Mammal. 89, 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillera-Arroita, G., Lahoz-Monfort, J.J., 2012. Designing studies to detect differences in species occupancy: power analysis under imperfect detection, Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 860–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillera-Arroita, G., Ridout, M.S., Morgan, B.J.T., 2010. Design of occupancy studies with imperfect detection, Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J.P., Ober, H.K., Sherwin, R.E., 2009. Surveying and monitoring of bats. In: Kunz, T.H., Parsons, S. (Eds.), Ecological and Behavioral Methods forthe Study of Bats. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore USA, pp. 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haysom, K.A., Dekker, J., Russ, J.A., van der Meij, T., van Strien, A.J., 2013. European bat population trends. A prototype biodiversity indicator. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, http://dx.doi.org/10.2800/10311, EEA Technical Report No 19/2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J.E., 2006. PRESENCE - Software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. USGS-PWRC http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html

  • Holck, M.H., 2008. Participatory forest monitoring: an assessment of the accuracy of simple cost-effective methods, Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 2023–2036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iknayan, K.J., Tingley, M.W., Furnas, B.J., Beissinger, S.R., 2014. Detecting diversity: emerging methods to estimate species diversity, Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 97–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., Jacobs, D.S., Kunz, T.H., Willig, M.R., Racey, P.A., 2009. Carpe noctem: the importance of bats as bioindicators, Endanger. Spec. Res. 8, 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., Rebelo, H., 2013. Responses of bats to climate change: learning from the past and predicting the future. In: Adams, R.A., Pedersen, S.C (Eds.), Bat Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation. Springer, New York, pp. 457–478.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.P.G., 2011. Monitoring species abundance and distribution at the landscape scale, J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.P.G., 2013. Monitoring in the real world. In: Collen, B., Pettorelli, N., Baillie, J.E.M., Durant, S.M. (Eds.), Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 335–347.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.P.G., Asner, G.P., Butchart, S.H.M., Karanth, K.U., 2013 a. The ‘why’ ‘what’ and ‘how’ of monitoring for conservation. In: Macdonald, D.W., Willis, K.J. (Eds.), Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK, pp. 327–343.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.P.G., Collen, B., Atkinson, G., Baxter, P.W.J., Bubb, P., Illian, J.B., Katzner, T.E., Keane, A., Loh, J., McDonald-Madden, E.V.E., Nicholson, E., Pereira, H.M., Possingham, H.P., Pullin, A.S., Rodrigues, A.S.L., Ruiz-Gutierrez, V., Sommerville, M., Milner-Gulland, E.J., 2011. The why, what, and how of global biodiversity indicators beyond the 2010 target, Conserv. Biol. 25, 450–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K.E., Russ, J.A., Bashta, A.T., Bilhari, Z., Catto, C., Csosz, I., Gorbachev, A., Gyorfi, P., Hughes, A., Ivashkiv, I., Koryagina, N., Kurali, A., Langton, S., Collen, A., Margiean, G., Pandourski, I., Parsons, S., Prokofev, I., Szodoray-Paradi, A., Szodoray-Paradi, F., Tilova, E., Walters, C.L., Weatherill, A., Zavarzin, O., 2013 b. Indicator bats program: a system for the global acoustic monitoring of bats. In: Collen, B., Pettorelli, N., Baillie, J.E.M., Durant, S.M. (Eds.), Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 211–247.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, L.N., Field, S.A., Wilcox, C., Possingham, H.P., 2006. Presence-absence versus abundance data for monitoring threatened species, Conserv. Biol. 20, 1679–1687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalka, M.B., Smith, A.R., Kalko, E.K.V., 2008. Bats limit arthropods and herbivory in a tropical forest. Science 320, 71.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kéry, M., Dorazio, R.M., Soldaat, L., Strien A. v. Zuiderwijk, A., Royle, J.A., 2009 a, Trend estimation in populations with imperfect detection. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 1163–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kéry, M., Royle, J.A., Plattner, M., Dorazio, R.M., 2009 b, Species richness and occupancy estimation in communities subject to temporary emigration. Ecology 90, 1279–1290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kéry, M., Royle, J.A., Schmid, H., Schaub, M., Volet, B., Häfliger, G., Zbinden, N., 2010. Site-occupancy distribution modeling to correct population-trend estimates derived from opportunistic observations, Conserv. Biol. 24, 1388–1397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kéry, M., Schmid, B.R., 2008. Imperfect detection and its consequences for monitoring for conservation, Community Ecol. 9, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, T., 2013. Response of bat diversity to forest disturbance in Southeast Asia: insights from long-term research in Malaysia. In: Adams, R.A., Pedersen, S.C. (Eds.), Bat Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation. Springer, New York, pp. 169–185.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, T.H., Hodgkison, R., Weise, C.D., 2009. Methods of capturing and handling bats. In: Kunz, T.H., Parsons, S. (Eds.), Ecological and Behavioral Methods forthe Study of Bats., 2nd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W.F., Sayer, J., Cassman, K.G., 2014. Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature, Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 107–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legg, C.J., Nagy, L., 2006. Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time, J. Environ. Manag. 78, 194–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, C.R., Yanai, R.D., Lampman, G.G., Burns, D.A., Driscoll, C.T., Lawrence, G.B., Lynch, J.A., Schoch, N., 2014. Evaluating the efficiency of environmental monitoring programs, Ecol. Indic. 39, 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, D.B., Gibbons, P., Bourke, M.A.X., Burgman, M., Dickman, C.R., Ferrier, S., Fitzsimons, J., Freudenberger, D., Garnett, S.T., Groves, C., Hobbs, R.J., Kingsford, R.T., Krebs, C., Legge, S., Lowe, A.J., McLean, R.O.B., Montambault, J., Possingham, H., Radford, J.I.M., Robinson, D., Smallbone, L., Thomas, D., Varcoe, T., Vardon, M., Wardle, G., Woinarski, J., Zerger, A., 2012. Improving biodiversity monitoring, Austral Ecol. 37, 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, D.B., Likens, G.E., 2009. Adaptive monitoring: anew paradigm for longterm research and monitoring, Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 482–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, D.B., Likens, G.E., 2010a. Effective Ecological Monitoring. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, D.B., Likens, G.E., 2010b. The science and application of ecological monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 143, 1317–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, D.B., Piggott, M.P., Wintle, B.A., 2013. Counting the books while the library burns: why conservation monitoring programs need a plan for action, Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 549–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, G.M., Burns, D.A., Driscoll, C.T., Jenkins, J.C, Mitchell, M.J., Rustad, L., Shanley, J.B., Likens,G.E., Haeuber, R., 2007. Who needs environmental monitoring? Front, Ecol. Environ. 5, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Lachman, G.B., Droege, S., Royle, J.A., 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one, Ecology 83, 2248–2255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Royle, J.A., Pollock, K.H., Bailey, L.L., Hines, J.E., 2006. Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Sutton, N., Kawanishi, K., Bailey, L.L., 2005. Improving inferences in population studies of rare species that are detected imperfectly, Ecology 86, 1101–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.I., Reardon, J.T., 2013. Occupancy methods for conservation management. In: Collen, B., Pettorelli, N., Baillie, J.E.M., Durant, S.M. (Eds.), Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 248–264.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.I., Royle, J.A., 2005. Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort, J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 1105–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A.E., Henderson, P.A., 2010. Temporal turnover and the maintenance of diversity in ecological assemblages, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 3611–3620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mapstone, B.D., 1995. Scalable decision rules for environmental impact studies: effect size, type I, and type II errors, Ecol. Appl. 5, 401–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D.M., Trenham, P.C., 2008. Current trends in plant and animal population monitoring, Conserv. Biol. 22, 647–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M.A., Moore, A.L., Krauss, J., Morgan, J.W., Clements, C.F., 2014. Linking indices for biodiversity monitoring to extinction risk theory. Conserv. Biol., http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12308

  • McComb, B., Zuckerberg, B., Vesely, D., Jordan, C., 2010. Monitoring Animal Populations and Their Habitats: A Practitioner’s Guide. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C.F.J., Aguiar, L.M.S., Aguirre, L.F., Baumgarten, J., Clarke, F.M., Cosson, J.F., EstradaVillegas, S., Fahr, J., Faria, D., Furey, N., Henry, M., Hodgkison, R., Jenkins, R.K.B., Jung, K.G., Kingston, T., Kunz, T.H., MacSwiney Gonzalez, M.C., Moya, I., Patterson, B.P., Pons, J.M., Racey, P.A., Rex, K., Sampaio, E.M., Solari, S., Stoner, K.E., Voigt, C.C., von Staden, D., Weise, C.D., Kalko, E.K.V., 2011. Accounting for detectability improves estimates of species richness in tropical bat surveys, J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 777–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C.F.J., Aguiar, L.M.S., Aguirre, L.F., Baumgarten, J., Clarke, F.M., Cosson, J.F., Estrada Villegas, S., Fahr, J., Faria, D., Furey, N., Henry, M., Hodgkison, R., Jenkins, R.K.B., Jung, K.G., Kingston, T., Kunz, T.H., MacSwiney Gonzalez, M.C., Moya, I., Pons, J.M., Racey, P.A., Rex, K., Sampaio, E.M., Stoner, K.E., Voigt, C.C., von Staden, D., Weise, C.D., Kalko, E.K.V., 2010. Long-term monitoring of tropical bats for anthropogenic impact assessment: gauging the statistical power to detect population change, Biol. Conserv. 143, 2797–2807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C.F.J., Aguiar, L.M.S., Aguirre, L.F., Baumgarten, J., Clarke, F.M., Cosson, J.F., Estrada Villegas, S., Fahr, J., Faria, D., Furey, N., Henry, M., Jenkins, R.K.B., Kunz, T.H., MacSwiney Gonzalez, M.C., Moya, I., Pons, J.-M., Racey, P.A., Rex, K., Sampaio, E.M., Stoner, K.E., Voigt, C.C., von Staden, D., Weise, C.D., Kalko, E.K.V., 2014. Species undersampling in tropical bat surveys: effects on emerging biodiversity patterns. J. Anim. Ecol., http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12261

  • Meyer, C.F.J., Kalko, E.K.V., 2008. Assemblage-level responses of phyllostomid bats to tropical forest fragmentation: land-bridge islands as a model system, J. Biogeogr. 35, 1711–1726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C.F.J., Kalko, E.K.V., Kerth, G., 2009. Small-scale fragmentation effects on local genetic diversity in two phyllostomid bats with different dispersal abilities in Panama, Biotropica 41, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C.F.J., Struebig, M., Willig, M.R., forthcoming. Responses of tropical bats to habitat fragmentation, logging, and deforestation, in: Voigt, C.C., Kingston, T. (Eds.), Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World. Springer.

  • Nichols, J.D., Bailey, L.L., O’Connell, J. A. F., Talancy, N.W., Campbell Grant, E.H., Gilbert, A.T., Annand, E.M., Husband, T.P., Hines, J.E., 2008. Multi-scale occupancy estimation and modeling using multiple detection methods, J Appl Ecol 45, 1321–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J.D., Williams, B.K., 2006. Monitoring for conservation, Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 668–673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noon, B.R., Bailey, L.L., Sisk, T.D., McKelvey, K.S., 2012. Efficient species-level monitoring at the landscape scale, Conserv. Biol. 26, 432–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, T.J., Bogan, M.A., 2003. Monitoring Trends in Bat Populations of the United States and Territories: Problems and Prospects. U. S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Information and Technology Report, USGS/BRD/ITR-2003-0003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, H.M., Belnap, J., Brummitt, N., Collen, B., Ding, H., Gonzalez-Espinosa, M., Gregory, R.D., Honrado J. o. Jongman, R.H., Julliard, R., McRae, L., Proenca, V., Rodrigues, P., Opige, M., Rodriguez, J.P., Schmeller, D.S., van Swaay, C., Vieira, C., 2010. Global biodiversity monitoring, Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 459–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, H.M., Cooper, H.D., 2006. Towards the global monitoring of biodiversity change, Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 123–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, H.M., Ferrier, S., Walters, M., Geller, G.N., Jongman, R.H.G., Scholes, R.J., Bruford, M.W., Brummitt, N., Butchart, S.H.M., Cardoso, A.C., Coops, N.C., Dulloo, E., Faith, D.P., Freyhof, J., Gregory, R.D., Heip, C., Höft, R., Hurtt,G., Jetz, W., Karp, D.S., McGeoch, M.A., Obura, D., Onoda, Y., Pettorelli, N., Reyers, B., Sayre, R., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Stuart, S.N., Turak, E., Walpole, M., Wegmann, M., 2013. Essential biodiversity variables, Science 339, 277–278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.F., 2006. Detecting population declines over large areas with presence-absence, time-to-encounter, and count survey methods, Conserv. Biol. 20, 882–892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K.H., Nichols, J.D., Simons, T.R., Farnsworth, G.L., Bailey, L.L., Sauer, J.R., 2002. Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis, Environmetrics 13, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeder, D.M., Moore, M.S., 2013. White-nose syndrome: a deadly emerging infectious disease of hibernating bats. In: Adams, R.A., Pedersen, S.C. (Eds.), Bat Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation. Springer, New York, pp. 413–434.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rex, K., Kelm, D.H., Wiesner, K., Kunz, T.H., Voigt, C.C., 2008. Species richness and structure of three Neotropical bat assemblages, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94, 617–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, N., Langton, S., Aughney, T., Russ, J.M., Marnell, F., Lynn, D., Catto, C., 2011. A car-based monitoring method reveals new information on bat populations and distributions in Ireland, Anim. Conserv. 14, 642–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodhouse, T.J., Ormsbee, P.C., Irvine, K.M., Vierling, L.A., Szewczak, J.M., Vierling, K.T., 2012. Assessing the status and trend of bat populations across broad geographic regions with dynamic distribution models, Ecol. Appl. 22, 1098–1113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A.S.L., Grenyer, R., Baillie, J.E.M., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Gittlemann, J.L., Hoffmann, M., Safi, K., Schipper, J., Stuart, S.N., Brooks, T., 2011. Complete, accurate, mammalian phylogenies aid conservation planning, but not much, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 2652–2660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J.A., Dorazio, R.M., 2008. Hierarchical Modeling and Inference in Ecology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Gutiérrez, V., Zipkin, E.F., 2011. Detection biases yield misleading patterns of species persistence and colonization in fragmented landscapes. Ecosphere 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES1810-00207.00201 (art61).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, R.J., Mace, G.M., Turner, W., Geller, G.N., Jürgens, N., Larigauderie, A., Muchoney, D., Walther, B.A., Mooney, H.A., 2008. Toward a global biodiversity observing system, Science 321, 1044–1045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, R.J., Walters, M., Turak, E., Saarenmaa, H., Heip, C.H.R., Tuama, É.Ó., Faith, D.P., Mooney, H.A., Ferrier, S., Jongman, R.H.G., Harrison, I.J., Yahara, T., Pereira, H.M., Larigauderie, A., Geller, G., 2012. Building a global observing system for biodiversity, Curr. Opin. Env. Sust. 4, 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struebig, M.J., Kingston, T., Petit, E.J., Le Comber, S.C., Zubaid, A., Mohd-Adnan, A., Rossiter, S.J., 2011. Parallel declines in species and genetic diversity in tropical forest fragments, Ecol. Lett. 14, 582–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Studeny, A.C., Buckland, S.T., Harrison, P.J., Illian, J.B., Magurran, A.E., Newson, S.E., 2013. Fine-tuning the assessment of large-scale temporal trends in biodiversity using the example of British breeding birds, J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meij, T., Van Strien, A.J., Haysom, K.A., Dekker, J., Russ, J., Biala, K., Bihari, Z., Jansen, E., Langton, S., Kurali, A., Limpens, H., Meschede, A., Petersons, G., Presetnik, P., Prüger, J., Reiter, G., Rodrigues, L., Schorcht, W., Uhrin, M., Vintulis, V., 2015. Return of the bats? A prototype indicator of trends in European bat populations in underground hibernacula, Mamm. Biol. 80, 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Strien, A.J., Soldaat, L.L., Gregory, R.D., 2012. Desirable mathematical properties of indicators for biodiversity change, Ecol. Indic. 14, 202–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Strien, A.J., van Swaay, C.A.M., Termaat, T., 2013. Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models, J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 1450–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewalle, M., de Bello, F., Berg, M., Bolger, T., Dolédec, S., Dubs, F., Feld, C., Harrington, R., Harrison, P., Lavorel, S., da Silva, P., Moretti, M., Niemelä, J., Santos, P., Sattler, T., Sousa, J.P., Sykes, M., Vanbergen, A., Woodcock, B., 2010. Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and organisms. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 2921–2947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A., Catto, C, Hutson, T., Racey, P.A., Richardson, P., Langton, S., 2001. The UK’s National Bat Monitoring Programme. Final Report 2001. London, The Bat Conservation Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A.L., Catto, C.M.C., Hutson, T.M., Langton, S., Racey, P.A., 2003. The United Kingdom Bat Monitoring Programme: Turning conservation goals into tangible results, in: O’Shea, T.J., Bogan, M.A. (Eds.), Monitoring Trends in Bat Populations of the United States and Territories: Problems and Prospects. U. S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Information and Technology Report, USGS/BRD/ITR-2003-0003, pp. 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C., Collen, A., Lucas, T., Mroz, K., Sayer, C., Jones, K., 2013. Challenges of using bioacoustics to globally monitor bats. In: Adams, R.A., Pedersen, S.C. (Eds.), Bat Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation. Springer, New York, pp. 479–499.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, T.J., 2008. Using occupancy estimation to assess the effectiveness of a regional multiple-species conservation plan: bats in the Pacific Northwest, Biol. Conserv. 141, 2279–2289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willig, M.R., 2012. A bat monitoring network for global change in the anthropocene: now or never. In: Flaquer, C., Puig-Montserrat, X. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Importance of Bats as Bioindicators. Museum of Natural Sciences Edicions, Granollers, pp. 2279–2289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz, N.G., 2012. Ecological Monitoring, eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0023571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz, N.G., Nichols, J.D., Boulinier, T., 2001. Monitoring of biodiversity in space and time, Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 446–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipkin, E.F., Andrew Royle, J., Dawson, D.K., Bates, S., 2010. Multi-species occurrence models to evaluate the effects of conservation and management actions, Biol. Conserv. 143, 479–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, C.F.J. Methodological challenges in monitoring bat population- and assemblage-level changes for anthropogenic impact assessment. Mamm Biol 80, 159–169 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.11.002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.11.002

Keywords

Navigation