Skip to main content
Log in

Walsh-average based variable selection for varying coefficient models

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Statistical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A shrinkage-type variable selection procedure for varying coefficient models is routinely established in the least-squares (LS) framework. Although the LS method has favorable properties for a large class of error distributions, it will break down if the error variance is infinite and is adversely affected by outliers and heavy-tail distributions. To overcome these issues, we propose a robust shrinkage method termed regularized Walsh-average (RWA) that can construct robust nonparametric variable selection and robust coefficient estimation simultaneously. Theoretical analysis reveals RWA works beautifully, including consistency in variable selection and oracle property in estimation, even when error variance is infinite. More important property is that when error variance is finite, compared with the LS based estimators, the asymptotic relative efficiency of the new estimator is at least 0.8896, a relatively high level. Furthermore, a robust BIC-type criterion, which can identify the true model consistently, is suggested for shrinkage parameter selection. Numerical studies also confirm our theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breiman, L. (1995). Better subset selection using nonnegative garrote. Techonometrics, 37, 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantoni, E., & Ronchetti, E. (2001). Resistant selection of the smoothing parameter for smoothing splines. Statistics and Computing, 11, 141–146.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001). Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1348–1360.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., & Li, R. (2004). New estimation and model selection procedures for semiparametric modeling in longitudinal data analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 710–723.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, L., Zou, C., & Wang, Z. (2012). Local Walsh-average regression. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 106, 36–48.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, W. (1998). Penalized regression: the bridge versus the LASSO. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 397–416.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hettmansperger, T., & McKean, J. (1998). Robust Nonparametric Statistical Methods. London and New York: Arnold/Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, J., & Lehmann, E. (1956). The efficiency of some nonparametric competitors of the t-Test. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 324–335.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, D., & Li, R. (2005). Variable selection using MM algorithms. The Annals of Statistics, 33, 1617–1642.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Janson, S. (1987). Maximal spacing in several dimensions. The Annals of Probability, 15, 274–280.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kai, B., Li, R., & Zou, H. (2010). Local composite quantile regression smoothing: an efficient and safe alternative to local polynomial regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. B, 72, 49–69.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kai, B., Li, R., & Zou, H. (2011). New efficient estimation and variable selection methods for semiparametric varying-coefficient partially linear models. The Annals of Statistics, 39, 305–332.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K., & Fu, W. (2000). Asymptotics for LASSO-type estimators. The Annals of Statistics, 28, 1356–1378.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leng, C. (2010). Variable selection and coefficient estimation via regularization rank estimation. Statistica Sinica, 20, 167–181.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., & Liang, H. (2008). Variable selection in semiparametric regression model. The Annals of Statistics, 36, 261–286.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, Y., & Silverman, B. (1982). Weak and strong uniform consistency of kernel regression estimates. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 61, 405–415.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Noh, H., Chung, K., & Keilegom, I. (2012). Variable selection of varying coefficient models in quantile regression. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6, 1220–1238.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shang, S., Zou, C., & Wang, Z. (2012). Local Walsh-average regression for semiparametric varying-coefficient models. Statistics & Probability Letters, 82, 1815–1822.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y., Wang, H., & Zhu, Z. (2013). Variable selection in quantile varying coefficient models with longitudinal data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 57, 435–449.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y., Wang, H., Zhu, Z., & Song, X. (2012). A unified variable selection approach for varying coefficient models. Statistica Sinica, 22, 601–628.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani, R. J. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 58, 267–288.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Kai, B., & Li, R. (2009). Local rank inference for varying coefficient models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 488, 1631–1645.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Li, R. (2009). Weighted Wilcoxon-type smoothly clipped absolute deviation method. Biometrics, 65, 564–571.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Li, H., & Huang, J. (2008). Variable selection in nonparametric varying-coefficient models for analysis of repeated measurements. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1556–1569.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Li, G., & Tsai, C. (2007). Regression coefficient and autoregressive order shrinkage and selection via LASSO. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. B, 69, 63–78.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Xia, Y. (2009). Shrinkage estimation of the varying coefficient model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 747–757.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, M., & Lin, Y. (2006). Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. B, 68, 49–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, M., & Lin, Y. (2007). On the nonnegative garrote estimator. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. B, 69, 143–161.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Lee, S., & Song, X. (2002). Local polynomial fitting in semivarying coefficient models. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 82, 166–188.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, W., Zhang, R., Lv, Y., & Liu, J. (2012). Variable selection of the quantile varying coefficient regression models. Journal of the Korean Statistical Association, 103, 1556–1569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H. (2006). The adaptive LASSO and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 1418–1429.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H., & Yuan, M. (2008). Composite quantile regression and the oracle model selection theory. The Annals of Statistics, 36, 1108–1126.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kangning Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, K., Lin, L. Walsh-average based variable selection for varying coefficient models. J. Korean Stat. Soc. 44, 95–110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2014.05.006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2014.05.006

AMS 2000 subject classifications

Keywords

Navigation