Skip to main content
Log in

Insertion and pull behavior of worker honeybee stinger

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Worker honeybee pierces animal or human skin with its ultra-sharp stinger and injects venom to defend itself. The insertion behavior is a painless transdermal drug delivery process. In this study, Apis cerana cerana worker honeybee was chosen as the research object. The geometry and structure of the stinger were observed by the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). High-speed video imaging technique was adopted to observe the stinger insertion and pull behavior of honeybee. The skin insertion, pull-out, in-plane buckling and out-of-plane bending forces of honeybee stinger were tested by a self-developed mechanical loading equipment. Results showed that the honeybee stinger pierces directly into skin without frequent vibration. The pull-out force (average 136.04 mN) was two orders of magnitude higher than the penetration force (average 1.34mN). Compared with the penetration force, the in-plane buckling force (average 6.72 mN) was in the same order of magnitude. The result of out-of-plane bending test showed that the stinger was elastic and it could recover after bending. The excellent geometry and structure of honeybee stinger will provide an inspiration for the further improved design of microneedle-based transdermal drug delivery system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prausnitz M R. Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2004, 56, 581–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis S P, Martanto W, Allen M G, Prausnitz M R. Hollow metal microneedles for insulin delivery to diabetic rats. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2005, 52, 909–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park J-H, Allen M G, Prausnitz M R. Polymer microneedles for controlled-release drug delivery. Pharmaceutical Research, 2006, 23, 1008–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Prausnitz M R, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nature Biotechnology, 2008, 26, 1261–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xin Qi, Wei Song, Zhu Mao, Wenran Gao, Qian Cong. Fabrication of a bionic needle with both super-hydrophobic and antibacterial properties. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2013, 10, 377–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henry S, McAllister D V, Allen M G, Prausnitz M R. Microfabricated microneedles: A novel approach to transdermal drug delivery. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1998, 87, 922–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Donnelly R F, Singh T R R, Woolfson A D. Microneedle- based drug delivery systems: Microfabrication, drug delivery, and safety. Drug delivery, 2010, 17, 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kong X Q, Wu C W. Measurement and prediction of insertion force for the mosquito fascicle penetrating into human skin. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2009, 6, 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roxhed N, Gasser T C, Griss P, Holzapfel G A, Stemme G. Penetration-enhanced ultrasharp microneedles and prediction on skin interaction for efficient transdermal drug delivery. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 2007, 16, 1429–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kong X Q, C W Wu, Mosquito proboscis: An elegant biomicro-electromechanical system. Physical Review E, 2010, 82, 01190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaiswal S, Muthuswamy S. Instability analysis of mosquito fascicle under compressive load with vibrations and microneedle design. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma G J, Shi L T, Wu C W. Biomechanical property of a natural microneedle: The caterpillar spine. Journal of Medical Devices-Transactions of the ASME, 2011, 5, 034502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho W K, Ankrum J A, Guo D G, Chester S A, Yang S Y, Kashyap A, Campbell G A, Wood R J, Rijal R K, Karnik R, Langer R, Karp J M. Microstructured barbs on the North American porcupine quill enable easy tissue penetration and difficult removal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109, 21289–21294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Snodgrass R E. Anatomy of the Honey Bee, Cornell University Press, New York, USA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lariviere W R, Melzack R. The bee venom test: A new tonic-pain test. Pain, 1996, 66, 271–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dade H A. Anatomy and Dissection of the Honeybee, International Bee Research Association, Cardiff, UK, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shing H, Erickson E. Some ultrastructure of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) sting. Apidologie, 1982, 13, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Odland G F. Structure of the skin. Physiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology of the Skin, 1991, 1, 3–62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu F, Lu T J, Seffen K A. Biothermomechanics of skin tissues. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2008, 56, 1852–1884.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Shergold O A, Fleck N A. Experimental investigation into the deep penetration of soft solids by sharp and blunt punches, with application to the piercing of skin. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2005, 127, 838–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu K S, van Osdol W W, Dauskardt R H. Mechanical properties of human stratum corneum: effects of temperature, hydration, and chemical treatment. Biomaterials, 2006, 27, 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hendriks F. Mechanical Behaviour of Human Epidermal and Dermal Layers in vivo, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wildnauer R H, Bothwell J W, Douglass A B. Stratum corneum biomechanical properties I. influence of relative humidity on normal and extracted human stratum corneum. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1971, 56, 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta A K, Wong F. Measurement of Flammability and Burn Potential of Fabrics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gardner T, Briggs G. Biomechanical measurements in microscopically thin stratum corneum using acoustics. Skin Research and Technology, 2001, 7, 254–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim C H. Biotherapy - History, Principles and Practice, Springer, the Netherlands, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang M, Zahn J. Microneedle Insertion force reduction using vibratory actuation. Biomedical Microdevices, 2004, 6, 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Izumi H, Suzuki M, Aoyagi S, Kanzaki T. Realistic imitation of mosquito’s proboscis: Electrochemically etched sharp and jagged needles and their cooperative inserting motion. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2011, 165, 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lelun Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ling, J., Jiang, L., Chen, K. et al. Insertion and pull behavior of worker honeybee stinger. J Bionic Eng 13, 303–311 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60303-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60303-7

Keyword

Navigation