Abstract
Urea is the most used fertilizer because of its significance on world food security but it is also the toughest fertilizer to manage. It is readily available to the plant and it is vulnerable to loss in various ways, causing environmental pollution and huge economic losses. Urea application requires a sound knowledge for its effective management, which will increase its availability to plants and reduce possible losses. Ammonia (NH3) and oxides of nitrogen (N) pollute the environment, and nitrate (\({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\)) leaching alters the aquatic ecosystem, which lowers the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of applied urea. Nitrate-contaminated drinking water causes human and animal health risks, whereas the emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) in the atmosphere is significant to ozone layer depletion and climate change. This review discusses the processes in the soil after urea application in the soil–plant system, which includes the loss mechanisms, and the significant factors affecting the N availability and losses. This review also shows that the judicial management of urea in soil–plant systems and maintaining the best management practices and technologies ensure sustainable agricultural development and decrease the risk of environmental contamination. Finally, the review summarizes the potential mechanisms of the applied urea in the soil with their mineralization and loss pathways and delivers the scientific reference to achieve sustainable crop production and reduce the risk of N losses.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Urea is the most widespread and user-friendly and the most significant nitrogen (N) fertilization source globally [87] and covers 73.4% of all N fertilizers use in the world [69, 178]. But, the frightening problem related to the urea fertilizer is its huge nitrogen loss (20–60%), low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) (30–40%) which was reported to be 10–50% in corn [117]. The agricultural system is the primary source of greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions, and more than half of applied urea to the soil is lost through gaseous and leaching loss resulting in low NUE [85, 178]. The surface application of urea is the principal anthropogenic cause of gaseous emissions in agriculture.
Defective application techniques, unnecessary application, irregular distribution, periodic variation, climatic interference, and soil factors stimulate losses of applied urea, which leads to lower NUE and increases the crop production cost, and disruption of the natural crop ecosystem. The N losses through gaseous and leaching mainly rely on the speed and amount of urea hydrolysis, N mineralization, and the amount of urea in soil. Soil water content is one of the significant factors that starts the urea hydrolysis process [2] which maintain the total N content in soil, and affects the N mineralization and loss processes [50]. Faster rate of hydrolysis stimulates greater urea mineralization, and higher soil moisture content increases the hydrolysis and the mineralization processes of urea. Alternatively, fast urea hydrolysis, slow down gaseous N losses as it dispersed the applied urea and \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) in the sub-soil layer [88]. Generally, the volatilization of NH3, emission of N2O, and N leaching increase with the increase of the urea applications rate [5, 111, 114].
Therefore, there is a need to reduce GHGs emissions and increase NUE along with cost optimization for sustainable crop production due to the severe impact of GHGs emissions on crop production and environmental contamination [46]. However, N losses can be minimized if urea hydrolysis is fast so that the ammonium cations (\({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\)) will be distributed uniformly throughout the soil profile [63, 129].
2 Forms of urea fertilizers
Various forms and formulations of urea are available in the market, such as granules, pellets, prills, crystals, and solutions (Table 1). Urea briquettes, urea super granules, and ammonium nitrate liquid (UAN-28%N) are also used in agriculture [96]. Most of the solid forms of urea contain a more or less similar amount of N. The size and weight of each solid urea may vary according to the manufacturer. Urea solutions have different N content depending on their formulation.
In addition, the typical urea is modified according to the specific objectives and to reduce loss potentiality and increase efficiency by coating and smeared with inhibitors or enzymes. Urea is coated with chemical, biochemical, or organic materials to enrich its quality [49, 214]. The commonly used coated urea are superphosphate-coated urea, sulfur-coated urea, and polyethene-coated urea [75]. Controlled-release urea and slow-release urea fertilizers are other types of urea that also modify typical urea by using inhibitors or enzymes.
Urea super granules are used in the root zone to increase its release time. It also reduces N losses and application frequency. Urea ammonium nitrate reduces loss potentiality during the mineralization process and enables mechanical surface or subsurface application. The coated urea and urea with inhibitors also slow down the hydrolysis process and control possible losses. Urea super granules coated urea, urea with inhibitor, or slow-release urea slow down the urea mineralization process, creating insufficient N availability to meet the crop demand. The N losses from their application could slow down, but total losses may be high. Liquid urea (e.g., UAN) enables faster hydrolysis to scatter inside the soil profile, which increases the N adsorption by the soil aggregates. These processes reduce the N loss potentiality and ensure immediate N availability to meet the current crop demand.
3 Problems related to urea applications
Urea is the most used fertilizer globally, having a significant impact on crop production to ensure food security. However, it also has some harmful effects on soil, the environment, and human health. Specifically, the loss of N from applied urea as N2O is a corrosive greenhouse gas (GHG), while NH3 gas pollutes the air. Nitrate leaching contaminates groundwater and causes eutrophication on surface water [171, 209]. Urea may be the possible reason for soil pollution, nutrient imbalance, acidification, and salinization [211].
Volatilization loss from the application of N fertilizers is widespread and harmful. Nevertheless, surface application of granular urea occurs more in the form of NH3 volatilization when it is applied in no-till soil conditions. In addition, about 30% of applied N is lost through volatilization when broadcasted on sandy soils [55, 83]. The produced NH3 gas creates adverse effects on seed germination and seedling development [19]. Furthermore, ammonia volatilization creates economic problems resulting in lower crop production and environmental contamination in the long term [167]. Ammonia gas loss also can be minimized with the effects of other nutrients like S, Cu, B, etc. [45]
Nitrogen leaching loss decreases crop growth, development, and NUE, polluting the surface and groundwater. Leaching is more problematic in light-textured upland soil [141]. During the denitrification process, nitrate (\({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\)) is reduced to nitrite (\({\text{NO}}_{2}^{ - }\)), and later nitrite (\({\text{NO}}_{2}^{ - }\)) is reduced to nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and dinitrogen (N2). Every step is catalyzed by specific enzymes and emits N oxides, which are corrosive gases and a reason for ozone layer depletion [125, 133, 143].
Split application of N fertilizers can increase the uptake capacity of crops, and the substrate concentration in soil solution for nitrification or denitrification can be minimized over a single application. The N losses from applied liquid N fertilizer (e.g., UAN) result in 25% and 27% less N loss as NH3 volatilization and N2O emission, respectively, than granular urea [60, 184]. Calcium ammonium Nitrate (CAN) resulted in higher crop yield [133]. Application of liquid urea increases N availability, uptake, NUE, protein content, and grain yield of cereals as plants found more available N in the soil to uptake [192].
Moreover, liquid urea reduces N loss from the soil-crop system by adsorbing it onto soil aggregates. The liquid urea application reduces the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in the soil by dispersing the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) into the soil profile and decreasing the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in the soil. Increased urea application frequency with lower doses can lower the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil compared to a single application [127, 129]. These mechanisms reduce the N loss potential and increase the N crop uptake potential of applied N [128]. Besides, some controlled released urea fertilizer reduces N losses (NH3, N2O) ensuring higher N concertation (\({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\),\({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\)) and higher crop yield [98, 110].
3.1 Soil pollution
Soil fertilized with urea in excess of the optimum dose has higher potential risk of soil pollution. The long-term and unnecessary application of urea has harmful effects on soil chemical and biological properties, which reduces its fertility, and reduces the diversity and activities of the soil microbes [82, 116, 156]. Urea fertilization also causes soil acidification [146]. Though the surrounding soil pH increases immediately after urea application, frequent use of urea in the same field in the long term increases soil acidity. This is more prevalent in soil that is moderately acidic (pH 5–6). The higher soil acidity hampers the biological processes of soil. In addition, excess N in soil may reduce soil carbon content and alter the soil nutrient balance [122].
Soil pollution from applying N fertilizers can be minimized by increasing the uptake efficiency of crops and controlling N losses during mineralization. Split N application significantly increases the crop's N uptake potential, leaving less residual N in the soil and decreasing the possible N losses. Liquid urea is more eco-friendly with efficient uptake, and about 19% higher NUE. Moreover, liquid urea is superior in terms of N uptake, NUE, and yield compared to the other two liquid (UAN and High NRGN, a commercial liquid N fertilizer) fertilizers [71, 120, 192].
3.2 Environmental disruption
The environmental disruption through the agricultural system has now become a great concern. Urea application has significant effects on GHGs emissions, i.e., carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) from agricultural soils [159]. The agricultural sector emits the highest amount of (98%) ammonia (a potential air pollutant), and it is estimated that about 35% is from the application of nitrogen fertilizer [47]. In addition, more than 50% of applied urea is lost through NH3 volatilization [115]. Agriculture also accounts for 60% of global anthropogenic N2O emissions, and agricultural soils are their major source [77]. Nitrous oxide is a persistent and harmful GHG whose global warming potential is 265 times than CO2 [77]. The nitrates from urea applications pollute surface and groundwater. The urea pollution promotes the ocean algae to manufacture a lethal poison called “Domoic acid”. This Domoic acid causes various mass deaths of several marine animals and birds [33].
3.3 Health hazard
Nitrate pollution is common in surface and sub-surface water around the cropping areas. Frequent and dense rainfall, and flood irrigation are the main ways to carry nitrate to water which leads to the water contamination. Water contamination is positively correlated with the cropland percentage in a region. High levels of nitrate are harmful to the reproductive and respiratory system, spleen, thyroid, and kidney of children and adults in humans. It is also corrosive to infants [198]. In addition, higher nitrate concentration in drinking water may cause a higher risk of diseases such as diabetes, spontaneous abortion, gastric cancer, methemoglobinemia, and many more [64, 73]. Frequent and continuous contact of urea with the skin can be the cause of dermatitis. A harmful carcinogenic material, “nitrosamines”, is produced in spinach and lettuce leaves fertilized with a high level of urea [157].
4 Processes involving urea in the soils
Urea transformation after application to soil involves several processes and steps [7]. It starts with urea hydrolysis, in which urea absorbs water and reacts with urease enzyme in the soil, and is transformed quickly to (NH4)2CO3, and later dissociates to \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) ions. The produced NH4+ undergoes a chemical reaction to produce NH3 under alkaline conditions (pH > 7.5) or a biological process called nitrification, which converts it to \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) [15]. The \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) can be used by the plants or leached down or undergoes a denitrification process which transforms NO3 to N2O and finally N2 gas (Fig. 1).
Nitrogen dynamics and losses depend on the transformation of urea. Mineralization and nitrification improve N availability to the plant; however, volatilization, leaching, immobilization, and denitrification increase temporary or permanent N removal from rhizospheres.
Optimum soil moisture content speeds up urea hydrolysis and reduces NH3 volatilization loss. The soil moisture accelerates the hydrolysis and defuses the applied urea faster into the soil layer, reducing N loss. Clayey soil can adsorb more \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\)and, therefore, reduce the amount of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) available for nitrification. A leaching process can lose nitrate, or it can undergo denitrification. Nitrification and denitrification are both processes driven by soil microbial enzymes. The activities of these enzymes increase with the increase of soil organic carbon (SOC), cation exchange capacity (CEC), and clay content of soil [72]. Application method affects urea transformation. The surface broadcast of granular urea may lead to NH3 volatilization from the soil surface after hydrolysis. In the case of sub-surface application of urea, the NH3 volatilization loss decreased by 20–45%, while the nitrogen recovery efficiency increased by 26–93%, and the nitrogen agronomic efficiency and corn yield by 31–51%, and 5–11%, respectively [111]. On the other hand, the use of liquid nitrogenous fertilizer can reduce N losses. The NH3 volatilization loss was 35–50% lower in liquid N fertilizer (e.g., UAN) than in granular urea. The nitrogen losses in UAN application are less in clay soil than in sandy soil [16, 204]. Surface and deep placement of UAN minimized the leaching loss of applied N in corn cultivation in poorly drained claypan soils [173]. Higher nitrate concentration in the soil promotes higher denitrification [165]. Therefore, liquid urea, which distributes quickly throughout the soil profile, can decrease denitrification by reducing the local nitrate density in the soil. The processes of urea transformation in the soil are described below.
4.1 Urea hydrolysis
Urea hydrolysis is the first process in urea transformation. The urea applied to the soil absorbs water and reacts with the soil urease enzyme, transforming to (NH4)2CO3. This compound later dissociates to \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and \({\text{CO}}_{3}^{2 - }\) ions. The hydroxyl ions released from the \({\text{CO}}_{3}^{2 - }\) ions increase the soil pH close to the hydrolysis site. The pH increase in the local soil site promotes NH3 volatilization as well.
The following equations represent the urea hydrolysis process.
The ammonium ions are formed and adsorbed by the soil clay minerals whose ready for crop uptake or further transformation. The carbamate is transformed to \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) and increases soil acidity (Fig. 2).
Urea can be hydrolysed by the urease enzyme within 4–7 days in a warm soil temperature with optimum soil moisture content [88]. Urease activity depends on urea concentration in soil which varies from 0.5 to 1.3 mol/L [25]. Urease activity also depends on soil pH, temperature, soluble SOC, total N, and CEC [37]. The optimum pH for maximum hydrolysis is > 6.5 in 5 °C to 40 °C. Weather variation, soil management, and soil properties affect urease activity in the soil. The urease activity decreases with increase in soil moisture (from field capacity moisture content) [4, 113].
The first hydrolysis of urea decreases the diffusion time for urea and \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) deeper while applied on the soil surface, which reduces the local \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration and increases the adsorption by the soil particles. The split application reduces the urea and \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil compared to a single application having a higher opportunity for urease activity and diffusing quickly inside the soil layer.
4.2 Soil factors affecting urea hydrolysis
The physicochemical properties of soil and environmental parameters affect the rate of urea hydrolysis. The factors include, e.g., soil microbial properties, temperature, moisture content, soil type, N quantity in soil, and soil pH [29, 40, 93, 191]. Among these factors, the most influential are the moisture content, temperature, and N quantity in soil [43, 103, 203]. In addition, the urease enzyme is the key catalyst for urea hydrolysis. The urease activity in soil is significantly associated with soil pH, temperature, moisture, organic matter content, and rate of urea applied [6, 11, 136, 145].
The granular urea application prevails higher ammonium concentration, which increases local soil pH temporarily. The higher soil pH promotes higher NH3 volatilization. On the other hand, the dry situation reduces ammonium diffusion in the soil and thus increases NH3 volatilization [204].
4.2.1 Soil pH
The soil pH is an important factor that affects the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil. The soil pH promotes the chemical and biological properties of soil that control hydrolysis of applied urea. The rate of urea hydrolysis increases with the increase in soil pH [3, 30] because H+ ions are absorbed, and \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) ions are released into the soil solution [88]. The highest hydrolysis was recorded at pH 8.0, but it varies in different soil and climatic conditions [3]. Six to seven is the optimum pH range for maximum urea hydrolysis due to the higher activity of the urease enzyme [89]. At the pH value 5.5–8.5, the rate of urea hydrolysis increases with the increase of urea concentration applied to soil, but at the pH over 9.5, the urea hydrolysis rate decreases with the increasing urea concentration. Nevertheless, the high urea concentration reduces the urease activity because of substrate inhibition or urease denaturation in high soil pH [25, 164].
The pH in the locality of a granule or liquid droplet of urea can be significantly higher than the adjoining soil as urea hydrolysis increases pH by capturing H+ ions from the soil solution. This pH rise is very short because the produced \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) is rapidly transformed to \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) and lowers the soil pH, yet this short time pH rise increases NH3 volatilization loss [81]. The soil pH affects the ionic nature of urease enzymes required for hydrolysis to conjugate with acid and base. These mechanisms decline at the high soil pH and deactivate urease. The higher clay content of the soil increases urease stability from deactivation by adsorption into its surface, but very high clay content reduces its affinity to the substrate [164].
The application of liquid urea can reduce the substrate concentration in soil, which stabilize the soil pH. A higher application frequency at a lower rate also lowers the substrate concentration than at a higher rate and lower application frequency. Loamy soils have more potential for higher hydrolysis than very clayey soils.
4.2.2 Soil temperature
Soil temperature significantly promotes urea hydrolysis, and the rate of urea hydrolysis is increased with the increase in soil temperature [101, 155, 203], but after 70 °C, urea hydrolysis decreases sharply because of thermal deactivation of urease enzymes [130, 188]. At a temperature above 15 °C, the urea hydrolysis rate is faster and slows down under 8 °C [204]. At temperatures above > 70 °C, the urea hydrolysis continues very slowly [20]. The rate of urea hydrolysis was 5.4 times higher at 28 °C than at 4 °C. Relatively higher soil temperature helps dissolve urea in water to be diffused in a deeper soil layer. Moreover, soil microbial activity remains high at optimum soil temperature, which increases the urease enzyme content in the soil.
The urease enzyme activity depends on the soil temperature, which affects the hydrolysis of solid urea. Liquid urea is previously hydrolyzed and readily scatters in the soil profile, which has less potential to be lost during application. Split urea application at a lower dose provides lower urea density that can disperse quickly inside the soil layer than higher dose sole urea application, as more elevated dense urea requires more water to be dissolved and hydrolyzed.
4.2.3 Soil texture
Soil texture determines several chemical and biological properties of soil. Urease activity is correlated with the clay content of soil [101]. Clayey soils usually contain higher OM and moisture and maintain higher urease activity and a sound urease synthesis environment. The higher soil moisture and urease enzyme encourage the applied urea to be diffused quickly in the soil profile. The clayey soils also have higher CEC, which can adsorb more \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\), which prevents the further transformation of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\). On the other hand, light-textured soils have a higher potential for NH3 volatilization due to their low CEC, low moisture content, high porosity, and relatively higher temperature than clayey soils [86]. The NH3 volatilization loss was doubled in sandy loam than in clay loam soils due to lower water content potential and lower urease activity [54].
The coarse-textured soils dried fast, promoting the upward movement of applied N fertilizer and water to the soil surface as moisture evaporates. In this way, urea and \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) accumulate close to the soil surface and increase concentration. The loss can be affected by the capability of applied N fertilizers to be diffused at far from the application point [27, 31]. Liquid urea applications disperse quickly from the soil surface, decreasing loss potential during hydrolysis.
4.2.4 Soil moisture content
Soil moisture content is a vital factor that significantly affects urea hydrolysis. Being hygroscopic, urea absorbs water from an aqueous solution or gaseous form of water [190]. After being applied to the soil, the dissolution of urea starts immediately as urea is easily soluble (1080 g/L at 20 °C) in water. The urea dissolution and hydrolysis rate will be slow under low soil moisture content conditions [4]. The increase in soil moisture of dried soil can increase the rate of urea hydrolysis [188]. On the other hand, water-saturated soil decreases the soil air and gaseous interchange reduces the urease activities, and delays the rate of urea hydrolysis [13, 43]. Other researchers described that the urea hydrolysis constant decreased by 13.9–28.7% when the soil moisture content increased by 60–100% of the field capacity [106].
The soil moisture helps urea to be defused quickly inside the soil profile and decreases the local soil pH by decreasing the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration at the application point, which can lower the NH3 formation. A dry situation reduces the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) diffusion in the soil and, as a result, increases NH3 formation in soil solution, increasing NH3 volatilization potential [204].
4.2.5 Urea concentration in soil
The urea hydrolysis process is influenced by the concentration of urea applied to the soil [130]. Generally, the concentration of urea applied in soil ranges from 0.01 M to 10 M. The urea hydrolysis increases with an increase in urea concentration up to the saturation of urea by the urease enzyme [34, 180, 205]. After that, urea hydrolysis is negatively correlated with the N quantity in soil for the degeneration of urease at high urea concentration [104, 107]. The urease activity mainly promotes urea hydrolysis of applied urea, and the hydrolysis is maximum at the urea density below 0.5 M and begins to decrease at the density over 6 M [23, 90]. The fast hydrolysis promotes lower NH3 volatilization loss as it diffuses quickly into the soil layer [215].
Granular urea application increases the ammonium concentration at the application point and quickly increases the local soil pH, even in acidic soils. This increased soil pH encourages to formation of higher NH3 in the soil [204].
The liquid urea decreases the substrate concentration by dispersing rapidly inside the soil profile. The higher application frequency at the lower dose of urea reduces its concentration than a single application at the higher dose.
4.3 Nitrification
The biotic oxidation of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) to \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) is called nitrification. It is one of the essential processes for maintaining soil N content and losses. Nitrification also affects the NUE of urea fertilizer. The immobile \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) is converted to unstable \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) by microbial process, and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) is misplaced from the soil system through denitrification and leaching [100, 177]. The vigorous nitrification rates in nitrogen-saturated soil occur due to various environmental issues, such as unbalancing soil buffering capacity, acidification, nitrate leaching to water, and emission of GHGs to the environment [152]. The nitrification changes the applied urea about how much is taken up by crops and how much contaminates the environment. Ammonium nitrification is a mechanism that follows two steps. Firstly, the ammonium or ammonia is transformed to nitrite (\({\text{NO}}_{2}^{ - }\)) by obligate autotrophic bacteria (Nitrosomonas) and in later to nitrate (\({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\)) by obligate autotrophic bacteria (Nitrobacter). This process is a biological process.
The complete nitrification process can be written as
During nitrification, hydrogen ions (H+) are released, resulting in soil acidification, while most of the NH4+ is transformed to \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) [182]. This soil acidification controls the diversity and population of nitrifying microbes in soils. Nitrate dominates in aerated soils and is ready for plant uptake or consumed by the soil microbes. Excess \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) in the soil may be the possible source of \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) loss through leaching. The soil particles have poorly adsorbed the nitrate due to their repulsion of each other [38].
The rates of nitrification are significantly affected by the soil properties (e.g., physical, chemical, and biological) soil pH, and water content. The maximum nitrification occurs at the field capacity water content but in case of wetter or very dry conditions of soils than field capacity water content, the nitrification rate is slower. Furthermore, the rates of nitrification vary depending on the amount and variety of nitrifying micro-organisms in the soil, substrate density, and availability of oxygen [137, 170]. Light-textured soils stimulate greater nitrification due to their higher oxygen potentiality than heavier soils. The lesser substrate density lowers the nitrification rate. Consequently, faster of hydrolysis urea diffuses the NH4+ inside the soil, reducing the spatial NH4+ density and, therefore, low nitrification. Moreover, synchronized application of urea to crop N uptake can decrease the substrate density concentration in the soil.
4.3.1 Factors affecting nitrification
Several (biotic and abiotic) factors are liable for the rate and quantity of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) that undergoes the nitrification mechanism. The factors are pH, moisture content, temperature, oxygen availability, and substrate density in the soil solution. The nitrification mechanism greatly depends on the diversity and density of the nitrifying micro-organisms [100, 170]. The nitrification rate also depends on the soil nutrient status, allele-pathic chemicals, and crop species grown in an agricultural system [152]. In addition, seasonal and temporal oscillation affects the population of nitrifying organisms and net nitrate formation in soils. This phenomenon is more common in tropical climatic conditions.
4.3.1.1 Density of ammonium in soil
The amount of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) available in the soil system relies on the rate of urea hydrolysis, distribution, method of urea application, and the gaseous NH3 loss. The net nitrate formation is positively correlated with the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) in the soil. The more available \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\), the more nitrification. However, very high \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) or NH3 concentrations in soil may decrease the rate of nitrification due to the restriction of Nitrobacter activity [100, 124]. On the other hand, some coated urea (e.g.,: humate-coated urea) maintained higher \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration without raising the \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) concentration compared to typical urea form in soil [98].
The clay minerals and the biological \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) immobilization can fix the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and reduce the amount available \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) for nitrification. Plant uptake of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) from the soil solution also reduces concentration, and these mechanisms may slow the nitrification process [152]. Liquid N fertilizer (e.g., UAN) application had higher \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and lower \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) concentration than that of granular urea. In liquid N fertilizers application, the concentration of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) is less compared to granular urea where it is applied, which can decrease the nitrification process [194]. Liquid urea can disperse rapidly inward soil profile that can reduce the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in the application point. In addition, multiple applications of urea in lower doses may decrease local \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil, thus reducing the nitrification rate.
4.3.1.2 Population density of nitrifying bacteria
Nitrification is a microbial oxidation process where nitrifying organisms play the main role. Nitrification is wildly variable on the density and diversity of the nitrifying population in the soil. The higher the diversity and quantity of the nitrifying population, the higher the nitrification potential. A large number of these bacteria are available in agricultural soils and supply sufficient enzymes as needed. Ammonia oxidizing bacteria are actively involved with the enzyme as ammonia monooxygenase. The rate of nitrification is positively correlated with the population density of nitrifying microbes [26, 100, 175]. The activities of nitrifying organisms depend on the substrate concentration along with various soil and environmental parameters, such as soil moisture content, pH, temperature, and oxygen availability.
Soils with higher OM content and air have a higher potential to contain more nitrifying bacteria, while arid or water-saturated soils have less potential for nitrifying bacteria. In tropical soils, nitrifying bacteria are more functional; thus, the rate of nitrification is high. The nitrification rate will be low, while the activities of nitrifiers will be low. Moreover, the nitrifiers activities will be restricted while substrate concentration is limited. In that case, fast hydrolysis and rapid distribution of urea or NH4+ inside the soil profile decrease its concentration at the point of use.
4.3.1.3 Soil texture
Soil texture influences nitrogen mineralization of soil because it controls several physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil, along with organic materials distribution and aeration. The higher clay content of soil can absorb more \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) ions, promoting a faster nitrification rate. Moreover, the growth rate of nitrifying microbes is also proportional to the soil particle surface area where the NH4+ ions are held. Sandy soil has a lower adsorb capacity for NH4+ ions, but it has more aeration [61, 176, 177].
The availability of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) ions to nitrifying microbes for nitrification depends on the NH4+ fixation capability of soil clay particles and the competition of other cations. In this situation, nitrification is less complex than balancing CEC [150, 197]. The nitrification rate can be minimized by decreasing NH4+ absorption by the soil colloids while the uptake potential of a crop will be high. The increased application frequency can increase the NUE of a crop.
4.3.1.4 Soil pH
Soil pH is a vital soil parameter because most of the physical, chemical, and biological processes are controlled by the soil pH value. The soil pH affects the rate of nitrification significantly. The optimum pH range for nitrification is 4.5–7.5 [65]. During nitrification, soil pH decreases, which reduces the ammonia volatilization loss.
The nitrification is faster at soil pH ≥ 6.0, slower at pH ≤ 5.0, and too slow at soil pH ≤ 3.8. In acidic soil, most ammonia prevails in the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) form, which is not appropriate to be oxidized by ammonia monooxygenase [179, 182]. In these conditions, the rate of nitrification depends on the survival of acid-tolerant nitrifiers strains in the soil [99]. During urea hydrolysis, the local soil acidity decreases temporally and thus higher nitrification. The temporally increases in soil pH depend on the local urea density at an application point. This short-time pH rise can be minimized by applying previously hydrolyzed urea (e.g., aqueous urea) and or split application than a single application of granular urea.
4.3.1.5 Soil OM content
The rate of nitrification depends on the diversity and population of soil microorganisms. On the other hand, the diversity and microbes population depend on the soil organic matter quality, particularly on the C/N ratio of the soil, and the C/N ratio regulates the ability of microbes to carry on the nitrification process. A high C/N ratio in the soil promotes microbial immobilization of ammonium, which lowers the rate of nitrification [151, 177]. The optimum nitrification rate occurs in soil with a C/N ratio of about 10, and higher ammonium immobilization occurs at a higher C/N ratio. Lower nitrification and higher ammonium immobilization occur in grassland and forest soil since the C/N ratio is usually more than 100 [177, 182, 187].
Soil OM content increases soil's physical, chemical, and biological properties, facilitating soil aeration and microbial activity, thus higher nitrification. Light-textured soil has a lower potential to contain OM than clayey soil. Moreover, moist soil has the potential to preserve more OM than dry soil.
4.3.1.6 Soil moisture content
Soil moisture content is an essential factor of soil nitrification because it has significant effects on soil properties. The maximum growth and diversity of nitrifying bacteria are recorded at the optimum moisture content, and the maximum rate of nitrification occurs in field capacity moisture content [65]. The nitrification rate is slow when soil moisture is more than field capacity. The nitrification is abruptly slow in dry soils but continues at the permanent wilting point [26].
The soil aeration also affects the rate of nitrification and nitrate stability. In this water-saturated condition, soil pores are filled with water, and the nitrification rate is stopped or near zero due to the absence of oxygen [152]. Seasonal variation, density, and distribution of rainfall promote the soil moisture content. Optimum moisture content promotes the diversity and distribution of nitrifying microbes in the soil. The microbial activity widely varies with the wet and dry periods of the soil. The net nitrification is significantly correlated with the density of nitrifying microbes [100]. Moreover, soil moisture content promotes substrate dispersion in the soil and increases NH4+ absorption by the clay minerals. Slow nitrification may be possible while N fertilizers are applied in a split rather than a single application. The split application also increases the NUE of a crop.
4.3.1.7 Soil temperature
Soil temperature is a crucial factor that promotes the rate and amount of nitrification as it controls the activities of nitrifying bacteria. The quantity, diversity, and functions of these bacteria mostly depend on the soil temperature [10] And the most functional temperature for nitrifying bacteria ranges from 25 °C to 35 °C [66, 152, 177]. The nitrification rate is the highest at the optimum temperature and slower at lower than 5 °C but still occurs at − 1.5 °C [162].
Dry soil has a higher potential to be hot than moist soil. Moreover, water-saturated soil is in relatively lower temperatures than the soil with field capacity moisture content. The aqueous solution of urea (e.g., aqueous urea) can increase soil moisture and decrease soil temperature.
4.4 Ammonia (NH3) volatilization
Ammonia is a corrosive GHG that causes environmental degradation along with its loss reduces NUE, hence, increasing crop production costs [144]. The agricultural sector emits the highest (98%) NH3 volatilization, and 35% is estimated from nitrogen fertilization [47]. In addition, more than 50% of applied urea is lost through NH3 volatilization [115]. Urea, ammonium sulphate, ammonium nitrate, and UAN are N fertilizers that are all vulnerable to NH3 volatilization [35].
As a gas, NH3 is likely to be volatilized to the atmosphere when present in the soil, water, or manure and shows a significant affinity to water. The basic determinants of volatilization rate are NH3 reactions in water. The process of NH3 volatilization [163, 189] is as follows.
The ammonia volatilization rate can be controlled with the withdrawal and dispersion of NH3 in the air and by NH4+ density alteration or NH3 in soil (Fig. 3). The driving force of NH3 volatilization is the partial pressure variance of NH3 between the liquid phase and the surrounding atmosphere [48].
The instant contact of urea granules to the soil aggregates increases the adsorption of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) to the soil solution, which significantly lowers the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) transformation to volatile NH3 of applied N in the presence of adequate moisture [166]. Similarly, Cabezas et al. [24] stated that an appropriate amount of moisture in the soil affects the NH3 volatilization loss from top-dressed urea by reducing the hydroxyl ions concentration, which is responsible for the transformation of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) to volatile \({\text{NH}}_{3}^{ + }\). Thus, NH3volatilization slows down when soil provides adequate moisture for urea hydrolysis and diffuses inside the soil particles.
4.4.1 Factors affecting NH3 volatilization
Nitrogen losses as NH3 volatilization from surface-applied NH3 or \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) forming N fertilizers are stimulated by various soil, environmental, and fertilizer management factors [35]. In the soil, ammonia is adsorbed and desorbed from the soil particles, OM, and water that control the NH3 liberation to the environment. Soil organic matter has more potential nature to retain NH3 than soil particles, but clay minerals adsorb more NH3. In acidic conditions, NH3 is absorbed more by clay particles, but under a strong alkaline situation, NH3 is adsorbed by the soil organic fraction. Generally, clay soils adsorb more NH3 than sandy soil as it has a higher surface area. Moisture content influences this mechanism [126].
The amount of ammonium transformed to NH3 also greatly depends on the soil pH and moisture content and in alkaline soils (pH > 7.0) is more vulnerable than natural to acidic (pH 5.0–7.0). The local soil pH increases during urea hydrolysis, which will increase NH3 volatilization. The pH rise depends on the soil buffering capacity and density of urea. Soil moisture content decreases urea density by diffusing the urea/ammonium into the soil layer [48]. Besides, higher soil moisture content decreases NH3 concentration in soil solution, which decreases the gaseous NH3 liberation to the environment.
Ammonia volatilization is also affected by environmental factors such as frequency and distribution of rain, drought, air velocity, snowdrops, etc., along with the N fertilizers’ source, time, and method of application. Topdressing or side dressing of granular urea increases the vulnerability of NH3 volatilization loss. Moreover, the split application of urea [196] and UAN application [80, 184] significantly reduce NH3 volatilization loss from soil.
4.4.1.1 Concentration of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) in soil
The ammonia volatilization mostly depends on the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in the soil solution and application rate of urea. Usually, the higher the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration, the higher the NH3 gas volatilization. A higher urea application rate also promotes higher \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration, and more NH3 volatilization loss will occur. Moreover, nitrification and denitrification rates, crop uptake, and many other factors influence the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and NH3 concentrations in soil [26]. Higher NH4+ concentration in soil solution increases the conversion rate to NH3 and the NH3 concentration in the soil solution. The higher the NH3 concentration in the soil, the solution encourages more ammonia gas to the environment [62].
In addition, higher NH4+ concentration increases the local soil pH and promotes higher NH3 volatilization. The fast hydrolysis of urea will lower NH3 volatilization loss as the urea is defused quickly into the soil [215]. If a high density of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) remains on the soil surface longer, more NH3 will be lost from applied urea.
4.4.1.2 Rate of urea hydrolysis
The higher rate of urea hydrolysis decreases NH3 volatilization loss by decreasing local NH4+ concentration. Fast hydrolysis diffuses \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) in a deeper soil layer from the surface. By increasing diffused time, the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) is more concentrated and increases the soil pH and, thus, greater NH3 gas volatilized [88].
Various soil and climatic factors affect the rate and amount of urea hydrolysis. The concentration of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) in soil depends on the rate of urea hydrolysis and the soil water content. The concentration of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) in the soil increases with a decrease in urea hydrolysis rate and at lower soil water content. The transformation of NH3 from \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) depends on the NH4+ concentration in the soil solution. Higher NH3 concentration in soil solution promotes higher NH3 volatilization [35].
Many other processes and factors affect NH3 concentration in the soil solution, such as nitrification, denitrification, plant uptake, irrigation, and rainfall, which promote to liberating of NH3 to the environment. Liquid urea fertilizers (e.g., UAN) or urea in solution are hydrolyzed faster than previously hydrolyzed and defuse and disperse rapidly inside the soil, so less is lost as NH3 volatilization. The risk of NH3 volatilization loss can also be minimized by splitting the urea fertilizer application depending on the uptake potential of the plant.
4.4.1.3 Soil pH
High soil pH promotes the transformation of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) to NH3 in the soil solution. The soil pH around the granules increases during urea hydrolysis by forming ammonium carbonate [78]. The alkaline soils (pH > 7) are more susceptible than acidic to neutral soils (pH 5–7) to NH3 volatilization loss. The increase in soil pH increases the transformation rate of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) to NH3 in the soil solution, while the greater NH3 concentration in the soil solution liberates more NH3 to the atmosphere. Moreover, the NH3 volatilization rate increases proportionally with the increase in soil pH by affecting the equilibrium between \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and NH3 in the soil solution. The NH3 volatilization rate increased from 0.1 to 1, 10, and 50% by increasing soil pH from 6.0 to 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0, respectively [48].
Soil buffering capacity maintains pH stability, and clayey or OM-rich soil, which has a higher buffering capacity, decreases NH3 volatilization compared to light-textured, which has low buffering capacity. Moreover, acidic to neutral soil (pH 5–7) may have low NH3 volatilization loss, while alkaline soils (pH > 7) are more susceptible to having high NH3 volatilization [35]. The higher availability of OH− in soil solution accelerates the transformation of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) to NH3 according to the reaction:
Hydrolysed urea of fast urea hydrolysis reduces the rate of pH rise by decreasing the ammonium carbonate concentration in soils soil solution while applying N fertilizers as a split application reduces \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil compared to a single application; therefore, less NH3 volatilization loss will occur [196]. Liquid N fertilizers (e.g., UAN) contain dissolved \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\), which can rapidly diffuse in the soil profile, and the concentration of ammonium carbonate/\({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) will be lower. Consequently, NH3 volatilization loss is lower when a liquid form of N fertilizers is used than solid N fertilizers [78, 80, 184].
4.4.1.4 Soil temperature
Soil temperature essentially controls urea hydrolysis rates and maintains sound microbial activities after urea application. Higher soil temperature promotes higher rates of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) transformation to NH3 in the soil system [118]. High temperature and high soil pH cause NH3 volatilization to proceed at higher rates because of their combined effects on increasing the concentration of NH3 dissolved in the soil solution [81]. Moreover, the urea solubility is increased by the increased soil temperature and, therefore, more NH3 volatilization. In the field condition, the rate of NH3 volatilization varies depending on the variation in the daily soil temperature. However, the transformation period of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) to NH3 is prolonged at relatively lower temperatures [62]. The highest NH3 volatilization occurs during the period of maximum daily temperature, and normally, the NH3 volatilization risk increases at a temperature above 20 °C [26, 35].
In addition, the soil temperature affects NH4+ adsorption, the transformation of NH4+ to NH3, and greater NH3 volatilization. At temperatures over 15 °C, the urea hydrolysis rate starts to be faster, and this raises the local NH3 concentrations and speeds up NH3 volatilization [204]. While the temperature increases from 5 °C to 25 °C and from 25 °C to 45 °C, the NH3 volatilization potential will be two- and three-fold, respectively [67]. At lower soil temperatures, the rate of NH3 volatilization is low. Ammonia still volatiles from the soil surface even in cold or frozen conditions during the time of fertilizer application [35]. Light-textured soils have a higher potential to be warmer than clayey soils, and soils with relatively lower moisture content have a higher potential to be warmer than moist soils. Urea ammonium nitrate of liquid urea application can increase the soil moisture content and reduce the soil temperature.
4.4.1.5 Soil moisture content
The concentrations of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) or NH3 in soils depend upon the soil moisture content, and lower moisture content promotes a higher concentration of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) or NH3, causing higher NH3 volatilization loss [26]. Ammonium ions will be highly dispersed in soil with high moisture content ensuring lower \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\)/NH3 concentrations than in dry soils. Urea broadcast on wet surfaces will have a high rate of hydrolysis, and the downward movement will be decreased because the soil pore spaces are filled with water. The \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration will be higher and thus increase NH3 volatilization [35]. In the case of very low soil moisture content, the urea dissolution and hydrolysis rates are lower resulting in slower NH3 gas loss [4]. Field capacity moisture content facilitates the downward movement of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) during urea hydrolysis and lowers \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) or NH3 concentration on the soil surface, thus, NH3 volatilization reduces.
Irrigation and precipitation wash the urea into the soil, maintain a lower \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration, and reduce NH3 gas volatilization from applied urea [14]. The application of anhydrous ammonia below the soil surface reduces NH3 volatilization loss due to rapid dispersion inside the soil profile [168]. Liquid urea is previously hydrolyzed, and the NH4+ ions disperse rapidly into the soil profile, reducing local \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and NH3 concentration, thus low NH3 volatilization. Split application of N fertilizers also has lower local \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and NH3 concentrations than sole application.
4.4.1.6 Physicochemical properties of soil
The volatilization loss of NH3 massively relies on the soil texture, which is controlled by the soil buffering potentiality as soil texture is a vital indicator of soil clay quantity and CEC. The cation exchange reactions of soil preserve \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) ions on the clay and OM surfaces by electrostatic attraction. This mechanism stores \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) in soil and keeps \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil solution low. The higher clay and OM content represent higher CEC, which indicates high \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) retention by the clay aggregates, which can prevent future transformation to NH3. Urea application at higher frequency but at lower doses lowers \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in the soil, thus reducing \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) transformation to NH3 [26, 142, 196].
Higher soil buffering capacity can resist an increase in the pH of soil, hence, light-textured soils which with lower CEC and less OM content have lower buffering capacity; therefore, urea is vulnerable to soil pH rise and will have higher NH3 volatilization loss [35, 199]. Usually, he ammonia volatilization potential in clayey soil is lesser than that of sandy soil, which has lower CEC. Clayey soil also has a higher potential to contain more water than sandy soil [68]. Liquid N fertilizer increases the soil water content, which promotes faster hydrolysis and rapid \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) diffusion inside the soil, which lowers the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration and, therefore, lowers the possibility of NH3 volatilization. Soil aeration does not influence NH3 transformation but helps to liberate NH3 from the soil; for example, wind velocity increases the liberation of NH3 from the soil.
4.5 Nitrate leaching
Leaching of N is the most critical N loss passageway it is estimated more than 19% of N applied to soil leaches out from crop production systems worldwide, contaminates water, and creates economic and environmental problems [178, 212, 213]. Nitrogen leaching decreases crop nutrient availability, growth, and NUE. Leaching of N is more in light-textured upland soil [141]. The leached nitrate quantity from a field relies on the nitrate concentration of a soil solution. Besides, rainfall distribution, irrigation system adopted, and soil texture play a significant role in nitrate leaching, while the concentration of nitrate in a soil solution depends on the N application rates, nitrification and denitrification processes, plant uptake, etc. [26]. Being the same charged, nitrate ions repel by the soil particles, and leach down by following three principal processes convection, dispersion, and diffusion combination. Usually, the nitrate lets out through either the mass flow of soil water (convection), diffusion among the soil aggregates, or the substrate movement from higher concentration to relatively low concentrate water (diffusion). Though, one of the processes may be more dominant, yet all three mechanisms are active collectively in the most common agricultural systems [26, 121]. Controlled release sometimes resulted in lower leaching loss and contained more residual mineral N than optimum urea application in the rice production system which ensured higher grain yield [110].
Nitrates are transformed from \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\)through nitrification catalyzed by ammonia-oxidising bacteria. The rate of \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) formation depends on the various soil factors, such as soil pH, moisture content and fertility status, and the maximum rate of nitrification at the field capacity moisture content [65]. The conditions favorable for nitrification increase nitrate leaching while plant uptake and denitrification decrease nitrate concentration in the soil solution, thus reducing the risk of nitrate leaching. The clayey soil with higher CEC adsorbs more \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) ions on its surfaces; therefore, they have a lower \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in the soil solution. The liquid urea application reduces the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in the soil by dispersing the \({\text{MH}}_{4}^{ + }\) into the soil profile and decreasing the NH4+ concentration in the soil. In addition, the increase in urea application frequency with lower doses lowers the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil compared to a single application. These mechanisms reduce the rate of nitrification and ensure less nitrate concentration in soil solution, therefore, decreasing the potential of nitrate leaching.
4.5.1 Factors affecting N leaching
Several factors such as soil properties, climatic conditions, and crop management during crop production affect the leaching loss of N from applied urea. The nitrate leaching loss is facilitated by the \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) concentration in the soil solution and water movement in the soil profile. The nitrate concentration depends on the N application rate, denitrification, and nitrification [26]. Sprinkler irrigation increases nitrate adsorption by 152% more than flood irrigation due to less water movement and a lower leaching rate. In addition, higher rainfall [8, 44] and excess or higher urea application rate significantly increase N leaching loss [114, 208]. The higher or excess N application rate increases the concentration of \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) in soil, and higher water movement in the soil profile increases the leaching loss of nitrate. The nitrogen leaching is high, while the light-textured soil experienced more tillage operations.
Faster hydrolysis of applied urea and slower transformation of NH4+ to nitrate reduce N leaching loss due to the higher adsorption [215]. Moreover, the appropriate rate and timely application of urea increase crop uptake potential and reduce N leaching loss [54, 186]. When applied at the right time and position, the economically optimum dose of urea significantly reduces the leaching of N due to optimum synchronization between crop N demand and uptake, thus improving NUE [132]. However, Shapiro et al. [160] did not find any benefits of the subsurface application of urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) over broadcast surface application. Still, there is a relationship between the N application rate and the rate of N leaching [210]. Besides, various soil factors affect nitrate leaching, such as crop root system, earthworms, freezing and thawing, and alternate wetting and drying may create surface connecting macro soil pores that increase leaching loss from the soil–plant system. Biological immobilization and crop uptake of nitrate reduce the nitrate concentration in the soil, thus decreasing the leaching loss rate.
4.5.1.1 Urea application rate and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) concentration in soil
The nitrate concentration in soil solution mainly affects its leaching loss as the nitrate leaching loss is positively correlated with the rate of N fertilizer application [74, 114]. Physical and biological processes in soil and plant N uptake ability maintain the \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) concentration in soil solution. The quantity of nitrate that remains in the soil solution relies on the amount of N fertilizer applied and other soil and environmental parameters that promote the nitrification and denitrification rate in the soil [26]. The higher urea application increases the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in the soil and increases the nitrification rate, enabling higher nitrate concentration, which promotes higher leaching loss. However, higher plant N demand and uptake ability decrease N leaching potential.
Liquid N fertilizers ensure lower \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration by dispersing in soil and reducing nitrification. Clayey soil adsorbs more \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) ions and checks to increase \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil solution. The lower \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration decreases the rate of nitrification; thus, nitrate leaching decreases significantly. Besides, fast hydrolysis decreases \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil and slows down the rate of nitrification.
4.5.1.2 Nitrogen adsorbing capacity of soil
Soils have different capacities to hold the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) that prevent N leaching loss. Soils with high clay content adsorb significant amounts of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and lower the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in the soil solution, reducing the nitrification rate. The lower rate of nitrification decreases the nitrate concentration in soil solution. The concentration of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) in soil solution decreases by the plant uptake, which lowers nitrate leaching.
Soil clay particles adsorb the cations (e.g. \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\)) and lower the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil solution [131]. Moreover, the OM content of the soil increases the total N-holding capacity of the soil and reduces the nitrate concentration in the soil solution [102]. Ammonium adsorbing capacity depends on the \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) addition or \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) forming fertilizer application and bounding to the interlayers of clay minerals. The \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) ions that enter into the interlayers of clay minerals stay out of nitrification and thus remain safe to be leached-out. This \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) adsorbing mechanism may vary due to the variation of the soil type, soil mineralogical properties, and agro-climatic situations of a soil–plant system. For example, \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) holding into the 2:1 clay minerals protects from entering water into the lattice, where adsorption occurs, reducing \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration in soil solution [94, 134].
Liquid urea is hydrolyzed previously and dispersed rapidly inside the soil profile increases the N adsorption capacity of the soil. A split application of N also increases the adsorption capacity of a single application. The adsorption capacity of \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) decreases concentration in soil solution and reduces the rate of nitrification. A lower rate of nitrification decreases nitrate concentration in soil and decreases the risk of nitrate leaching.
4.5.1.3 Distribution and frequency of rainfall
Total leaching loss of urea is correlated with the water intrusion from soil [193]. This percolation typically depends on the quantity and distribution of rainfall and the method of irrigation practiced. The high rainfall affected areas suffered more \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) leaching in relation to aired or temperate regions [9, 26]. Raining immediately after urea fertilizer application stimulates N leaching from the active plant root zone. The optimum use of urea fertilizer and effective irrigation lessened N leaching from 48 to 5% [59]. Huge rainfall raises the downward flow of water, which carries soluble ions from the soil. This water flow is higher in the sandy soil with a relatively lower water holding capacity, and lower CEC allows to easy drain out of the water with free ions in relation to clayey soil.
The nitrate leaching may increase 13 times depending on rainfall variability by controlling denitrification. In addition, under anaerobic conditions, the nitrate for denitrification is mostly limited due to the anaerobicity of soil is not favorable for nitrification and nitrate content controls the nitrogen turnover rate in soil [58]. The sandy soil is more likely to drain out of water inside the soil than clayey soil in intensive and frequent rainfall-prone areas. The higher nitrate concentration increases nitrate leaching through excess rainwater. The lower NH4+ concentration reduces the nitrate leaching by lowering the nitrification rate in the soil. Liquid urea promotes higher hydrolysis, and rapid dispersion inside the soil profile enables lower \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration and lowers the nitrification rate. A split application lowers substrate concentration more than a single application. The lower nitrate concentration decreases nitrate-leaching loss from soil.
4.5.1.4 Properties of soil
Soil properties significantly control the leaching of N from the soil. Nitrogen leaching losses are generally more significant in light-textured sandy soil than in finer-textured clayey soil. The clayey soil has a higher water-holding capacity, slower water movement, and higher denitrification potential. The leaching loss from silt loam soil was five times higher than from clay loam soil [140]. The higher CEC of soil reduced cumulative N losses by holding NH4+ from the nitrification process. The higher clay-content soil has a lower potential for N mineralization and relaxes organic N reversal [172]. The efficient drainage mechanism increases the nitrate leaching loss as it ensures faster transportation from source to sink. A good drainage system improves soil aeration conditions, which increases nitrification and decreases denitrification resulting in more nitrate prevailing in soil solution [158].
In addition, the nitrate leaching potential increases in the soil having lower water holding capacity, higher porosity, and higher soil permeability. Puddling rice cultivation reduces leaching potential by forming an impermeable layer below the plough layer (plough pan). Nitrate leaching also fluctuates with the depth of the “Vadose Zone” in a cropping system. Lower nitrate concentration decreases leaching loss. A lower rate of nitrification decreases nitrate concentration in solution, which decreases in lower \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration. The lower \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) can possible fast hydrolysis and rapid dispersion of NH4+ in the soil profile.
4.5.1.5 Agronomic practices
Agronomic practices influence the N leaching loss from the soil–plant system. The lower leaching loss occurs in arable cropland than in ploughed pasture and land cultivated with horticultural crops due to shallow plant root systems and higher soil permeability [39, 200]. Usually, the risk of nitrate leaching is low in wetland rice cultivation systems due to the formation of plough pans [26]. Appropriate irrigation promotes crop growth by increasing crop N uptake and fruitfully decreasing the N leaching loss potential. For example, Hahne et al. [59] recorded that fertilizer applied at an optimum rate and appropriate irrigation decreased leaching losses by 5–48%. Gheysari et al. [52] reported 25 kg/ha nitrate leaching loss from optimum irrigation, which was 47 kg/ha from a field with excessive irrigation. On the other hand, flood irrigation may cause drainage and increase the N leaching risk more than sprinkler irrigation.
When N fertilizers are applied above the optimum dose required for economic yield, a significant amount of N will be leached out due to excess nitrate in the soil solution [56]. Besides, higher N-fertilizer inputs, intensive crop cultivation, short life, or shallow roots of crops contribute to low NUE and increase the risk of nitrate leaching. In addition, higher nitrogen availability above crop uptake capacity or crop demand increases N leaching potential. On the other hand, the efficient N uptake mechanisms of the crops with an extensive rooting system decrease leaching loss. When the N uptake ability is high, the leaching loss potential in the soil-crop system will be lower.
Split application of N corresponding to the crop uptake potential significantly reduces nitrate leaching loss as it decreases the substrate concentration in the soil solution. For example, double or triple splits of N application increase N uptake efficiency considerably, leaving less nitrate in the soil through leaching than a single application [51, 195]. Liquid urea application allows fast hydrolysis and promotes NH4+ dispersion throughout the root zoon, thus decreasing the local \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration and slowing the transformation to \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\). This increases the uptake ability of the crop and reduces the leaching potential.
4.6 Denitrification
Denitrification is a very crucial process for N loss from a soil system. Under aquatic systems or anaerobic conditions, nitrate undergoes the denitrification process which is carried out by facultative denitrifies when oxygen availability is less than 0.50 mg/L [139]. The key requirements for denitrification are the availability of nitrate, lack of oxygen, and the presence of a continuous energy supply for the denitrifiers [18]. The denitrification rates are also influenced by soil pH and temperature [23, 201]. Denitrification occurs faster in neutral or slightly alkaline soils under water-saturated soil conditions at 25 °C. In acidic soil conditions (pH < 4) and low temperatures, the rate of denitrification is very low [21].
During the denitrification process, nitrate (\({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\)) is reduced to nitrite (\({\text{NO}}_{2}^{ - }\)), and later nitrite (\({\text{NO}}_{2}^{ - }\)) is reduced to nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and dinitrogen (N2) (Eq. 1). Specific enzymes catalyze every step in the process. The first step is carried out by nitrate reductase and later nitrite reductase, nitric oxide reductase, and finally nitrous oxide reductase. In each step, the gaseous product may be emitted into the atmosphere or reduced again. The most significant part of the gas completes the whole reduction pathway by forming N2. This process is fully anaerobic and microbes-driven [147, 165]. The N2O emissions patterns are affected by N management patterns and soil texture. The single N application and low N uptake potential of the crop are liable for the most significant N2O emission, whereas N application with irrigation water over the cropping season results in lower N2O emission [105].
Clayey soil is more vulnerable to denitrification due to lower substrate movement and higher potential to be anaerobic. Besides, higher soil CEC repels nitrate to soil solution, therefore higher \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) in the soil solution, which can undergo further denitrification under favorable conditions. Granular urea promotes higher denitrification resulting in about 23.8% higher N2O loss due to rapid nitrification and about 5.3% yield loss compared to slow-released urea [154, 201]. Liquid urea (e.g., UAN) application reduced denitrification and decreased 27% nitrous oxide emission compared to granular urea fertilizer in corn cultivation. The higher local density of granular urea promoted higher nitrification and increased the nitrate concentration in the soil, thus, higher denitrification [60]. Split application of N fertilizers can increase the uptake capacity of crops, and the substrate concentration in soil solution for nitrification or denitrification can be minimized over a single application. Furthermore, the fast hydrolysis potential of the aqueous urea solution can lower the substrate concentration in the soil solution by dispersing inside the soil profile.
4.6.1 Factors affecting denitrification
The main prerequisites of microbial denitrification are the availability of nitrate, lack of oxygen, and source of organic energy for denitrifying microbes. Other factors include soil pH, temperature, nitrate concentration, presence of SOC, specific enzyme inhibitors, and water saturation [49, 95]. In addition, some of the other factors that affects the denitrification process indirectly are aquatic vegetation for OC source and the rate of nitrification which influences substrate concentration [70].
The main factors affecting denitrification are described below.
4.6.1.1 Nitrate (\({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\)) concentration
Higher nitrate content in the soil increases the rate of denitrification in submerged or saturated soils [1, 165]. The N application rate considerably increased the total N2O emission from the soil by increasing substrate concentration and promoting the denitrification process [133, 161, 202].
Nitrate concentration in the soil can be reduced by applying coated urea, which mineralized slowly resulting in lower N2O loss [98]. Overuse of N fertilizers initiates soil acidification which increases the rate of denitrification [181]. The concentration of \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) in soil depends on \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) concentration and rate of nitrification. When the urea transformation processes are more frequent, the denitrification rate will be high, and N2O emissions will be higher [84, 112, 169].
Clayey soil reduces substrate movement, increases local substrate concentration, and also increases the anaerobic potential of the soil, thus, increasing the denitrification rate. A side dressing of optimum N fertilizers and higher N uptake capacity of the crop reduces the substrate concentration in the soil. Split application of N fertilizers and fast hydrolysis of aqueous urea can decrease \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) concentration in soil solution by decreasing NH4+ concentration and nitrification rate; therefore, the denitrification rate will be reduced.
4.6.1.2 Soil texture
Soil texture influences denitrification in the soil as the finer soil is more susceptible to oxides of N as it controls many soil physicochemical parameters affecting the rate of nitrification and denitrification. The clayey soil has a higher potential to be saturated by water, which speeds up denitrification and increases the gaseous emissions [108]. The higher CEC of clayey soil repels the nitrate ions in the soil solution, increasing its concentration and speeding up denitrification. Davidsson and Stahl [36] have recorded a higher denitrification rate in peat soil than in sandy loam soil. Poorly drained soil has a higher denitrification rate than well-drained soil due to its higher potential to be anaerobic. Besides, fertile soil has a higher denitrification rate due to higher substrate concentration than less-fertile soil [57]. Soil cultivation also influenced N2O emissions by increasing the denitrification rate by increasing nitrification. The arable land emitted less N2O because of lower carbon variability than grassland soil [108].
Liquid fertilizers (e.g., UAN) are easy-flowing in light-textured soil, with less potential for denitrification than in fine-textured soil. Besides, rapid substrate dispersion inside the soil layer (e.g., aqueous urea application) effectively decreases its concentration and thus, reduces the nitrification rate and eventually the denitrification. Split application of N fertilizers also lowers the risk of fast-increasing substrate concentration in soil than a basal or single application and, therefore, reduces the denitrification.
4.6.1.3 Soil pH
The rate of denitrification is significantly affected by soil pH. The denitrification rate is slow in acidic conditions (pH 3.6–4.8), very slow at pH < 4.1, and undetectable at the soil pH < 3.6. The faster rate of denitrification occurs at soil pH between 8.0 and 8.6, but N loss by denitrification will be non-significant at the soil pH < 5.0 [22]. Nitrous oxide production would be the main product of denitrification at pH 4.0 [95]. So, acidic soils with a pH of less than 5 have lower denitrification rates than typical agricultural soils having a pH of around 6 [66]. On the other hand, the low pH value reduces the transformation of N2O to N2, which increases N2O concentration in soils [28].
The denitrification process increases soil pH, and the increased soil pH would increase the ratio of N2O/N2 emission [84, 149]. Furthermore, the increasing pH in the soil solution affects the N2O to N2 emission. Consequently, the acidic soil experiences a lower rate of denitrification [66, 149, 181]. The denitrification rate will be lower if nitrification remains lower and crop N uptake is vigorous, which lowers the substrate concentration in the soil solution. The split application of N fertilizers and instant dispersion of aqueous urea ensure lower substrate concentration in soil and decrease denitrification rate, thus improving the N uptake capacity of crops.
4.6.1.4 Soil OM content
Soil organic matter (OM) plays a significant role in the denitrification and emission of N2O as it controls the microbial activity and population in the soil. The required organic carbon for microbial growth and activity is provided by the OM of soil [26]. The nitrous oxide emission relies on the microbial metabolism responsible for sustaining anaerobic conditions in soil [174]. The nitrate concentration and high moisture content in soils promote denitrification and emission of N2O in the presence of sufficient OM in soil [148]. Soils with high OM content have a higher potential to have more nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria, which promote \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) transformation and N2O emission. Nitrate denitrification, which is carried out by heterotrophic microbes, occurs when the organic compound is present for the growth of the microbes. Therefore, the quantity and nature of OM available in the soil are also crucial during denitrification. For example, the denitrification process is not detectable at low OM content but measurable after adding crop residues or glucose [21]. Furthermore, adding carbon sources such as glucose, methanol, sodium acetate, cellulose, starch, plant materials, and stover increases the denitrification rate under anaerobic conditions [165].
Clayey soils have a higher potential to hold higher moisture to be saturated and contain more OM than sandy soils. The higher moisture content decreases OM decomposition and preserves higher OM content in the soil. The denitrification rate will be lower when \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) concentration is low, though there are optimum OM and availability of soil moisture. The lower nitrification rate decreases the \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) concentration in soil solution. Fast urea hydrolysis and rapid dispersion of NH4+ inside the soil profile reduce the substrate concentration in the soil solution and, therefore, lower the nitrification and denitrification rates. Increased application frequency with lower dose N fertilizers also decreases the substrate concentration in soil solution, thus a lower denitrification rate.
4.6.1.5 Soil moisture content
Soil moisture content is one of the driving factors of denitrification. Higher soil moisture content leads to poor aeration and makes the soil anaerobic, which promotes denitrification and increases N2O emissions. On the other hand, higher precipitation carries the urea to the deep soil layer resulting in more \({\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }\) in the deep soil layer by the hydrolysed urea [207]. The denitrification rate will be faster, and the emission of N2O will be higher in water-saturated soil than in soil with lower moisture content [12, 22, 53]. On the other hand, the increased denitrification rate decreases the N2O/N2 ratio in the soil. Denitrification is an enzyme-oriented process, and the enzyme synthesis is affected by oxygen, \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) and \({\text{NO}}_{2}^{ - }\) concentration in soil solution. Therefore, it affects the denitrification rate and relative fraction of N2O and N2 formation [32, 119]. Increased soil moisture content increases the N2O reductase in soil. A higher amount of N2O reductase enzyme in the soil increases the denitrification rate but decreases the N2O/N2 ratio in soil solution [123]. The denitrification rate significantly increases while the soil moisture content exceeds the critical moisture level [92]. The denitrification rate increased sharply while 60% of soil pore space (PS) was filled by water and reached its maximum rate at 90% PS filled by water [42].
Clayey soil has a high moisture-holding capacity with a higher potential to be anaerobic and therefore has a high denitrification potential, thus having more N2O emission than sandy soil. Furthermore, clayey soils possess poorly drainage conditions that increase denitrification potential than well-drained sandy soils. However, lower substrate availability reduces the rate of denitrification and lowers the emission of N2O. If any urea fertilizer or application method modification can decrease the substrate concentration in soil, then the denitrification rate would be low and, thus, lower N2O emission.
4.6.1.6 Soil temperature
The denitrification rate is significantly affected by soil temperature. Higher soil temperature promotes the growth and metabolism of denitrifies which increases the denitrification process [153]. A suitable temperature range for denitrification is between 25 °C to 35 °C [17] and the denitrification rate increases with the increase in soil temperature. When the temperature increased from 6 °C to 21 °C, the denitrification rate increased 10 to 20-fold [135]. The denitrification rate is slow at < 4 °C, slower at < 2 °C, and very slow at 0 °C but continuing [41, 165]. At low to very low temperatures, a large amount of carbon substrate is required by the denitrifies to continue the denitrification process. The seasonal variation in soil temperature causes the rate of denitrification and the cumulative amount of N2O emission to fluctuate [206]. Denitrification is affected more by the extreme temperature in non-irrigated dry soil than in irrigated soil [91].
Usually, light-textured soil maintains a relatively higher temperature than fine-textured soil, and light-textured soil has a lower potential to be anaerobic. Therefore, the denitrification rate in anaerobic light-textured soil will be higher than in fine-textured soil. The denitrifies activities increase with the increase of soil temperature, and the linear relation remains between the temperatures 4–25 °C. The rates of the enzymatic procedures increase with the rise of temperature if other factors such as substrate or moisture are not limited [138]. Therefore, the denitrification rate can be minimized by decreasing the substrate concentration in the soil solution. Liquid urea is an aqueous solution that decreases substrate concentration by distributing throughout the crop root zone, which may reduce the denitrification rate.
5 Conclusions
Urea is the common N source of the plant and plays an important role in ensuring world food security and it also has a significant contribution to the environmental disruption. The agricultural system is the primary source of greenhouse gas emission, and more than half of applied N to the soil as urea is lost through gaseous and leaching loss resulting in low NUE. The surface application of urea is the principal anthropogenic cause of gaseous emissions. Splits or aqueous watery urea solution application to soil may improve the soil N adsorption, plant uptake and reduce the possible risk of losses. Faulty application methods, excessive use, uneven distribution, seasonal variation, climatic interference, and edaphic factors promote loss of applied urea, which causes low NUE and increases the cost of crop production, and disruption of the natural ecosystem.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Abd-el-Malek Y, Hosny I, Emam NF. Studies on some environmental factors, affecting denitrification in soil. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg. 1975;130:644–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-4057(75)80101-8.
Abera G, Wolde-meskel E, Beyene S, Bakken LR. Nitrogen mineralization dynamics under different moisture regimes in tropical soils. Int J Soil Sci. 2012;7:132.
Ahmed OH, Aminuddin H, Husni MHA. Reducing ammonia loss from urea and improving soil-exchangeable ammonium retention through mixing triple superphosphate, humic acid and zeolite. Soil Use Manag. 2006;22:315–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00040.x.
Al-Kanani T, MacKenzie AF, Barthakur NN. Soil water and ammonia volatilization relationships with surface-applied nitrogen fertilizer solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1991;55:1761–6. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500060043x.
Alves IMD, Soares JR, Montezano ZF, DelGrosso S, Vitti AC, Rossetto R, Cantarella H. Nitrogen sources and application rates affect emissions of N2O and NH3 in sugarcane. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2020;116:329–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-10045-w.
Antil DRS, Mahata MK, Narwal RP. Effect of substrate concentration, soil moisture, and organic materials on urease activity of soil contaminated with lead. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2006;52:61–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340500421182.
Antil RS, Gangwar MS, Kumar V. Transformation and movement of urea in soil as influenced by water application rate, moisture management regime, and initial moisture content. Arid Soil Res Rehabil. 1992;6:319–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324989209381326.
Aronsson H, Ulén B (2013) Estimating nitrogen leaching from individual fields. In: Ulén B, Pietrzak S, Tonderski KS, editors. Samoocena gospodarstw w zakresie zarz adzania składnikami nawozowymi i oceny warunków środowiskowych. Institute of Technology and Life Sciences in Falenty, Poland, EU, Falenty, Poland, pp. 34–41.
Arora RP, Sachdev MS, Sud YK, Luthra VK, Subbiah BV. Fate of fertilizer nitrogen in a multiple cropping system. In: Soil nitrogen as fertilizer or pollutant. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1980.
Avrahami S, Conrad R. Patterns of community change among ammonia oxidizers in meadow soils upon long-term incubation at different temperatures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:6152–64. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.10.6152-6164.2003.
Bache BW. Ion-Exchange. In: Lal R, editor. Encyclopedia of soil science. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2006. p. 916–9.
Baggs EM, Rees RM, Smith KA, Vinten AJA. Nitrous oxide emission from soils after incorporating crop residues. Soil Use Manage. 2000;16:82–7.
Bhagat RM, Bhuiyan SI, Moody K. Water, tillage and weed interactions in lowland tropical rice: a review. Agric Water Manage. 1996;31:165–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(96)01242-5.
Black AS, Sherlock RR, Smith NP. Effect of timing of simulated rainfall on ammonia volatilization from urea, applied to soil of varyingmoisture content. J Soil Sci. 1987;38:679–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1987.tb02165.x.
Bolan N, Saggar S, Singh J. The role of inhibitors in mitigating nitrogen losses in grazed pasture. New Zeal Soil News. 2004; 42
Botha ADP. Nitrogen losses from urea, UAN and LAN when applied to four different soils. South Afr J Plant Soil. 1987;4:43–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.1987.10634234.
Braker G, Schwarz J, Conrad R. Influence of temperature on the composition and activity of denitrifying soil communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;73:134–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00884.x.
Brar ASS, Miller RH, Logan TJ, Brar SS, Miller RH, Logan TJ. Some factors affecting denitrification in soils irrigated. Water Environ Fed. 2015;50:709–17.
Bremner JM. Recent research on problems in the use of urea as a nitrogen fertilizer. Fertil Res. 1995;42:321–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750524.
Bremner JM, Mulvaney RL. Urease activity in soils. In: Burns RG, editor. Soil enzymes. London: Academic Press; 1978. p. 149–96.
Bremner JM, Shaw K. Denitrification in soil. II. Factors affecting denitrification. J Agric Sci. 1958;51:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600032779.
Bremner JM, Shaw K. Denitrification in soil. I. Methods of investigation. J Agric Sci. 1958;51:22–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600032767.
Byrnes BH, Amberger A. Fate of broadcast urea in a flooded soil when treated with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide, a urease inhibitor. Fertil Res. 1989;18:221–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049572.
Cabezas WAR, Korndorfer GH, Motta SA. Volatilização de N-NH3 na cultura de milho: I. Efeito da irrigação e substituição parcial da ureia por sulfato de amônio. Rev Bras ciência do Solo. 1997;21:481–7.
Cabrera ML, Kissel DE, Bock BR. Urea hydrolysis in soil : effects of urea concentration and soil pH. Soil Biol Biochem. 1991;23:1121–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(96)01242-5.
Cameron KC, Di HJ, Moir JL. Nitrogen losses from the soil / plant system: a review. Ann Appl Biol. 2013;162:145–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12014.
Carmona G, Christianson CB, Byrnes BH. Temperature and low concentration effects of the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (nBTPT) on ammonia volatilization from urea. Soil Biol Biochem. 1990;22:933–7.
Chapuis-Lardy L, Wrage N, Metay A, Chotte J, Bernoux M. Soils, a sink for N2O? A review. Glob Change Biol. 2007;13:1–17.
Chauhan HS, Mishra B. Ammonia volatilization from a flooded rice field fertilized with amended urea materials. Fertil Res. 1989;19:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01080686.
Christianson CB. Factors affecting N release of urea from reactive layer coated urea. Fertil Res. 1988;16:273–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01051376.
Christianson CB, Howard RG. Use of soil thin-layer chromatography to assess the mobility of the phosphoric triamide urease inhibitors and urea in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 1994;26:1161–4.
Conrad R. Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO). Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:609–40. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.60.4.609-640.1996.
Coombs A. Urea pollution turns tides toxic. Nature. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2008.1190.
Dalal RC. Urease activity in some Trinidad soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1975;7:5–8.
Dari B, Rogers CW, Walsh OS. Understanding factors controlling ammonia volatilization from fertilizer nitrogen applications. 2019.
Davidsson TE, Stahl M. The influence of organic carbon on nitrogen transformations in five wetland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2000;1136:1129–36.
Dawar K, Zaman M, Rowarth JS, Blennerhassett J, Turnbull MH. Urease inhibitor reduces N losses and improves plant-bioavailability of urea applied in fine particle and granular forms under field conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011;144:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.007.
Dechorgnat J, Nguyen CT, Armengaud P, Jossier M, Diatloff E, Filleur S, Daniel-Vedele F. From the soil to the seeds: the long journey of nitrate in plants. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:1349–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq409.
Di HJ, Cameron KC. Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2002;64:237–56.
Doak BW. Some chemical changes in the nitrogenous constituents of urine when voided on pasture. J Agric Sci. 1952;42:162–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600058767.
Dorland S, Beauchamp EG. Denitrification and ammonification at low soil temperatures. Can J Soil Sci. 1991;71:293–303. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss91-029.
Drury CF, Zhang TQ, Kay BD. The non-limiting and least limiting water ranges for soil nitrogen mineralization. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2003;67:1388–404.
Du JJ, Gou CL, Cui YD, Qu D. Effects of water retaining agent on ammonia volatilization and nutrient leaching loss from N, P and K fertilizers. J Agro-Environ Sci. 2007;26:1296–301.
Dybowski D, Dzierzbicka-Glowacka LA, Pietrzak S, Juszkowska D, Puszkarczuk T. Estimation of nitrogen leaching load from agricultural fields in the Puck Commune with an interactive calculator. PeerJ. 2020;2020:1–21. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8899.
Espindula MC, Rodovalho GM, Marcolan AL, Barberena IM, Cipriani HN, de Araújo LFB. Ammonia loss from protected urea in soil under different irrigation depths. Acta Sci Agron. 2020;43:1–11. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v43i1.46764.
Ferdous J, Mahjabin F, Asif MA, Riza IJ, Rahman MM. Gaseous losses of nitrogen from rice field: insights into balancing climate change and sustainable rice production. In: Huang M, editor. Sustainable rice production—challenges, strategies and opportunities. London: IntechOpen; 2023. p. 13.
Fontelle JP, Chang JP, Vincent J. Organisation et méthodes des inventaires nationaux des émissions atmosphéroiques en France. 2014;1222.
Freney JR, Simpson JR, Denmead OT. Volatilization of ammonia. In: Freney JR, Simpson JR, editors. Gaseous loss of nitrogen from plant–soil systems. Dordrecht, Switzerland: Springer; 1983. p. 1–32.
Friedl J, Warner D, Wang W, Rowlings DW, Grace PR, Scheer C. Strategies for mitigating N2O and N2 emissions from an intensive sugarcane cropping system. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2023;125:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10262-4.
Fu W, Wang X, Wei X. No response of soil N mineralization to experimental warming in a northern middle-high latitude agro-ecosystem. Sci Total Environ. 2019;659:240–8.
Gehl RJ, Schmidt JP, Maddux LD, Gordon WB. Corn yield response to nitrogen rate and timing in sandy irrigated soils. Agron J. 2005;97:1230–8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0303.
Gheysari M, Majid Mirlatifi S, Homaee M, Asadi ME, Hoogenboom G. Nitrate leaching in a silage maize field under different irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer rates. Agric Water Manage. 2009;96:946–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.01.005.
Giacomini SJ, Jantalia CP, Aita C, Urquiaga SS, Alves BJR. Nitrous oxide emissions following pig slurry application in soil under no-tillage system. Pesqui Agropecu Bras. 2006;41:1653–61.
Gioacchini P, Nastri A, Marzadori C, Giovannini C, Antisari LV, Gessa C. Influence of urease and nitrification inhibitors on N losses from soils fertilized with urea. Biol Fertil Soils. 2002;36:129–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-002-0521-1.
Gordon WB. Management of urea-containing fertilizers for no-tillage corn using nitrogen stabilizers and coated-granule technology. J Plant Nutr. 2014;37:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2013.848890.
Goulding K. Nitrate leaching from arable and horticultural land. Soil Use Manage. 2000;16:145–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2000.tb00218.x.
Groffman PM, Hansen GC. Wetland denitrification: influence of site quality and relationships with wetland delineation protocols. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1997;61:323–9.
Gu C, Riley WJ. Combined effects of short term rainfall patterns and soil texture on soil nitrogen cycling—a modeling analysis. J Contam Hydrol. 2010;112:141–54.
Hahne HCH, Kroontje W, Lutz JA Jr. Nitrogen fertilization I. Nitrate accumulation and losses under continuous corn cropping. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1977;41:562–7. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100030028x.
Halvorson AD, Del Grosso SJ, Alluvione F. Nitrogen source effects on nitrous oxide emissions from irrigated no-till corn. J Environ Qual. 2010;39:1554–62.
Harmsen GW, van Schreven DA. Mineralization of organic nitrogen in soil. Adv Agron. 1955;7:299–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60341-7.
Harper LA, Catchpoole VR, Vallis I. Ammonia loss from fertilizer applied to tropical pastures. In: Freney JR, Simpson JR, editors. Gaseous loss of nitrogen from plant–soil systems, developments in plant and soil sciences, vol. 9. Dordrecht: Springer; 1983. p. 195–214.
Harty MA, McDonnell KP, Whetton R, Gillespie G, Burke JI. Comparison of ammonia-N volatilization losses from untreated granular urea and granular urea treated with NutriSphere-N®. Soil Use Manage. 2023;40:e12891. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12891.
Havelaar AH, Melse JM. Quantifying public health risk in the WHO Guidelines for drinking water quality. WHO RIVM Rep. 2003;1–49.
Haynes RJ, Cameron KC, Goh KM, Sherlock RR. Mineral nitrogen in the plant–soil system. New York: Academic Press; 1986.
Haynes RJ, Sherlock RR. Gaseous losses of nitrogen. In: Haynes RJ, editor. Mineral nitrogen in the plant–soil system. Orlando: Academic Press; 1986. p. 242–302.
He ZL, Alva AK, Calvert DV, Banks DJ. Ammonia volatilization from different fertilizer sources and effects of temperature and soil pH. Soil Sci. 1999;164:750–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199910000-00006.
Hearn LO, Barton L, Schwenke GD, Murphy DV. Ammonia volatilisation losses from urea applied to acidic cropping soils is regulated by pH buffering capacity. Soil Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR23044.
Heffer P, Prud’homme M. Short-Term Fertilizer Outlook 2016–2017. International Fertilizer Industry Association Paris, France 2016.
Herrman KS, Bouchard V, Moore RH. Factors affecting denitrification in agricultural headwater streams in Northeast Ohio, USA. Hydrobiologia. 2008;598:305–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9164-4.
Holloway RE, Bertrand I, Frischke AJ, Brace DM, Mclaughlin MJ. Improving fertiliser efficiency on calcareous and alkaline soils with fluid sources of P, N and Zn. Plant Soil. 2001; 209–219.
Hongprayoon C. Urea transformations in flooded soil. USA: Louisiana State University; 1992.
Hord NG. Dietary nitrates, nitrites, and cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2011;13:484–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-011-0209-9.
Huang M, Liang T, Ou-Yang Z, Wang L, Zhang C, Zhou C. Leaching losses of nitrate nitrogen and dissolved organic nitrogen from a yearly two crops system, wheat-maize, under monsoon situations. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2011;91:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-011-9447-z.
Ibrahim AA, Jibril BY. Controlled release of paraffin wax/rosin-coated fertilisers. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:2288–91. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie048853d.
IFDC. Rapid introduction and market development for urea deep placement technology for lowland transplanted rice : a reference guide, LCSH: Soil. International Fertilizer Development Center, IFDC, Alabama, The USA. 2016.
IPCC. Topic 3: future pathways for adaption, mitigation and sustainable development. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA, editors. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Geneva, Switzerland. IPCC, Geneva, p 87, 2014.
IPNI (International Plant Nutrition Institute). Nitrogen Notes. Ammonia Volatilization. California, USA, 2015.
IPNI (International Plant Nutrition Institute). Urea–Ammonium Nitrate. 3500 Parkway Lane, Suite 550 Norcross, Georgia 30092-2844 USA, 2019.
Jones C, Brown BD, Engel R, Horneck D, Olson-Rutz K. Nitrogen fertilizer volatilization. Manage Minimize. 2013; 8.
Jones CA, Koenig RT, Ellsworth JW, Brown BD, Jackson GD. Management of urea fertilizer to minimize volatilization. Mont State Univ Ext. 2007;12.
Ju XT, Kou CL, Christie P, Dou ZX, Zhang FS. Changes in the soil environment from excessive application of fertilizers and manures to two contrasting intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain. Environ Pollut. 2007;145:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2006.04.017.
Keller GD, Mengel DB. Ammonia volatilization from nitrogen fertilizers surface applied to no-till corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1986;50:1060–3.
Khalil K, Mary B, Renault P. Nitrous oxide production by nitrification and denitrification in soil aggregates as affected by O2 concentration. Soil Biol Biochem. 2004;36:687–99.
Khan MJ, Malik A, Zaman M, Khan Q, Rahman H, Kalimullah, K. Nitrogen use efficiency and yield of maize crop as affected by agrotain coated urea in arid calcareous soils. Soil Environ. 2014;33:1–6.
Khariri RA, Yusop MK, Musa MH, Hussin A. Laboratory evaluation of metal elements urease inhibitor and DMPP nitrification inhibitor on nitrogenous gas losses in selected rice soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016;227:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2927-7.
Kira O, Shaviv A, Dubowski Y. Direct tracing of NH3 and N2O emissions associated with urea fertilization approaches, using static incubation cells. Sci Total Environ. 2019;661:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.128.
Kissel DE. Management of Urea Fertilizer. Manhattan, Kansas, USA. 1988.
Kissel DE, Cabrera ML. Factors affecting urea hydrolysis. In: Bock BR, Kissel DE, editors. Ammonia volatilization from urea fertilizers, Bulletin Y. National Fertilizer Development Center, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama., pp 53–66, 1988.
Kistiakowsky GB, Shaw WHR. On the mechanism of the inhibition of urease. J Am Chem Soc. 1953;75:866–71.
De Klein CAM, Van Logtestijn RSP. Denitrification in grassland soils in the Netherlands in relation to irrigation, N-application rate, soil water content and soil temperature. Soil Biol Biochem. 1996;28:231–7.
Klemedtsson L, Simkins S, Svensson BH, Johnsson H, Rosswall T. Soil denitrification in three cropping systems characterized by differences in nitrogen and carbon supply-II. Water and NO3 effects on the denitrification process. Plant Soil. 1991;138:273–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012254.
Klose S, Tabatabai MA. Urease activity of microbial biomass in soils as affected by cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils. 2000;31:191–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050645.
Klttrick JA. Forces involved in ion fixation by vermiculitte. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1966;30:801–3.
Knowles R. Denitrification. Microbiol Rev. 1982;46:43.
Koli P, Bhardwaj NR, Mahawer SK. Agrochemicals: Harmful and beneficial effects of climate changing scenarios. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.; 2019.
Konieczna I, Zarnowiec P, Kwinkowski M, Kolesinska B, Fraczyk J, Kaminski Z, Kaca W. Bacterial urease and its role in long-lasting human diseases. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2013;13:789–806. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920312804871094.
Korsakov K, Stepanov A, Pozdnyakov L, Yakimenko O. Humate-coated urea as a tool to decrease nitrogen losses in soil. Agronomy. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13081958.
Kowalchuk GA, Stephen JR. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: a model for molecular microbial ecology. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:485–529.
Krave AS, Van SNM, Van VHW. Potential nitrification and factors influencing nitrification in pine forest and agricultural soils in Central Java, Indonesia. Pedobiologia (Jena). 2002;594:573–94.
Kumar V, Wagenet RJ. Urease activity and kinetics of urea transformation in soils. Soil Sci. 1984;137:263–9.
Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem. 2000;32:1485–98.
Lai C, Tabatabai M. Kinitic parameters of immobilized urease. Soil Biol Biochem. 1992;24:225–8.
Lal RB, Kissel DE, Cabrera ML, Schwab AP. Kinetics of urea hydrolysis in wheat residue. Soil Biol Biochem. 1993;25:1033–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(93)90151-Z.
Lazcano C, Tsang A, Doane TA, Pettygrove GS, Horwath WR, Burger M. Soil nitrous oxide emissions in forage systems fertilized with liquid dairy manure and inorganic fertilizers. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;225:160–72.
Lei T, Gu Q, Guo X, Ma J, Zhang Y, Sun X. Urease activity and urea hydrolysis rate under coupling effects of moisture content, temperature, and nitrogen application rate. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2018;11:132–8. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20181102.3784.
Lei T, Sun X, huan, Guo X hong, Ma J juan,. Quantifying the relative importance of soil moisture, nitrogen, and temperature on the urea hydrolysis rate. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2017;63:225–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2017.1340813.
Lesschen JP, Velthof GL, De Vries W, Kros J. Differentiation of nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils. Environ Pollut. 2011;159:3215–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.001.
Liang WZ, Classen JJ, Shah SB, Sharma-Shivappa R. Ammonia fate and transport mechanisms in broiler litter. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014;225:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1812-x.
Liu R, Wang Y, Hong Y, Wang F, Mao X, Yi J. Controlled-release urea application and optimized nitrogen applied strategy reduced nitrogen leaching and maintained grain yield of paddy fields in Northwest China. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1033506.
Liu TQ, Fan DJ, Zhang XX, Chen J, Li CF, Cao CG. Deep placement of nitrogen fertilizers reduces ammonia volatilization and increases nitrogen utilization efficiency in no-tillage paddy fields in central China. F Crop Res. 2015;184:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.09.011.
Liu XJ, Mosier AR, Halvorson AD, Zhang FS. Tillage and nitrogen application effects on nitrous and nitric oxide emissions from irrigated corn fields. Plant Soil. 2005;276:235–49.
Lloyd AB, Sheaffe MJ. Urease activity in soils. Plant Soil. 1973;39:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018046.
Ma Z, Yue Y, Feng M, Li Y, Ma X, Zhao X, Wang S. Mitigation of ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching via loss control urea triggered H-bond forces. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51566-2.
Majaron VF, da Silva MG, Bortoletto-Santos R, Klaic R, Giroto A, Guimarães GGF, Polito WL, Farinas CS, Ribeiro C. Synergy between castor oil polyurethane/starch polymer coating and local acidification by A. niger for increasing the efficiency of nitrogen fertilization using urea granules. Ind Crops Prod. 2020;154:112717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112717.
Mandal A, Patra AK, Singh D, Swarup A, Ebhin Masto R. Effect of long-term application of manure and fertilizer on biological and biochemical activities in soil during crop development stages. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:3585–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2006.11.027.
McAllister CH, Beatty PH, Good AG. Engineering nitrogen use efficient crop plants: the current status. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012;10:1011–25.
McGarry SJ, O’Toole P, Morgan MA. Effects of soil temperature and moisture content on ammonia volatilization from urea-treated pasture and tillage soils. Irish J Agric Res. 1987; 173–182.
McKenney DJ, Drury CF, Wang SW. Effects of oxygen on denitrification inhibition, repression, and derepression in soil columns. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2001;65:126–32.
McLaughlin MJ, McBeath TM, Smernik R, Stacey SP, Ajiboye B, Guppy C. The chemical nature of P accumulation in agricultural soils-implications for fertiliser management and design: an Australian perspective. Plant Soil. 2011;349:69–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0907-7.
McLenaghen RD, Cameron KC, Lampkin NH, Daly ML, Deo B. Nitrate leaching from ploughed pasture and the effectiveness of winter catch crops in reducing leaching losses. New Zeal J Agric Res. 1996;39:413–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1996.9513202.
Meng D, Cheng H, Shao Y, Luo M, Xu D, Liu Z, Ma L. Progress on the effect of nitrogen on transformation of soil organic carbon. Processes. 2022;10:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112425.
Miller MN, Zebarth BJ, Dandie CE, Burton DL, Goyer C, Trevors JT. Crop residue influence on denitrification, N2O emissions and denitrifier community abundance in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40:2553–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.06.024.
Monaghan RM, Barraclough D. Some chemical and physical factors affecting the rate and dunamics of nitrification in urine-affected soil. Plant Soil. 1992;143:11–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00009124.
Morgenstern O, Stone KA, Schofield R, Akiyoshi H, Yamashita Y, Kinnison DE, Garcia RR, Sudo K, Plummer DA, Scinocca J, Oman LD, Manyin ME, Zeng G, Rozanov E, Stenke A, Revell LE, Pitari G, Mancini E, Genova DIG, Visioni D, Dhomse SS, Chipperfield MP. Ozone sensitivity to varying greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances in CCMI-1 simulations. Atmos Chem Phys. 2018;18:1091–114. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1091-2018.
Mortland MM. Ammonia interactions with soil minerals. In: McVickar MH, Martin WP, Miles IE, Tucker HH, editors. Agricultural anhydrous ammonia technology and use. Madison, Wisconsin, The USA: Soil Science Society of America; 1966. p. 188–97.
Motasim AM, Samsuri AW, Sukor ASA, Amin AM. Effects of liquid urea application frequency on the growth and grain yield of corn (Zea mays L.). Commod Corn. 2022; 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2071435.
Motasim AM, Samsuri AW, Sukor ASA, Amin AM. Split application of liquid urea as a tool to nitrogen loss minimization and NUE improvement of corn—a review. Chil J Agric Res. 2022;82:645–57. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392022000400645.
Motasim MA, Samsuri AW, Sukor ASA, Adibah AM. Nitrogen dynamics in tropical soils treated with liquid and granular urea fertilizers. Agriculture. 2021;11:546.
Moyo CC. Effects of soil temperature on urea hydrolysis. MS thesis. Department of Agronomy. Kansas State University. Manhattan, Kansas. The USA, 1988.
Mukhopadhyay S, Masto RE, Tripathi RC, Srivastava NK. Application of soil quality indicators for the phytorestoration of mine spoil dumps. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.; 2019.
Nasielski J, Grant B, Smith W, Niemeyer C, Janovicek K, Deen B. Effect of nitrogen source, placement and timing on the environmental performance of economically optimum nitrogen rates in maize. F Crop Res. 2020;246: 107686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107686.
Ni K, Vietinghoff M, Pacholski A. Targeting yield and reducing nitrous oxide emission by use of single and double inhibitor treated urea during winter wheat season in Northern Germany. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2023;347: 108391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108391.
Nieder R, Benbi DK, Scherer HW. Fixation and defixation of ammonium in soils: a review. Biol Fertil Soils. 2011;47:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0506-4.
Nommik H, Larsson K. Measurement of denitrification rate in undisturbed soil cores under different temperature and moisture conditions using 15N tracer technique, 2: factors affecting denitrification. Swedish J Agric Res. 1989;19:35–44.
O’toole P, Morgan MA, McAleese DM. Effects of soil properties, temperature and urea concentration on patterns and rates of urea hydrolysis in some Irish soils. Irish J Agric Res. 1982;21:185–97.
Parkin TB. Spatial variability of microbial processes in soil—a review. J Environ Qual. 1993;22:409–17. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200030004x.
Pilegaard K, Skiba U, Ambus P, Beier C, Brüggemann N, Butterbach-Bahl K, Dick J, Dorsey J, Duyzer J, Gallagher M. Factors controlling regional differences in forest soil emission of nitrogen oxides (NO and N2O). Biogeosciences. 2006;3:651–61.
Pina-Ochoa E, Álvarez-Cobelas M. Denitrification in aquatic environments: a cross-system analysis. Biogeochemistry. 2006;81:111–30.
Pratt PF, Lund LJ, Warnke JE. Nitrogen losses in relation to soil profile characteristics. In: Agrochemicals in soils. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1980. p. 33–45.
Puga AP, Grutzmacher P, Cerri CEP, Ribeirinho VS, de Andrade CA. Biochar-based nitrogen fertilizers: greenhouse gas emissions, use efficiency, and maize yield in tropical soils. Sci Total Environ. 2020;704: 135375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135375.
Ramalingappa PL, Shrivastava M, Dhar S, Bandyopadhyay K, Prasad S, Langyan S, Tomer R, Khandelwal A, Darjee S, Singh R. Reducing options of ammonia volatilization and improving nitrogen use efficiency via organic and inorganic amendments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PeerJ. 2023;11:14965. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14965.
Ravishankara AR. Nitrous oxide: a greenhouse gas that is also an ozone layer depleting gas. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. The SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System, pp B14A-01, 2015.
Recio J, Vallejo A, Le-noë J, Garnier J, García-marco S, Manuel J, Sanz-cobena A. The effect of nitrification inhibitors on NH3 and N2O emissions in highly N fertilized irrigated Mediterranean cropping systems. Sci Total Environ. 2018;636:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.294.
Reynolds CM, Wolf DC, Armbruster JA. Factors related to urea hydrolysis in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1985;49:104–8. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900010021x.
Rice N. Fertilisers and the environment. In: Fertil. Environ. https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/soils/guides/soil-nutrients-and-fertilisers/environment. 1993. Accessed 18 Dec 2019.
Robertson GP, Groffman PM (2006) Nitrogen transformations, 4th ed. Elsevier Inc.
Ruser R, Flessa H, Russow R, Schmidt G, Buegger F, Munch JC. Emission of N2O, N2 and CO2 from soil fertilized with nitrate: effect of compaction, soil moisture and rewetting. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:263–74.
Saggar S, Luo J, Giltrap DL, Maddena M. Nitrous oxide emission processes, measurements, modeling and mitigation. In: Sheldon AI, Barnhart EP, editors. Nitrous oxide emissions research progress. New York, USA: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2009. p. 1–66.
Sahrawat KL. Ammonium fixation in some tropical rice soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1979;10:1015–23.
Sahrawat KL. Nitrification inhibitors, with emphasis on natural products, and the persistence of fertilizer nitrogen in the soil. In: Ahmmed N, editor. Nitrogen economy in tropical soils. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 379–88.
Sahrawat KL. Factors affecting nitrification in soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2008;39:1436–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620802004235.
Saleh-Lakha S, Shannon KE, Henderson SL, Goyer C, Trevors JT, Zebarth BJ, Burton DL. Effect of pH and temperature on denitrification gene expression and activity in Pseudomonas mandelii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:3903–11. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00080-09.
Sangita M, Swain CK, Tripathi R, Sethi SK, Bhattacharyya P, Kumar A, Raja R, Shahid M, Panda BB, Lal B, Gautam P, Munda S, Nayak AK. Nitrate leaching, nitrous oxide emission and N use efficiency of aerobic rice under different N application strategy. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2018;64:465–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1359414.
Sankhayan SD, Shukla UC. Rates of urea hydrolysis in five soils if India. Geoderma. 1976;16:171–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016.
Sarathchandra SU, Ghani A, Yeates GW, Burch G, Cox NR. Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers on microbial and nematode diversity in pasture soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;33:953–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00245-5.
Savci S. An agricultural pollutant: chemical fertilizer. Int J Environ Sci Dev. 2012;3:73–80. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2012.v3.191.
Scholefield D, Tyson KC, Garwood EA, Armstrong AC, Hawkins J, Stone AC. Nitrate leaching from grazed grassland lysimeters: effects of fertilizer input, field drainage, age of sward and patterns of weather. J Soil Sci. 1993;44:601–13.
Serrano-Silva N, Luna-Guido M, Fernández-Luqueño F, Marsch R, Dendooven L. Emission of greenhouse gases from an agricultural soil amended with urea: a laboratory study. Appl Soil Ecol. 2011;47:92–7.
Shapiro C, Attia A, Ulloa S, Mainz M. Use of five nitrogen source and placement systems for improved nitrogen management of irrigated corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2016;80:1663–74. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.10.0363.
Signor D, Cerri CEP, Conant R. N2O emissions due to nitrogen fertilizer applications in two regions of sugarcane cultivation in Brazil. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8:15013.
Silvennoinen H, Hämäläinen R, Koponen HT, Martikainen PJ. Nitrogen turnover rates at low temperatures in an agricultural peat soil. Geophys Res Abstr. 2010;12:10151.
Simpson JR. A modelling approach to nitrogen cycling in agro-ecosystems. In: Nitrogen Cycling in South-East Asian Wet Monsoonal Ecosystems. Proceedings of a regional workshop arranged by the SCOPE/UNEP International Nitrogen Unit of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and the Chiang Mai Univ., Thailand, 5–10 Nov 1979. Australian Academy of Science, pp 174–180. 1981.
Sing R, Nye PH. The effect of soil pH and high urea concentrations on urease activity in soil. J Soil Sci. 1984;35:519–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1984.tb00609.x.
Sirivedhin T, Gray KA. Factors affecting denitrification rates in experimental wetlands: field and laboratory studies. Ecol Eng. 2006;26:167–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.09.001.
da Siva AJ, Lima Junior MA, Ferreira NCM, Fraga VS. Perdas de amônia por volatilização proveniente da uréia aplicada a solos dos trópicos úmidos. Rev Bras Ciência do Solo. 1995;19:141–4.
Skorupka M, Nosalewicz A. Ammonia volatilization from fertilizer urea—a new challenge for agriculture and industry in view of growing global demand for food and energy crops. Agriculture. 2021;11:822. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090822.
Sommer SG, Schjoerring JK, Denmead OT. Ammonia emission from mineral fertilizers and fertilized crops. Adv Agron. 2004;82:82004–8.
Song H, Wang J, Zhang K, Zhang M, Hui R, Sui T, Yang L, Du W. A 4-year field measurement of N2O emissions from a maize-wheat rotation system as influenced by partial organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer. J Environ Manage. 2020;263: 110384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110384.
Stark JM, Firestone MK. Kinetic characteristics of ammonium-oxidizer communities in a California oak woodland-annual grassland. Soil Biol Biochem. 1996;28:1307–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00133-2.
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, De Vries W, De Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science (80-). 2015;347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.
Steffens D, Pfanschilling R, Feigenbaum S. Extractability of 15 N-labeled corn-shoot tissue in a sandy and a clay soil by 0.01 M CaCl2 method in laboratory incubation experiments. Biol Fertil soils. 1996;22:109–15.
Steusloff TW, Singh G, Nelson KA, Motavalli PP. Enhanced efficiency liquid nitrogen fertilizer management for corn production. Int J Agron. 2019;2019:12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9879273.
Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ. Measurement of nitrous oxide and di-nitrogen emissions from agricultural soils. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 1998;52:131–9.
Strauss SL, Reardon CL, Mazzola M. The response of ammonia-oxidizer activity and community structure to fertilizer amendment of orchard soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;68:410–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.016.
Strong DT, Sale PWG, Helyar KR. The infuence of the soil matrix on nitrogen mineralisation and nitrification. IV Texture Aust J Soil Res. 1999;37(329):344.
Subbarao G, Ito O, Sahrawat K, Berry W, Nakahara K, Ishikawa T, Watanabe T, Suenaga K, Rondon M, Rao I. Scope and strategies for regulation of nitrification in agricultural systems—challenges and opportunities. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2006;25:303–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680600794232.
Sutton MA, Oenema O, Erisman JW, Leip A, van Grinsven H, Winiwarter W. Too much of a good thing. Nature. 2011;472:159–61.
Suzuki I, Dular U, Kwok SC. Ammonia or ammonium ion as substrate for oxidation by Nitrosomonas europaea cells and extracts. J Bacteriol. 1974;120:556–8.
Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1972;4:479–87.
Thomson AJ, Giannopoulos G, Pretty J, Baggs EM, Richardson DJ. Biological sources and sinks of nitrous oxide and strategies to mitigate emissions. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2012;367:1157–68. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0415.
Tisdale SL, Nelson WL. Soil fertility and fertilizers. 2nd ed. London, UK, London, UK: The Macmillan Publishers; 1970.
Tung YH, Lean-Teik N. Effects of nitrogen fertilization rate on tocopherols, tocotrienols and γ-oryzanol contents and enzymatic antioxidant activities in rice grains. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2019;25:189–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0617-1.
Vaio N. Ammonia Volatilization and N-uptake from Urea, Urea Ammonium Nitrate (UAN) and NITAMIN® (Uea polimar) Applied to Tall Fescue in Georgia. Master Thesis, The University of Georgia. 2006.
Valency International. Prilled Urea Specification. In: Prod. Overview, Agro Consum. Food Prod. http://www.valencyinternational.com/granular-urea-specifications.php. 2012. Accessed 16 Sep 2021.
Vetsch JA, Randall GW. Corn production as affected by nitrogen application timing and tillage. Agron J. 2004;96:502. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0502.
Vitousek PM, Hättenschwiler S, Olander L, Allison S. Nitrogen and nature. AMBIO A J Hum Environ. 2002;31:97–101.
Vlek PLG, Carter MF. The effect of soil environment and fertilizer modifications on the rate of urea hydrolysis. Soil Sci. 1983;136:56.
Vlek PLG, Fillery IRP, Burford JR. Accession, transformation, and loss of nitrogen in soils of the arid region. Plant Soil. 1981;58:133–75.
Wahl M, Kirsch R, Bröckel U, Trapp S, Bottlinger M. Caking of urea prills. Chem Eng Technol Ind Chem Equipment-Process Eng. 2006;29:674–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200600067.
Wali P, Kumar V, Singh JP. Effect of soil type, exchangeable sodium percentage, water content, and organic amendments on urea hydrolysis in some tropical Indian soils. Soil Res. 2003;41:1171–6.
Walsh OS, Christiaens RJ. Relative efficacy of liquid nitrogen fertilizers in dryland spring wheat. Int J Agron. 2016;2016:9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6850672.
Walters DT, Malzer GL. Nitrogen management and nitrification inhibitor effects on nitrogen-15 urea: II. Nitrogen leaching and balance. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1990;54:122–30. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400010019x.
Wang H, Köbke S, Dittert K. Use of urease and nitrification inhibitors to reduce gaseous nitrogen emissions from fertilizers containing ammonium nitrate and urea. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2020;22:e00933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00933.
Wang S, Luo S, Yue S, Shen Y, Li S. Fate of 15N fertilizer under different nitrogen split applications to plastic mulched maize in semiarid farmland. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2016;105:129–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9780-3.
Wang SJ, Luo SS, Gao Q, Li SQ. Influence of n split application on nh3 volatilization losses and n recovery efficiency from plastic mulching maize in Loess Plateau, China. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2019;17:9215–27. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_92159227.
Wang WJ, Dalal RC, Moody PW, Smith CJ. Relationships of soil respiration to microbial biomass, substrate availability and clay content. Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35:273–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00274-2.
Water Education Foundation. Nitrate Contamination. In: Aquapedia Backgr. https://www.watereducation.org/aquapedia/nitrate-contamination. 2021. Accessed 13 Sep 2021
Whitehead DC, Raistrick N. The volatilization of ammonia from cattle urine applied to soils as influenced by soil properties. Plant Soil. 1993;148:43–51.
Wild A, Cameron KC. Nitrate leaching through soils and environmental considerations with special reference to recent work in the United Kingdom. In: PTinker PB, editor. Soil nitrogen as fertilizer or pollutant. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria, 1980, pp. 35–37.
Wu H, Du S, Zhang Y, An J, Zou H, Zhang Y, Yu N. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on greenhouse soil organic nitrogen fractions and soil-soluble nitrogen pools. Agric Water Manag. 2019;216:415–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.02.020.
Xu C, Huang S, Tian B, Ren J, Meng Q, Wang P. Manipulating planting density and nitrogen fertilizer application to improve yield and reduce environmental impact in Chinese Maize production. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01234.
Yadav DS, Kumar V, Singh M, Relan PS. Effect of temperature and moisture on kinetics of urea hydrolysis and nitrification. Aust J Soil Res. 1987;25:185–91. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9870185.
Yara International ASA. Reducing Ammonia Emissions from Agriculture. Oslo, Norway, 2017.
Zantua MI, Bremner JM. Stability of urease in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1977;9:135–40.
Zhang J, Han X. N2O emission from the semi-arid ecosystem under mineral fertilizer (urea and superphosphate) and increased precipitation in northern China. Atmos Environ. 2008;42:291–302.
Zhang L, Zhang X, Gao Q, Yan L. Nitrogen application effect on maize yield, NH3, and N2O emissions in northeast China by meta-analysis. Agronomy. 2023;13:1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061479.
Zhang M, Tian Y, Zhao M, Yin B, Zhu Z. The assessment of nitrate leaching in a rice–wheat rotation system using an improved agronomic practice aimed to increase rice crop yields. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2017;241:100–9.
Zhang W, Liang Z, He X, Wang X, Shi X, Zou C, Chen X. The effects of controlled release urea on maize productivity and reactive nitrogen losses: a meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2019;246:559–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.059.
Zhao X, Christianson LE, Harmel D, Pittelkow CM. Assessment of drainage nitrogen losses on a yield-scaled basis. F Crop Res. 2016;199:156–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.015.
Zhong H, Wang Q, Zhao X, Du Q, Zhao Y, Wang X. Effects of different nitrogen applications on soil physical, chemical properties and yield in maize (Zea mays L.). Agric Sci. 2014;5:1440–7. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.514155Effects.
Zhou M, Butterbach-Bahl K. Assessment of nitrate leaching loss on a yield-scaled basis from maize and wheat cropping systems. Plant Soil. 2014;374:977–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1876-9.
Zhu B, Wang T, Kuang F, Luo Z, Tang J, Xu T. Measurements of nitrate leaching from a hillslope cropland in the Central Sichuan Basin, China. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2009;73:1419–26.
Zuki MMBM. Nitrogen (N) transformation of NBPT treated urea on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays var. Thai Super Sweet). Masters thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia. 2020.
Zuki MMBM. Nitrogen (N) Transformation of NBPT Treated Urea on Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays var. Thai Super Sweet). Masters Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia, 2020.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Universiti Putra Malaysia and Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council for their continuous support. The authors are also grateful to the Ministry of Agriculture, the People's Republic of Bangladesh, and the Soil Resource Development Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contribute information collection, formal analysis, and writing the original draft by Ahmmed Md Motasim, under the supervision of Abdul Wahid Samsuri, Arina Shairah Abdul Sukor, Abba Nabayi, Amaily Akter, Mohammad Amdadul Haque and Amin Mohd. Adibah. All authors have read carefully and agreed to the published version of this review manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Motasim, A.M., Samsuri, A.W., Nabayi, A. et al. Urea application in soil: processes, losses, and alternatives—a review. Discov Agric 2, 42 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00060-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00060-z