Sodium-ion battery (SIB) is currently a well-developed, next-generation commercial rechargeable battery technology (Usiskin et al. 2021). Given the abundant sodium resources in the earth's crust, SIB is deemed to be a cost-effective energy storage technology that could compete with the mature lead acid battery (LABs) (Yin et al. 2022) and lithium-ion battery (Xie and Lu 2020) technologies. Therefore, the cost-effectiveness of the electrode materials and electrolytes should meet the low-cost design philosophy of SIBs. Among the widely investigated anodes (conversion, alloy, intercalation, and carbonaceous) (Zhang et al. 2019) in research papers, hard carbon is the most practical, promising family of anodes for the commercialization of SIB due to its high capacity and low (de)sodiation potentials (Li et al. 2023). Moreover, hard carbons could be prepared from low-cost, abundant lignocellulose carbon precursors (Huang et al. 2023; Yang et al. 2023).

Hard carbon refers to the carbon materials obtained from resin, lignocellulose biomasses, and thermosetting plastics at moderate carbonization temperatures (1000 − 2000°C). These carbon materials can not be totally graphitized even under a high carbonization temperature of 2500°C. HC contains multi-dimensional structure aspects, such as micro graphite nanodomains (GND), defects, and close pores formed by the arrangements of these GNDs (Zhao et al. 2021). Therefore, the microcrystalline, closed pores, and defects in HC could influence its electrochemical sodium-ion storage behaviors. Basically, hard carbon stores sodium ions through an “adsorption-intercalation-pore filling” mechanism (Sun et al. 2024). Under such a mechanism, the development of HCs with high capacities should focus on aspects of high closed pore volume, while the development of high-rate HC should focus on aspects of abundant defects and large interlayer spacing.

Lignocellulose biomasses and their components (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) are promising HC precursors that are available and abundant in the present papermaking and biorefinery factories (Zhang et al. 2022). Primary lignocellulose biomasses are coconut shells, rice husks, bamboo fibers, etc. These primary lignocellulose biomasses exhibit different physicochemical structures in terms of chemical structure (Meng et al. 2023), components, arrangements of constituents, composite, and muti-dimensional structures. These multi-dimensional structure aspects could influence the pyrolysis and carbonization of lignocellulose so that the structure and electrochemical performances of hard carbon could also be influenced. In this regard, research on the relationship between hard carbon structures and lignocellulose structure is important for developing HCs with high performances.

Understanding the single role of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose in the formation of hard carbon anodes is necessary since they not only have different chemical structures (Fig. 1) but also different aggregate states. Usually, lignin is of an amorphous 3D structure, and cellulose is composed of crystalline or amorphous regions. Hemicellulose is the binder between lignin and cellulose. In this perspective, we investigated the HCs derived from cellulose (not oxidized), lignin (enzymatic hydrolysis lignin), and hemicellulose (xylan) (denoted as CHC, LHC, and HCHC) under different calcination temperatures (600 − 1600°C) for 4 hours in nitrogen inert atmosphere with a heating ramping rate of 5 °C min-1. Through powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the HC samples, it is observed that CHC, LHC, and HCHC showed a similar tendency for the phenomenological (002) diffraction shapes until a carbonization temperature of 1600°C (Fig. 2a-c). At a carbonization temperature of 1600°C, LHC1600 displayed a small crystalline peak indicative of the formation of graphite microcrystalline. HCHC1600 showed a sharp diffraction peak suggesting the formation of larger graphite microcrystalline inside the carbon skeleton of HCHC1600. Some work reports the preferential formation of graphite crystalline in the cellulose-dominated biomass (Wang et al. 2021), which is ascribed to the existence of high content of cellulose component. Our results indicate that this preferential formation phenomenon is probably ascribed to the composite structure between cellulose and lignin/hemicellulose. Nevertheless, the formation of graphite nanodomains (GND) may influence the (002) interlayer spacing (d002), the pores size, and the pore volume of closed pores.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The molecular structure of the precursors of HCs: (a) lignin, (b) cellulose, (c) hemicellulose

Fig. 2
figure 2

Structural characterizations of HCs. a XRD patterns of CHCs. b XRD patterns of LHCs. c XRD patterns of HCHCs. d The (002) interlayer spacing of CHCs, LHCs and HCHCs

It could be read from Fig. 2d that the d002 values of HCHC are relatively smaller (Tables 1, 2 and 3), which indicates the higher rate capabilities of LHC and CHCs compared with HCHC. The electrochemical performances of these HCs are compared in the following section.

Table 1 Structure parameters of CHCs
Table 2 Structure parameters of LHCs
Table 3 Structure parameters of HCHCs

Closed pores sizes and pore volumes determine the plateau capacities and rate capabilities, which are important parameters that influence the energy density of SIB full cells. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) techniques are usually used to determine the close pore size, pore volume, and pore size distribution (Fig. 3a-c). These pores are inaccessible to the electrolyte (Li et al. 2022; Chen et al. 2023), which allows a “pore-filling” charge storage mechanism. Pore size and pore volume should influence the sodium-ion storage performances (capacity and rate capabilities of the plateau and slope capacities). Whether the pore size and crystalline structure could be changed during the sodium-ion storage process is a scientific issue. The relationship between closed pores and plateau capacity is somewhat difficult to build since some of the pores are closed by GNDs which do not allow sodium ions to diffuse or intercalate. On the contrary, there are also open pores that do not allow electrolytes to go inside, which indicates that the pores are “closed” for the sodium-ion storage process. The pore size could influence the formation of Na metal clusters, which determines the capacities and rate capabilities of the plateau charge-discharge behaviors. The closed pore size of HCs is in the range of 1.5 to 3.0 nm (Fig. 3d). The closed pore size of CHC is larger than LHC and HCHC under the same calcination temperature, which needs to be explained in future research. A possible reason is that the thermal stability of hemicellulose is much inferior to cellulose and lignin, which induces extensive decomposition at low pyrolysis temperatures. The same tendency is found in lignin with different units (Yang et al. 2023). The larger closed pores of CHC could be due to the large GND formed from cellulose.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a SAXS patterns of CHCs. b SAXS patterns of LHCs. c SAXS patterns of HCHCs. d Dependence of closed pore size and closed pore volume (calculated from SAXS) on the carbonization temperatures of CHCs, LHCs and HCHCs

The galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) technique is used to test the electrochemical sodium-ion storage performances of HC anodes (Fig. 4). It is observed that the behaviors are similar for these HCs, which indicates that the intrinsic structures of HCs are similar. However, the capacities (including the plateau capacities) of LHC and CHC are much higher than HCHC, while they have similar initial coulombic efficiencies (ICEs). The result indicates that we could prepare hard carbons with higher capacities using lignocellulose with a low content of hemicellulose. The relatively low ICEs should be ascribed to the abundance of surface defects. Statistics results show the plateau capacities and the slope capacities of these HCs (Fig. 4c, f, i), the plateau capacities of LHC and CHC are higher than that of HCHCs (Tables 4, 5 and 6), which is ascribed to the higher closed pore volume storing sodium metal cluster in this potential range. The closed pore volumes of most HCs are in the range of 0.2 to 0.3 cm3 g-1 which gives rise to plateau capacities around 200 mAh g−1 according to the full filling of these pores by Na clusters. The closed pore volume could be tuned meticulously to meet the demand for developing HCs with higher plateau capacities. A variety of pore engineering methods should be applied to the pyrolysis and carbonization of lignocellulose to achieve HCs with high capacities. HCs with stable GCD cycling stabilities coupled with stable cathodes should be employed to construct SIB full cells with superior cycling stabilities. HCs show stable cycling stabilities under a GCD current density of 100 mAg-1 (Fig. 5). However, it must be guaranteed that under high current densities, long cycling regimes, and extreme temperatures, the cycling stability of HCs is still superior to building stable SIBs. The failure mode of HC should be investigated and improved to meet commercialization requirements.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Electrochemical performances of HCs. a GCD curve of CHCs. b Rate performances of CHCs. c The contributions of slope-region capacity (> 0.1 V) and plateau-region capacity (< 0.1 V) in the 5th discharge process of CHCs. d GCD curve of LHCs. e Rate performances of LHCs. f The contributions of slope-region capacity (> 0.1 V) and plateau-region capacity (< 0.1 V) in the 5th discharge process of LHCs. g GCD curve of HCHCs. h Rate performances of HCHCs. i The contributions of slope-region capacity (> 0.1 V) and plateau-region capacity (< 0.1 V) in the 5th discharge process of HCHCs

Table 4 Slope, plateau and reversible capacities of CHCs
Table 5 Slope, plateau and reversible capacities of HCHCs
Table 6 Slope, plateau and reversible capacities of LHCs
Fig. 5
figure 5

a Cycling stability of CHCs at 50 mA g−1. b Cycling stability of LHCs at 50 mA g−1. c Cycling stability of HCHCs at 50 mA g−1

Given the abundant nature of lignocellulose biomasses on the earth, it is natural to develop low-cost HCs for commercial SIBs. The intrinsic pyrolysis and carbonization mechanism should be analyzed to track the formation mechanism of HCs derived from these single components and lignocellulose biomasses. Primary lignocellulose biomass is of particular interest since these raw materials of HCd are inexpensive and abundant in the Earth. However, firstly, for developing commercial HCs, the consistency of lignocellulose biomasses must be guaranteed. Consistency means that the composition, composite structure, and muti-dimension structures are reproducible. Secondly, the electrochemical performances of HC could be tuned by chemical and chemical engineering methods. In this regard, the extraction of chemicals could result in lignocellulose biomasses with changed structures and the tuning of the aggregate of lignocellulose. These aggregates could have different pyrolysis and carbonization behaviors, which could result in HCs with different structures (Tang et al. 2023). Therefore, aggregate and structure regulation is an important strategy for constructing the lignocellulose precursors for HCs. Mature methods are built to separate hemicellulose, lignin, and cellulose sequentially (Fig. 6) using etching and conversion methods, such as dehydration, dissolution, oxidation, and lignin-first strategies. In such a way, the inconsistency of the raw materials should be tuned as raw materials for HC commercially employed in SIBs. Thirdly, these chemical processes should follow the principles of green chemistry and the ideas of sustainable development. In these chemical processes, less contaminant is released, and the components of the lignocellulose biomass should be fully utilized. To meet the huge demand for hard carbon anodes, lignocellulose should be produced in a large amount.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Chemical structure tuning for the construction of lignocellulose with engineered multi-dimensional structures toward building HCs with different structures