Abstract
In recent years, extensive research has focused on applying machine learning (ML) techniques to predict the properties of engineered cementitious composites (ECCs). ECCs exhibit crucial characteristics such as compressive strength (CS), tensile strength (TS), and tensile strain (TSt). Accurate forecasting of these critical properties can reduce material waste, lower construction expenses, and expedite project timelines for engineers and designers. This study investigates mixture design components and corresponding strengths of ECCs based on only polyethylene fiber drawing from existing literatures. Artificial neural network (ANN) models are developed to predict CS, TS, and TSt using a dataset of 339 experimental results with twelve input variables. The ANN models, implemented in MATLAB, consider various hidden layers and neurons to optimize accuracy and validation metrics demonstrate the model's high accuracy. Sensitivity analysis explores individual parameter impacts. Drawing inspiration from this study, it would be advantageous to enhance the predictive modeling toolkit by leveraging the progress made in existing technologies, thereby driving the green and low-carbon development of civil engineering. This approach not only improves the efficiency and sustainability of construction practices but also aligns with global environmental goals by reducing the carbon footprint associated with civil engineering projects.
摘要
近年来,采用机器学习(ML)技术预测工程水泥 基复合材料(ECC)性能的研究备受关注。ECCs 具有优异的抗压强度 (CS)、抗拉强度 (TS) 和抗拉应变 (TSt) 等重要 性能。准确预测这些性能可以减少材料浪费,降低施工成本,并促进工程师和设计师的项目进度。本文基于现有文 献,整理了仅含聚乙烯纤维的 ECCs的混合物设计成分及其相应强度的数据。采用人工神经网络(ANN)模型,利用 包含12个输入变量的339个实验数据集来预测CS、TS和TSt。ANN模型在 MATLAB 中实现,并通过考虑不同的隐藏层 和神经元以优化模型预测准确性,且验证指标表明该预测模型具有高准确性。此外,还进行了敏感性分析,以评估单 个输入参数对PE-ECC预测结果的影响。通过进一步利用现有技术来改进和提升预测建模工具,将有助于推动土木工 程的绿色和低碳发展。该方法不仅提高了施工的效率和可持续性,还减少了与土木工程项目相关的碳足迹,与全球环 境目标保持一致。
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
ECCs are a developing category of cementitious composites that are reinforced with high-performance fibers such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyethylene (PE), carbon, glass, steel, and natural fibers; however, the PVA and PE fibers are particularly popular due to their compatibility with the cementitious matrix; their ability to enhance the ductility of the composite significantly and display various micro-cracks features [1,2,3]. Li et al. [4] developed engineered cementitious composite (ECC) composites in the 1990s through the intentional modification of the matrix, fiber, and fiber-matrix interface, fiber volume fraction, orientation, slip-debonding mechanism, and stress transfer guided by the principles of micromechanics theory [5, 6]. The material has achieved a distinctive composition of high-performance fiber-reinforced cement composite (HP-FRCC), in which the overall volume fraction of fibers typically does not exceed 2% [5, 7, 8]. ECCs serve as a noteworthy illustration of a sustainable material that possesses the potential to enhance the economic aspects of construction projects while also addressing various technical challenges, e.g., cost, material consistency, workability, design codes, standards, and sustainability [22]. When subjected to tension, ECCs demonstrate a ductility that surpasses a strain value of 3% and exhibits acceptable flaws of less than 100 µm [8, 9]. Deng et al. [10] demonstrate lightweight ECC (LWECC) with an impressive high strain of > 12% and low density make ECC suitable for retrofitting structural parts, particularly in enhancing seismic performance [11] and lightweight structure application with low cost and low carbon footprint [12]. Moreover, it can potentially address the spalling in brittle concrete cover, which leads to the corrosion of embedded steel bars and subsequent premature deterioration of concrete structures [13].
The mechanical properties of ECCs (e.g., CS, TS, TSt) are mainly affected by the mix design, including the inclusion of cement matrix constituents and fiber variables [14, 15]. The composition of the mixture includes Portland cement (PC) along with environmentally beneficial supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as class-F fly ash, class C fly ash, and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). These SCMs, together with micro-silica sand, chemical admixtures like superplasticizer and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), and water, not only enhance the performance of the concrete but also significantly contribute to the green and low-carbon development of civil engineering by reducing the carbon footprint associated with cement production. Predicting mechanical properties accurately through the integration of mixed parameters, like employing precise mixed proportions to attain the desired tensile strain capacity, in ECCs, could greatly improve the design process. This in turn could lead to a substantial decrease in experimental workload and cost. However, the material components of green ECCs are characterized by a high level of complexity and play a crucial role in reducing the carbon footprint. This poses challenges in accurately modeling the mechanical characteristics based on mixture design parameters through conventional regression studies [16], highlighting the need for innovative approaches to support the green and low-carbon development of civil engineering. There is a pressing need for the development of more robust and advanced modeling techniques to enhance the prediction capabilities of models.
Traditional approaches to discerning the relationships among various parameters typically rely on statistical analyses, which facilitate the construction of both linear and non-linear regression models [17, 18]. Nevertheless, these regression models are often constrained by their inherent limitations; they are bound to the relationships defined by the pre-established equations, whether linear or non-linear [19, 20]. To overcome these limitations, machine learning methodologies inspired by biological processes have been devised to effectively model intricate engineering phenomena [21,22,23]. Among the most precise and dependable machine-learning techniques are genetic programming, gene expression programming, and ANN [17]. The fundamental principle behind these algorithms is the development of models through the training of available datasets, allowing for a more dynamic and adaptable representation of complex relationships [24, 25].
Numerous studies have explored the utilization of ANN models in the field of ECCs. Various ANN models were utilized to forecast the mechanical characteristics of ECCs reinforced mostly with PVA and steel fibers [14, 26, 27]. These models exhibited commendable precision and the ability to generalize correctly. Nevertheless, the scope of these studies is confined to assessing the predictive accuracy of ANN models without delving into the interpretation of their outputs. Consequently, they offer minimal understanding of the input–output correlations, which is a cause for concern among researchers and engineers involved in the design of ECC. Additional sensitivity analysis should be undertaken using the established ANN model to accurately assess the impact of mixture design parameters on the development of mechanical characteristics in ECCs. Furthermore, prior research mainly concentrated on examining PE-ECC. Limited research has been conducted on using ANN for predicting mechanical characteristics of only PE fiber-based ECC.
Using an ANN model, this paper predicted the mechanical strength (e.g., CS, TS, and TSt) of PE-ECC. A comprehensive dataset containing 339 mixtures from published literature has been established with 12 influencing factors. The data are then arbitrarily divided into training, validation, and testing sets using proportions of 70% for training and 30% for validation and testing. This study confirmed the model's accuracy by evaluating the defects, MSE, RMSE, R2, and R. In addition, the sensitivity analysis was also carried out to evaluate each input parameter's contribution towards the PE-ECC prediction results.
2 Research significance
The PE- ECC has potentiality to improve the TS, TSt, Ductility, crack resistance, and toughness which makes the concrete more durable and more reliable to use in the structure. Some research novelty is mentioned in the below:
-
PE- ECC plays a pivotal role in sustainable construction practices – especially for engineers to design complex materials with high strain capacity, where the ML model will help to identify the optimized concrete mixtures.
-
A novel dataset is created to only focus on PE-ECC based concrete, which makes the predictive results more accurate, robust, and applicable to the industry.
-
The ANN models (i.e., optimizing different neurons and hidden layers) offer a powerful tool showing robust and accurate results.
-
The predictive model not only considered CS but also considered TS and TSt which are significant for the fiber-based concrete. Moreover, the input parameters for the fiber are carefully considered to get the appropriate results for TS and TSt.
-
The sensitivity analysis was also considered to observe the influential parameters in this study.
Later the methodology properly addressed the process of the influences of PE-ECC based concrete and this process can help to identify the proper mechanical strength of the concrete.
3 Methodology
ML techniques have recently been applied to simulate and predict challenging issues in science and engineering. One of the ML techniques, i.e., ANN, has been used to anticipate the behavior of numerous structural components and materials [28]. ANN model functions as a black box system (e.g., feed-forwardnet function to create a feedforward neural network) and configures training parameters (e.g., net.trainParam) using the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm. The backpropagation (e.g., LM) is chosen among scaled conjugate gradient and resilient backpropagation. Six main processes are typically involved in the modeling of an appropriate ANN model: (1) data collection, analysis, and problem definition; (2) ANN model development; (3) architecture determination; (4) learning process determination; (5) training of the networks; and (6) testing of the trained network for validation [32].
The main objective of the current work is to develop valuable ANN models for predicting PE-ECC mechanical properties (e.g., CS, TS, and TSt) by gathering databases from various mixed proportions based on previously published research. The model must next be trained and tested using input data to provide the desired model output. Fig. 1 illustrates the ANN model's methodology for determining various anticipated PE-ECC CS, TS, and TSt. This study examined the topic of Material selection and database analysis in Sect. 3.1, the theory of ANN in Sect. 2, the results and discussions of ANN models and the sensitivity analysis which is implemented in Sect. 4, and the conclusion is presented in Sect. 5.
3.1 Material selection and database analysis
The dataset utilized in this study comprises 339 samples of PE-ECC mixture that were gathered from various literature sources [13, 35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53] [13, 54, 55].This dataset utilized fifteen features, comprising twelve input characteristics and three output features. Various features can influence the resulting mechanical property, regarded as the input variables [53]. The input variables consist of the following variables C/B, S/B, FA/B, GS/B, SF/B, SP/B, W/B, CA (day), AR, Df (mm), Lf (mm), Fv (mm). These twelve characteristics were equally considered to predict the CS, TS, and TSt of PE-ECC.
The statistical properties of the dataset hold higher significance in the context of ML models [29]. Figure 2 depicts a histogram of the PE-ECC, which graphically summarizes a univariate data set's distribution. Tables 1 and 2 summarizes the descriptive statistics for ECC's input, target, and output variables, encompassing measures such as mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, kurtosis, and skewness. This information is intended to facilitate understanding the data, which can also be related to Fig. 2. Skewness is a statistical metric that quantifies the degree of symmetry exhibited by the investigated variables.
On the other hand, kurtosis is a measure that determines if the dataset has heavy or light tails compared to a normal distribution. Figs. 3, 4, and 5 illustrate the correlation heatmap matrix of the input variables for CS, TS, and TSt, respectively. The heatmap's primary purpose is to uncover possible relationships between distinct variables and to comprehend their correlation. It also shows whether the input variable influenced the original variable selection. A correlation value of 0.90 to 1 implies that the variables have an influential positive or negative association [56]. Coefficients that fall between 0.50 and 0.70 indicate a robust correlation, whereas values below 0.25 represent a minimal relationship among the variables.
Correlation coefficients within the range of ± 0.50 to 0.70, as well as those below ± 0.25, are indicative of a significant and weak association between the variables. Figure 3 shows the input variables, namely C/B, SF/B, and SP/B, which exhibit substantial positive correlation coefficients with CS with correlation coefficients of 0.43, 0.66, and 0.34, respectively. However, the FA/B and W/B correlation coefficients are negative, with values of -0.7 and -0.59, respectively, for the CS.
Figure 4 illustrates the input variables, specifically GS/B, AR/B, and Lf, that display noteworthy positive correlation coefficients with TS. The correlation coefficients for these variables are evaluated as 0.5, 0.34, and 0.35, in the given order. Similarly, Fig. 5 shows that the correlation coefficient for TSt exhibits positive values for FA/B, W/B, and AR of 0.48, 0.32, and 0.29, respectively. Conversely, C/B, SF/B, and SP/B show the negative correlation coefficients of 0.38, 0.43, and 0.37, respectively.
3.1.1 Artificial neural networks (ANN)
ANN are computational models that are inspired by the structure and function of biological neural networks in the brain [30, 57]. ANN models consist of interconnected units called artificial neurons, which can process and transmit signals to other neurons [33]. ANN can learn from data and perform various tasks such as classification, regression, clustering, dimensionality reduction, etc.
ANN can be trained using different algorithms, such as back-propagation, gradient descent, genetic algorithms, etc. [58, 59]. The training process involves adjusting the weights and biases of the artificial neurons to minimize the error between the actual output and the desired output. The error function can differ depending on the task, such as mean squared error, cross-entropy, etc. The training process can also use different techniques to improve performance and avoid overfitting, such as regularization, dropout, batch normalization, etc. [33].
The primary objective of this study was to construct an ANN model using the ANN toolbox in MATLAB R2017b software, and the LM algorithm was employed to validate the effectiveness of various neuron quantities. The LM algorithm utilizese random partitioning strategy to separate input and target vectors into three sets: training, validation, and testing. Modifying the respective proportions of these three sets has the potential to enhance the process of generalization marginally.
4 Results and discussions
4.1 Prediction and error analysis for ANN models
Tables 4, 5, and 6 show the performance of the proposed ML techniques for CS, TS, and TSt based on statistical analysis, respectively. We used four metrics to evaluate the accuracy of the ML techniques: R, R2, MSE, and RMSE. R and R2 measure how well the ML technique fits the data, while MSE and RMSE measure the average error between the actual and predicted values. A robust ML technique should have a high R and R2 value and low values for the other two metrics. Table 3 represents the statistical models to evaluate the ML models for the PE-ECC.
Network performance is evaluated by how low the error values are in the training process, with zero error indicating the best possible outcome. The network architecture also measures the correlation between the outputs and the targets using the coefficients of determination, or R-values. A high R-value (close to 1) means a strong and almost perfect correlation [17], while a low R-value (close to 0) means a weak and random correlation. The closeness of the model's training and testing results indicates the degree of overfitting of the model [18]. Overfitting is a problem that occurs when the model learns too much from the training data and fails to generalize well to new data. Therefore, evaluating the overfitting of the ML techniques is an important aspect of their performance. The optimal network configuration was selected based on a dual-criteria approach encompassing the MSE and the R-values.
With the optimal network configuration now established, we apply our rigorously validated model to the critical task of predicting the mechanical properties—CS, TS, and TSt—of PE-ECC. This step is pivotal, as it not only assesses the model’s predictive power but also underscores its practical relevance in advancing material science.
4.2 Strength prediction results
4.2.1 Prediction of compressive strength (CS)
The statistical analysis results for the CS using the proposed ML techniques are displayed in Table 4. This study involved the development of seven ANN models with varying numbers of hidden neurons to forecast the CS of PE-based ECC. The R2-values for all hidden neurons in the system ranged from 0.85 to 0.96, as observed in Table 4. The ANN model with ten hidden neurons achieved the highest accuracy of 0.96, followed by models with 8, 14, 12, 6, and 4 hidden neurons in descending order. The ANN2, ANN4, ANN6, ANN8, ANN10, ANN12 and ANN14 represents the neural networks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, and 14 respectively. The model with two hidden neurons obtained the lowest accuracy of 0.85. The regression plot in Fig. 6 illustrates the performance of the best ANN model with ten hidden neurons, showing a high R-value of 0.97 for all stages (e.g., training, validation, testing, and total). These results verify the accuracy and reliability of the model in estimating the CS of PE-ECC. Figure 7 presents the performance of the trained ANN model, with some errors observed but overall satisfactory validation outcomes, including a value of 90.123 and an optimal epoch of 31. Furthermore, Fig. 8 displays an error histogram illustrating the distribution of errors across different CS levels, with an error range of -26.62 to 29.11 and varying numbers of instances for the training, validation, and testing data.
Based on the comparison of all seven models in Table 4, the model with twelve hidden neurons exhibited the lowest RMSE value of 7.8 for testing data, although not for training data of 8.62. A similar situation occurred for the model with 14 hidden neurons. Consequently, the model with ten hidden neurons achieved the best accuracy in terms of RMSE values (training- 8.44, testing- 8.62). Figures 9, 10, and 11 depict the error values between the actual and predicted CS for the training, validation, and testing data using the ANN models. These results indicate that the number of hidden neurons significantly influenced the prediction accuracy, as reflected by the lower mean square error values throughout the training, validation, and testing stages. Taking into consideration these findings, it can be concluded that the ANN model with ten hidden neurons exhibits high accuracy in predicting CS, owing to its low error values.
Table 2 presents a comparison between the experimental findings and the prediction model based on ANN. The deviation between the experimental mean CS and the predicted mean CS was approximately 1.591 MPa, representing a mere 1.42% discrepancy from the experimental mean CS value.
Moreover, the comparison of the mean experimental target and the mean predicted outputs revealed negligible differences (errors) compared to the individual experimental and predicted strength values.
4.2.2 Prediction of tensile strength (TS)
The present study applied the same modeling and analysis methods utilized for predicting CS values of PE-ECC to forecast the TS. However, in order to enhance the accuracy of the ANN models for TS, a total sample size of 325 was employed. The results detailing the performance of the ANN model with various hidden neurons are summarized in Table 5. According to the R2-values presented in the table, the accuracy of the ANN models varied from 0.79 to 0.94 with different numbers of hidden neurons. Notably, the model with 10 hidden neurons demonstrated the highest accuracy of 0.94, followed by the models with 6, 8, 12, 14, and 4 hidden neurons in descending order. Conversely, the model with two hidden neurons achieved the lowest accuracy of 0.79. The regression plot displayed in Fig. 12 presents the results obtained from the most accurate ANN model (e.g., ten hidden neurons), revealing R-values of 0.97, 0.94, 0.94, and 0.96 for the training, validation, testing, and total stages, respectively. These values indicate that the model provides reliable and accurate predictions of TS for PE-ECC. Figure 13 depicts the error values between the actual and predicted TS for the training, testing, and validation data using the best ANN model, showcasing satisfactory results with a value of 1.2522 and an optimal epoch of 170. Additionally, Fig. 14 illustrates the error histogram with 20 bins for the training, testing, and validation data at different TS levels, employing distinct colors. The histogram demonstrates that the error range spans from -5.032 to 5.038, with the number of samples for the training, testing, and validation data approximately totaling 70, 85, and 95, respectively.
The performance of the ANN models with diverse hidden neurons in predicting TS is presented in Table 5. The model with ten hidden neurons yielded the lowest RMSE value of 0.95 for training, as well as the second lowest RMSE value of 1.29 for testing. While the model with 6 hidden neurons exhibited a lower RMSE value for testing of 1.16, it also yielded a lower R2 value and a higher RMSE value for training 1.37. Thus, the model with ten hidden neurons emerged as the most accurate and consistent model when considering the RMSE value. Figs. 15, 16, and 17 showcase the errors between the target and predicted values across training, validation, and testing data, respectively, employing the ten hidden neurons ANN model. The impact of the number of hidden neurons on prediction accuracy is evident from the lower MSE values observed in all stages when utilizing the best ANN model. Collectively, these findings lead to the conclusion that the ANN model featuring ten hidden neurons offers high accuracy in predicting TS due to the low error values.
Table 2 presents a comprehensive comparison between the input parameters and the TS values ascertained experimentally and those predicted by the ANN. The mean predicted TS exhibited a high degree of congruence with the mean experimental TS, deviating by a marginal 0.475 MPa. This deviation represents a negligible 5% of the mean experimental TS, underscoring the precision of the ANN model. Notably, the percentage error observed when comparing the mean experimental target to the mean predicted output was substantially lower than the error margins recorded for individual samples, indicating the model’s robust predictive capability.
4.2.3 Prediction of tensile strain (TSt)
The same processes for CS and TS prediction were used for the TSt prediction of PE-ECC but with 318 samples. Table 5 summarizes the results of the ANN models with different hidden neurons for TSt. The best model was the one with 12 hidden neurons, which had an R2-value of 0.93 and an R-value of 0.96 for the total data, as shown in the regression plot in Fig. 18. The error values for the training, testing, and validation data using the best model are shown in Fig. 19, which also shows a satisfactory validation result with 0.8413 and an optimal epoch of 81. The error histogram with 20 bins for the different data sets at different TSt levels is displayed in Fig. 20, which shows a low error range of -2.93 to 3.106, and the number of samples for the training, testing, and validation data was about 75, 85, and 98, respectively.
Table 6 summarizes the performance of the ANN models with different hidden neurons for TSt prediction. The best model was the one with 12 hidden neurons, which had the smallest RMSE value, 0.84 for training and 0.92 for testing. Therefore, this model achieved the best accuracy and consistency in terms of RMSE value compared to any other model. Figures 21, 22, and 23 show the error values between the target and predicted values for the training, validation, and testing data using the best ANN model. The prediction accuracy was influenced by the number of hidden neurons, as indicated by the lower MSE values for all stages using the best ANN model. These results suggest that the ANN model with 12 hidden neurons had a high accuracy for predicting TSt due to the low error values.
According to Table 2, the difference between the mean experimental and mean predicted TSt is 0.31 MPa, representing a mere 6.11% of the experimental TSt value. The difference percentage between the mean experimental target and the mean predicted outputs was much smaller than the difference values for each individual sample.
4.3 Sensitivity analysis
A sensitivity study was conducted to assess the relative impact of each input parameter on the prediction of CS, TS, and TSt of PE-ECC. Since each input parameter substantially impacts the forecast of the outcome, it is imperative to have a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy of each particular input parameter. Figures 24, 25, and 26 depict the effectiveness of input parameters predicting the CS, TS, and TSt, respectively. Figure 24 illustrates that the main variables influencing the CS of PE-ECC are C/B (95%), S/B (85%), GS/B (43%), SF/B (88%), SP/B (86%), W/B (88%), CA (61%), AR (91%), Lf (92%), and Fv (95%), respectively. Nevertheless, the remaining input factors had a relatively minor contribution to the forecast of CS of PE-ECC, with FA/B (27%) and Df accounting for (8%). Similarly, Figs. 25 and 26 illustrate the influence of input parameters on the TS and TSt. The F/B shows less effect for the TS and TSt however, the C/B and S/B have a similar approach. The Df is the lowest influence parameter for the CS, TS, and TSt. During the experimental phase, a significant advancement was noticed in which the concentration of CS exhibited an increase in response to variations in CA (days) and mixture parameters. To ascertain the individual impact of each parameter on the projected outcome, Eq. 2 was obtained from a of literature [31]. In order to utilize the equation, all data pairs were employed, with each data pair being applied subsequently to form the data array xi.
The equation represents the relative influence rij between datasets xi and xj.
Armed with the insights gleaned from our comprehensive sensitivity analysis, we are now poised to encapsulate the overarching conclusions drawn from our extensive study.
5 Conclusion
This study presents the development of ANN models designed to estimate the mechanical properties (e.g., CS, TS, and TSt) of the PE-ECC. The models were developed using datasets comprising 339, 325, and 319 respectively test results for CS, TS, and TSt, respectively. To predict the CS, TS, and TSt values of the PE-ECC mixtures, seven distinct ANN architectures with varying numbers of hidden neurons (e.g., 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14) were evaluated. The ANN model featuring 10 hidden neurons yielded the most accurate predictions for CS and TS, while the model with 12 hidden neurons was superior for TSt prediction. Performance metrics (e.g., R, and R2, MSE, RMSE) were employed to finalize the ANNs for training, validation, and testing of the PE-ECC samples. The outcomes of this investigation enable the following conclusions:
-
The ANN model with 10 hidden neurons demonstrated high predictive accuracy for the CS of PE-ECC, with an R2 of 0.94 for training, and 0.96 for both validation and testing phases. The RMSE was 9.49 for training, 8.44 for validation, and 8.62 for testing, indicating the model’s precision across different evaluation stages. The relative error for CS was as low as 1.42%, highlighting the model’s exceptional precision. To enhance the model's performance, exploring advanced regularization techniques and expanding the training dataset is recommended.
-
The ANN model with 10 hidden neurons confirmed its efficacy in predicting the TS of PE-ECC, with an R2 of 0.88 for training and testing, and 0.94 for validation. The RMSE values were 1.12 for training, 0.95 for validation, and 1.29 for testing, indicating a consistent predictive performance. The model achieved a relative error of 5% for TS, showcasing its accuracy. Addressing the RMSE disparity observed between validation and testing may involve refining data preprocessing and feature engineering methods.
-
The ANN model with 12 hidden neurons showcased robust capabilities for predicting the TSt of PE-ECC, achieving an R2 of 0.92 for training and testing, and 0.93 for validation. The RMSE remained consistent at 0.92 for training and testing, with a lower 0.84 for validation. The relative error for TSt was 6.11%, further confirming the model’s reliability. Investigating factors during the validation phase that contributed to the lower RMSE could provide insights to optimize model accuracy.
-
Sensitivity analysis indicated the differential impact of input parameters on the prediction of CS, TS, and TSt. Parameters such as C/B, SF/B, Lf, and Fv were highly influential for CS, while FA/B and Df had lesser effects. For TS and TSt, parameters like C/B, W/B, and Lf were critical. This underscores the importance of a comprehensive understanding of each parameter's influence to enhance predictive models.
This study’s comprehensive analysis of ANN models underscores the importance of specific input parameters and model configurations in accurately predicting the mechanical properties of PE-ECC. The minimal prediction errors across CS, TS, and TSt validate the models’ effectiveness and suggest avenues for model refinement, highlighting the potential for ANN models in material property estimation. Future research should delve deeper into the interaction between input parameters and model structure to refine the accuracy and utility of ANN predictions in material properties. This exploration is crucial for aligning with the broader objectives of sustainability and low-carbon initiatives in civil engineering, underscoring the pivotal role of sophisticated ANN models in realizing these environmental goals.
Data Availability
Data will be made available on request.
Abbreviations
- ANN:
-
Artificial Neural Network
- ECCs:
-
Engineered Cementitious Composites
- PVA:
-
Polyvinyl alcohol
- PE:
-
Polyethylene
- HP-FRCC:
-
High-performance fiber-reinforced cement composite
- LWECC:
-
Lightweight ECC
- PC:
-
Portland cement
- SCM:
-
Supplementary cementitious materials
- GGBS:
-
Ground granulated blast furnace slag
- HPMC:
-
Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
- HPC:
-
High-performance concrete
- UHSFRC:
-
Ultra-high steel fiber reinforced concrete
- FRP:
-
Fiber-reinforced polymer
- C/B:
-
Cement/Binder
- S/B:
-
Sand/Binder
- FA/B:
-
Fly ash/Binder
- GS/B:
-
Ground slag/Binder
- SF/B:
-
Silica Fume/Binder
- SP/B:
-
Superplasticizer/Binder
- W/B:
-
Water/Binder
- CA:
-
Curing age(d)
- AR:
-
Aspect ratio
- Df:
-
Fiber diameter (mm)
- Lf:
-
Fiber length (mm)
- Vf:
-
Fiber volume (%)
- CS:
-
Compressive strength
- TS:
-
Tensile strength
- TSt:
-
Tensile strain
- MSE:
-
Mean squared error
- RMSE:
-
Root mean square error
- R:
-
Correlation coefficient
- R2 :
-
Absolute fraction of variance
- LM:
-
Levenberg–Marquardt
References
Shanmugasundaram, N., & Praveenkumar, S. (2021). Influence of supplementary cementitious materials, curing conditions and mixing ratios on fresh and mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites – A review. Construction and Building Materials, 309, 125038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125038
Zhou, Y., Xi, B., Yu, K., Sui, L., & Xing, F. (2018). Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Ultra-High Performance Engineered Cementitous Composites Incorporating Steel and Polyethylene Fibers. Materials, 11(8), 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081448
Li, L., Cai, Z., Yu, K., Zhang, Y. X., & Ding, Y. (2019). Performance-based design of all-grade strain hardening cementitious composites with compressive strengths from 40 MPa to 120 MPa. Cement and Concrete Composites, 97, 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.01.001
Li, V. C., & Leung, C. K. Y. (1992). Steady-State and Multiple Cracking of Short Random Fiber Composites. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 118(11), 2246–2264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1992)118:11(2246)
Zhang, Z., Yang, F., Liu, J.-C., & Wang, S. (2020). Eco-friendly high strength, high ductility engineered cementitious composites (ECC) with substitution of fly ash by rice husk ash. Cement and Concrete Research, 137, 106200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106200
Shanmugasundaram, N., Praveenkumar, S., Gayathiri, K., & Divya, S. (2022). Prediction on compressive strength of Engineered Cementitious composites using Machine learning approach. Construction and Building Materials, 342, 127933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127933
Li, V. C. (1993). From Micromechanics To Structural Engineering. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1993(471), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.1993.471_1
Yu, K., Li, L., Yu, J., Wang, Y., Ye, J., & Xu, Q. F. (2018). Direct tensile properties of engineered cementitious composites: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 165, 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.124
Lepech, M. D., & Li, V. C. (2009). Water permeability of engineered cementitious composites. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(10), 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.07.002
Deng, B. Y., Li, L. Z., Tan, D., Uddin, M. N., Cai, Z.-W., & Yu, K. Q. (2023). Sustainable and cost-effective ultra-lightweight engineered cementitious composite: Design and material characterization. Cement and Concrete Composites, 136, 104895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104895
Xu, L., Pan, J., & Cai, J. (2019). Seismic performance of precast RC and RC/ECC composite columns with grouted sleeve connections. Engineering Structures, 188, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.022
Huang, Z., Liang, T., & Chen, L. (2023). Experimental studies on durability performances of ultra-lightweight low-carbon LC3 cement composites against chloride ingression and carbonation. Construction and Building Materials, 395, 132340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132340
Huang, B. T., Wu, J. Q., Yu, J., Dai, J. G., & Leung, C. K. (2020). High-strength seawater sea-sand Engineered Cementitious Composites (SS-ECC): Mechanical performance and probabilistic modeling. Cement and Concrete Composites, 114, 103740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103740
Hossain, K. M. A., Anwar, M. S., & Samani, S. G. (2018). Regression and artificial neural network models for strength properties of engineered cementitious composites. Neural Computing and Applications, 29(9), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2602-3
Yesilmen, S. (2021). Strength prediction of engineered cementitious composites with artificial neural networks. Res. Eng. Struct. Mater., 7(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2020.222ma1013
Uddin, M. N., Shanmugasundaram, N., Praveenkumar, S., & Li, L. (2024). Prediction of compressive strength and tensile strain of engineered cementitious composite using machine learning. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-023-09695-0
Liu, Q., Hu, Z., Lu, X., Yang, J., Azim, I., & Sun, W. (2020). Prediction of Chloride Distribution for Offshore Concrete Based on Statistical Analysis. Materials, 13(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010174
Liu, Q., Iqbal, M. F., Yang, J., Lu, X., Zhang, P., & Rauf, M. (2021). Prediction of chloride diffusivity in concrete using artificial neural network: Modelling and performance evaluation. Construction and Building Materials, 268, 121082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121082
Gandomi, A. H., Alavi, A. H., Mirzahosseini, M. R., & Nejad, F. M. (2011). Nonlinear Genetic-Based Models for Prediction of Flow Number of Asphalt Mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23(3), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000154
Iqbal, M. F., Liu, Q., Azim, I., Zhu, X., Yang, J., Javed, M. F., & Rauf, M. (2020). Prediction of mechanical properties of green concrete incorporating waste foundry sand based on gene expression programming. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 384, 121322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121322
DeRousseau, M. A., Kasprzyk, J. R., & Srubar, W. V. (2018). Computational design optimization of concrete mixtures: A review. Cement and Concrete Research, 109, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.007
Yaseen, Z. M., Deo, R. C., Hilal, A., Abd, A. M., Bueno, L. C., Salcedo-Sanz, S., & Nehdi, M. L. (2018). Predicting compressive strength of lightweight foamed concrete using extreme learning machine model. Advances in Engineering Software, 115, 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.09.004
Taffese, W. Z., & Sistonen, E. (2017). Machine learning for durability and service-life assessment of reinforced concrete structures: Recent advances and future directions. Automation in Construction, 77, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.016
Emad, W., et al. (2022). Prediction of concrete materials compressive strength using surrogate models. Structures, 46, 1243–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.002
Emad, W., Mohammed, A. S., Bras, A., Asteris, P. G., Kurda, R., Muhammed, Z., Hassan, A. M. T., Qaidi, S. M. A., & Sihag, P. (2022). Metamodel techniques to estimate the compressive strength of UHPFRC using various mix proportions and a high range of curing temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, 349, 128737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128737
Altayeb, M., Wang, X., & Musa, T. H. (2021). An ensemble method for predicting the mechanical properties of strain hardening cementitious composites. Construction and Building Materials, 286, 122807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122807
Shi, L., Lin, S. T. K., Lu, Y., Ye, L., & Zhang, Y. X. (2018). Artificial neural network based mechanical and electrical property prediction of engineered cementitious composites. Construction and Building Materials, 174, 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.127
Nateghi-A, F., & Ahmadi, M. H. (2019). Prediction of Engineered Cementitious Composite Material Properties Using Artificial Neural Network. International Journal of Engineering, 32(11), 1534–1542. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2019.32.11b.04
Wu, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Splitting tensile strength prediction of sustainable high-performance concrete using machine learning techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(59), 89198–89209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22048-2
Naderpour, H., Kheyroddin, A., & Amiri, G. G. (2010). Prediction of FRP-confined compressive strength of concrete using artificial neural networks. Composite Structures, 92(12), 2817–2829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.04.008
Minaz Hossain, M., Nasir Uddin, M., & Abu Sayed Hossain, M. (2023). Prediction of compressive strength ultra-high steel fiber reinforced concrete (UHSFRC) using artificial neural networks (ANNs). Materials Today: Proceedings, S2214785323009720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.409
Morsy, A. M., Abd Elmoaty, A. E. M., & Harraz, A. B. (2022). Predicting mechanical properties of engineering cementitious composite reinforced with PVA using artificial neural network. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00998
Haddad, R., & Haddad, M. (2021). Predicting fiber-reinforced polymer–concrete bond strength using artificial neural networks: A comparative analysis study. Structural Concrete, 22(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900298
Nasir Uddin, M., Li, L., Ahmed, A., & Yahya Mohammed Almajhali, K. (2022). Prediction of PVA fiber effect in Engineered Composite cement (ECC) by Artificial neural Network (ANN). Materials Today: Proceedings, 65, 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.088
Ranade, R., Li, V. C., Stults, M. D., Heard, W. F., & Rushing, T. S. (2013). Composite properties of high-Strength, high-Ductility concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 110(4), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.14359/51685788
Zhang, Z., Yuvaraj, A., Di, J., & Qian, S. (2019). Matrix design of light weight, high strength, high ductility ECC. Construction and Building Materials, 210, 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.159
Kim, M. J., Chun, B., Choi, H. J., Shin, W., & Yoo, D. Y. (2021). Effects of supplementary cementitious materials and curing condition on mechanical properties of ultra-high-performance, strain-hardening cementitious composites. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2394. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052394
Curosu, I., Liebscher, M., Mechtcherine, V., Bellmann, C., & Michel, S. (2017). Tensile behavior of high-strength strain-hardening cement-based composites (HS-SHCC) made with high-performance polyethylene, aramid and PBO fibers. Cement and Concrete Research, 98, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.04.004
Yu, K. Q., Yu, J. T., Dai, J. G., Lu, Z. D., & Shah, S. P. (2018). Development of ultra-high performance engineered cementitious composites using polyethylene (PE) fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.040
Kim, M. J., Yoo, D. Y., & Yoon, Y. S. (2019). Effects of geometry and hybrid ratio of steel and polyethylene fibers on the mechanical performance of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composites. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 8(2), 1835–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.01.001
He, S., Qiu, J., Li, J., & Yang, E. H. (2017). Strain hardening ultra-high performance concrete (SHUHPC) incorporating CNF-coated polyethylene fibers. Cement and Concrete Research, 98, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.04.003
Li, Y., Guan, X., Zhang, C., & Liu, T. (2020). Development of High-Strength and High-Ductility ECC with Saturated Multiple Cracking Based on the Flaw Effect of Coarse River Sand. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32(11), 04020317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003405
Xu, L., Huang, B., Li, V. C., & Dai, J. (2022). High-strength high-ductility Engineered/Strain-Hardening Cementitious Composites (ECC/SHCC) incorporating geopolymer fine aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, 125, 104296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104296
Yu, K., Wang, Y., Yu, J., & Xu, S. (2017). A strain-hardening cementitious composites with the tensile capacity up to 8%. Construction and Building Materials, 137, 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.060
Zhou, Y., Xi, B., Sui, L., Zheng, S., Xing, F., & Li, L. (2019). Development of high strain-hardening lightweight engineered cementitious composites: Design and performance. Cement and Concrete Composites, 104, 103370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103370
Xu, L., Huang, B., Lao, J., & Dai, J. (2022). Tailoring strain-hardening behavior of high-strength Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) using hybrid silica sand and artificial geopolymer aggregates. Materials & Design, 220, 110876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110876
Guan, X., Li, Y., Liu, T., Zhang, C., Li, H., & Ou, J. (2019). An economical ultra-high ductile engineered cementitious composite with large amount of coarse river sand. Construction and Building Materials, 201, 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.207
Kim, M. J., Choi, H. J., Shin, W., Oh, T., & Yoo, D. Y. (2021). Development of impact resistant high-strength strain-hardening cementitious composites (HS-SHCC) superior to reactive powder concrete (RPC) under flexure. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 102652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102652
Chen, Y., Yu, J., & Leung, C. K. Y. (2018). Use of high strength Strain-Hardening Cementitious Composites for flexural repair of concrete structures with significant steel corrosion. Construction and Building Materials, 167, 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.009
Lei, D. Y., Guo, L. P., Chen, B., Curosu, I., & Mechtcherine, V. (2019). The connection between microscopic and macroscopic properties of ultra-high strength and ultra-high ductility cementitious composites (UHS-UHDCC). Composites. Part B, Engineering, 164, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.062
Xu, L., Huang, B., & Dai, J. (2021). Development of engineered cementitious composites (ECC) using artificial fine aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 305, 124742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124742
Wu, J., Cai, L., Cao, Y., & Lyu, B. (2022). Mechanical and fiber/matrix interfacial behavior of ultra-high-strength and high-ductility cementitious composites incorporating waste glass powder. Cement and Concrete Composites, 126, 104371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104371
Xu, L., Huang, B., Qian, L., & Dai, J. (2022). Enhancing long-term tensile performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) using sustainable artificial geopolymer aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, 133, 104676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104676
Zhang, D., Tu, H., Li, Y., & Weng, Y. (2022). Effect of fiber content and fiber length on the dynamic compressive properties of strain-hardening ultra-high performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 328, 127024.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3986060
Wu, J., Cai, L., & Qin, Y. (2021). Preparation and characterization of ultra-high-strength and ultra-high-ductility cementitious composites incorporating waste clay brick powder. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127813
Uddin, M. N., Li, L., Deng, B., & Ye, J. (2023). Interpretable XGBoost–SHAP machine learning technique to predict the compressive strength of environment-friendly rice husk ash concrete. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 8(5), 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01122-9
Moon, H. S., Ok, S., Chun, P. J., & Lim, Y. M. (2019). Artificial Neural Network for Vertical Displacement Prediction of a Bridge from Strains (Part 1): Girder Bridge under Moving Vehicles. Applied Sciences, 9(14), 2881. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142881
Yadav, R. K., & Anubhav, A. (2020). PSO-GA based hybrid with Adam Optimization for ANN training with application in Medical Diagnosis. Cognitive Systems Research, 64, 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2020.08.011
Morse, G., & Stanley, K. O. (2016). Simple Evolutionary Optimization Can Rival Stochastic Gradient Descent in Neural Networks. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016, 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1145/2908812.2908916
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the research and testing facilities provided by the Tongji University and Shanghai Government Scholarship.
Funding
The authors did not receive funding to carry out this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors participated in the conceptualization and design of the study. The tasks of material preparation, data collection, and analysis were carried out by Shameem Hossain, Md Nasir Uddin, and Kangtai Yan. The initial draft of the manuscript was composed by Md Minaz Hossain, with all authors providing comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors state that the research was conducted according to ethical standards.
Competing interests
The authors hereby assert that there are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have potentially influenced the work reported in this paper. They affirm having read, understood, and agreed to the submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration stipulated by the journal.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hossain, S., Uddin, M.N., Yan, K. et al. Prediction of the mechanical performance of polyethylene fiber-based engineered cementitious composite (PE-ECC). Low-carbon Mater. Green Constr. 2, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44242-024-00040-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44242-024-00040-y
Keywords
- Engineered cementitious composites
- Polyethylene fibers
- Artificial neural network
- Compressive strength
- Tensile strength
- Tensile strain