Skip to main content
Log in

Creating an optimal electric vehicle ecosystem: an investigation of electric vehicle stakeholders and ecosystem trends in the US

  • Original Article
  • Published:
SN Business & Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are a key transportation alternative that can help reduce tailpipe emissions associated with internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV). The overall emphasis on sustainability, energy independence, and rapid technological advancement has influenced the US to set targets to increase EV adoption. This study investigates emerging technologies within the EV ecosystem, including those likely to take precedence, phase out, or require strengthening. In pursuit of comprehensive insights, we gathered stakeholders' perspectives on current and future EV ecosystem trends targeting different facets of the ecosystem. Existing EV surveys often center on specific issues, such as charging infrastructure, purchasing intentions, or battery swapping. However, no literature has comprehensively examined stakeholders’ perspectives on various dimensions of the EV ecosystem. To address this gap, we conducted a survey using SurveyMonkey, an online survey tool employing a purposive sampling technique to target stakeholders within the EV ecosystem. The results of this survey highlight several key findings. Stakeholders express a strong preference for alternatives to traditional plugin charging methods. In addition, cybersecurity emerges as a paramount concern, underscoring the critical need to address potential vulnerabilities in EV systems. This study highlights obstacles and possible pathways for developing the EV ecosystem. Moreover, these insights can guide policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers to shape effective strategies and regulations. By incorporating stakeholder perspectives and leveraging emerging technologies, the EV ecosystem can be fortified to accelerate widespread EV adoption and meet sustainability goals. Finally, this study paves the way for more comprehensive research, including in-person interviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Our own criteria

Fig. 2

Source: Own survey results

Fig. 3

Source: Own survey results

Fig. 4

Source: Own survey results

Fig. 5

Source: Own survey results

Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data(s) sourced from public resources and created available with the manuscript.

Abbreviations

AV:

Autonomous vehicles

BSS:

Battery swap station

DRC:

Democratic Republic of Congo

EV:

Electric vehicles

FCEV:

Fuel cell electric vehicles

FDWA:

Federal Highway Administration

HOV:

High occupancy vehicle

ICEV:

Internal combustion engine vehicles

MCS:

Mobile charging stations

NACS:

National Association of Convenience Stores

NEHC:

National electric highway coalition

NEV:

New electric vehicle

RES:

Renewable energy sources

V2G:

Vehicle to grid

V2H:

Vehicle to home

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author(s) have no acknowledgment to declare.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions from all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rico Ruffino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

The author(s) give full consent for this publication of identifiable details, which can include images, graphs, and charts (“Material”) for publication in the above Journal.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agbesi, P.K., Ruffino, R. & Hakovirta, M. Creating an optimal electric vehicle ecosystem: an investigation of electric vehicle stakeholders and ecosystem trends in the US. SN Bus Econ 4, 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00624-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00624-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation