Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of trade, foreign direct investment, and economic growth on environmental quality and overshoot: a dynamic common correlation effects approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
SN Business & Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the effects of trade, foreign direct investment, and growth on environmental quality and sustainability. In order to attain the objective of the study, we adopt the novel dynamic common correlation effect technique that accounts for cross-sectional dependence. A panel of 109 countries from 1995 to 2016 was used for the study, based on availability of data. The results indicated that economic growth, trade openness, and FDI generally degrade the environment quality, while control variables like population and human development are environmentally friendly. Income-level disparity is equally noticed with the division of the panel into low-income, lower middle-income, and upper middle-income and high-income countries. For sustainability, only human development is seen to be exerting a positive effect on ecological overshoot. The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis is equally validated for the global sample and for each income level but more significant in lower middle-income countries. The results indicate that efforts to improve the quality of the environment and sustain Mother Nature need to be encouraged. There is need to introduce abatement policies for firms, encourage renewable energy consumption, discourage investment in fossil fuel, implement the Common Agricultural policy, and adopt trade policy with legislation on minimum pollution within all countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data materials

The data sets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Common wealth of independent states.

  2. \(\tilde{S }\)= \(\sum_{i=1}^{N}{({\widehat{\beta }}_{i}- {\stackrel{\sim }{\beta }}_{WFE})}^{^{\prime}}\) \(\frac{{X}_{i}^{^{\prime}} {M}_{\tau } {X}_{i}}{{\stackrel{\sim }{\sigma }}_{i}^{2}}\) (\({\widehat{\beta }}_{i}- {\stackrel{\sim }{\beta }}_{WFE}\)) where β̂ indicates the pooled OLS regression coefficients for any given individual i, β̃WFE denotes the weighted fixe effect(WFE) of the pooled estimator of slope coefficients, \(\tilde{\sigma }_{i}^{2}\) represents the estimated variance of individual i, Xi is the matrix of exogenous variables, and finally, Mτ denotes the identity matrix.

  3. \(\overline{Z }\)= \(\sqrt{\frac{N}{2p}}\) (\(\overline{W }\)—P); where P follows a standard distribution with mean zero and variance 1.

    Dumitrescu and Hurlin noted that the harmonised Z test given as Z̃ that is adjusted for fixed T equally follow a standard normal distribution and it is defined as: \(\tilde{Z }\) = \(\sqrt{\frac{N}{2p}X\frac{(T-2P-5)}{(T-2P-1)}}\) X \(\left[\frac{(T-2P-5)}{(T-2P-\&)}\overline{W }-P\right]\)

References

  • Abid M (2017) Does economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? A comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries. J Environ Manage 188:183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed K, Rehman MU, Ozturk I (2017) What drives carbon dioxide emission in the long run? Evidence from selected South Asian countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:1142–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali HS, Hassan S, Kofarmata YI (2016a) Dynamic impact of income inequality on carbon dioxide emissions in Africa: new evidence from heterogeneous panel data analysis. Int J Energy Econo Policy 6(4):760–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali HS, Law SH, Zannah TI (2016b) Dynamic impact of urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and trade openness on CO2 emissions in Nigeria. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(12):12435–12443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali HS, Zeqiraj V, Lin WL, Law SH, Yusop Z, Bare UAA, Chin L (2019) Does quality institutions promote environmental quality? Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:10446–10456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali S, Yusop Z, Kaliappan SR, Chin L (2020) Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from OIC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(11671–11682):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07768-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Lean HH (2015) The infleunce of economic growth, urbanisation, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat Hazards 79(1):621–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altıntaş H, Kassouri Y (2020) Is the environmental Kuznets Curve in Europe related to the percapita ecological footprint or CO2 emissions? Ecol Ind. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arain H, Han L, Meo MS (2019) Nexus of FDI, population, energy production, and water resources in south Asia: a fresh inside from dynamic common correlation effects (DCCE). Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(7):27128–27137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armeanu D, Vintilă G, Andrei JV, Gherghina ŞC, Drăgoi MC, Teodor C (2018) Exploring the link between environmental pollution and economic growth in EU-28 countries: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? PLoS One 13:e0195708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin C, Esen Ӧ, Aydin R (2019) Is the ecological footprint related to the Kuznets curve a real process or rationalizing the ecological consequences of the affluence? Evidence from PSTR approach. Ecol Ind 98:543–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aye GC, Edoja PE (2017) Effect of economic growth on CO2 emission in developing countries: evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Econ Fin 5(1):1379239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersvendsen T, Ditzen J (2020) xthst: Testing for slope homogeneity in Stata. Centre for energy economics research and policy working paper, (11)

  • Breitung J (2005) A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econ Rev 24:151–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, WA, Taylor MS (2005) Economic growth and the environment: a review of theory and empirics. In: Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 1. Elsevier, pp 1749–1821

  • Chien F, Anwar A, Hsu CC, Sharif A, Razzaq A, Sinha A (2021) The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: Proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technol Soc 65:101587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran MH, Rai M (2013) Debt, inflation and growth: robust estimation of long-run effects in dynamic panel data model. Working Paper No. 162

  • Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom 188(2):393–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole HSD (1973) Thinking about the future: a critique of ‘The Limits to Growth.’ Sussex University Press, Chatto & Windus

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson C (2000) Economic growth and the environment: alternatives to the limits paradigm. Bioscience 50(5):433–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demena BA, Afesorgbor SK (2020) The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demena BA, Murshed SM (2018) Transmission channels matter: identifying spillovers from FDI. J Int Trade Econ Dev 27(7):701–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demena BA, van Bergeijk PA (2019) Observing FDI spillover transmission channels: evidence from firms in Uganda. Third World Quart 40(9):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinga GD, Fonchamnyo DC, Nginyu GG, Njuh CJ (2020) Short and long run dynamic common correlation effects of external capital inflow on economic growth in SSA countries. Asian J Econ Model 8(4):218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditzen J (2016) Xtdcce: estimating dynamic common correlation effects in STATA. In: United Kingdom Stata Users Group meetings 2016(NO. 08), Stata Users

  • Doğanlar M, Mike F, Kızılkaya O, Karlilar S (2021) Testing the long-run effects of economic growth, financial development and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from RALS cointegration test. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:32554–32563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong K, Hochman G, Zhang Y, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018) CO2 emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy: empirical evidence across regions. Energy Econ 75:180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang HAH, Serajuddin U (2020) Tracking the sustainable development goals: Emerging measurement challenges and further reflections. World Development 127:104570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(20):15663–15676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gareth J (1968) Unjust enrichment and fiduciarys duty of loyalty. Law Quart Rev 84:472–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy JM (1994) Coevolutionary economics: the economy, society and the environment. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working, Paper#3914 (November)

  • Le HP, Ozturk I (2020) The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majeed M, Mazhar M (2020) Reexamination of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of biocapacity, human capital, and trade. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 14(1):202–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Tauqir A, Mazhar M, Samreen I (2021) Asymmetric effects of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: new evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:32945–32961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makki S, Somwaru A (2004) Impact of foreign direct investment and trade on economic growth: evidence from developing countries. Am J Agr Econ 86(3):795–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon HR, Perron B (2007) An empirical analysis of non-stationarity in a panel of interest rates with factors. J Appl Economet 22(2):386–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouthaan S (1995) International environmental law and the 1992 Rio Earth Summit: a brave new world. Holdsworth Law Review 17(2):119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel S, Aguegboh E, Iheonu C, Sharma G, Shah M (2020) Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal Mediterranean countries: re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(28):35474–35487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal T (2015) Estimating heterogeneous coefficients in panel data models with endogenous regressors and common factors. Work blacking paper.

  • Ohlan R (2015) The impact of population density, energy consumption, economic growth and trade openness on CO2 emissions in India. Nat Hazards 79(2):1409–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74:967–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Economet Rev 34:1089–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Yamagatta T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142(2):50–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran HA (2003) Simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics (DAE). Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0346.

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Papers No. 1233, 255–60

  • Ren S, Yuan B, Ma X, Chen X (2014) International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Econ Rev 28:123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N (1973) Innovative responses to material shortages. Am Econ Rev 63(2):111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Gow J, Ozturk I (2015) Is the long-run relationship between economic growth, electricity consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and financial development in Gulf cooperation Council Countries robust? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapkota P, Bastola U (2017) Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Econ 64:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarafidis V, Wansbeek T (2012) Cross sectional dependence in panel data analysis. Econom Rev 31(5):483–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seker F, Ertugrul HM, Cetin M (2015) The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Sinha A (2019) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. J Econ Stud 46(1):106–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma GD, Shah MI, Shahzad U, Jain M, Chopra R (2021) Exploring the nexus between agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in BIMSTEC region: The role of renewable energy and human capital as moderators. J Environ Manag 297:113316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shittu W, Adedoyin FF, Shah MI, Musibau HO (2021) An investigation of the nexus between natural resources, environmental performance, energy security and environmental degradation: evidence from Asia. Resour Policy 73:102227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrinhal R (2018) Economics, technology, and environmental protection: a critical analysis of phytomanagement. In: Phytomanagement of Polluted Sites (pp 569–580). Elsevier

  • Sinha A, Bhattacharya J (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve estimation for NO2 emission: a case of Indian cities. Ecol Ind 67:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Sengupta T, Alvarado R (2020) Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. J Clean Prod 242:118549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1974) The economics of resources or the resources of economics. In: classic papers in natural resource economics (257–276). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

  • Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS (2018) Population growth and CO2 emission in Nigeria: a recursive ARDL approach. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018765916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swamy PAVB (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UIA (2020) The Encyclopedia of World problems and Human Potential. Environmental Degradation. Brussels: Union of International Association, encyclopedia.uia.org

  • Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.03.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN, United Nations (2020) The sustainable development goals report

  • Vos ID, Everaert G (2019) Bias-corrected common correlated effects pooled. J Bus Econ Stat. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2019.1654879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Nataliia D, Yoo S-J, Hwang Y-S (2019) Does trade openness convey a positive impact for the environmental quality? Evidence from a panel of CIS countries. Eurasian Geogr Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.16700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DCF: participated in the conceptualization, writing, analyses, and interpretation in the manuscript. ONBE: participated in revision, editing, and prove reading. GDD: participated in the conceptualization, writing, editing, and interpretation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gildas Dohba Dinga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fonchamnyo, D.C., Emmanuel, O.N.B. & Dinga, G.D. The effects of trade, foreign direct investment, and economic growth on environmental quality and overshoot: a dynamic common correlation effects approach. SN Bus Econ 1, 138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00147-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00147-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation