Skip to main content
Log in

The uses of class: A Latin American anthropological reading of Marxist debates in the twentieth century

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
SN Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article takes up six Marxist-inspired debates that substantially impacted Latin American anthropological thought toward social classes in the twentieth century. The aim is to provide a summary of these uses and to situate their possible current applications. We will begin by covering Marxist discussions and categories, presenting a concise review of Marx’s debates on class, and their re-readings by European authors such as Lukacs and Gramsci. Then, we will discuss Weber’s principal criticisms of these arguments, referring to the theoretical underpinnings of social stratification. In addition, we will synthesize the critical turns of Marxism: feminist debates on social reproduction, the geographical discussion on the spatial configuration of class, Bourdieu’s articulationist proposal and re-readings of Gramsci’s works. Following these debates, we will analyze the six uses of the concept of social class in Latin American world-historical anthropology from the second half of the twentieth century. We group them by their central topic and by the national academia in which their articulation had institutional effects on the discipline (Brazil, Peru, Chile, Mexico, and Argentina). We end with a look at the debate’s outcomes in the twenty-first century, in the context of international crisis and its Latin American configuration, to propose a conceptualization that dialogs with the revised traditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Our bibliographical review was extensive, including 150 international publications. Due to space limitations, we excluded several texts that, although relevant, did not contribute to our objective.

  2. The use of the term “condition” attends to Borón’s (2006) reflections on the inadequate translations of Marx’s Prologue in “A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy” in 1859. There, he explicitly states that “the means of production of material life ‘determines’ [bedingen, in German] the process of social, political, and spiritual life in general” (Marx in Borón 2006, p. 48). The translation of beningen as “determine” is inadequate because the verb means “condition”, “require”, “presuppose”, and “imply” (Borón 2006, p. 48). Traditional critiques highlight that the use of the verb “determine” is to accuse Marx of “economist reductionism”, when this would not have been the expression chosen by the author (Borón 2006, p. 48).

  3. For example, Engels (2019 [1845], p. 9), in his analysis on the working-class situation in England in 1845, called the bourgeois class the “middle class”, adopting the terms in use at the time by the British.

  4. Some authors attribute this Reading on heterogeneity to Marx himself, particularly given the impact of his analyses published in the European press in the nineteenth century about the ethnic minorities in Iceland, Ireland, Poland, and the black population in the United States (Anderson 2016, p. 3).

  5. In this work, Bourdieu applied feminist reasonings on the reproduction of the patriarch in an analysis of an ethnic group in Algeria, on whom he carried out ethnography during his years of military service. He concluded that the androcentric conformation of social hierarchies was structuring and initial (established before class and strata divisions) and that its reproduction was sustained by symbolic mechanisms that expressed, permitted, and constituted the masculine domination. He defined this domination as the “social order dominated by the masculine principle” (Bourdieu 1998, p. 7), that is “built through the principle of fundamental division between the masculine, active and the feminine, passive, and that this principle creates, expresses and directs desire, the masculine desire as a desire to possess, as in dominate” (Bourdieu 1998, p. 19).

  6. Feminist thinkers linked to this group set forth a new theory of exploitation and autonomy of class and gender within subaltern groups (Chakravorty-Spivak 1988), bringing together feminism’s criticisms and the Gramscian perspective.

  7. The demographic impact of the phenomenon was considerable in certain Latin American countries: between 1856 and 1932, Argentina received 6.4 million migrants. 4.4 million arrived in Brazil between 1821 and 1932. Uruguay saw some 713,000 migrants arrive from 1911 to 1932; Mexico received 226,000 between 1911 and 1932, and Cuba 857,000 from 1901 to 1932 (Margulis 1977, p. 283).

  8. In Brazil, this rural–urban migration displaced 54 million people between 1950 and 1995 (Camarano and Abramovay 1999:3). In Mexico, the rural population accounted for 68% of its total inhabitants in 1920. By the end of the twentieth century, this had dropped to less than 25% (Carton de Grammont 2009, p. 17). In Peru, the urban population grew from 35 to 70% between 1950 and 2000 (Da Cunha 2009, p. 24). From 1940 to 1981, the population of Lima, Peru’s capital, went from 645,000 people to 4.6 million (Golte and Adams 1990, p. 38). Argentina had an urban rate of 62% in 1947, while by 2000, this had reached 89.9%.

  9. In addition, he created the Universidad Nacional de Brasília (National University of Brasilia) (bilingual Portuguese-Spanish, with 50% of its teachers from other Latin American countries) and designed the Brazilian university reform orientated towards critical thought and the Latin American integrationist perspective.

  10. He also took over the direction of the Instituto Nacional Indigenista [National Indigenous Institute] from when it opened until it closed (1948–1971). Cano was, consequently, a sort of state control figure of anthropology in the Mexico of his time.

  11. Incidentally, he observed that the formulation of the multilineal character of history in Mexican anthropology occurs from the work of Aguirre Beltrán onwards; but it was Julian Steward who received the merits for the proposal, taking it to the United States and publishing it in English, after seasons of ethnographic work in Mexican territories together with Beltrán’s team (Palerm 2008, p. 262).

  12. Wallerstein (1996) observes that in the seventies two Marxist-inspired visions in Latin America were polarized and were understood as extreme poles of the critique of development. The first, the Theory of Dependence, heterodox in relation to the Soviet position, argued that Latin American developments were an oxymoron: beyond governmental policies, “the only thing that develops is the capitalist world economy and that world economy is by nature polarized (Wallerstein 1996, p. 196). The second, orthodox in relation to the Russian communist party, proposed that the “capitalist world economy develops so successfully that it is destroying itself” (Wallerstein 1996, p. 197).

  13. Several factors contributed to explaining just how exceptional this circumstance was (Yankelevich 2010). For example, the hospitality the Mexican State offered to political exiles; the economic oil boom of the seventies that allowed an unprecedented development of university academic life and the cultural and publishing world in the country; the repercussions of the internal reorganization and theoretical opening that the Mexican Communist party was going through at that time.

  14. Brazil is a compelling example. Since 2016, hate speech has become a central node in the interpretation of social and political processes. The swing to the extreme right was supported by the promotion of hatred against the Workers’ Party, led by Luis Inácio Lula da Silva among popular social sectors, that contradictorily were beneficiaries of his redistributive policies (Casimiro 2018).

  15. The research done by CEPAL (2019, p. 27), and carried out in eighteen Latin American countries, shows that the middle class (measured by stratification and based on multi-dimensional aspects) increased in the region by 26,7%, in 2002, to 36,6% in 2008, and 41,1% in 2017; however, it fell back to 36% in 2018. Currently, “76,8% of the population is made up of groups that belong to low or lower-middle class” (CEPAL 2019, p. 28). Although it is true there was an increase in middle classes until 2015, since then there has been a generalized decline, with a tendency to impoverishment (CEPAL 2019, p. 29).

References

  • Althusser L (1988) Ideología y aparatos ideológicos del Estado. Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez G (2010) La antropología de Roberto Cardoso de Oliveira (1928–2006). Desacatos 33:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson K (2016) Marx at the margins: on nationalism, ethnicity, and non-western societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J, Jalles J (2014) Dividing the pie in Brazil: income distribution, social policies, and the new middle class. OCDE, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron R (1981) Max Weber y la política de poder. Papers: Revista de Sociología 15:33–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt C (1990) Gramsci y el concepto del bloque histórico. Historia Crítica 4:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borón A (2006) Clase inaugural: por el necesario (y demorado) retorno al marxismo. In: Borón A, Amadeo J, González S (eds) La teoría marxista hoy Problemas y perspectivas. CLACSO, Buenos Aires, pp 35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Borón A (2016) Las vueltas de la vida (política) o breve relato sobre el precio de la ambición. In: Polo Democrático Alternativo. https://www.polodemocratico.net/las-vueltas-de-la-vida-politica-o-breve-relato-sobre-el-precio-de-la-ambicion/ Accessed 20 Aug 2020

  • Bourdieu P (1977) La ilusión bibliográfica. Anagrama, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1998) La dominación masculina. Anagrama, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2002a) Condición de clase y posición de clase. Revista Colombiana De Sociología 7(1):121–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2002b) La distinción. Criterios y bases sociales del gusto. Taurus, Ciudad de México

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2011) Las estrategias de la Reproducción Social. Siglo Veintiuno, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Briones C, Fava R, Rosan A (2004) Ni todos, ni alguien, ni uno. La politización de los indefinidos como clave para pensar la crisis argentina. In: Grimson A (ed) La cultura de las crisis latinoamericanas. CLACSO, Buenos Aires, pp 81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgos R (2004) Los Gramscianos argentines. Cultura y política en la experiencia de Pasado y Presente. Siglo Veintiuno, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachón L (1989) ¿Movilidad social o trayectorias de clase? Elementos para una crítica de la sociología de la movilidad social, Siglo Veintiuno, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Çağlar A, Glick Schiller N (2021) Relational multiscalar analysis: a comparative approach to migrants within city-making processes. Geogr Rev 111(2):206–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramano AA, Abramovay R (1999) Êxodo Rural, envelhecimento e masculinização no Brasil: Panorama dos últimos 50 anos. IPEA, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso FH, Faletto E (1971) Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina: ensayo de interpretación sociológica. Siglo Veintiuno, Ciudad de México

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso de Oliveira R (1963) Aculturación y fricción interétnica. Revista América Latina 6(3):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso de Oliveira R (2007) Etnicidad y estructura social. CIESAS, Ciudad de México

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso de Oliveira R (2017) El trabajo del antropólogo. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier J (2015) The concept of class. In: Carrier J, Kalb D (eds) Anthropologies of class. Power, practice, and inequality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 28–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carton de Grammont H (2009) La desagrarización del campo mexicano. Convergencia 16(50):13–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Casimiro FHC (2018) As classes dominantes e a nova direita no Brasil contemporâneo. In: Solano E, (eds) (2018) O ódio como política: a reinvenção das direitas no Brasil. Boitempo, Rio de Janeiro, pp 42–48

  • Clifford J (1997) Spatial practices: fieldwork, travel, and the disciplining of anthropology. In: Gupta A, Ferguson J (eds) Anthropological locations. University of California Press, Berkeley, Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, pp 185–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Económica para América Latina y Caribe [CEPAL] (2012) Latinobarómetro: opinión pública latinoamericana. CEPAL, Santiago

  • Comisión Económica y Política para América Latina [CEPAL] (2019) Panorama Social de América Latina. CEPAL, Santiago

  • Correa M (1993) Breve esbozo de la antropología brasileña reciente (1960–1980). Alteridades 6:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw K (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev 6:1241–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Cunha JMP (2002) Urbanización, redistribución espacial de la población y transformaciones socioeconómicas en América Latina. CEPAL, Santiago

  • De Beauvoir S (2018 [1949]) El segundo sexo. Lumen, Buenos Aires

  • De la Cadena M (2009) La producción de otros conocimientos y sus tensiones: ¿De una antropología andinista a la interculturalidad? In: Krotz E, Lins Ribeiro G (eds) Antropologías del mundo: transformaciones disciplinarias dentro de sistemas de poder. Envión, Ciudad de México, pp 255–284

  • De Oliveira O, García B (1984) Migración a grandes ciudades del Tercer Mundo: algunas implicaciones sociodemográficas. Estudios Sociológicos 2(4):71–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Duek C, Inda G (2006) La teoría de la estratificación social de Weber: un análisis crítico. Revista Austral De Ciencias Sociales 11:5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duek C, Inda G (2009) ¿Desembarazarse de Marx? Avatares del concepto de clases sociales. Conflicto Social 2(1):26–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels F (2017 [1844]) El origen de la familia, de la propiedad privada y del Estado. Editorial Claridad, Buenos Aires

  • Engels F (2019) [1845]) La situación de la clase obrera en Inglaterra. Publications Mia, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian J (2002) Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon F (2009) [1952]) Piel negra, máscaras blancas. Akal, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson S (2008) Canadian contributions to social reproduction feminism, race and embodied labor. Race Gender Class 15(1–2):42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes F (1965) A integração do Negro na sociedade de classes. Dominus, São Paulo

  • Garcia A (2009) Fundamentos empíricos da razão antropológica: a criação do PPGAS e a seleção das espécies científicas. Mana 15(2):411–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García Canclini N (1984) Gramsci con Bourdieu. Hegemonía, consumo y nuevas formas de organización popular. Nueva Sociedad 71:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • García Canclini N (1989) Culturas híbridas: estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidad. Grijaldo, Ciudad de México

  • Gilroy P (2002) The Black Atlantic. Modernity and Double Consciousness. Verso, London.

  • Golte J, Adams N (1990) Los caballos de Troya de los invasores. Estrategias campesinas en la conquista de la Gran Lima. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima

  • Gonzálvez H (2013) La producción científica sobre la familia en Chile: miradas desde la antropología feminista. La Ventana 4(38):88–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (1981 [1938]) Cuadernos de la Cárcel (Tomo 6). Cuaderno XXIII, 1934. Al margen de la historia. Historia de los grupos sociales subalternos. Ediciones Era, Ciudad de México

  • Grimson A (2011) Los límites de la cultura. Crítica de las teorías de la identidad. Siglo Veintiuno, Buenos Aires

  • Grimson A, Semán P (2006) Antropología brasileña contemporánea. Contribuciones para un debate latinoamericano. J World Anthropol Netw 2:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimson A, Varela M [eds] (1999) Audiencias, cultura y poder. Estudios sobre la televisión. Eudeba, Buenos Aires

  • Guizardi M, Merenson S (2021) Indians, Blacks and Morochos: trajectories, intersectionalities and class frictions in a neighborhood of Buenos Aires. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

  • Gutiérrez A (2005) Las prácticas sociales: una introducción a Pierre Bourdieu. Ferreyra Editor, Córdoba

  • Gupta A, Ferguson J (1992) Beyond culture: space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cult Anthropol 7(1):6–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall S (1973) Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. University of Birmingham, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz U (1986) Theory in anthropology: small is beautiful? The problem of complex cultures. Comp Stud Soc Hist 28(2):362–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2007) Espacios del Capital. Hacia una geografía crítica. Akal, Madrid

  • Harvey D (2008) La libertad de la ciudad. Antípoda 7:5–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ianni O (1978) Escravidão e Racismo. Hucitec, São Paulo.

  • Kalb D (2015a) Class, labor, social reproduction: towards a non-self-limiting anthropology. Suomen Antropologi 40(2):50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb D (2015b) Introduction: class and the new anthropological holism. In: Carrier J, Kalb D (eds) Anthropologies of class. Power, practice, and inequality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb D, Mollona M (2018) Introductory thoughts on anthropology and urban insurrection. In: Kalb D, Mollona M (eds) Worldwide mobilizations. Berghahn Books, Oxford, Class Struggles and Urban Commoning, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasmir S (2015) Thoughts on world-historical anthropology and the new culturalism. Suomen Antropologi 40(2):56–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney M (1986) From the invisible hand to visible feet: anthropological studies of migration and development. Annu Rev Anthropol 15:331–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krotz E (2015) Las antropologías segundas en América Latina: interpelaciones y recuperaciones. Cuadernos De Antropología Social 42:5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1974) La producción del espacio. Papers Revista de Sociología 3:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenin VI (1974) [1909] Materialismo y empiriocriticismo. Editorial Fundamentos, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Lera C, Genolet A, Rocha V, Schoenfeld Z, Guerriera L, Bolcatto S (2007) Trayectorias: un concepto que posibilita pensar y trazar otros caminos en las intervenciones profesionales del Trabajo Social. Revista Cátedra Paralela 4:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Lins-Ribeiro G, Escobar A (2009) Introducción. In: Lins Ribeiro G, Escobar A (eds) Antropologías del mundo: transformaciones disciplinarias dentro de sistemas de poder. Envión, Ciudad de México, pp 25–56.

  • Lovell T (2000) Thinking feminism with and against Bourdieu. Fem Theory 1(1):11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukács G (1970) Historia y consciencia de clase. Instituto del Libro, La Habana

  • Manzo E (2010) Las teorías sociológicas de Pierre Bourdieu y Norbert Elias: los conceptos de campo social y habitus. Estudios Sociológicos 28(83):383–409

  • Margulis M (1977) Inmigración y desarrollo capitalista. La migración europea a la Argentina. Demografía y economía 11(3):273–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1970 [1845]) Tesis sobre Feuerbach y otros escritos filosóficos. Grijalbo, Buenos Aires

  • Marx K (1996 [1867]) A assim chamada Acumulação Primitiva. In: Marx KO (ed) Capital, vol 2, Editora Nova Cultural, São Paulo, pp 338–382

  • Marx K (2008 [1867]) El Capital. El proceso de producción del capital, vol 1, Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno

  • Nash J (1979) We eat the mines and the mines eat us: dependency and exploitation in Bolivian Tin Mines. Columbia University Press, Nueva York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash J, Safa H (eds) (1976) Sex and class in Latin America. Praeger, Nueva York

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel G (2020) A la sombra de los bárbaros. Transformaciones sociales y procesos de delimitación moral en una ciudad de la Costa Atlántica bonaerense (Villa Gesell, 2007–2014). Teseu, Buenos Aires

  • Noordam J, Arriagada I (1980) Estructura social y situación de la mujer rural: algunas proposiciones. CEPAL, Santiago

  • Palerm Á (2008) [1978] Antropología y Marxismo. CIESAS, Ciudad de México

  • Pateman C (1988) The sexual contract. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirano M (1991) The anthropology of anthropology: the Brazilian case. UNB, Brasilia

  • Peirano M (1998) When anthropology is at home. The different contexts of a single discipline. Ann Rev Anthropol 27(1):105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portantiero JC (1977) Los usos de Gramsci. Folio Ediciones, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebich R (1963) Hacia una dinámica del desarrollo latinoamericano. Fondo de Cultura Económico, México DF

  • Quijano A (2000) Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. In: Lander E (ed) La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas Latinoamericanas, CLACSO, Buenos Aires, pp 777–832

  • Ribeiro D (1970) The culture-historical configurations of the American peoples. Curr Anthropol 11(4–5):403–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro D (1977) Las Américas y la civilización. Procesos de formación y causas del desarrollo desigual de los pueblos latinoamericanos. Extemporáneos, Ciudad de México

  • Rist G (2008) The history of development: from Western origins to global faith. Zed Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas R (2008) Dos enfoques clásicos para el estudio de la estratificación social y de las clases sociales. Espacio Abierto 17(3):367–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Sader E (1999) Brasil: una historia de pactos entre elites. In: Boron A, Gambina J, Minsburg N (eds) Tiempos violentos. Neoliberalismo, globalización y desigualdad en América Latina. CLACSO, Buenos Aires, pp 102–123

  • Said E (1979) Orientalism. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmucler H (1981) Apuntes e interrogantes para reflexionar sobre política. Controversia 3(11–12):15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Segato R (1999) Identidades políticas/alteridades históricas: una crítica a las certezas del pluralismo global. Maguaré 14:114–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Segato R (2010) Las estructuras elementales de la violencia. Ensayos sobre género entre la antropología, psicionálisis y los derechos humanos. Prometeo, Buenos Aires

  • Service R (2006) Stalin: una biografía. Siglo Veintiuno, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak GC (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: Nelson C (ed) Marxism and the interpretation of culture. MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 271–313

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stavenhagen R (2014) FLACSO, CLACSO y la búsqueda de una sociología latinoamericana. Perfiles Latinoamericanos 22(43):7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svampa M (2013) Consenso de los commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad (244):30–46

  • Terán O (1993) Nuestros años sesenta. La formación de la nueva izquierda intelectual argentina, 1956–1966. Ediciones El Cielo por Asalto, Buenos Aires.

  • United Nations [UN] (2015) World urbanization prospects. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez L (2014) Ciento cuatro años de antropología mexicana. Antropologías Del Sur 1:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visacovsky S (2014) Inmigración, virtudes genealógicas y los relatos de origen de la clase media argentina. In: Adamovsky E, Visacovsky S, Vargas P (eds) Clases medias: Nuevos enfoques desde la sociología, la historia y la antropología. Arien, Buenos Aires, pp 213–240

  • Wallerstein I (1974) The modern world system. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein I (1996) La re-estructuración capitalista y el sistema-mundo. Anuario Mariateguiano 8:195–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Warman A (1970) Todos santos y todos difuntos. Crítica histórica de la antropología mexicana. In: Warman A, Nolasco M, Bonfil Batalla G, Olivera M, Valencia E (eds) De eso que llaman la Antropología Mexicana. Editorial Nuestro Tiempo, Ciudad de México, pp 9–38

  • Warman A, Nolasco M, Bonfil-Batalla G (eds) (1970) De eso que llaman la Antropología Mexicana. Editorial Nuestro Tiempo, Ciudad de México

  • Weber M (1996 [1922]) División del poder en la comunidad: clases, estamentos, partidos. In: Economía y Sociedad. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Ciudad de México, pp 682–694

  • Weber M (2012 [1905]) La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Ciudad de México

  • Yankelevich P (2010) Ráfagas de un exilio. Argentinos en México, 1974–1983. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Buenos Aires

  • Zarowsky M (2015) Del exilio a los nuevos paradigmas: los intelectuales argentinos de la comunicación en México (de Controversia a Comunicación y Cultura). Comunicación y Sociedad 24:127–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Research and Development Agency of Chile that supported this article through the Project Fondecyt 1190056, “The Boundaries of Gender Violence: Migrant Women’s Experiences in South American Border Territories,” and the National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion of Argentina, through the Project PICT 2017-1767, “Emerging middle classes in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay.” They also thank Christine Ann Hills for the translation to English.

Funding

The research that gives rise to this article was financed by the National Research and Development Agency of Chile (ANID, in its Spanish acronym) through the Fondecyt Project 1190056, “The Boundaries of Gender Violence: Migrant Women’s Experiences in South American Border Territories”; and by the National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion of Argentina, through the Project PICT 2017-1767, “Emerging middle classes in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MG carried out the state-of-the-art review on the Mexican and Brazilian Marxist anthropological literature for the periods between 1960 and 1980, while SM oversaw the review of the Argentine and Chilean literature for the same period. Both worked in the state-of-the-art review on Marx and Weber arguments (and of the theories inspired by both). Both authors worked on the writing of the article’s sections (originally in Spanish), in their review and on the review of the article’s translation from Spanish to English.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Menara Guizardi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Human and/or animals

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guizardi, M., Merenson, S. The uses of class: A Latin American anthropological reading of Marxist debates in the twentieth century. SN Soc Sci 2, 60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00369-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00369-w

Keywords

Navigation