Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Students’ perceptions of effective teaching: between retired professors and contract instructors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
SN Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective in this paper is to discern how student comments at the Rate My Professors website distinguish between retired professors and contract instructors in economics. A qualitative content analysis is used to investigate whether student comments capture effective teaching, as depicted in the academic literature and whether teaching pedagogy has shifted from critical thinking and challenge to easy expectations and easy grades, as part of the corporatization of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data are additionally public at the RMP website.

References

  • Abrami PC, d’Apollonia S, Rosenfield S (2007) The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: what we know and what we do not. In: Perry RP, Smart JC (eds) The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: an evidence-based perspective. Springer, New York, pp 385–456

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlind GS (2007) Constraints on academics’ potential for developing as a teacher. Stud High Educ 32(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht S, Hoopes J (2009) An empirical assessment of commercial web-based professor evaluation services. J Account Educ 27(3):125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni L (1987) Student rating myths versus research facts. J Pers Eval Educ 1(1):111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreopoulos GC, Panayides A (2009) Teaching Economics to the best undergraduates: what are the problems? Am J Bus Educ 2(6):117–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr RB, Tagg J (1995) From teaching to learning: a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change 27:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker WE (2000) Teaching Economics in the 21st century. J Econ Perspect 14(1):109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker WE, Watts M (2001) Teaching methods in U.S. undergraduate Economics courses. J Econ Educ 32(3):269–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman M, Stirling K (2005) Promoting critical thinking in Economics education. Working Paper.

  • Beecham R (2009) Teaching quality and student satisfaction: nexus or simulacrum? Lond Rev Educ 7:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson M (2016) How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open 2:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs J, Tang C (2011) Teaching for quality learning at university, 4th edn. Open University Press , New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleske-Rechek A, Michels K (2010) RateMyProfessors.com: testing assumptions about student use and misuse. Pract Assess Res Eval 15(5):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright-Horowitz S, Soeung S (2009) Teaching white privilege to white students can mean saying good-bye to positive student evaluations. Am Psychol 64(6):574–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boex JFL (2000) Attributes of effective Economics instructors: an analysis of student evaluation. J Econ Educ 31(3):211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell CC (1992) Risky business: making active learning a reality. Teach Excell POD Netw High Educ 93:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga M, Paccagnella M, Pellizzari M (2014) Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors. Econ Educ Rev 41:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braskamp L, Ory J, Pieper D (1981) Student written comments: dimensions of instructional quality. J Educ Psychol 73(1):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busler J, Kirk C, Keeley J, Buskist W (2017) What constitutes poor teaching? A preliminary inquiry into the misbehaviours of not-so-good instructors. Teach Psychol 44(4):330–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashin W (1990) Students do rate different academic fields differently. In: Theall M, Franklin J (eds) Student ratings of instruction: issues for improving practice, new directions for teaching and learning, vol 43 (Fall). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 113–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Coladarci T, Kornfield I (2007) RateMyProfessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(6):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman J, McKeachie WJ (1981) Effects of instructor/course evaluations on student course selection. J Educ Psychol 73(2):224–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downe-Wamblot B (1992) Content analysis: method, applications and issues. Health Care Women Int 13:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn R, Griggs SA (2000) Practical approaches to using learning styles in higher education. Bergin & Garvey, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman KA (2007) Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: evidence from student ratings. In: Perry RP, Smart JC (eds) The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: an evidence-based perspective. Springer, New York, pp 93–143

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Felton J, Mitchell J, Stinson M (2004) Web-based student evaluations of professors: the relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness. Assess Eval High Educ 29(1):91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh IK (2013) Learning by doing models to teach undergraduate Economics. J Econ Econ Educ Res 14(1):105–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald AG, Gillmore GM (1997) Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. Am Psychol 52(11):1209–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh DS (2019) 50 Years of teaching introductory Economics. J Econ Educ 50(3):273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervani A, Helms MM (2004) Increasing creativity in Economics: the service learning project. J Educ Bus 79(5):267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein HA (2017) Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Educ 4(1):1304016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, DW (2011) Re-thinking student written comments in course evaluations: text mining unstructured data for program and institutional assessment. Doctoral dissertation, California State University.

  • Lattuca LR, Domagal-Goldman JM (2007) Using qualitative methods to access teaching effectiveness. New Dir Inst Res 136:81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg AM, Wilson JH (2012) RateMyProfessors.com offers biased evaluations. Assess Eval High Educ 37(1):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson S, Considine M (2000) The enterprise university: power, governance, and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW (1987) Students’ evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. Int J Educ Res 11(3):253–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW, Roche LA (2000) Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students’ evaluations of teaching: popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? J Educ Psychol 92(1):202–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW, Ware JE (1982) Effects of expressiveness, content coverage and incentive on multidimensional student rating scales: new interpretations of the Dr. Fox effect. J Educ Psychol 74(1):126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol T, Soutar GN, Seng MSY (2003) The third wave: future trends in international education. Int J Educ Manag 17(3):90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie WJ (1997) Student ratings: the validity of use. Am Psychol 52(11):1218–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson MA, Jewell RT (2007) Leveling the playing field: should student evaluation scores be adjusted? Soc Sci Q 88(3):868–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers C, Jones TB (1993) Promoting active learning: strategies for the college classroom. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD (2006) How to fight ratemyprofessors.com. Inside Higher Ed, January 31. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2006/01/31/how-fight-ratemyprofessorscom. Accessed 26 Mar 2021

  • Niu SC (2005) Comparing two populations. University of Texas at Dallas. https://www.utdallas.edu/~scniu/OPRE-6301/documents/Two_Populations.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2021.

  • Ogier J (2005) Evaluating the effect of a lecturer’s language background on a student rating of teaching form. Assess Eval High Educ 30(5):477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ongeri JD (2009) Poor student evaluation of teaching in economics: a critical survey of the literature. Australas J Econ Educ 6(2):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto J, Sanford DAJ, Ross DN (2008) Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor? Assess Eval High Educ 33(4):355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan D, Tan G, Ragupathi K, Booluck K, Roop R, Ip Y (2009) Profiling teacher/teaching using descriptors derived from qualitative feedback: formative and summative applications. Res High Educ 50(1):73–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pienta NJ (2017) The slippery slope of student evaluations. J Chem Educ 94(2):131–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozo-Munoz C, Rebolloso-Pacheco E, Fernandez-Ramirez B (2000) The ‘ideal teacher’ implications for student evaluation of teacher effectiveness. Assess Eval High Educ 25(3):253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann N (2004) First-year teaching–learning environments in Economics. Int Rev Econ Educ 3(1):9–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam E, Lynch B, Jones J (2018) Making sense of student feedback using text analysis: adapting and expanding a common lexicon. Qual Assur Educ 26(1):60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Voia M, Woolley F (2010) Hot or not: how appearance affects earnings and productivity in academia. Carleton Economic Papers 10-07.

  • Sheridan BJ, Hoyt G, Imazeki J (2014) Targeting teaching: a primer for new teachers of Economics. South Econ J 80(3):839–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva KM, Silva FJ, Quinn MA, Draper JN, Cover KR, Munoff AA (2008) Rate my professor: Online evaluations of psychology instructors. Teach Psychol 35(2):71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BP (2007) Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: an analysis of end-of-course faculty evaluations. Coll Stud J 41(4):788–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooren P, Brockx B, Mortelmans D (2013) On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: the state of the art. Rev Educ Res 83:598–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theyson KC (2015) Hot or not: The role of instructor quality and gender on the formation of positive illusions among students using ratemyprofessors.com. Pract Assess Res Eval 20(4):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman T (2008) On the validity of RateMyProfessors.com. J Educ Bus 84(1):55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MacEwan University, 7-368, 10700 104 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T5J 4S2, Canada

    Junaid B. Jahangir

Authors
  1. Junaid B. Jahangir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junaid B. Jahangir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahangir, J.B. Students’ perceptions of effective teaching: between retired professors and contract instructors. SN Soc Sci 1, 235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00244-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00244-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation